Comparison of Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in Patients Enrolled in the Anticoagulation Management Services Following Pharmacist Intervention

IntroductionThe importance of time in therapeutic range (TTR) in patients prescribed warfarin therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) cannot be overemphasised.AimTo evaluate the impact of provision of TTR results during clinic visits on anticoagulation management.DesignSingle-centred, randomised controlled study.SettingFifteen arrhythmia clinics in Hong Kong.PatientsAF patients prescribed warfarin.InterventionsProvision of TTR or no provision of TTR.Main outcome measuresA documented discussion between doctors and patients about switching warfarin to a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC).ResultsFour hundred and eighty one patients with AF prescribed warfarin were randomly assigned to (1) a TTR provision group or (2) control. Their mean age was 73.6±12.0 years and 60.7% were men. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.2±1.6 and the mean HASBLED score was 1.7±1.2. The mean TTR was 63.9%±29.9%. At the index clinic visit, 71 of 481 patients (14.8%) had a documented discussion about switching warfarin to a NOAC. Patients with provision of TTR results were more likely to discuss switching warfarin to a NOAC than controls (19.1% vs 10.6%, P=0.03), especially those with a TTR <65% (35.2% vs 10.6%, P<0.001). A higher proportion of patients with provision of TTR results switched to a NOAC (5.9% vs 4.1%, P=0.49).ConclusionsThe provision of TTR among patients on warfarin was associated with a discussion about switching from warfarin to a NOAC in those with TTR <65%, but did not result in actual switching to a NOAC, suggesting additional barriers.

Download Full-text

Impact of Protocolized Pharmacist Intervention on Critical Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Values With Heparin Infusions

Journal of Pharmacy Technology ◽

10.1177/87551225211031923 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 875512252110319

Author(s):

Rachelle Barry ◽

Craig A. Stevens ◽

Trina Huynh ◽

Dmitri Lerner

Keyword(s):

Therapeutic Range ◽

Partial Thromboplastin Time ◽

Academic Research ◽

Pharmacist Intervention ◽

Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Time In Therapeutic Range ◽

Institutional Review ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

Research Consortium

Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions are commonly managed with nurse-driven nomograms titrated to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In some patients, anti-Xa values may be more appropriate measures of anticoagulation. At the present institution, an update to the nurse-driven aPTT nomogram requires pharmacist notification and clinical assessment for critically supratherapeutic aPTT results. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the nomogram update. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, pre-post analysis was conducted in patients treated with UFH who experienced a critical aPTT during the 6 months preceding and following the nomogram update. Patients with erroneous critical aPTT results were excluded. The primary endpoint was the time in therapeutic range (Rosendaal method) from the first critical aPTT until UFH discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients transitioned to anti-Xa monitoring and the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, 5 bleeding. Data were analyzed by the χ2 test. The study was institutional review board approved. Results: Of 277 UFH infusions, 142 belonged to the pre-implementation group and 135 to the post-implementation group. Baseline aPTTs were similar between the 2 groups. Time in therapeutic range was 58.1% versus 62.4% of between groups ( P = .467). UFH was transitioned to pharmacist-driven anti-Xa monitoring in 16.2% versus 40.3% of patients ( P < .001). BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding occurred in 23.2% versus 13.4% of patients ( P < .001). Conclusions: Application of these data suggest improved safety and efficacy outcomes with directed pharmacist management of UFH in patients with critically elevated aPTTs.

Download Full-text

Use of SAMe-TT₂R₂ Score to Predict the Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Warfarin in Thailand

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand ◽

10.35755/jmedassocthai.2020.06.10827 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 103 (6) ◽

pp. 548-552

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Therapeutic Range ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Discrimination Performance ◽

Poor Quality ◽

Chi Square ◽

Exact Test ◽

Time In Therapeutic Range ◽

Anticoagulation Control

Objective: To predict the quality of anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving warfarin in Thailand. Materials and Methods: The present study retrospectively recruited Thai AF patients receiving warfarin for three months or longer between June 2012 and December 2017 in Central Chest Institute of Thailand. The patients were classified into those with SAMe-TT₂R₂ of 2 or less, and 3 or more. The Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the proportion of the patients with poor time in therapeutic range (TTR) between the two groups of SAMe-TT₂R₂ score. The discrimination performance of SAMe-TT₂R₂ score was demonstrated with c-statistics. Results: Ninety AF patients were enrolled. An average age was 69.89±10.04 years. Most patients were persistent AF. An average CHA₂DS₂-VASc, SAMe-TT₂R₂, and HAS-BLED score were 3.68±1.51, 3.26±0.88, and 1.98±0.85, respectively. The present study showed the increased proportion of AF patients with poor TTR with higher SAMe-TT₂R₂ score. The AF patients with SAMe-TT₂R₂ score of 3 or more had a larger proportion of patients with poor TTR than those with SAMe-TT₂R₂ score of 2 or less with statistical significance when TTR was below 70% (p=0.03) and 65% (p=0.04), respectively. The discrimination performance of SAMe-TT₂R₂ score was demonstrated with c-statistics of 0.60, 0.59, and 0.55 when TTR was below 70%, 65% and 60%, respectively. Conclusion: Thai AF patients receiving warfarin had a larger proportion of patients with poor TTR when the SAMe-TT₂R₂ score was higher. The score of 3 or more could predict poor quality of anticoagulation control in those patients. Keywords: Time in therapeutic range, Poor quality of anticoagulation control, Warfarin, SAMe-TT₂R₂, Labile INR

Download Full-text