scholarly journals Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability in patients after acute coronary syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-215
Author(s):  
V. A. Brazhnik ◽  
L. O. Minushkina ◽  
A. S. Galyavich ◽  
N. R. Khasanov ◽  
M. A. Chichkova ◽  
...  

Objective. The aim of the study was to assess the possible association of visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability and the risk of adverse outcomes in hypertensive (HTN) patients after acute coronary syndrome.Design and methods. We analyzed data of 1,456 patients (mean age 65,6 ± 12,2 years, 875 (60,1 %) men) discharged from the hospital after acute coronary syndrome and followed up for 1 year in 4 vascular centers in Moscow, Astrakhan, Kazan and Krasnodar in 2014–2017. BP, heart rate, and adverse events were recorded on the day of discharge and on days 25, 90, 180 and 360 after discharge. The visit-to-visit BP variability was assessed by the VIM coefficient (variation independent of mean).Results. The systolic BP variability was 7,81 ± 0,226 mm Hg, diastolic BP variability was 9,89 ± 0,577 mm Hg during follow-up. In total, 110 deaths from any cause, 63 coronary deaths, 130 repeated non-fatal coronary events, 33 ischemic strokes were recorded. A decrease in BP variability was associated with the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (10,21 ± 6,45 and 7,99 ± 4,70 mm Hg, p = 0,024) and thiazide diuretics (10,34 ± 6,59 and 7,63 ± 9,63 mm Hg, p = 0,049). Multivariate analysis showed that high long-term variability of BP is a more significant factor associated with the overall mortality rate than the initial severity of HTN and even the fact of achieving target BP. The risk of ischemic stroke in patients with HTN was associated with factors such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, a history of stroke, and high visit-to-visit BP variability.Conclusions. Visit-to-visit BP variability is an important characteristic of BP control and is associated with the risk of death from any causes and stroke in patients with coronary heart disease.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marrco Vitolo ◽  
Vincenzo Livio Malavasi ◽  
Marco Proietti ◽  
Igor Diemberger ◽  
Laurent Fauchier ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Cardiac troponins (cTn) have been reported to be predictors for adverse outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF), patients, but their actual use is still unclear. To assess the factors associated with cTn testing in routine clinical practice and to evaluate the association of elevated levels of cTn with adverse outcomes in a large contemporary cohort of European AF patients. Methods and results Patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry were stratified into three groups according to cTn levels as (i) cTn not tested, (ii) cTn in range (≤99th percentile), and (iii) cTn elevated (>99th percentile). The composite outcome of any thromboembolism/any acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/cardiovascular (CV) death, defined as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause death were the main endpoints. 10 445 (94.1%) AF patients were included in this analysis [median age 71 years, interquartile range (IQR): 63–77; males 59.7%]. cTn were tested in 2834 (27.1%). Overall, cTn was elevated in 904 (8.7%) and in-range in 1930 (18.5%) patients. Patients in whom cTn was tested tended to be younger (P < 0.001) and more frequently presenting with first detected AF and atypical AF-related symptoms (i.e. chest pain, dyspnoea, or syncope) (P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex, in-hospital enrollment, first-detected AF, CV risk factors, history of coronary artery disease (CAD), and atypical AF symptoms were independently associated with cTn testing. After a median follow-up of 730 days (IQR: 692–749), 957 (9.7%) composite endpoints occurred while all-cause death was 9.5%. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a higher cumulative risk for both outcomes in patients with elevated cTn levels (Figure) (Log Rank tests, P < 0.001). On adjusted Cox regression analysis, elevated levels of cTn were independently associated with a higher risk for MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40–2.16] and all-cause death (HR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.21–1.74). Elevated levels of cTn were independently associated with a higher occurrence of MACE, all-cause death, any ACS, CV death and hospital readmission even after the exclusion of patients with history of CAD, diagnosis of ACS at discharge, those who underwent coronary revascularization during the admission and/or who were treated with oral anticoagulants plus antiplatelet therapy. Conclusions Elevated cTn levels were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and adverse CV events, even after exclusion of CAD patients. Clinical factors that might enhance the need to rule out CAD were associated with cTn testing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Minushkina ◽  
V Brazhnik ◽  
N Selezneva ◽  
V Safarjan ◽  
M Alekhin ◽  
...  

