scholarly journals Prognostic Validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Staging System for Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Multinational Multicenter Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hebin Wang ◽  
Ding Ding ◽  
Tingting Qin ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Hang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
American Joint Committee ◽  
Staging Systems ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Eighth Edition

Abstract Background:There is no widely-accepted staging system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). The aim of this study was to validate the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for well-differentiated (G1/G2) pNETs.Methods:A multicenter dataset (n=1086) was used to evaluate the application of the AJCC 7th and 8th, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), and the modified ENETS (mENETS) staging systems for well-differentiated pNETs.Results:The proportion of patients with stage III tumors was extremely low (1.1%) according to the AJCC 7th staging system. For the ENETS staging system, patients with stage IIIA disease had worse estimated mean survival than patients with stage IIIB disease (78.9 vs. 107.3 months). When comparing with patients in stage I, the AJCC 7th, ENETS, and mENETS staging systems showed good performance in discriminating between stages; however, there was no significant difference in some stages when the reference was defined as the earlier stage. When the reference was defined as stage I or the earlier stage, there was a significant inter-stage difference in the AJCC 8th staging system.Conclusions:The AJCC 8th staging system is more suitable for pNETs than other TNM staging systems and may be adopted in clinical practice.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Single institution review over 10 years.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15183-e15183
Author(s):  
Aakanksha Asija ◽  
Stacey Milan ◽  
Anthony Prestipino ◽  
Charles Yeo ◽  
Madhavan V. Pillai
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
The Body ◽  
Stage I ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

e15183 Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(pNET) are rare tumors accounting for less than 5% of pancreatic cancer. They are functionally and biologically heterogeneous and have not been studied in great detail until recently. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 79 consecutive patients with pNET diagnosed and treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between the years of 2000 and 2010. Results: Of the 79 patients whose records were reviewed, 32 were male and 47 were female. Median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Two cases were associated with MEN1 syndrome. Primary tumor arose in the head, body and tail of the pancreas in 15, 10 and 26 patients, resp. In 6 patients, the tumor was multifocal. The neuroendocrine tumor was accompanied by pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 1 patient and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in 3. In 10 patients, distant metastasis was detected, involving liver only. Tumor was functional in 9 patients: 5 insulinoma, 2 gastrinoma,1 glucagonoma and 1 VIPoma. As per TNM staging, 28, 22 and 10 patients were Stage I, II and III, and IV at diagnosis. Treatment by surgical resection was undertaken in 54 patients. In 21 patients, the tumor was discovered incidentally; 21 patients presented with abdominal pain. Other symptoms were irregular bowel movements, weight loss and jaundice. 51 of the 79 (64.5%) patients were alive at last follow up. On univariate analysis, median survival for females was 137 months vs 114 months for male. Median survival for patients with functional tumors was similar to those with nonfunctioning tumors (118 and 115 months, resp). Median survival for patients with Stage I, II, and III and Stage IV patients were 234,112 and 40 months resp. Median survival for patients who underwent surgical resection was 130 months vs those who did not (30 months). Conclusions: Majority of pNET were located in the body and tail of pancreas; an area requiring thorough scrutiny with special imaging studies for diagnosis. Only a minority of patients presented with liver metastasis(12%) and a smaller number showed hormonal activity (11%). Prognosis improved markedly in patients who underwent surgical resection. Therefore, whenever appropriate, surgical resection should be the treatment of choice in patients with pNET.

scholarly journals Validation and Modification of Staging Systems for Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haihong Wang ◽  
Zhenyu Lin ◽  
Guiling Li ◽  
Dejun Zhang ◽  
Dandan Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stage Iv ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
7Th Edition ◽  
Staging Systems ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ajcc Staging System ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Ajcc Staging

