scholarly journals Mevsimlik Tarım İşçileri ve Ailelerinin Sağlık Kuruluşlarına Başvuru Tercihleri-Application Preferences of Seasonal Farm Workers And Their Families for Health Care Institutions

Author(s):  
BURCU IŞIKTEKİN ATALAY ◽  
MUHAMMED FATİH ÖNSÜZ ◽  
BURHANETTİN IŞIKLI ◽  
GÜLSÜM ÖZTÜRK EMİRAL ◽  
EMİNE AYHAN ◽  
...  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-740
Author(s):  

Migrant and seasonal/farm workers constitute a major portion of the labor force in the American food industry. By harvesting and processing farm crops, they contribute positively to agricultural communities and the American economy. Currently, the office of Migrant Health estimates that nationwide there are between 3 and 5 million migrant and seasonal farm workers and dependents. The average annual income for migrant and seasonal farm workers is well below the poverty level (US Dept of Health and Human Services, unpublished data, 1988). Because health care insurance is invariably beyond the reach of migrant family budgets, and employers of farm workers rarely provide health care benefits for their employees, these families are usually uninsured. In some cases, these families lack US citizenship or are in this country illegally, which complicates obtaining health care for their children. Medicaid enrollment is also complicated by migration because aliens must meet eligibility requirements in each state to which they migrate, and only US citizens are eligible. Because of their income and mobile life-style, migrant worker families often find that comprehensive child health care (health maintenance, anticipatory guidance, and preventive medicine) essentially is not available. Migrating families must seek health care whenever it is available. This results in a pattern of service that usually is fragmented and ad hoc. Migration not only interrupts continuity of care but it also contributes to a lack of knowledge about a community's health services and/or jeopardizes eligibility for these services by conflicting with residency requirements. Other problems that delay or prevent access to health care for the children of migrant families include language barriers and differences in culture.


2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Jacobs ◽  
Emily Mendenhall ◽  
Ann Scheck-McAlearney ◽  
Italia Rolle ◽  
Eric Whitaker ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-341
Author(s):  
Clare T. Tully

AbstractNursing home discharges of employees based on patient abuse raise a difficult issue when the motivating factor for the disciplinary action is union activism. A tension is created between the rights of employees to engage in protected concerted activity and the rights of patients to quality care. In 1974, Congress passed the Health Care Institutions Amendments, which granted to non-profit health care workers collective organizing and bargaining rights substantially similar to those which workers in other industries had enjoyed for decades under the National Labor Relations Act. Congress intended to give health care workers only that degree of parity, however, which is compatible with the provision of high quality patient care. The agency charged with enforcing the Act, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), has failed to distinguish employee misconduct in industrial settings from patient abuse in health care institutions when fashioning remedies for discriminatorily discharged union activists. The NLRB typically has ordered the reinstatement, with back pay, of the patient abuser as the patient’s primary care-giver. This Article suggests that a front pay remedy is more appropriate to these cases because it protects the patient’s right to be free from abuse without sacrificing employee unionization rights.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Viridiana Gallegos-Miranda ◽  
Ulises Garza-Ramos ◽  
Enrique Bolado-Martínez ◽  
Moisés Navarro-Navarro ◽  
Katya Rocío Félix-Murray ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document