Impact of pathological staging on survival in patients with epithelial mesothelioma treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7706-7706 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Sugarbaker ◽  
W. G. Richards ◽  
C. A. Alsup ◽  
M. T. Jaklitsch ◽  
J. M. Corson ◽  
...  

7706 Objective: There is no universally accepted staging system in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). A seventeen-year single institution experience of surgically treating a large epithelial MPM cohort with extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) gives insight to the applications and limitations of BWH/ DFCI and AJCC staging systems. Methods: We retrospectivly reviewed 526 consecutive patients with epithelial MPM who were surgically explored at our institution since 1988 with intent to perform EPP. Pathologic diagnoses of mesothelioma were confirmed and clinicopathologic data were recorded. Kaplan-Meyer survival from diagnosis was calculated. Those who underwent EPP were staged using BWH / DFCI (J Thorac Cardiov Surg 117:5463;1999) and AJCC (6th Edition) criteria. Operative deaths were included in the analysis and patients received varied adjuvant regimens. Results: Of 526 patients explored for potential EPP, 53 (10%) underwent alternative pleurectomy and 55 (11%) were unresectable. The remaining 418 (79%) underwent EPP. Of these, 307 (73%) were male. Median age at diagnosis was 57.9 years (17–78). Operative mortality was 5%. Median follow-up was 16 months and 23% of observations were censored. Overall median, 1-yr, 3-yr and 5-yr survival was: 18.9 mo., 68.8%, 26.3%, and 13.9%. The table below presents Kaplan-Meyer survival by stage. Conclusions: 1) Both pathological staging systems stratify survival in this cohort, although each system is limited in that a majority of patients are classified as stage 3. 2) BWH / DFCI criteria identify more stage 1–2 patients with favorable prognosis, 164 (39%) vs 46 (11%). 3) AJCC criteria classify more patients to stage 4, 76 (18%) vs 4 (1%), but appear to identify some patients with relatively favorable prognosis. 4) Selected criteria from both systems might be combined to optimally stratify patients with epithelial MPM undergoing EPP. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 2174-2180 ◽  
Author(s):  
B H Kushner ◽  
N K Cheung ◽  
M P LaQuaglia ◽  
P F Ambros ◽  
I M Ambros ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To gain insight into the management of non-metastatic neuroblastoma by examining clinical and biologic features of International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stage 1 tumors. METHODS Patients were staged by both the INSS and the Evans staging system and were evaluated for biologic prognostic factors. Patients with INSS stage 1 received no cytotoxic therapy. The literature was reviewed for clinical and biologic data about INSS stage 1. RESULTS We evaluated 10 consecutive patients (median age, 17.5 months) with INSS stage 1; all remain disease-free (median follow-up duration, > 5 years). Tumors were in the abdomen (n = 6), chest (n = 3), or pelvis (n = 1). Neuroblastoma involved margins of resection in six tumors. Poor-prognostic biologic findings included tumor-cell diploidy (n = 2) and unfavorable Shimada histopathology (n = 2). Two patients were to receive chemotherapy for, respectively, a tumor deemed unresectable and a tumor classified as Evans stage III; second opinions resulted in surgical management alone in each case. Published reports confirm that some INSS stage 1 patients (1) are at risk for overtreatment, and (2) have poor-prognostic biologic findings yet do well. CONCLUSION Surgery alone suffices for INSS stage 1 neuroblastoma, even if biologic prognostic factors are unfavorable, microscopic disease remains after surgery, and tumor size is suggestive of "advanced-stage" status in other staging systems. Attempts to resect regionally confined neuroblastomas should take precedence over immediate use of cytotoxic therapy; otherwise, some patients may receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy unnecessarily.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110143
Author(s):  
Elshimaa A Mateen Mossa ◽  
Heba Khallaf ◽  
Khulood Muhammad Sayed

