Factors Influencing Physician Decision Making to Attempt Advanced Resuscitation in Asystolic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

The objective of this study was to identify the key elements used by prehospital emergency physicians (EP) to decide whether or not to attempt advanced life support (ALS) in asystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). From 01.01.2009 to 01.01.2017, all adult victims of asystolic OHCA in Geneva, Switzerland, were retrospectively included. Patients with signs of "obvious death" or with a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation order were excluded. Patients were categorized as having received ALS if this was mentioned in the medical record, or, failing that, if at least one dose of adrenaline had been administered during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Prognostic factors known at the time of EP's decision were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. 784 patients were included. Factors favourably influencing the decision to provide ALS were witnessed OHCA (OR=2.14, 95%CI1.43–3.20) and bystander CPR (OR=4.10, 95%CI2.28–7.39). Traumatic aetiology (OR=0.04, 95%CI0.02–0.08), age >80 years (OR=0.14, 95%CI0.09–0.24) and a Charlson comorbidity index greater than 5 (OR=0.12, 95%CI0.06–0.27) were the factors most strongly associated with the decision not to attempt ALS. Factors influencing the EP’s decision to attempt ALS in asystolic OHCA are the relatively young age of the patients, few comorbidities, presumed medical aetiology, witnessed OHCA and bystander CPR.

Download Full-text

Factors Influencing Physician Decision Making to Attempt Advanced Resuscitation in Asystolic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18168323 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (16) ◽

pp. 8323

Author(s):

Charles Payot ◽

Christophe A. Fehlmann ◽

Laurent Suppan ◽

Marc Niquille ◽

Christelle Lardi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Life Support ◽

Advanced Life Support ◽

Multivariable Logistic Regression Model ◽

Physician Decision Making ◽

Factors Influencing ◽

Prehospital Emergency ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Comorbidity Index ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

The objective of this study was to identify the key elements used by prehospital emergency physicians (EP) to decide whether or not to attempt advanced life support (ALS) in asystolic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). From 1 January 2009 to 1 January 2017, all adult victims of asystolic OHCA in Geneva, Switzerland, were retrospectively included. Patients with signs of “obvious death” or with a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation order were excluded. Patients were categorized as having received ALS if this was mentioned in the medical record, or, failing that, if at least one dose of adrenaline had been administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Prognostic factors known at the time of EP’s decision were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Included were 784 patients. Factors favourably influencing the decision to provide ALS were witnessed OHCA (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.43–3.20) and bystander CPR (OR = 4.10, 95% CI: 2.28–7.39). Traumatic aetiology (OR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02–0.08), age > 80 years (OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.09–0.24) and a Charlson comorbidity index greater than 5 (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06–0.27) were the factors most strongly associated with the decision not to attempt ALS. Factors influencing the EP’s decision to attempt ALS in asystolic OHCA are the relatively young age of the patients, few comorbidities, presumed medical aetiology, witnessed OHCA and bystander CPR.

Download Full-text

Abstract 20: Intraosseous vs. Intravenously Administered Advanced Life Support Drugs in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compression Trial

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.20 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Purav Mody ◽

Siobhan Brown ◽

Rohan Khera ◽

Ambarish Pandey ◽

Colby Ayers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Chest Compression ◽

Life Support ◽

Advanced Life Support ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

Neurological Function ◽

Access Route ◽

Epinephrine Administration ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: There is an urgent need to identify strategies which improve outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Determining the optimal access route to deliver medications during resuscitation from OHCA may be one such strategy. Methods: Using data from the Continuous Chest compression trial between 2011 and 2016, we examined rates of sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) i.e. ROSC on ER arrival, survival to discharge and survival with favorable neurological function (modified Rankin scale ≤3) among patients with attempted IV and IO access. Results: Among 19,731 patients with available access information, IO or IV access was attempted in 3,068 (15.5%) and 16,663 (84.5%) patients, respectively and was successful in 2,975 (97%) and 15,485 (92%) of these patients. Overall, patients with attempted IO access were younger, more likely female, received less bystander CPR, had lower proportions of shockable and witnessed arrests, marginally faster times to access and to epinephrine administration, and less frequently received therapeutic hypothermia and coronary angiography as compared with patients with IV access ( Table ) . Unadjusted rates of sustained ROSC, discharge survival and survival with favorable neurological function were significantly lower in patients with attempted IO access ( Table) . After adjustment for age, sex, initial rhythm, bystander CPR, public location, witnessed status, EMS response time and trial cluster, attempted IO access was associated with lower sustained ROSC rates (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89, p<0.001) but not with discharge survival (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71-1.08, p=0.21) or survival with favorable neurological function (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.1, p=0.26). Conclusions: Among patients with OHCA, intraosseous access was attempted in 1 in 7 OHCA patients and associated with worse ROSC rates but no difference in survival. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the optimal access route among OHCA patients.

