scholarly journals Optimizing health before elective thoracic surgery: systematic review of modifiable risk factors and opportunities for health services research

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (S4) ◽  
pp. S537-S554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Stokes ◽  
Elliot Wakeam ◽  
Mara B. Antonoff ◽  
Leah M. Backhus ◽  
Robert A. Meguid ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abimbola A. Ayorinde ◽  
Iestyn Williams ◽  
Russell Mannion ◽  
Fujian Song ◽  
Magdalena Skrybant ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Price ◽  
Hannah Bryson ◽  
Ashlee Smith ◽  
Fiona Mensah ◽  
Sharon Goldfeld

Abstract Background Women and families experiencing socioeconomic and psychosocial adversity are the least likely to access health care but most likely to benefit. For health services to effectively meet the needs of individuals experiencing adversity, research involving the health services must be truly representative. However, individuals experiencing adversity are typically excluded from or underrepresented in health services research. This paper reports on the implementation of a quality improvement approach designed to support recruitment and retention of pregnant women experiencing adversity in a longitudinal, health services randomized controlled trial (“right@home”). Methods right@home recruited Australian women from 10 public maternity hospitals across the states of Victoria and Tasmania who were experiencing adversity (≥2 risk factors on screening survey). Regular follow-up assessments were conducted by phone or face-to-face to child age 2 years. Research processes were designed taking heed of previous research demonstrating effective strategies for recruiting and retaining minority groups (e.g. piloting the recruitment process; recruiting via the health service providing care to the subgroup; remunerating participants); however, we were concerned that important information was missing. Therefore, once recruitment began, we conducted a continuous evaluation of the research processes, testing and implementing changes to processes or new strategies to maximize recruitment and retention (e.g. using a suite of strategies to maintain contact with families, using flexible data collection methods, obtaining consent for data linkage for future health and education data). Results right@home enrolled a large cohort of women (N = 722) experiencing high levels of adversity according to socioeconomic status and psychosocial risk factors, and achieved excellent retention (83% completion at 2 years). Most strategies appeared to increase recruitment and retention. All required additional time from the research team to develop and test, and some required extra funding, which ranged from minor (e.g. printing) to substantial (e.g. salaries, remuneration). Conclusions By taking a quality improvement approach, supported by sufficient resourcing and flexible research processes, it is possible to recruit and retain a large cohort of women experiencing adversity who are typically missed or lost from longitudinal research.


1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. M30-M35 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Beardsley ◽  
D. B. Larson ◽  
J. S. Lyons ◽  
G. L. Gottlieb ◽  
P. Rabins ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. medhum-2020-011845
Author(s):  
Umair Majid ◽  
Sujane Kandasamy

Health services research (HSR) is an interdisciplinary field that investigates and improves the design and delivery of health services from individual, group, organisational and system perspectives. HSR examines complex problems within health systems. Qualitative research plays an important role in aiding us to develop a nuanced understanding of patients, family, healthcare providers, teams and systems. However, the overwhelming majority of HSR publications using qualitative research use traditional methods such as focus groups and interviews. Arts-based research—artistic and creative forms of data collection such as dance, drama and photovoice—have had limited uptake in HSR due to the lack of clarity in the methods, their rationales and potential impacts. To address this uncertainty, we conducted a qualitative systematic review of studies that have employed arts-based research in HSR topics. We searched four databases for peer-reviewed, primary HSR studies. Using conventional content analysis, we analysed the rationales for using arts-based approaches in 42 primary qualitative studies. We found four rationales for using arts-based approaches for HSR: (1) Capture aspects of a topic that may be overlooked, ignored or not conceptualised by other methods (ie, quantitative and interview-based qualitative methods). (2) Allow participants to reflect on their own experiences. (3) Generate valuable community knowledge to inform intervention design and delivery. (4) Formulate research projects that are more participatory in nature. This review provides health services researchers with the tools, reasons, rationales and justifications for using arts-based methods. We conclude this review by discussing the practicalities of making arts-based approaches commensurable to HSR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document