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to assess the agreement between the new optical coherence tomography (OCT) glaucoma staging system (GSS) and the visual field (VF) GSS 2 (GSS2). Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 161 eyes of 110 patients with controlled primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). All eyes were subjected to VF examination using standard automated perimetry and Humphrey field analyzer II 750. GSS2 was used for the classification of the VF defects’ severity. OCT of the optic disc and the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) was performed using RTVue. Patients were classified by OCT GSS into six stages. Results: The study examined 161 eyes of 110 patients with controlled POAG. The staging according to VF GSS2 was as follows: stage 0 (12.42%), border stage (12.42%), stage 1 (13.04%), stage 2 (14.29%), stage 3 (14.28%), stage 4 (14.28%), and stage 5 (19.25%). The staging by OCT GSS was as follows: stage 0 (18.6 %), border stage (17.3%), stage 1 (6.8%), stage 2 (9.31%), stage 3 (6%), stage 4 (11.8%), and stage 5 (30.43%). The sensitivity of the new OCT GSS was different in different stages of glaucoma. In this study, no normal control group was considered; thus, the specificity could not be calculated. There was moderate agreement between the two staging systems. Conclusions: OCT GSS is a reliable and objective method for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma. Correlations were found between GSS2, inferior and total macular GCC thickness values, and cup-to-disc ratios, so considering these items as additional parameters may make this new classification even more sensitive than VF GSS2.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8517-8517
Author(s):  
H. Neuman ◽  
A. Patel ◽  
C. Hanlon ◽  
M. S. Brady ◽  
A. C. Halpern ◽  
...  

8517 Background: We sought to validate the AJCC staging system for stage IV melanoma in a contemporary, prospective, single- institution cohort and explore additional clinical factors that may influence prognosis. Methods: A prospective institutional database identified 1319 patients with stage IV melanoma. To minimize tertiary center referral bias, only patients seen prior to a stage IV diagnosis were included (n=687). Variables were dichotomized: lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (=200, >200), number of metastases (1, >1), and number of involved organs (1, >1). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated and Cox regression was used to identify factors independently predictive of survival. Results: Demographics are provided in the table . The median age at diagnosis of stage IV was 55 years (range 16–94) and the median disease free interval (DFI) was 12 months (0–181). The overall median survival was 10 months (5–21) with a median follow-up for survivors of 31 months (9–68); 569 deaths were observed. Cox regression analysis ( table ) identified younger age at stage IV diagnosis, a longer DFI, and a normal LDH to be predictive of improved survival. Patients with either distant skin/subcutaneous/nodal or pulmonary disease experienced prolonged survival when compared to patients with metastases to other visceral sites. Survival was improved in patients with a single metastatic site at diagnosis of stage IV. Gender, antecedent stage, and number of involved organs were not associated with outcome. Conclusions: In this single institution cohort of patients with stage IV melanoma, poorer survival in patients with non-pulmonary visceral metastases and/or abnormal LDH levels as described by the AJCC staging system was confirmed. Additionally, the number of metastases at the time of diagnosis of stage IV was the most powerful predictor of poorer survival and may be a variable to consider in future staging systems. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Roggeri ◽  
Daniela Paola Roggeri ◽  
Carlotta Rossi ◽  
Marco Gambera ◽  
