Improvement of pathological staging system for neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

Abstract Background:There is no widely-accepted staging system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). The aim of this study was to validate the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for well-differentiated (G1/G2) pNETs.Methods:A multicenter dataset (n=1086) was used to evaluate the application of the AJCC 7th and 8th, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), and the modified ENETS (mENETS) staging systems for well-differentiated pNETs.Results:The proportion of patients with stage III tumors was extremely low (1.1%) according to the AJCC 7th staging system. For the ENETS staging system, patients with stage IIIA disease had worse estimated mean survival than patients with stage IIIB disease (78.9 vs. 107.3 months). When comparing with patients in stage I, the AJCC 7th, ENETS, and mENETS staging systems showed good performance in discriminating between stages; however, there was no significant difference in some stages when the reference was defined as the earlier stage. When the reference was defined as stage I or the earlier stage, there was a significant inter-stage difference in the AJCC 8th staging system.Conclusions:The AJCC 8th staging system is more suitable for pNETs than other TNM staging systems and may be adopted in clinical practice.

Download Full-text

Impact of pathological staging on survival in patients with epithelial mesothelioma treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.7706 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 7706-7706 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

D. Sugarbaker ◽

W. G. Richards ◽

C. A. Alsup ◽

M. T. Jaklitsch ◽

J. M. Corson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Staging System ◽

Extrapleural Pneumonectomy ◽

Single Institution ◽

Favorable Prognosis ◽

Pathological Staging ◽

Stage 4 ◽

Staging Systems ◽

Ajcc Staging ◽

Stage 1

7706 Objective: There is no universally accepted staging system in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). A seventeen-year single institution experience of surgically treating a large epithelial MPM cohort with extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) gives insight to the applications and limitations of BWH/ DFCI and AJCC staging systems. Methods: We retrospectivly reviewed 526 consecutive patients with epithelial MPM who were surgically explored at our institution since 1988 with intent to perform EPP. Pathologic diagnoses of mesothelioma were confirmed and clinicopathologic data were recorded. Kaplan-Meyer survival from diagnosis was calculated. Those who underwent EPP were staged using BWH / DFCI (J Thorac Cardiov Surg 117:5463;1999) and AJCC (6th Edition) criteria. Operative deaths were included in the analysis and patients received varied adjuvant regimens. Results: Of 526 patients explored for potential EPP, 53 (10%) underwent alternative pleurectomy and 55 (11%) were unresectable. The remaining 418 (79%) underwent EPP. Of these, 307 (73%) were male. Median age at diagnosis was 57.9 years (17–78). Operative mortality was 5%. Median follow-up was 16 months and 23% of observations were censored. Overall median, 1-yr, 3-yr and 5-yr survival was: 18.9 mo., 68.8%, 26.3%, and 13.9%. The table below presents Kaplan-Meyer survival by stage. Conclusions: 1) Both pathological staging systems stratify survival in this cohort, although each system is limited in that a majority of patients are classified as stage 3. 2) BWH / DFCI criteria identify more stage 1–2 patients with favorable prognosis, 164 (39%) vs 46 (11%). 3) AJCC criteria classify more patients to stage 4, 76 (18%) vs 4 (1%), but appear to identify some patients with relatively favorable prognosis. 4) Selected criteria from both systems might be combined to optimally stratify patients with epithelial MPM undergoing EPP. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Performance of a novel TNM staging system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors versus the current AJCC staging system.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.156 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 156-156

Author(s):

Motaz Qadan ◽

Yifei Ma ◽

Brendan C. Visser ◽

Jeffrey A. Norton ◽

George A. Poultsides

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽

Staging System ◽

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽

Population Database ◽

Curative Intent ◽

Discriminatory Ability ◽

Tnm System ◽

Ajcc Staging System ◽

Ajcc Staging

156 Background: Adopting a unified staging system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) has been challenging. Currently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recommends the use of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging system for PNET. We sought to validate this recommendation on a large administrative population database. Methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data were used to identify patients with PNET (excluding patients with large cell, small cell, or mixed endocrine-exocrine carcinoma) who underwent curative-intent surgical resection from 1983 to 2008. The discriminatory ability of the AJCC system (recorded by SEER since 2004) was examined and a new TNM system was devised utilizing extent of disease variables. Results: Of 1,202 patients identified, 51% were female. Median age was 55 years (range, 9-93). Lymph node metastasis (present in 43% of patients) was associated with worse overall survival (OS) after resection (10-year OS, 50% vs 63%, p<.0001), as was the presence of distant metastasis (present in 24% of patients, 10-year OS, 35% vs 63%, p<.0001).The current AJCC system (available in 412 patients) distinguished overall survival adequately only between stages I and II, but not between II and III, or III and IV (Table). By modifying the T stage to be based only on size (0-1 cm, 1-2 cm, 2-4 cm, and > 4 cm) and by revising the grouping allocation, we propose a novel TNM system with improved discriminatory ability (Table). Conclusions: In this study validating the current AJCC staging system for PNET, we found stages II, III, and IV to perform similarly. We propose a simplified TNM system that better discriminates between outcomes. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text