scholarly journals Postural control during dual task in adolescent cochlear implant users under on/off-device conditions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Nadimi ◽  
Mansoureh Adel Ghahraman ◽  
Ghassem Mohammadkhani ◽  
Reza Hoseinabadi ◽  
Shohreh Jalaie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Vestibular System ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Cognitive Task ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Caloric Test ◽  
Vestibular Disorders ◽  
Control Performance

Background and Aim: Vestibular system has several anatomical connections with cognitive regions of the brain. Vestibular disorders have negative effects on cognitive performance. Hearing-impaired patients, particularly cochlear implant users, have concomitant vestibular disor­ders. Previous studies have shown that attention assigned to postural control decreases while per­forming a cognitive task (dual task) in hearing-impaired children. Since the vestibular system and postural control performance develop around 15−16 years of age, the aim of this study was to compare postural control performance during dual task in adolescent boys with normal hearing and cochlear implant (CI) users with congenital hearing-impairment. Methods: Postural control was assessed in twenty 16−19 year old cochlear implant boys and 40 normal hearing peers with force plate. The main outcomes were displacement in posterior- anterior and medial-lateral planes, and mean speed with and without cognitive task and under on/off-device conditions. Caloric test was per­formed for CI users in order to examine the peri­pheral vestibular system. Results: Ninety-five percent of CI users showed caloric weakness. There were no significant diff­erences in postural control parameters between groups. All performances deteriorated in the foam pad condition compared to the hard surface in all groups. Total mean velocity significantly increased during dual task in normal hearing group and in CI users with off-device. Conclusion: Although CI users had apparent vestibular disorders, their postural control in both single and dual-task conditions was identical to the normal peers. These effects can be attributed to the vestibular compensation that takes place during growing. Keywords: Balance; postural control; dual task; congenital hearing loss; cochlear implant

A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narges Jafari ◽  
Michael Drinnan ◽  
Reyhane Mohamadi ◽  
Fariba Yadegari ◽  
Mandana Nourbakhsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Vowel Production ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

scholarly journals Speech production changes wih the use of a multichannel cochlear implant in postlingually hearing impaired adult

1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Cummings ◽  
Emily Groenewald ◽  
René Hugo ◽  
Lida Müller ◽  
Mike Van der Linde
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Auditory Feedback ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Speech Features ◽  
Over Time

Profoundly deaf cochlear implant users provide an interesting population in which to assess the role of distorted auditory feedback in speech, since their electrically stimulated hearing is significantly different from normal hearing. The aim of the study was to evaluate, by means of spectrographic and listener analyses, the speech production changes in a postlingually deafened adult with the use of a multichannel cochlear implant over time, compared to that of hearing aids as well as no-amplification. The results indicated significant improvements in the use of suprasegmental speech features as well in the production of specific segmental features of speech.

scholarly journals Sound Source Localization by Normal-Hearing Listeners, Hearing-Impaired Listeners and Cochlear Implant Listeners

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Dorman ◽  
Louise H. Loiselle ◽  
Sarah J. Cook ◽  
William A. Yost ◽  
René H. Gifford
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Source Localization ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Sound Source ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Sound Source Localization ◽  
Localization Accuracy ◽  
Rms Error

Objective: Our primary aim was to determine whether listeners in the following patient groups achieve localization accuracy within the 95th percentile of accuracy shown by younger or older normal-hearing (NH) listeners: (1) hearing impaired with bilateral hearing aids, (2) bimodal cochlear implant (CI), (3) bilateral CI, (4) hearing preservation CI, (5) single-sided deaf CI and (6) combined bilateral CI and bilateral hearing preservation. Design: The listeners included 57 young NH listeners, 12 older NH listeners, 17 listeners fit with hearing aids, 8 bimodal CI listeners, 32 bilateral CI listeners, 8 hearing preservation CI listeners, 13 single-sided deaf CI listeners and 3 listeners with bilateral CIs and bilateral hearing preservation. Sound source localization was assessed in a sound-deadened room with 13 loudspeakers arrayed in a 180-degree arc. Results: The root mean square (rms) error for the NH listeners was 6 degrees. The 95th percentile was 11 degrees. Nine of 16 listeners with bilateral hearing aids achieved scores within the 95th percentile of normal. Only 1 of 64 CI patients achieved a score within that range. Bimodal CI listeners scored at a level near chance, as did the listeners with a single CI or a single NH ear. Listeners with (1) bilateral CIs, (2) hearing preservation CIs, (3) single-sided deaf CIs and (4) both bilateral CIs and bilateral hearing preservation, all showed rms error scores within a similar range (mean scores between 20 and 30 degrees of error). Conclusion: Modern CIs do not restore a normal level of sound source localization for CI listeners with access to sound information from two ears.

