scholarly journals The Constitutional Law and Order and Administration: Differentiation of Legal Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Andrey V. Bezrukov ◽  
◽  
Dmitriy V. Osintsev ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidana Bakytova ◽  
Bolat Kushkaliyev

The article analyzes the principle of legal certainty, the constitutional presumption of knowledge of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and laws, and the obligation to comply with them. The contribution of constitutional law scholars to the development of the constitutional theory is emphasized. The author studies the political, legal, and social essence of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan as a kind of legal and cultural phenomenon that determines the development of Kazakhstan's society and state after independence. The full constitutional and legal characteristics of the sovereignty of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the significance of the Constitution in its strengthening and development are given. As criteria of constitutional law called the supremacy and direct action of the Constitution; effective work of state bodies in order to create favorable conditions for the development of society and the rights and freedoms of citizens and their associations, the performance of their legal responsibilities; ensure the inevitability of bringing perpetrators to legal liability. Attention is drawn to the fact that the principle of the supremacy of the Constitution, which ensures constitutional law and order, can be understood in two aspects: material and formal; their content is revealed. It is concluded that even the ideal text of the Constitution cannot guarantee its supremacy without its implementation in the constitutional legal order. The author substantiates the conclusion that the constitutional law and order presupposes the stability of the Constitution and the inadmissibility of its frequent amendments that are not objectively necessary.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidana Bakytova ◽  
Bolat Kushkaliyev

The article analyzes the principle of legal certainty, the constitutional presumption of knowledge of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan and laws, and the obligation to comply with them. The contribution of constitutional law scholars to the development of the constitutional theory is emphasized. The author studies the political, legal, and social essence of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan as a kind of legal and cultural phenomenon that determines the development of Kazakhstan's society and state after independence. The full constitutional and legal characteristics of the sovereignty of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the significance of the Constitution in its strengthening and development are given. As criteria of constitutional law called the supremacy and direct action of the Constitution; effective work of state bodies in order to create favorable conditions for the development of society and the rights and freedoms of citizens and their associations, the performance of their legal responsibilities; ensure the inevitability of bringing perpetrators to legal liability. Attention is drawn to the fact that the principle of the supremacy of the Constitution, which ensures constitutional law and order, can be understood in two aspects: material and formal; their content is revealed. It is concluded that even the ideal text of the Constitution cannot guarantee its supremacy without its implementation in the constitutional legal order. The author substantiates the conclusion that the constitutional law and order presupposes the stability of the Constitution and the inadmissibility of its frequent amendments that are not objectively necessary.


The article deals with theoretical issues related to the core of the rule of law – the constitutional legal order. The author views the latter as the result of implementation of constitutional legality, that is, the implementation of the provisions of the Constitution by all subjects of law, the exercise of their actions on the basis and in pursuit of the Constitution. The following criteria of the constitutional law and order are defined: the supremacy and direct effect of the Constitution; effective work of state bodies with a view to creating favorable conditions for the development of society and the realization of the rights and freedoms of citizens and their associations and the performance of their legal duties; ensuring inevitable bringing of offenders to justice. Special attention is paid to the fact that the principle of the supremacy of the Constitution that provides constitutional order can be understood in two aspects – material and formal, and their content is disclosed. It is concluded that even an ideal text of the Constitution cannot guarantee its supremacy without its embodiment in the actual constitutional law and order. Proceeding from the fact that the supremacy of the Constitution implies inadmissibility of distortion of the constitutional norms’ essence by current legislation, as well as their different understanding and application, the author justifies the assertion about the special role and responsibility of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation for the actual state of constitutional law and order. Claiming that the Constitutional Court has the right to apply any means and types of interpretation of the Russian Constitution, the author believes that the Court cannot change the content of the Constitution while maintaining the invariability of its text. The article substantiates the conclusion that the constitutional legal order presupposes stability of the Constitution, inadmissibility of frequent amendments that are not conditioned by objective necessity.


1974 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Andrew Lukele

A recent book by Anthony S. Mathews bears the sort of impressive title which will no doubt attract a much wider readership than the limited audience of legal and constitutional law specialists which the author in his preface appoints for the work. Law, Order and Liberty in South Africa (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1972) will excite the interest of many people both in and outside South Africa who have come to associate law and order in that country not with liberty and freedom but with the very processes and mechanisms of its denial. The reader's hope will be for insight into how law and order in South Africa—up to now an implement of repression and an aid to the securing of privilege for a racial minority—might be employed for the reversal of present conditions. Those less optimistic would be content with an analysis of the place and role of law in a society characterized by racial discrimination. The expectations of most readers will remain unfulfilled.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document