scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT OF ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS BASED ON HOTS AT SURABAYA VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-218
Author(s):  
Rudi Hartono ◽  
Triesninda Pahlevi

This study aims to produce assessment instruments according to Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in General Administration subjects at Basic Competencies 3.9 The Implementation of Office Layout, and 3.10 The Implementation of  Communication in the Workplace as many as 40 items of multiple-choice, and to decide the feasibility level of the questions in measuring students' HOTS based on the validation results from the material expert, evaluation expert, and linguist. This study is Research and Development (R&D) adapted Sugiyono's development model that has been adopted into 5 stages: potential and problems, data collection, product design, design validation, and design revision. Then, the research instruments used by the researcher were the validation sheet from the expert of material, evaluation, and the linguist. Furthermore, the validation result from the material expert was 98.3% (very strong). Besides, the validation result of the evaluation expert was 100% (very strong). Moreover, the validation results from the linguist were 98.7% (very strong). Therefore, the average validation result was 99% with the interpretations of criteria were "very strong" and feasible to use. In conclusion, the development of assessment instruments based on HOTS at Surabaya vocational high school was feasible to use in measuring students' HOTS. Keywords: An Assessment Instrument Development, General Administration, HOTS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-218
Author(s):  
Rudi Hartono ◽  
Triesninda Pahlevi

This study aims to produce assessment instruments according to Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in General Administration subjects at Basic Competencies 3.9 The Implementation of Office Layout, and 3.10 The Implementation of  Communication in the Workplace as many as 40 items of multiple-choice, and to decide the feasibility level of the questions in measuring students' HOTS based on the validation results from the material expert, evaluation expert, and linguist. This study is Research and Development (R&D) adapted Sugiyono's development model that has been adopted into 5 stages: potential and problems, data collection, product design, design validation, and design revision. Then, the research instruments used by the researcher were the validation sheet from the expert of material, evaluation, and the linguist. Furthermore, the validation result from the material expert was 98.3% (very strong). Besides, the validation result of the evaluation expert was 100% (very strong). Moreover, the validation results from the linguist were 98.7% (very strong). Therefore, the average validation result was 99% with the interpretations of criteria were "very strong" and feasible to use. In conclusion, the development of assessment instruments based on HOTS at Surabaya vocational high school was feasible to use in measuring students' HOTS. Keywords: An Assessment Instrument Development, General Administration, HOTS.


Mangifera Edu ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-142
Author(s):  
Marvia Afrita ◽  
Rahmawati Darussyamsu

Higher order thinking skills is very important in the 2013 curriculum. This 2013 curriculum emphasizes the ability of reasoning for concepts. This ability involves a high cognitive level from Bloom’s taxonomy, C4-C6. One example in improving students HOTS is to develop assessment instruments HOTS. This type research is research and development (R&D) research with using the 4D models. This research develop an assessment instrument in the form of multiple choice. In this research, the object is assessment instrument HOTS on respiration system content. The subject of this research were two lectures major in Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences UNP. The result of validation show an average value of 87.91 with a valid category. This shows of assessment instrument HOTS on respiration system content is valid among in terms of the feasibility aspects of content, construction, language, and the cognitive level of the assessment instruments is at a HOTS.


EduKimia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
Andromeda Andromeda ◽  
Zonalia Fitriza ◽  
Faizah Qurrata 'Aini

Basic Competence (BC) is a minimum students’ achievement after learning process. Most of the BC in the 2017 revised Indonesian curriculum requires students to have higher order thinking skills (HOTS), therefore teachers have to prepare assessment instruments referring HOTS. However, there are still many teachers who misperceive HOTS and think that HOTS is a difficult problem. This causes the teacher’s understanding of HOTS questions to be low. This study aims to describe chemistry teachers’ competence in evaluating HOTS of students. 19 teachers from 14 Senior High Schools was examined using structured essay test to figure out their ability and problems in compiling HOTS assessment instrument. The data collected was analysed using Miles Huberman methods starting with data reduction, data display and conclusion. Through this evaluation, it is known that only 10.53% of teachers comprehended HOTS and were able to apply it in evaluation, 57,89% of them understood the HOTS but weren’t able to apply in evaluation while 31,58% others didn’t know the comprehensive HOTS evaluation. This fact will certainly disrupt the planning, implementation and assessment of learning. Furthermore, the instrument compiled to assess higher order thinking skills based on BC does not measure expected abilities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Suhendro Suhendro ◽  
Dede Sugandi ◽  
Mamat Ruhimat

The teacher's ability to construct assessment instruments is a focus that needs to be considered. Furthermore, the demand of the 21st century directs teachers to set questions that are oriented to train students' abilities in higher-order thinking. However, several factors affect the ability to construct HOTS-oriented assessment instruments. This study aims to investigate what factors influence geography teachers’ ability to develop higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) instruments to measure learning outcomes. This study used a survey method with a quantitative approach. The data collection technique was field observation, and multiple linear regression was used for analysis. The results showed the linearity of teacher education regarding the length of teaching geography was 0.904, the tertiary institution was 0.009, and the background of education was 0.019. Also, teachers' certification was 0.007, their training was 0.032, and their experience in making HOTS questions was 0.047. The coefficient value of determination R, namely 0.635 means the relationship between teaching length, the linearity of their education in tertiary institutions, background, certification, training, and experience regarding the ability to develop HOTS-oriented assessment instruments is 63.5%. This means the relationship is strong, and 36.5% is another factor. This study concludes that the factors that significantly affect the ability of geography teachers in developing HOTS-oriented assessment instruments are the linearity factor of teacher education in universities, education background, certification, teacher training and experience in making HOTS questions. Keywords: Teacher ability factors; Assessment, Higher-order thinking skills   Copyright (c) 2021 Geosfera Indonesia and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moh. Ainin

