Dynamic balance conditions were realized by asking eight volunteers to stand on uniaxial balance board with adjustable geometry and to carry out 60 s long balancing trials. Four different balance board geometry were used, each associated with different difficulty level. Balancing trials were repeated five times weekly (learning period) in order to test improvement of balancing skill. The measurement was repeated eight weeks after the learning period in order to check the persistence of the balancing skill (confirmation session). Oscillations of ankle angle and hip angle were monitored by OptiTrack motion capture system and four stabilometry parameters were used to characterize improvement in balancing performance, namely, Standard Deviation (STD), Largest Amplitude (LA), Normalized Path Length (NPL) and Mean Power Frequency (MPF). STD and NPL show similar tendency to the preliminary expectations, therefore they can be considered as good measures to describe balancing performance. Results show that subjects used ankle strategy for the less difficult balance board configurations, while for the more difficult tasks, hip strategy was also involved. Changes in STD and NPL during the learning period showed that the improvement and the persistence in balancing skill is more significant for more difficult balancing tasks.
Balance Board vs Balance Ball: Which One is Superior in Enhancing Static And Dynamic Balance Abilities on Healthy University Students