Abstract Background The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging classifications and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) are two broadly used systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study aims to identify the most accurate and useful TNM staging system for poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas(pNECs). Methods An analysis was performed to evaluate the application of the ENETS, 7th edition (7th) AJCC and 8th edition (8th) AJCC staging classifications using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (N = 568 patients). A modified system was proposed based on analysis of the 7th AJCC classification. Results In multivariable analyses, only the 7th AJCC staging system allocated patients into four different risk groups, compared with the 8th AJCC staging system and ENETS staging system, although there was no significant difference. We modified the staging classification by maintaining the T and M definitions of the 7th AJCC staging and adopting new staging definitions. An increased hazard ratio (HR) of death was also observed from class I to class IV for the modified 7th (m7th) staging system (compared with stage I disease; HR for stage II =1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.73-2.06, P =0.44; HR for stage III =2.20, 95% CI =1.06-4.56, P=0.03; HR for stage IV =4.95, 95% CI =3.20-7.65, P < 0.001).The concordance index (C-index) was higher for local disease with the m7th AJCC staging system than with the 7th AJCC staging system. Conclusions The m7th AJCC staging system for pNECs proposed in this study provides improvements and may be assessed for potential adoption in the next edition.

scholarly journals Masaoka-Koga and TNM Staging System in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Prognostic Comparison and the Role of the Number of Involved Structures

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5254
Author(s):  
Marco Chiappetta ◽  
Filippo Lococo ◽  
Luca Pogliani ◽  
Isabella Sperduti ◽  
Diomira Tabacco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staging System ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Thymic Epithelial Tumors ◽  
Epithelial Tumors ◽  
Tnm Staging System ◽  
Staging Systems

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Masaoka–Koga and the tumor node metastases (TNM) staging system in thymic epithelial tumors (TET) considering possible improvements. Methods: We reviewed the data of 379 patients who underwent surgical resection for TET from 1 January 1985 to 1 January 2018, collecting and classifying the pathological report according to the Masaoka–Koga and the TMN system. The number of involved organs was also considered as a possible prognostic factor and integrated in the two staging systems to verify its impact. Results: Considering the Masaoka–Koga system, 5- and 10-year overall survival (5–10YOS) was 96.4% and 88.9% in stage I, 95% and 89.5% in stage II and 85.4% and 72.8% in stage III (p = 0.01), with overlapping in stage I and stage II curves. Considering the TNM system, 5–10YOS was 95.5% and 88.8% in T1, 84.8% and 70.7% in T2 and 88% and 76.3% in T3 (p = 0.02), with overlapping T2–T3 curves. Including the number of involved structures, in Masaoka–Koga stage III, patients with singular involved organs had a 100% and 76.6% vs. 87.7% 5–10YOS, which was 76.6% in patients with multiple organ infiltration. Considering the TNM, T3 patients with singular involved structures presented a 5–10YOS of 100% vs. 62.5% and 37.5% in patients with multiple organ involvement (p = 0.07). Conclusion: The two staging systems present limitations due to overlapping curves in early Masaoka–Koga stages and in advanced T stages for TNM. The addition of the number of involved organs seems to be a promising factor for the prognosis stratification in these patients.

scholarly journals Validation and Modification of Staging Systems for Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haihong Wang ◽  
Zhenyu Lin ◽  
Guiling Li ◽  
Dejun Zhang ◽  
Dandan Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stage Iv ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Tnm Staging ◽  
7Th Edition ◽  
Staging Systems ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ajcc Staging System ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Ajcc Staging

Abstract Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) staging classifications are two broadly used systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study aims to identify the most accurate and useful tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system for poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas(pNECs).Methods: An analysis was performed to evaluate the application of the ENETS, 7th edition (7th) AJCC and 8th edition (8th) AJCC staging classifications using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (N = 568 patients), and a modified system based on the analysis of the 7th AJCC classification was proposed Results: In multivariable analyses, only the 7th AJCC staging system allocated patients into four different risk groups, although there was no significant difference. We modified the staging classification by maintaining the T and M definitions of the 7th AJCC staging and adopting new staging definitions. An increased hazard ratio (HR) of death was also observed from class I to class IV for the modified 7th (m7th) staging system (compared with stage I disease; HR for stage II =1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.73-2.06, P =0.44; HR for stage III =2.20, 95% CI =1.06-4.56, P=0.03; HR for stage IV =4.95, 95% CI =3.20-7.65, P < 0.001).The concordance index (C-index) was higher for local disease with the m7th AJCC staging system than with the 7th AJCC staging system. Conclusions: The m7th AJCC staging system for pNECs proposed in this study provides improvements and may be assessed for potential adoption in the next edition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document