Rossana Piccinelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a chronic illness with important implications for the health of the population and for the commitment of resources by public health services. CKD staging makes it possible to assess the severity of the disease and its distribution in the population. The distribution of the stages of CKD diagnosed through hospitalization were analyzed using administrative database of the Local Health Authority of a province with a population of about 1 million inhabitants in northern Italy. Method Patients with hospital discharge with a diagnosis of CKD (ICD9CM 5851, 5852, 5853, 5854) in 2011- 2012 years, without dialysis treatment, neither transplantation procedure nor acute renal failure were selected. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, dialysis treatment, drugs prescription and nephrological follow-up were investigated. This cohort of patients was examined over a 7-year period (2011-2017). Stage five was not considered to avoid possible misunderstanding with five D stage. Results 1808 patients diagnosed with CKD were extracted from the 2011-2017 administrative database; of these, 1267 had a diagnosis with the CKD stage specification. The distribution of 1267 patients in the CKD stages at the first hospital discharge was as follows: 7.4% stage 1, 30.9% stage 2, 42.3% stage 3, 19.3% stage 4. The 832 patients described in the study were still alive as of Jan. 1, 2013 while 435 (34.3%) died by Dec. 31, 2012. Until Dec. 31, 2017, 503 of the 832 patients died representing the 52.8% of stage 1 patients, 62% of stage 2 patients, 58.2% of stage 3 patients, 66.4% of stage 4 patients. Males were the most prevalent gender (58.5%), without any significant difference into CKD stages. Our patients have a fairly high age as can be seen from the table 1. The presence of co-morbidities was assessed either directly for the main risk factors or by the modified Charlson index (MCI) for CKD patients. The average value of the MCI is 3.8 ± 3.1 for all patients and 3.4 ±3.0 for stage 1, 4.1 ± 3.3 for stage 2, 3.7 ± 3.1 for stage 3, 3.7 ± 2.9 for stage 4, with maximum values of 12.0, 17.0, 16.0 and 14.0 respectively. About 40% of patients had diabetes mellitus, with the highest prevalence in stage 4 (49.3%) and the lowest in stage 1 (25%). Cardiovascular disease was distributed almost equally among all patients with a value between 82% in stage 1 and 86.3% in stage 4. Cancer were present in 26.3% of patients with similar values in all stages. Just about 9% of patients underwent dialysis treatment for achieving ESRD, with a percentage of 5.6% among patients in stage 1 and 17.1% among those in stage 4. Hemodialysis represented first choice treatment (86%) compared with peritoneal one (14%). Time from the diagnosis of CKD to the first dialysis was variable with an average of 3.4 ±1.7 years; the longest interval for patients in stage 1 (5.1±1.8) and the shortest (3.0 ±1.6) for patients in stage 4. The number of nephrological visits at renal units was analyzed for an assessment of the extent of follow-up and prevention upon reaching the ESRD (table2). More than 90% of patients had prescribed drugs antagonists of the renin angiotensin system, in all stages of CKD; other antihypertensive drugs (Ca channel blockers and peripheral vasodilators) had a similar prescription level. Anemia control drugs (ESA and iron) had an incremental prescription with stages of the disease from 51.4% in stage 1 to 74% in stage 4, similarly to Ca-P metabolism control drugs ranging from 44.4% in stage 1 to 67.8% in stage 4. Conclusion Correct staging of CKD is very important to assess the prognosis of patients, but the major determinants of outcome are comorbidities and age of the patients. The cohort examined has a high mortality rate, far higher than reported in the literature for CKD. It should be noted that the sample was identified by hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases more than 50% complicated by diabetes and hypertension, so death represents the main outcome and not ESRD.