Download Full-text

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT)

Resuscitation ◽

10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.11.031 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 66 (2) ◽

pp. 149-157 ◽

Cited By ~ 75

Author(s):

Laurie J. Morrison ◽

Paul Dorian ◽

Jennifer Long ◽

Marian Vermeulen ◽

Brian Schwartz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Life Support ◽

Advanced Life Support ◽

Intervention Trial ◽

Support Intervention ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Download Full-text

External validation of multimodal termination of resuscitation rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the COVID-19 era

10.21203/rs.3.rs-32324/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Haewon Jung ◽

Mijin Lee ◽

Jae Wan Cho ◽

Sang Hun Lee ◽

Suk Hee Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Disease Transmission ◽

Life Support ◽

External Validation ◽

Advanced Life Support ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Shock Delivery ◽

Treatment Protocols ◽

Multicenter Observational Study ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background: Futile resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 era can lead to risk of disease transmission and unnecessary transport. Various existing basic or advanced life support (BLS or ALS, respectively) rules for the termination of resuscitation (TOR) have been derived and validated in North America and Asian countries. This study aimed to evaluate the external validation of these rules in predicting the survival outcomes of OHCA patients in the COVID-19 era.Methods: This was a multicenter observational study using the WinCOVID-19 Daegu registry data collected during February 18–March 31, 2020. The subjects were patients who showed cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology. The outcomes of each rule were compared to the actual patient survival outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive value (FPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of each TOR rule were evaluated. Results: In total, 170 of the 184 OHCA patients were eligible and evaluated. TOR was recommended for 122 patients based on the international basic life support termination of resuscitation (BLS-TOR) rule, which showed 85% specificity, 74% sensitivity, 0.8% FPV, and 99% PPV for predicting unfavorable survival outcomes. When the traditional BLS-TOR rules and KoCARC TOR rule II were applied to our registry, one patient met the TOR criteria but survived at hospital discharge. With regard to the FPV (upper limit of 95% confidence interval <5%), specificity (100%), and PPV (>99%) criteria, only the KoCARC TOR rule I, which included a combination of three factors including not being witnessed by emergency medical technicians, presenting with an asystole at the scene, and not experiencing prehospital shock delivery or return of spontaneous circulation, was found to be superior to all other TOR rules. Conclusion: Among the previous nine BLS and ALS TOR rules, KoCARC TOR rule I was most suitable for predicting poor survival outcomes and showed improved diagnostic performance. Further research on variations in resources and treatment protocols among facilities, regions, and cultures will be useful in determining the feasibility of TOR rules for COVID-19 patients worldwide.

Download Full-text

Out of hospital cardiac arrest in Western Sydney - an analysis of outcomes and estimation of future eCPR eligibility

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1083706/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Pramod Chandru ◽

Tatum Priyambada Mitra ◽

Nitesh Dutt Dhanekula ◽

Mark Dennis ◽

Adam Eslick ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Life Support ◽

Rescue Therapy ◽

A Priori ◽

Advanced Life Support ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Poor Outcomes ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with extremely poor outcomes. However, in selected patients extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be an effective rescue therapy, allowing time treat reversible causes. The primary goal was to estimate the potential future caseload of eCPR at historically 'low-volume' extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centres. Methods A 3-year observational study of OHCA presenting to the Emergency Department (ED of an urban referral centre without historical protocolised use of eCPR. Demographics and standard Utstein outcomes are reported. Further, an a priori analysis of each case for potential eCPR eligibility was conducted. A current eCPR selection criteria (from the 2-CHEER study) was used to determine eligibly. Results In the study window 248 eligible cardiac arrest cases were included in the OHCA registry. 30-day survival was 23.4% (n=58). The mean age of survivors was 55.4 years. 17 (6.8%) cases were deemed true refractory arrests and fulfilled the 2-CHEER eligibility criteria. The majority of these cases presented within “office hours” and no case obtained a return of spontaneous circulation standard advanced life support. Conclusions In this contemporary OHCA registry a significant number of refractory cases were deemed potential eCPR candidates reflecting a need for future interdisciplinary work to support delivery of this therapy.

