scholarly journals 'Offshoring Processes' – understanding the impacts of global trade in services for Wales and the UK

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Stephen Bussell
2019 ◽  
Vol 250 ◽  
pp. R30-R33
Author(s):  
Alexis P. Lautenberg

Executive SummaryServices are simultaneously the most important sector of the UK economy and the sector facing the biggest challenge as a result of Brexit. The prospective departure from the European Single Market reduces the UK to the status of ‘3rd country’ in respect of services. Accessing the internal market will depend on both subjective and objective conditions that differ from sector to sector, requiring detailed and highly specific arrangements for such industries as aviation and financial services.In practice, the EU can be expected to use these circumstances to discourage the UK from significantly diverging from European regulatory norms, as a matter of policy. In view of the weakness of, and uncertainty surrounding, international moves to oversee, let alone to further liberalise, trade in services, Brexit will thus leave the UK's services sector – and especially financial services – uniquely isolated and exposed. The government will hence need to consider carefully the costs of decisions to diverge from EU regulatory standards, and should be giving great priority to establishing clear objectives for close cooperation between the UK and the EU policy makers and regulators.


2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans H. Glismann ◽  
Klaus Schrader

AbstractIt is analysed whether the EU’s Eastern Enlargement has been an obstacle to further European integration. Does the Enlargement provoke protectionist policies in core member countries, such as Germany? The paper deals with the institutional settings pertaining to labour supply and trade in services within the Union. It is shown that Germany is one of the two EU 15 countries still denying free access of new member countries to its labour market. In addition, Germany has been pushing for protection regarding trade in services. Statistics indicate that German protection and EU free trade have made the UK a winner in the game of labour migration.


2021 ◽  
pp. 195-210
Author(s):  
Kent Jones

The concluding chapter summarizes the major findings of the book. Populism has inflicted the greatest damage to global trade and the trading system through the policies of Donald Trump and the UK Brexit vote. Trump’s populist manifesto presents globalism as the opposite of patriotism, but globalized societies increase their national welfare through trade, serving patriotic goals. In order to rebuff the populist temptation it will be necessary to improve adjustment policies, so that workers will have better chances of moving to new jobs when globalization disrupts markets. National trade policy should prevent the concentration of power in one individual’s discretion. The WTO needs to be revitalized through updating its rule book, introducing more effective safeguard measures, and finding new methods of reaching consensus. Maintaining democratic institutions will also be necessary, along with global efforts to defuse refugee crises, and national efforts to integrate and assimilate immigrants.


2021 ◽  
pp. 285-304
Author(s):  
Alex Brummer
Keyword(s):  
The Uk ◽  

This chapter emphasizes the profound impact that Brexit has had on British and global trade and production associated with the coronavirus pandemic. It examines how it has become fashionable to deprecate Englishness and the admittedly nebulous concept of Global Britain as the UK embarks on a post-Brexit renewal. It also describes the UK's rich heritage at home and overseas as something to be admired and developed, and should not be dismissed as a vacuous slogan. The chapter explores the little recognition given to the part that immigration has played in the advancement of the UK economy. It points out the latest long-term projections from City forecasters CEBR, which cite migration as one of the reasons why the UK economy will outpace that of France and other EU members in the 2020s.


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caf Dowlah

AbstractLiberalization of merchandize trade has brought forth extraordinary gains to world economy in recent decades. Available research, however, suggests that even greater benefits can result from the liberalization of global trade in services. Currently only about 20 percent of services are traded internationally although this sector accounts for more than half of global outputs, and exceeds 75 percent of GDP in high-income countries. Temporary movement of natural persons as service suppliers—as envisaged by GATS-Mode 4 of WTO—is one such services area which promises great benefits to both labor sending and receiving countries, but remains mired in a complex quagmire of trade and non-trade barriers as well as widespread misapprehensions. This paper argues that a basic convergence of economic interests seem to exist between the labor sending and receiving countries for liberalizing temporary movement of natural persons as service suppliers, and that, despite growing anti-immigration sentiments in developed countries, GATS-Mode 4 may be capable of spurring greater cross-border labor mobility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document