Abstract   Left ventricular (LV) global function index (LVGFI) is a MRI marker of left ventricular remodeling. LVGFI has high predictive significance in young healthy individuals. The aim of the study was to assess prognostic significance in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We include into this analysis 2169 patients with ACS (1340 (61.8%) men and 829 (38.2%) women), mean age 64.08±12.601 years. All patients were observed in 2 Russian multicenter observational studies: ORACLE I (ObseRvation after Acute Coronary syndrome for deveLopment of trEatment options) (2004–2007 years) and ORACLE II (NCT04068909) (2014–2019 years). 1886 (87.0%) pts had arterial hypertension, 1539 (71.0%) – history of coronary artery disease, 647 (29.8%) – history of myocardial infarction, 444 (20.5%) - diabetes mellitus. Duration of the follow-up was 1 years after the hospital discharge. Cases of death from any cause, coronary deaths, repeated coronary events (fatal and non-fatal) were recorded. An echocardiographic study was conducted 5–7 days from the time of hospitalization. The LVGFI was defined as LV stroke volume/LV global volume × 100, where LV global volume was the sum of the LV mean cavity volume ((LV end-diastolic volume + LV end-systolic volume)/2) and myocardial volume (LV mass/density). During the follow-up, 193 deaths were recorded (8.9%), 122 deaths (5.6%) were coronary. In total, repeated coronary events were recorded in 253 (11.7%) patients. Mean LVGFI was 22.64±8.121%. Patients who died during the follow-up were older (73.03±10.936 years and 63.15±12.429 years, p=0.001), had a higher blood glucose level at the admission to the hospital (8.12±3.887 mmol/L and 7.17±3.355 mmol/L, p=0.041), serum creatinine (110.86±53.954 μmol/L and 99.25±30.273 μmol/L, p=0.007), maximum systolic blood pressure (196.3±25.17 mm Hg and 190.3±27.83 mm Hg, p=0.042). Those who died had a lower LVGFI value (19.75±6.77% and 23.01±8.243%, p<0.001). Myocardial mass index, ejection fraction and other left ventricular parameters did not significantly differ between died and alive patients. Among the patients who died, there were higher rate of women, pts with a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes. In a multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus OR1.67 95% CI [1.12–2.51] p=0.012, history of heart failure (1.78 [1.2.-2.59], p=0.003), a history of myocardial infarction (1.47 [1.05–2.05], p=0024), age (1.06 [1.05–1.08], p=0.001) and LVGFI <22% (1.53 [1.08–2.17], p=0.015) were independent predictors of death from any cause. The LVGFI was also independently associated with the risk of coronary death, but not with the risk of all recurring coronary events. Thus, LVGFI may be useful the marker to assess risk in patients who have experienced an ACS episode. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasreen Chowdhury ◽  
Md. Aminul Haque Khan ◽  
Md Mozammel Hoque

Acute Coronary syndrome (ACS) is the most common cause of admission to the coronary care unit with highest risk of death and adverse outcomes. ACS accounts for 60–70% of all admissions in the hospital. Patients with ACS encompass a heterogeneous group that varies widely regarding severity of the underlying coronary artery disease, prognosis and response to treatment. Patients with the highest risk of subsequent events usually have the largest benefit of an intensified pharmacological treatment and early mechanical intervention. The prognosis for low-risk patients, on the other hand, is often difficult to improve further and these patients usually benefit more from a conservative management with a lower risk of side effects. Therefore, risk stratification is essential and should be initiated early and updated continuously throughout the hospital stay. Early risk stratification is usually performed by the use of clinical background factors, clinical presentation, electrocardiography and biochemical markers of myocardial damage. Levels of natriuretic peptides have been shown to reflect cardiac performance. The aim of this study was to review elaborately on B type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and its prognostic value in patient with ACS. This review focuses on the emerging role of these peptides in the early risk stratification of ACS patients. Elevation of BNP levels in acute MI and UA is predictive of a greater risk of death, post infarction heart failure, or  reinfarction. Post infarction studies demonstrate that elevated plasma BNP levels are associated with larger infarct size, increased probability of ventricular remodeling, lower ejection fraction, higher risk of heart failure, and increased mortality. This cardiac marker is a potent predictor of mortality in patients with all forms ACS. BNP measurements serve as an index of severity of the ischemic injury, as well as the degree of impairment in left ventricular function.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cmoshmcj.v13i2.21079


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miquel Sánchez ◽  
Pere Llorens ◽  
Pablo Herrero ◽  
F Javier Martín-Sanchez ◽  
Pascual Piñera ◽  
...  

AimsTo test the utility of a single copeptin determination at presentation to the emergency department (ED) as a short-term prognosis marker in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). To compare the results with those achieved with conventional troponin.MethodsA multicentric, prospective, observational, longitudinal, cohort study involving 15 Spanish EDs. Inclusion: consecutive patients with chest pain (<12 h) finally diagnosed of NSTEACS. Measurements: copeptin and troponin at arrival. Cut-off point for copeptin: 25.9 pmol/l. Follow-up: within 2 months after ED attendance to identify 30-day adverse events. Discriminatory capacity of copeptin and troponin was compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.ResultsWe included 377 patients with NSTEACS. Adverse events: 11 (2.9%) patients died, 27 (7.2%) had an adverse coronary event, 14 (3.7%) had a stroke, and 48 (12.7%) a composite endpoint. The initial copeptine value was over 25.9 pmol/l in 114 patients, and they presented a higher mortality rate (OR: 4.2, (95% CI 1.2 to 14.8); p=0.03). This association disappeared after adjusting by clinical variables or troponin level. No significant differences were found for the remaining endpoints. The area under the curve  of the ROC curve of 30-day mortality was 0.73 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.87) for copeptin, and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.87) for troponin.ConclusionsIn patients with NSTEACS, determination of copeptin at presentation to the ED is associated with risk of death during the subsequent month. This association, however, disappears after adjusting by baseline features or troponin level, so copeptin does not add complementary prognostic information over that provided by troponin.