One of the teachers’ responsibilities in the teaching and learning process is to conduct assessments. The main purpose of assessment is to understand students’ learning outcomes. Based on the outcomes, teachers can give feedback to improve the planning and the implementation of the teaching process and to determine the quality of the assessment instrument. The Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-based assessment is urgently needed in schools to produce competitive graduates who have the critical thinking, communicative, collaborative, and creative skills. However, there are some challenges in the implementation of HOTS-based assessment, such as students’ low motivation and Arabic competence, ambiguous definitions of basic competencies in the curriculum, and lack of HOTS materials in textbooks. These challenges can be solved by making an acquisition-based learning of Arabic, reconstructing the descriptions of basic competence, and adapting HOTS-based assessment which is in line with the students’ ability. Keywords: challenges, HOTS, Arabic teaching, solutions


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riza Yonisa Kurniawan ◽  
Dian Lestari

This research aims to develop Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) based assessment instruments on economic subjects especially in Basic Competencies 3.4 price and inflation index. This study adopts the development model of Borg & Gall which is limited to five stages of development, namely, data collection, product design, product testing, product analysis and final product revision. This research was conducted on 33 students of Social Eleven One class at Senior High School 1 Cerme. This assessment instrument produces 15 multiple choice test and has been tested twice. This study shows the results that in the first and second trials the overall validity value of the problem is greater than r table which is 0.344 and the reliability value is 0.786 and 0.763. This shows that the assessment instrument is valid and reliable. While the test for the quantity of items consists level difficulty of the question, differentiating question and effectivity of distractor that meet the quality criteria of HOTS-based questions. Based on the results of the trial it was found that there were 7 students who were included in the "less" category. Overall, the average student has a high level of thinking ability that requires sufficient categories. So, the efforts to support the learning process continue to be needed which is useful for improving higher order thinking skills in students.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-124
Author(s):  
Miske Hayunia Hamidah ◽  
Siti Sri Wulandari

Abstrak: Pengembangan instrumen penilaian berbasis HOTS menggunakan aplikasi “quizizz”. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan alat evaluasi berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) menggunakan aplikasi Quizizz, menguji tingkat kelayakan instrumen penilaian HOTS yang telah dikembangkan, menganalisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa, dan menganalisis respon siswa terhadap penggunaan aplikasi Quizizz. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian pengembangan  dengan model pengembangan Sugiyono sepuluh langkah namun dibatasi dengan tujuh langkah pengembangan. Subjek pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XII produktif Otomatisasi Tata Kelola Perkantoran (OTKP)  sebanyak 34 siswa. Hasil validasi produk pengembangan kepada tiga validator ahli diperoleh rata-rata validasi sebesar 94% (sangat kuat). Adapun hasil pengembangan, menunjukkan dari 30 butir soal yang dikembangkan 25 soal dikatakan valid dengan perhitungan r hitung > r tabel (0,3291). Reliabilitas soal sebesar 0,77 > 0,60 sehingga soal dapat dikatakan reliable. Tingkat kesukaran soal memiliki rata-rata “Sedang”. Terdapat 2 soal dengan daya pembeda “Kurang” sehingga soal harus dibuang. Secara keseluruhan pengecoh soal sudah berfungsi dengan baik ditunjukkan dengan pemilihan option jawaban melebihi 5% dari jumlah siswa. Hasil uji coba pada penelitian ini menunjukkan siswa memiliki rata-rata kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi pada kriteria “Cukup”. Rata-rata respon siswa sebesar 89,5% artinya siswa memberikan respon sangat positif dalam penggunaan Quizizz saat penerapan instrumen penilaian HOTS. Abstract: Development of HOTS-based assessment instruments using the "quizizz" application. The purpose of this research is to develop an evaluation tool based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) using the Quizizz application, to test the feasibility of the HOTS assessment instrument that has been developed, to analyze students 'higher order thinking skills, and to analyze students' responses to the use of the Quizizz application. The method used in this study is a development research method with the Sugiyono ten-step development model but is limited to seven development steps. The subjects in this study were all students of class XII productive Office Governance Automation (OTKP) as many as 34 students. The results of the validation of development products to three expert validators obtained an average validation of 94% (very strong). As for the development results, it shows that of the 30 items developed, 25 questions are said to be valid with the calculation of r count> r table (0.3291). The reliability of the questions is 0.77> 0.60 so that the questions can be said to be reliable. The difficulty level of the item has a "Medium" average. There are 2 questions with "Less" distinguishing power, so the questions must be discarded. Overall, the question fraudsters are functioning properly, indicated by the selection of answer options exceeding 5% of the total number of students. The test results in this study showed students had an average high-order thinking ability on the "Enough" criterion. The average student response was 89.5%, meaning that students gave a very positive response in using Quizizz when implementing HOTS assessment instruments 


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-133
Author(s):  
Sandi Kurniawan

Higher-order thinking skills is an ability that all vocational high school students should have because vocational high school graduates are required to have the good soft skill and hard skill. The reality was their HOTS ability was low, as stated by several explanations from researchers and strengthened by the observation in vocational high school. This research aimed to find the students' learning activity through blended learning of Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) model and jigsaw model, and their influence on the HOTS. This research was quantitative research using the quasi-experiment method of nonequivalent control group design with research subjects of 50 students that were chosen using simple random sampling. The data was collected using test instruments in multiple choices and descriptions and non-test tool in the form of observation sheets. The data then were analyzed with t-test sample independent test. The results showed that the usage of STAD and jigsaw blended learning made students more active and energized in following the learning activities. The direct learning model made students inactive and not excited during learning activities. Also, the blended learning of STAD and jigsaw had significant influence compared to the direct learning model on higher-order thinking skills.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document