Download Full-text

Abstract 344: The Association Between ALS Response Interval and Out-of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.344 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Brian Grunau ◽

Takahisa Kawano ◽

John Tallon ◽

Frank Scheuermeyer ◽

Joshua Reynolds ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Life Support ◽

Secondary Analysis ◽

Advanced Life Support ◽

Median Response ◽

Neurological Outcomes ◽

Spline Curves ◽

Response Interval ◽

Optimal Deployment ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective: There is conflicting data in studies investigating the effectiveness of advanced life support (ALS) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Within a tiered BLS-ALS system, we sought to determine if the ALS response interval was associated with patient outcomes. Methods: This secondary analysis examined prospectively identified consecutive non-traumatic adult OHCAs from 2006-2016 in British Columbia. We excluded EMS-witnessed arrests and those not treated by ALS. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival and favorable neurological outcomes (mRS ≤3) at hospital discharge. Using logistic regression we estimated the association of ALS response interval (9-1-1 call to ALS arrival) and outcomes, adjusting for treatment year, response interval of the first EMS unit, and other baseline characteristics. We drew spline curves to illustrate this relationship. Results: Of 12,722 included cases, survival was 12%. The median response interval for the first EMS unit was 6.4 minutes (IQR 5.2 - 8.3) and for ALS was 11.8 minutes (IQR 8.7 - 16.5).The adjusted odds of survival and favourable neurological outcome for each additional minute in ALS response interval were 0.98 (95 % CI 0.96-0.99) and 0.98, (95% CI 0.97-0.99) respectively. The spline curve demonstrated an initial decline in survival probability that moderated at approximately 11 minutes. Conclusion: Among ALS-treated subjects within our tiered EMS system, earlier ALS arrival was associated with improved survival and favorable neurological outcomes. The greatest yield of ALS care may be prior to 11 minutes. This may help inform the optimal deployment configuration of prehospital providers.

Download Full-text

2019 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

Circulation ◽

10.1161/cir.0000000000000736 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 140 (24) ◽

Author(s):

Jonathan P. Duff ◽

Alexis A. Topjian ◽

Marc D. Berg ◽

Melissa Chan ◽

Sarah E. Haskell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

American Heart Association ◽

Basic Life Support ◽

Life Support ◽

American Heart ◽

Heart Association ◽

Liaison Committee ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

This 2019 focused update to the American Heart Association pediatric basic life support guidelines follows the 2019 systematic review of the effects of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) on survival of infants and children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This systematic review and the primary studies identified were analyzed by the Pediatric Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. It aligns with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation’s continuous evidence review process, with updates published when the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation completes a literature review based on new published evidence. This update summarizes the available pediatric evidence supporting DA-CPR and provides treatment recommendations for DA-CPR for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Four new pediatric studies were reviewed. A systematic review of this data identified the association of a significant improvement in the rates of bystander CPR and in survival 1 month after cardiac arrest with DA-CPR. The writing group recommends that emergency medical dispatch centers offer DA-CPR for presumed pediatric cardiac arrest, especially when no bystander CPR is in progress. No recommendation could be made for or against DA-CPR instructions when bystander CPR is already in progress.

Download Full-text

Strengthening Links in the “Chain of Survival”: A Singapore Perspective

Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1177/102490790200900301 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. 121-125 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ra Charles ◽

F Lateef ◽

V Anantharaman

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Life Support ◽

Advanced Cardiac Life Support ◽

Basic Cardiac Life Support ◽

Chain Of Survival ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Mean Time ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽

Ambulance Crew

Introduction The concept of the chain of survival is widely accepted. The four links viz. early access, early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), early defibrillation and early Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) are related to survival after pre-hospital cardiac arrest. Owing to the dismal survival-to-discharge figures locally, we conducted this study to identify any weaknesses in the chain, looking in particular at bystander CPR rates and times to Basic Cardiac Life Support (BCLS) and ACLS. Methods and materials A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Emergency Department of an urban tertiary 1500-bed hospital. Over a 12-month period, all cases of non-trauma out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were evaluated. Results A total of 142 cases of non-trauma out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were identified; the majority being Chinese (103/142, 72.5%) and male (71.8%) with a mean age of 64.3±7.8 years (range 23–89 yrs). Most patients (111/142, 78.2%) did not receive any form of life support until arrival of the ambulance crew. Mean time from collapse to arrival of the ambulance crew and initiation of BCLS and defibrillation was 9.2±3.5 minutes. Mean time from collapse to arrival in the Emergency Department (and thus ACLS) was 16.8±7.1 minutes. Three patients (2.11%) survived to discharge. Conclusion There is a need to (i) facilitate layperson training in bystander CPR, and (ii) enhance paramedic training to include ACLS, in order to improve the current dismal survival outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore.

Download Full-text