2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 2112-2118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A Kavsak ◽  
Dennis T Ko ◽  
Alice M Newman ◽  
Glenn E Palomaki ◽  
Viliam Lustig ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Inflammation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can identify those at greater long-term risks for heart failure (HF) and death. The present study assessed the performance of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) (cytokines involved in the activation and recruitment of leukocytes) in addition to known biomarkers [e.g., N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)] for predicting HF and death in an ACS population. Methods: In a cohort of 216 ACS patients, NT-proBNP (Elecsys®; Roche) and IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 (evidence investigator™; Randox) were measured in serial specimens collected early after symptom onset (n = 723). We collected at least 2 specimens from each participant: an early specimen (median 2 h; interquartile range 2–4 h) and a later specimen (9 h; 9–9 h), and used the later specimens’ biomarker concentrations for risk stratification. Results: An increase in both IL-6 and NT-proBNP was observed but not for IL-8 or MCP-1 early after pain onset. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that individuals with increased NT-proBNP (&gt;183 ng/L) or cytokines (IL-6 &gt; 6.4 ng/L; above upper limit of normal for IL-8 or MCP-1) had a greater probability of death or HF in the following 8 years (P &lt;0.05). In a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for both CRP and troponin I, increased IL-6, MCP-1, and NT-proBNP remained significant risk factors. Combining all 3 biomarkers resulted in a higher likelihood ratio for death or HF than models restricted to any 2 of these biomarkers. Conclusion: IL-6, MCP-1, and NT-proBNP are independent predictors of long-term risk of death or HF, highlighting the importance of identifying leukocyte activation and recruitment in ACS patients.


Angiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genovefa D. Kolovou ◽  
Niki Katsiki ◽  
Sophie Mavrogeni

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with both short- and long-term unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, medical societies developed risk scores for predicting mortality and assessing decision-making regarding early aggressive treatment in patients presenting an ACS. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk scores are the most extensively investigated scores for ACS. Clinical judgment is also important. Significant differences in aggressive treatment of ACS still exist with respect to gender, age, and ethnicity. The reasons for these discrepancies need to be further elucidated in future studies. Therefore, generalizability of stratifications and risk scores in certain populations should be performed with caution.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Proietti ◽  
C Laroche ◽  
A Tello-Montoliu ◽  
R Lenarczyk ◽  
G A Dan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Heart failure (HF) is a well-known risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). Moreover, HF is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with known AF. Recently, phenotypes of HF have been redefined according to the level of ejection fraction (EF). New data are needed to understand if a differential risk for outcomes exists according to the new phenotypes' definitions. Purpose To evaluate the risk of major adverse outcomes in patients with AF and HF according to HF clinical phenotypes. Methods We performed a subgroup analysis of AF patients enrolled in the EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry with a history of HF at baseline, available EF and follow-up data. Patients were categorized as follows: i) EF<40%, i.e. HF reduced EF [HFrEF]; ii) EF 40–49%, i.e. HF mid-range EF [HFmrEF]; iii) EF ≥50%, i.e. HF preserved EF [HFpEF]. Any thromboembolic event (TE)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/cardiovascular (CV) death, CV death and all-cause death were recorded. Results A total of 3409 patients were included in this analysis: of these, 907 (26.6%) had HFrEF, 779 (22.9%) had HFmrEF and 1723 (50.5%) had HFpEF. An increasing proportion with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 was found across the three groups: 90.4% in HFrEF, 94.6% in HFmrEF and 97.3% in HFpEF (p<0.001), while lower proportions of HAS-BLED ≥3 were seen (28.0% in HFrEF, 26.3% in HFmrEF and 23.6% in HFpEF, p=0.035). At discharge patients with HFpEF were less likely treated with antiplatelet drugs (22.0%) compared to other classes and were less prescribed with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (57.0%) and with any oral anticoagulant (OAC) (85.7%). No differences were found in terms of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant use. At 1-year follow-up, a progressively lower rate for all study outcomes (all p<0.001), with an increasing cumulative survival, was found across the three groups, with patients with HFpEF having better survival (all p<0.0001 for Kaplan-Meier curves). After full adjustment, Cox regression analysis showed that compared to HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF were associated with risk of all study outcomes (Table). Cox Regression Analysis HR (95% CI) Any TE/ACS/CV Death CV Death All-Cause Death HFmrEF 0.65 (0.49–0.86) 0.53 (0.38–0.74) 0.55 (0.41–0.74) HFpEF 0.50 (0.39–0.64) 0.42 (0.31–0.56) 0.45 (0.35–0.59) ACS = Acute Coronary Syndrome; CI = Confidence Interval; CV = Cardiovascular; EF = Ejection Fraction; HF = Heart Failure; HR = Hazard Ratio. Conclusions In this cohort of AF patients with HF, HFpEF was the most common phenotype, being associated with a profile related to an increased thromboembolic risk. Compared to HFrEF, both HFmrEF and HFpEF were associated with a lower risk of all major adverse outcomes in AF patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document