2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 2034-2041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather B. Neuman ◽  
Ami Patel ◽  
Nicole Ishill ◽  
Christine Hanlon ◽  
Mary Sue Brady ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16155-e16155
Author(s):  
Ting-Shi Su ◽  
Shi-Xiong Liang ◽  
Li-Qing Li ◽  
Qiu-Hua Liu ◽  
Xiao-Fei Zhu ◽  
...  

e16155 Background: External beam radiation therapy has been used as a palliative to radical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) depending on different tumor status, liver function and patient's general state of health. The existing models of HCC staging cannot perfectly predict the prognosis of radiotherapy. In this study, we aimed to set up a new staging system for radiotherapy-based treatment by incorporating bilirubin-albumin (ALBI) grade and tumor status for the prognostic classifications of HCC. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included 878 HCC patients who received radiotherapy-based treatment. A new staging system was established: stage I, solitary nodule without macrovascular invasion or 2-3 nodules with no more than 3.0 cm each other and PS 0-2 (Ia: ALBI-1 grade; Ib: ALBI-2 or 3 grade); stage II: 2-3 nodules with anyone more than 3.0 cm or ≥4 nodules and PS 0-2 (IIa: ALBI-1 grade; IIb: ALBI-2 grade); stage III: macrovascular invasion or regional lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis and PS 0-2 (IIIa: ALBI-1 grade; IIIb:ALBI-2 grade); stage IV: ALBI-3 grade without stage I patient or/and PS score 3-4. The new modified staging system and the existing staging systems, such as the BCLC, TNM, CNLC staging systems were used for prognostic analysis. All patients were separated into different stages and substages. The long-term overall survival outcomes and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were analyzed. Results: A training cohort of 595 patients underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) from 2011 to 2017 and an external validation cohort of 283 patients underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) from 2000 to 2013 were included into establishing and validating the new staging system. In the training cohort, the median follow-up time was 55 months (range, 6–100 months), and the new staging system had a good discriminatory ability to separate patients into different stages with 4 notably different curves and substages with 7 notably different curves. BCLC staging could not differentiate stage 0 to A, and stage C to D in these selected patients. TNM staging could not completely distinguish stage IIIb to IV, but also stage Ia to Ib. CNLC staging could not differentiate among stage IIIa, IIIb, and IV. In the external validation, the median follow-up time was 95 months (range, 9–120 months), and the new staging system also had a good discriminatory ability to separate patients into different stages with 4 notably different curves and substages with 7 notably different curves. The new staging system had a better area under curve of time-dependent ROC than BCLC, TNM and CNLC staging in both SBRT and IMRT cohorts. Conclusions: The new modified (Su’s) staging system could provide a good discriminatory ability to separate patients into different stages and substages after radiotherapy treatment. It may be used to supplement the other HCC staging systems.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Wong ◽  
Brad Barrows ◽  
Alexandra Gangi ◽  
Stacey Kim ◽  
Richard B. Mertens ◽  
...  

Background. In this single-institution study, we applied the current (eighth edition) American Joint Committee on Cancer pathologic staging criteria to 64 low-grade mucinous neoplasms of the appendix (LAMNs), examined their histopathologic features, and studied the patients’ clinical outcomes. Design. Sixty-four LAMNs, with a median follow-up of 52 months, were reviewed. Results. The distribution of pathologic stages was pTis (n = 39), pT3 (n = 1), pT4a (n = 5), pT4aM1a (n = 8), and pT4aM1b (n = 11). Recurrence was observed in only 2 patients (both with pT4aM1b disease), one of whom died of disease. All remaining patients were disease-free after a median clinical follow-up of 60 months. Conclusions. Our study confirms that pTis LAMNs have an excellent prognosis and suggests that pT4a and pT4aM1a LAMNs may also have a low risk of developing progressive disease.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5479-5479
Author(s):  
Hee-Jung Sohn ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Jae-Hoon Lee ◽  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract The Durie-Salmon (DS) stage has been the gold standard for stratification of MM patients. However, the system does not contain beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) widely recognized as the single most powerful prognostic parameter. Recently, The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) staging system (Jacobson JL, et al. Br J Haematol122:441–50, 2003) and the International Staging System (ISS) (Greipp PR, et al. J Clin Oncol23:3412–20, 2005) utilizing B2M have been proposed. We aimed to evaluate whether the stage assessed at the time of ASCT by DS, SWOG, or ISS predict outcome following ASCT in patients with MM. Between November 1996 and December 2004, a total of 141 patients with MM who were treated with ASCT at 5 institutions in Korea were available for this analysis. The distribution of patients’ stage at ASCT by 3 staging systems was as Table 1. With a median follow-up of 20 months from ASCT, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11–21) and 56 months (95% CI, 38–74), respectively. The median survival of each stage group according to 3 staging systems at ASCT was as Table 2. Differences in EFS among the stage groups were not statistically significant. However, OS after ASCT was dependent on the SWOG stage at the time of ASCT and also significantly longer in patients with ISS stage I than others (NR vs. 39 months, P =.001). In this study, OS following ASCT was influenced by the stage according to SWOG or ISS, but not DS. The distribution of patients by 3 staging systems Stage I II III IV DS 32 (23%) 23 (16%) 86 (61%) - SWOG 53 (38%) 66 (47%) 16 (11%) 6 (4%) ISS 85 (60%) 34 (24%) 22 (16%) - Median event-free survial and overall survival by 3 staging systems Stage I II III IV P EFS=evnet-free survival, OS=overall survival, NR=not reached, * in months EFS* DS 27 17 13 - .40 SWOG 22 15 24 4 .21 ISS 17 13 10 - .63 OS* DS NR 58 40 - .17 SWOG NR 41 32 17 .045 ISS NR 32 40 - .0042


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document