The Transition Into Professorship: Beyond the Three-Phase Approach to Socialization

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Pennington
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Occupational Socialization ◽  
Socialization Theory ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Dialectical Perspective ◽  
Key Issues

This article outlines a brief review of literature of occupational socialization theory. Specific to physical educators, occupational socialization theory examines the ways individuals are recruited into, prepared for, and socialized in the profession. It represents a dialectical perspective on socialization, acknowledging that educators are shaped by the institutions that seek to socialize them, but that they can resist the influence of this socialization. This article also discusses the key issues affecting physical education teacher education (PETE) doctoral programs and the means by which PETE doctoral students are socialized into the role of university educators.

Physical Education Graduate Student Socialization in a Research-Focused Master’s Program

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Andrew R. Richards ◽  
Karen Lux Gaudreault ◽  
Kelly L. Simonton ◽  
Angela Simonton
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Graduate Student ◽  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Text Message ◽  
Occupational Socialization ◽  
Socialization Theory ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Online Discussion Forum ◽  
Student Socialization

Researchers have begun using occupational socialization theory to understand the experiences of physical education teacher education doctoral students and faculty members. Comparatively little work has been done with graduate students pursuing research-focused masters’ degrees. These programs can serve as pipelines into PhD programs and have implications for the process of becoming a faculty member. Using a qualitative methodology grounded in existential phenomenology, this 2-year longitudinal study sought to understand the perspectives of Angela and Kelly as they navigated the master’s degree program. Data were collected through interviews, an online discussion forum, and text message conversations. Data analysis resulted in the construction of three themes and associated subthemes to describe the data. The primary themes included: (a) adjusting to graduate student life, (b) the importance of relationships, and (c) preparing for life after graduate school. Results are discussed using occupational socialization theory, and implications for research and practice are suggested.

Chapter 2 Creating a Before-School Physical Activity Program: Pre-Service Physical Educators’ Experiences and Implications for PETE

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaimie McMullen ◽  
Hans van der Mars ◽  
Julie A. Jahn
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Systematic Observation ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Educator ◽  
Before School ◽  
Pete Programs

The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of physical education teacher education (PETE) majors enrolled in an internship course that provided them with authentic experiences promoting and facilitating a before-school physical activity (PA) program and to examine the associated implications for PETE programs within the Comprehensive School Physical Activity (CSPAP) framework. In this study, five PETE majors were recruited to participate. Data were collected from several sources including participant observation, interviews, systematic observation, and document analysis. The results show that preservice physical educators struggled with PA promotion as a consequence of perceptions of early programmatic success, feelings of nervousness and influences of their existing beliefs about the role of the physical educator. Therefore, when considering the role of the physical educator relative to a CSPAP, PETE programs should consider making adjustments to their curricula to include experiences that allow preservice teachers to practice skills associated with out-of-class PA promotion.

Chapter 6: Perspectives on the Future of Doctoral Programs

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Murray F. Mitchell ◽  
Hal A. Lawson ◽  
Hans van der Mars ◽  
Phillip Ward
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Core Knowledge ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
The Future ◽  
Local Program ◽  
State Accreditation ◽  
Pete Programs

What does the future hold for Doctoral Programs for Physical Education Teacher Education (D-PETE) programs, faculty, and doctoral students? What can D-PETE faculty prioritize and do to create a more desirable future for D-PETE, PETE, and school physical education programs? What are the main facilitators, constraints, and barriers? Framed by these three questions, this chapter offers an action-oriented analysis of doctoral programs. Alongside physical education-specific program priorities influential factors in the external environment merit attention, including regional and state accreditation, neoliberal forces for accountability, the regulatory environment, program standards and national rankings, and declining enrollments. Mindful of alternative perspectives and university- and program-specific action plans, a dual priority appears to be crosscutting. Every D-PETE program needs to reflect theoretically sound and evidence-based practices, and D-PETE graduates need to be prepared to advance these practices after graduation. Toward these ends, it is timely to work toward consensus on a core knowledge base, explore how best to share resources across university boundaries, and join forces to solidify and safeguard appropriate practices. Today’s choices have short- and long-term consequences for each program and the profession overall, recommending that national priorities gain prominence alongside local program traditions and D-PETE faculty practices.

Research and Practical Implications of Integrating Autobiographical Essays Into Physical Education Teacher Education

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
K. Andrew R. Richards ◽  
Karen Lux Gaudreault ◽  
Wesley J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Elementary Education ◽  
Occupational Socialization ◽  
Essay Writing ◽  
Research Perspective ◽  
Education Practice ◽  
Socialization Theory ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Personal Belief

The purpose of this research note is to introduce and overview both the teaching and research applications of autobiographical essay writing. Grounded in occupational socialization theory and teacher reflection, the authors propose that autobiography can be a powerful tool in helping preservice and in-service teachers more deeply reflect on their prior socialization experiences, which may help them to better understand and be willing to critique their personal belief structures. The authors provide an overview of how autobiographical essays have been used and include recommendations for teacher education practice. From a research perspective, the authors argue that autobiographical essays provide a targeted strategy for collecting reflective data on individuals’ background socialization experiences. Such data are critical for socialization scholars who are interested in understanding how teachers’ biographies influence their current teaching beliefs and practices. Applications for physical education-adjacent spaces, including doctoral education, adapted physical education, and elementary education, are also discussed.

