scholarly journals Efektivitas Cognitive Behavior Therapy terhadap Kontrol Diri Remaja dengan Perilaku Kenakalan Status Offense di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri X Magetan

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-19
Author(s):  
Sofy Ariany Hasan ◽  
Duta Nurdibyanandaru
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavior Therapy ◽  
T Test ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Cognitive Behavior ◽  
Control Scale ◽  
Gain Score ◽  
Status Offense

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) efektif terhadap kontrol diri remaja dengan perilaku status offense  di MTsN X Magetan. Pemberian CBT bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kontrol diri remaja, sehingga remaja tersebut dapat mengurangi perilaku kenakalan remaja, khususnya status offense. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan tipe penelitian eksperimen. Penelitian eksperimen ini dilakukan selama 6 sesi, dan masing-masing sesi dilaksanakan selama 1 jam. Subjek pada penelitian ini berjumlah 24 remaja dengan perilaku kenakalan status offense yang merupakan siswa MTsN X Magetan. Penelitian ini menggunakan skala psikologi untuk mengukur efektivitas dari CBT. Skala yang digunakan adalah Self Control Scale (SCS) yang dikembangkan oleh Tangney, dkk (2004), berjumlah 24 aitem setelah diujicobakan peneliti dengan reliabilitas sebesar 0,864. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan teknik t-independent (two sample t-test dengan menggunakan bantuan SPSS 22 for windows. Hasil yang diperoleh pada penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa  CBT efektif dalam meningkatkan kontrol diri remaja dengan perilaku kenakalan status offense di MTsN X Magetan. Nilai signifikansi pada gain score kontrol diri sebesar 0.001 (sig. < 0.05) sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara gain score kontrol diri pada kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok kontrol setelah adanya pemberian perlakuan CBT.

An Examination of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Truancy Court

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-58
Author(s):  
Laura L. Rubino ◽  
Valerie R. Anderson ◽  
Christina A. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Regression Models ◽  
Ethnic Disparities ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
White Youth ◽  
School To Prison Pipeline ◽  
Status Offense ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Racial Ethnic

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of race/ethnicity on recidivism outcomes with a sample of juveniles involved with a truancy court. Three regression models were conducted to examine the influence of race/ethnicity on receiving any new court petition ( N = 1,206), including petitions for delinquency offenses or any new status offense petition within 2 years of their initial contact with the court. Results suggest that racial/ethnic disparities exist for juveniles involved in truancy court, especially with regard to new delinquency petitions. These findings are important to take into consideration to understand how truancy courts may facilitate the school-to-prison pipeline for non-White youth.

scholarly journals A longitudinal examination of African American adolescent females detained for status offense

2020 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 104648
Author(s):  
Bo-Kyung Elizabeth Kim ◽  
Camille R. Quinn ◽  
Patricia Logan-Greene ◽  
Ralph DiClemente ◽  
Dexter Voisin
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
Adolescent Females ◽  
African American Adolescent ◽  
Status Offense ◽  
Longitudinal Examination ◽  
African American Adolescent Females

Status Offenders Can Be Different:

1983 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Kelley
Keyword(s):  
Due Process ◽  
Juvenile Court ◽  
Status Offenders ◽  
Status Offense ◽  
Cogent Argument

Numerous scholars and program planners have argued vehemently for the removal of status offenders from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Perhaps the most cogent argument for the removal of such offenses from the juvenile codes concerns the vagueness of status offense statutes, which permits flexible interpretation and serves as an invitation to arbitrary and capricious enforcement as well as procedural and due process inequities.

Do Status Offenders Get Worse? Some Clarifications on the Question of Escalation

1989 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall G. Shelden ◽  
John A. Horvath ◽  
Sharon Tracy
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Juvenile Court ◽  
Status Offenders ◽  
Arrest Record ◽  
Status Offense ◽  
Court Referrals

Data from a longitudinal study of juvenile court referrals reveal that whether or not status offenders “escalate” is dependent upon gender and the specific type of status offense committed. Specifically, male status offenders were found to be more likely than females to escalate. Also, runaways and unmanageables were far less likely to escalate than those who were first referred for truancy, curfew, and liquor law violations. Status offenders are also compared with other offenders in terms of the total number of subsequent referrals and whether or not a youth had an arrest record as an adult. Some of the problems associated with the study of status offenders are discussed.

Are Status Offenders Really So Different?

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles W. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Juvenile Court ◽  
Juvenile Courts ◽  
Substantial Body ◽  
Large Sample ◽  
Status Offenders ◽  
Status Offense ◽  
Status Offenses ◽  
Court Appearance

Numerous authorities have argued convincingly that what have been termed "status offenses" should be removed from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Perhaps the most cogent rationale that has been advanced in this regard flows directly from the statutory and procedural inequity that is clearly demonstrated by this vaguely defined set of offenses. Unfortunately, many advocates of reform have gone on to argue that a substantial body of empirical research has shown that (1) status offenders are not a significant threat to society because they have not been and generally will not become involved in more serious offenses and (2) any movement toward more serious involvement stems more from the stig matizing consequences of formal legal processing than from any other source. Such assertions are based on insufficient or nonexistent empirical evidence. Indeed, this analysis, based on an examination of the offense histories of a large sample of juveniles who appeared before one of two urban juvenile courts on one or more occasions during a five-year period, shows that many juveniles charged with status offenses have previously been charged with other types of offenses, that juveniles whose first court appearance involved a status offense are more likely to recidivate than those first charged with a misdemeanor or a felony, and that there is little or no evidence to support the contention that legal processing is associated with subsequent involvement in more serious delinquency. '

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document