Compound risk monitor

2021 ◽  
pp. 226-229
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 107403
Author(s):  
D. Ferretto ◽  
G. Mazzini ◽  
W. Ambrosini ◽  
R. Aldorf ◽  
M. Hrehor

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhang Zhang ◽  
Zhijian Zhang ◽  
He Wang ◽  
Lixuan Zhang ◽  
Dabin Sun

Abstract To ensure nuclear safety and prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents, many safety systems have been set up in nuclear power plants to limit the consequences of accidents. Even though technical specifications based on deterministic safety analysis are applied to avoid serious accidents, they are too poor to handle multi-device managements compared with configuration risk management which computes risks in nuclear power plants based on probabilistic safety assessment according to on-going configurations. In general, there are two methodologies employed in configuration risk management: living probabilistic safety assessment (LPSA) and risk monitor (RM). And average reliability databases during a time of interest are employed in living probabilistic safety assessment, which may be naturally applied to make long-term or regular management projects. While transient risk databases are involved in risk monitor to measure transient risks in nuclear power plants, which may be more appropriate to monitor the real-time risks in nuclear power plants and provide scientific real-time suggestions to operators compared with living probabilistic safety assessment. And this paper concentrates on the applications and developments of living probabilistic safety assessment and risk monitor which are the mainly foundation of the configuration risk management to manage nuclear power plants within safe threshold and avoid serious accidents.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Hashim ◽  
Hidekazu Yoshikawa ◽  
Takeshi Matsuoka ◽  
Ming Yang

Author’s proposed risk monitor system of Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) is based on the idea of Plant Defense-in-Depth (DiD) risk monitor and reliability monitor to monitor what degree of safety functions incorporated in the plant system is maintained by multiple barriers of Defense-in-Depth (DiD). In the risk monitor system, the range of risk state is not limited in core damage accident but includes all kinds of dangerous states brought by severe accident. In present study, method of the reliability monitor of a risk monitor system is applied to the PWR safety system in order to evaluate the risk state numerically by pursuing all conditions of reliability evaluation given by plant DiD risk monitor. Large break LOCA is taken as an initiating accident event and the implementation of method of the reliability monitor is discussed in detail for single loop PWR safety system by considering the Multilevel Flow Model (MFM), Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), and the qualitative reliability evaluation by Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and the dynamic reliability evaluation by GO-FLOW. The summary of reliability results of PWR safety subsystems are also presented.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 155A
Author(s):  
Michael Seneff ◽  
Leody Bojanowsky ◽  
Jack Zimmerman
Keyword(s):  
Low Risk ◽  

Medical Care ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas P. Wagner ◽  
William A. Knaus ◽  
Elizabeth A. Draper ◽  
Jack E. Zimmerman

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanguo Ma ◽  
Hidekazu Yoshikawa ◽  
Takashi Nakagawa ◽  
Ming Yang

Author(s):  
Pradeep Ramuhalli ◽  
Arun Veeramany ◽  
Christopher A. Bonebrake ◽  
William J. Ivans ◽  
Garill A. Coles ◽  
...  

This study provides an overview of the methodology for integrating time-dependent failure probabilities into nuclear power reactor risk monitors. This prototypic enhanced risk monitor methodology was evaluated using a hypothetical probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) model, generated using a simplified design of a liquid-metal-cooled advanced reactor (AdvRx). Component failure data from industry compilation of failures of components similar to those in the simplified AR model were used to initialize the PRA model. Core damage frequency (CDF) over time were computed and analyzed. In addition, a study on alternative risk metrics for AdvRx was conducted. Risk metrics that quantify the normalized cost of repairs, replacements, or other operations and management (O&M) actions were defined and used, along with an economic model, to compute the likely economic risk of future actions such as deferred maintenance based on the anticipated change in CDF due to current component condition and future anticipated degradation. Such integration of conventional-risk metrics with alternate-risk metrics provides a convenient mechanism for assessing the impact of O&M decisions on safety and economics of the plant. It is expected that, when integrated with supervisory control algorithms, such integrated-risk monitors will provide a mechanism for real-time control decision-making that ensure safety margins are maintained while operating the plant in an economically viable manner.


Author(s):  
Ming Yang ◽  
Jiande Zhang ◽  
Zhijian Zhang ◽  
Hidekazu Yoshikawa ◽  
Morten Lind

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document