Teaching Physical Education in an Urban Intensive Environment

2020 ◽  
pp. 004208592092301
Author(s):  
K. Andrew R. Richards ◽  
Michael A. Hemphill ◽  
Victoria N. Shiver ◽  
Karen Lux Gaudreault ◽  
Victor Ramsey
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
York City ◽  
Student Diversity ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Occupational Socialization ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Urban Context ◽  
Socialization Theory ◽  
Teaching Context

The purpose of this study was to understand the unique stressors faced by physical educators working in New York City schools. Participants included 34 New York City physical educators who participated in semi-structured interviews about their experiences teaching in an urban context. Qualitative data analysis resulted in the construction of four themes: (a) working with limited and inconsistent infrastructure, (b) navigating student diversity, (c) coping with marginalization and advocating for quality practices, and (d) managing the sociopolitics of teaching. These themes highlight the intersection between discipline and teaching context and are discussed through the lens of occupational socialization theory.

PETE Faculty Preferences and Responsibilities for Research, Teaching, and Service in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-406
Author(s):  
Kim C. Graber ◽  
K. Andrew R. Richards ◽  
Chad M. Killian ◽  
Amelia Mays Woods
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Work Role ◽  
Occupational Socialization ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Institution Type ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Socialization Theory ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Teacher Education Faculty

Purpose: Grounded in occupational socialization theory, the purpose of this investigation was to examine U.S. physical education teacher education faculty members’ work role preferences, how their actual work role responsibilities compare to institutional expectations, and differences in these preferences and responsibilities based on gender and institution type (i.e., bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral institutions). Methods: Participants included 323 physical education teacher education faculty members (188 females and 135 males) from 230 institutions of higher education who completed an online survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a series of 3 × 2 (Institution Type × Gender) factorial analysis of variances. Results: There was relative alignment between what faculty members are expected to do, what they prefer to do, and how they actually spend their time. There are, however, some important differences based on gender and institutional classification. Discussion/Conclusion: Results are discussed within the framework of occupational socialization theory and with reference to faculty role expectations and the propensity for role conflict.

Quality Enhancement in Doctoral Education: Developing a More Public Process

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Neumann ◽  
James Guthrie
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Quality Enhancement ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Ultimate Responsibility ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Doctoral Supervision

AbstractGovernments play an important role in providing an appropriate national framework and structure for the development of doctoral education. Nevertheless, ultimate responsibility for quality supervision processes lies with institutions, in particular with their departmental units and their policies and processes (DETYA, 1999c). This paper presents a case study of recent developments in the quality enhancement of doctoral supervision in the Macquarie Graduate School of Management (MGSM). In doing so it looks at three areas in particular: (1) the key role of infrastructure support, including the introduction of a code of practice in doctoral supervision; (2) the induction and acculturation processes; and (3) supervision quality, including the selection, development and training of supervisors. The aim of the developments is to make a recognized private process more public and transparent. MGSM currently enrolls a significant number of doctoral students and the enhancement of their doctoral experience is a key priority. The paper concludes by highlighting key issues for future development.

The Doctorate in Physical Education Teacher Education in the 21st Century: Contexts and Challenges

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Ward ◽  
Sue Sutherland ◽  
Marianne L. Woods ◽  
B. Ann Boyce ◽  
Grace Goc Karp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Doctoral Degree ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Core Content ◽  
The Status

In this paper, we situate the findings from the studies in this thematic issue within the current policy environment that influences the status, rankings, and funding contexts for doctoral programs in Physical Education Teacher Education within and across institutions. We identify common challenges that these doctoral programs are confronted with including the recruitment of doctoral students, the lack of diversity of faculty and students, the purpose of the doctoral degree, and core content knowledge for the degree. Throughout the discussion we provide questions and recommendations for the field to consider.

Influence of Occupational Socialization on Sport Pedagogy Doctoral Students’ Beliefs and Actions

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Richard F. Jowers ◽  
Jamie J. Brunsdon ◽  
Jacob T. Peterson ◽  
Hayden L. Mitchell ◽  
Matthew D. Curtner-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Occupational Socialization ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Sport Pedagogy ◽  
Analytic Induction ◽  
Hybrid Forms

Purpose: To examine the influence of occupational socialization on the beliefs and actions of six sport pedagogy doctoral students (DSs) in terms of physical education (PE) teaching and physical education teacher education (PETE). Method: Data were collected with five qualitative techniques and analyzed by employing analytic induction and constant comparison. Results: DSs had conservative or liberal views about PE and endorsed hybrid forms of PETE, which included elements of the behavioristic, traditional/craft, and critical inquiry orientations. Patterns of socialization that shaped these beliefs and actions were both congruent and contrasting with those described in past research. Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of asking potential DSs about their beliefs and the forces that shaped those beliefs during recruitment. In addition, it indicates that the potency of doctoral education can be enhanced when it has a dual focus on PETE and research and when DSs experience it within a cohort.

Quality Enhancement in Doctoral Education: Developing a More Public Process

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24
Author(s):  
Ruth Neumann ◽  
James Guthrie
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Quality Enhancement ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Ultimate Responsibility ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Doctoral Supervision

AbstractGovernments play an important role in providing an appropriate national framework and structure for the development of doctoral education. Nevertheless, ultimate responsibility for quality supervision processes lies with institutions, in particular with their departmental units and their policies and processes (DETYA, 1999c). This paper presents a case study of recent developments in the quality enhancement of doctoral supervision in the Macquarie Graduate School of Management (MGSM). In doing so it looks at three areas in particular: (1) the key role of infrastructure support, including the introduction of a code of practice in doctoral supervision; (2) the induction and acculturation processes; and (3) supervision quality, including the selection, development and training of supervisors. The aim of the developments is to make a recognized private process more public and transparent. MGSM currently enrolls a significant number of doctoral students and the enhancement of their doctoral experience is a key priority. The paper concludes by highlighting key issues for future development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document