scholarly journals Dual-Task Performance in Hearing-Impaired Older Adults—Study Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Mobile Brain/Body Imaging Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wunderlich ◽  
Oliver Vogel ◽  
Maja Maša Šömen ◽  
Manca Peskar ◽  
Madeleine Fricke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Cognitive Task ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Hearing Impairments ◽  
Body Imaging ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
Motor Processes ◽  
Dual Task Performance

Background: Hearing impairments are associated with reduced walking performance under Dual-task (DT) conditions. Little is known about the neural representation of DT performance while walking in this target group compared to healthy controls or younger adults. Therefore, utilizing the Mobile Brain/Body Imaging approach (MoBI), we aim at gaining deeper insights into the brain dynamics underlying the interaction of cognitive and motor processes during different DT conditions (visual and auditory) controlling for age and the potential performance decrements of older adults with hearing impairments.Methods: The cross-sectional study integrates a multifactorial mixed-measure design. Between-subject factors grouping the sample will be age (younger vs. older adults) and hearing impairment (mild vs. not hearing impaired). The within-subject factors will be the task complexity (single- vs. DT) and cognitive task modality (visual vs. auditory). Stimuli of the cognitive task will vary according to the stimulus modality (visual vs. auditory), presentation side (left vs. right), and presentation-response compatibility (ipsilateral vs. contralateral). Analyses of DT costs and underlying neuronal correlates focus either on gait or cognitive performance. Based on an a priori sample size calculation 96 (48 healthy and 48 mildly hearing impaired) community-dwelling older adults (50–70 years) and 48 younger adults (20–30 years) will be recruited. Gait parameters of speed and rhythm will be captured. EEG activity will be recorded using 64 active electrodes.Discussion: The study evaluates cognitive-motor interference (CMI) in groups of young and older adults as well as older adults with hearing impairment. The underlying processes of the interaction between motor and cognitive tasks will be identified at a behavioral and neurophysiological level comparing an auditory or a visual secondary task. We assume that performance differences are linked to different cognitive-motor processes, i.e., stimulus input, resource allocation, and movement execution. Moreover, for the different DT conditions (auditory vs. visual) we assume performance decrements within the auditory condition, especially for older, hearing-impaired adults. Findings will provide evidence of general mechanisms of CMI (ST vs. DT walking) as well as task-specific effects in dual-task performance while over ground walking.

Effect of Single-Leg Squat Speed and Depth on Dynamic Postural Control Under Single-Task and Dual-Task Paradigms

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-279
Author(s):  
Maria K. Talarico ◽  
Robert C. Lynall ◽  
Timothy C. Mauntel ◽  
Erin B. Wasserman ◽  
Darin A. Padua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Dual Task ◽  
Mixed Models ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Generalized Linear Mixed Models ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Control Performance ◽  
Single Task ◽  
The Relationship

Although single-leg squats are a common dynamic balance clinical assessment, little is known about the relationship between parameters that influence squat movement and postural control performance. The objective of this study was to determine the relationships between squat parameters (speed and depth) and postural control under single task and dual task. A total of 30 healthy college students performed single-leg squats under single task and dual task with Stroop. Random-intercepts generalized linear mixed models determined the effect of squat parameters on center of pressure (CoP) parameters. For each 1-cm·s−1 increase in squat speed, sway range (mediolateral: β = −0.03; anteroposterior: β = −0.05) and area (β = −0.25) decreased, whereas sway speed (mediolateral: β = 0.05; anteroposterior: β = 0.29; total: β = 0.29) increased. For each 1-cm increase in squat depth, sway range (mediolateral: β = 0.05; anteroposterior: β = 0.20) and area (β = 0.72) increased, whereas sway speed (anteroposterior: β = −0.14; total: β = −0.14) decreased. Compared with single task, the association between total and anteroposterior sway speed and squat speed was stronger under dual task. Clinicians and researchers should consider monitoring squat speed and depth when assessing dynamic balance during single-leg squats, as these parameters influence postural control, especially under dual task.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document