Applications of Natural Language Processing in Clinical Research and Practice

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshan Wang ◽  
Ahmad Tafti ◽  
Sunghwan Sohn ◽  
Rui Zhang
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
Matthieu Kirkland ◽  
Christian Reyes ◽  
Nancy Pire-Smerkanich ◽  
Eunjoo Pacifici

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Clinical research is the backbone of the medical community. However, there are few regulations to ensure clinical trial participants can understand their results, leading to volunteers feeling unvalued and unlikely to enroll in trials1. This study examines the need of lay summaries METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To understand the current landscape of clinical trial summaries, literature searches were conducted using the University of Southern California Library database with keywords Title contains “lay language” OR “lay summary” AND any field contains “Trial” OR “clinical”, and Title contains “natural language processing” AND “clinical trial” OR “Summary”. Studies were deemed relevant if they discussed lay language summaries for health care realms or using Natural Language Processing (NLP) to increase comprehension. Papers published by the Center for Information and Study on Clinical Research Participation (CISCRP) were reviewed and their Associate Director was interviewed. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of 67 total results, 14 were determined to be relevant. Ten of the relevant results examined lay language summaries and their regulation and 4 were NLP studies. The European Medicines Agency set regulations mandating clinical trial summaries. However, researchers have difficulty validating to an appropriate reading level2. Difficulty and potential bias halted a U.S. mandate of lay summaries3. The nonprofit CISCRP has partnered with industry to develop unbiased clinical trial summaries resulting in all volunteers feeling appreciated and 91% understanding clinical trial results post summary1. Similarly, NLP software for annotating Electronic Health Records increased comprehension for 77% of patients4. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: In the U.S., a lack of regulations mandating lay summaries may be related to concerns by regulatory agencies that summaries in plain language may introduce bias3. Future looks into integration of NLP systems to clinical trials may create unbiased summaries and allow for FDA regulation.


JAMIA Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe He ◽  
Arslan Erdengasileng ◽  
Xiao Luo ◽  
Aiwen Xing ◽  
Neil Charness ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective In the past few months, a large number of clinical studies on the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have been initiated worldwide to find effective therapeutics, vaccines, and preventive strategies for COVID-19. In this study, we aim to understand the landscape of COVID-19 clinical research and identify the issues that may cause recruitment difficulty or reduce study generalizability. Methods We analyzed 3,765 COVID-19 studies registered in the largest public registry - ClinicalTrials.gov, leveraging natural language processing and using descriptive, association, and clustering analyses. We first characterized COVID-19 studies by study features such as phase and tested intervention. We then took a deep dive and analyzed their eligibility criteria to understand whether these studies: (1) considered the reported underlying health conditions that may lead to severe illnesses, and (2) excluded older adults, either explicitly or implicitly, which may reduce the generalizability of these studies to the older adults population. Results Our analysis included 2295 interventional studies and 1470 observational studies. Most trials did not explicitly exclude older adults with common chronic conditions. However, known risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension were considered by less than 5% of trials based on their trial description. Pregnant women were excluded by 34.9% of the studies. Conclusions Most COVID-19 clinical studies included both genders and older adults. However, risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and pregnancy were under-represented, likely skewing the population that was sampled. A careful examination of existing COVID-19 studies can inform future COVID-19 trial design towards balanced internal validity and generalizability. Lay Summary Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in early 2020, thousands of clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various types of treatments and vaccines in human. COVID-19 clinical studies play a crucial role in controlling the virus. Yet it is unclear what types of patients were considered by these studies. This study analyzed 3,765 COVID-19 clinical study summaries downloaded from a major clinical trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov. We employed natural language processing techniques to parse the study description and eligibility criteria of these studies and then performed descriptive and clustering analysis on the parsing results. We found that older adults were not systematically excluded but pregnant women were often excluded. It was also found that the known risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and asthma, which may lead to serious illnesses, were considered by less than 5% of the studies according to their study description and eligibility criteria. This study provides an evidence that natural language processing can be applied to examine the design of clinical studies and identify issues that may cause delays in patient recruitment and the lack of real-world population representativeness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document