Formalizing the Concept of “Build Back Better” Based on the Global Forum on Science and Technology for Disaster Resilience 2017 WG4

This paper outlines the process of formalizing Priority Action 4, “Build Back Better,” in recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction in Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. We propose this formalization by introducing the background and existing framework of recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction, a case-study of Post-War Japan, and the outcome of discussions implemented in the Global Forum on Science and Technology for Disaster Resilience 2017 held at the Science Council of Japan in Tokyo on November 23–25, 2017. This paper also summarizes the results of discussions regarding further development of Priority Action 4.

Download Full-text

Strengthening Disaster Risk Governance to Manage Disaster Risk: Output of the Global Forum on Science and Technology for Disaster Resilience 2017

Journal of Disaster Research ◽

10.20965/jdr.2018.p1177 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 13 (7) ◽

pp. 1177-1180 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kenichi Tsukahara ◽

Keyword(s):

Risk Reduction ◽

Disaster Risk Reduction ◽

Science And Technology ◽

Disaster Risk ◽

Risk Governance ◽

Disaster Resilience ◽

Global Forum ◽

Sendai Framework ◽

Hyogo Framework For Action

The importance of disaster risk governance was stated in the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) in 2005. However, effective measures towards strengthening disaster risk governance from the science and technology community have not been sufficiently implemented since then. In the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR) in 2015, “strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk” was established as one of the four action items, and many roles for the science and technology community were stated in the SFDRR. This report introduces the discussions and outcomes regarding the role of the science and technology community in strengthening disaster risk governance at the Global Forum on Science and Technology for Disaster Resilience 2017.

Download Full-text

Exploring transdisciplinary approaches to facilitate disaster risk reduction

Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal ◽

10.1108/dpm-09-2019-0289 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 28 (6) ◽

pp. 817-830 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Shohei Matsuura ◽

Khamarrul Azahari Razak

Keyword(s):

Risk Reduction ◽

Case Studies ◽

Disaster Risk Reduction ◽

Science And Technology ◽

Scientific Information ◽

Disaster Risk ◽

Asia Pacific ◽

Disaster Resilience ◽

Content Type ◽

Actual Field

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to look into how collaborations among science and technology groups and other stakeholders in the Asia-Pacific region can facilitate implementation of national and local disaster risk reduction (DRR) strategies through education, training and field practice. Case studies on transdisciplinary approach (TDA) that integrates cross-cutting DRR issues and various stakeholders through science and technology are introduced from several countries in the region as attempts to holistically support societies build and strengthen their disaster resilience. Design/methodology/approach First, through literature review, the transition from single discipline to TDA is illustrated in which various stakeholders of different disciplines work together to achieve a common societal goal. This is followed by introduction of several case studies of actual TDA implementation for DRR in which information had been gathered through surveys and interviews with international science and technology stakeholders. Finally, through analysis and discussion, the study identifies the key roles of science and technology stakeholders for facilitating TDA for DRR. Findings The study concludes with key findings on the specific roles of science and technology including provision of education and training to build capacities of DRR practitioners to effectively plan and implement DRR measures, support to evidence-based decision making through locally specific scientific assessments and analysis and validation scientific information on the actual field for DRR practitioners and agencies. In materializing these roles into action, institutionalization of supporting policies and budget provision that promotes TDA are suggested. Originality/value Even though TDA is not a new concept and many stakeholders understand its importance, TDA has not been widely exercised mainly due to conventional practices of experts and organizations working only within their groups and disciplines. With this understanding, this study has newly identified eight key elements that can be used as a guide and checklist for DRR stakeholders to effectively implement TDA for strengthening disaster resilience of their societies.

Download Full-text

Data interoperability for disaster risk reduction in Europe

Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal ◽

10.1108/dpm-09-2019-0291 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 28 (6) ◽

pp. 804-816 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Massimo Migliorini ◽

Jenny Sjåstad Hagen ◽

Jadranka Mihaljević ◽

Jaroslav Mysiak ◽

Jean-Louis Rossi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Reduction ◽

Disaster Risk Reduction ◽

Science And Technology ◽

Disaster Risk ◽

Data Availability ◽

Risk Governance ◽

Data Interoperability ◽

Content Type ◽

Wide Range

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss how, despite increasing data availability from a wide range of sources unlocks unprecedented opportunities for disaster risk reduction, data interoperability remains a challenge due to a number of barriers. As a first step to enhancing data interoperability for disaster risk reduction is to identify major barriers, this paper presents a case study on data interoperability in disaster risk reduction in Europe, linking current barriers to the regional initiative of the European Science and Technology Advisory Group. Design/methodology/approach In support of Priority 2 (“Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk”) of the Sendai Framework and SDG17 (“Partnerships for the goals”), this paper presents a case study on barriers to data interoperability in Europe based on a series of reviews, surveys and interviews with National Sendai Focal Points and stakeholders in science and research, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations and industry. Findings For a number of European countries, there remains a clear imbalance between long-term disaster risk reduction and short-term preparation and the dominant role of emergency relief, response and recovery, pointing to the potential of investments in ex ante measures with better inclusion and exploitation of data. Originality/value Modern society is facing a digital revolution. As highlighted by the International Council of Science and the Committee on Data for Science and Technology, digital technology offers profound opportunities for science to discover unsuspected patterns and relationships in nature and society, on scales from the molecular to the cosmic, from local health systems to global sustainability. It has created the potential for disciplines of science to synergize into a holistic understanding of the complex challenges currently confronting humanity; the Sustainable Development Goals are a direct reflectance of this. Interdisciplinary is obtained with integration of data across relevant disciplines. However, a barrier to realization and exploitation of this potential arises from the incompatible data standards and nomenclatures used in different disciplines. Although the problem has been addressed by several initiatives, the following challenge still remains: to make online data integration a routine.

Download Full-text

Promotion of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Collaboration in Disaster Risk Reduction

Journal of Disaster Research ◽

10.20965/jdr.2018.p1193 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 13 (7) ◽

pp. 1193-1198

Author(s):

Kaoru Takara ◽

Keyword(s):

Risk Management ◽

Risk Reduction ◽

Volcanic Eruption ◽

Disaster Risk Reduction ◽

Disaster Risk ◽

Tsunami Hazard ◽

Disaster Resilience ◽

Hazard Map ◽

River Flooding ◽

Further Development

This paper describes interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches inevitably necessary for effective disaster risk management, introducing examples involving the tsunami hazard map in Sendai, volcanic eruption in Iceland, and river flooding in Thailand. On the basis of the conversations conducted at the Global Forum on Science and Technology for Disaster Resilience 2017 held at the Science Council of Japan in Tokyo on November 23–25, 2017, this paper summarizes the results of the discussion for further development of these approaches. Some international initiatives are also briefly introduced.

Download Full-text