scholarly journals Ranking Community Health Status to Stimulate Discussion of Local Public Health Issues: The Wisconsin County Health Rankings

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Peppard ◽  
David A. Kindig ◽  
Elizabeth Dranger ◽  
Amanda Jovaag ◽  
Patrick L. Remington
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e030983
Author(s):  
Xi Zhu ◽  
Paula Weigel ◽  
Jure Baloh ◽  
Mochamad Nataliansyah ◽  
Nichole Gunn ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThis study examines types and forms of cross-sector collaborations employed by rural communities to address community health issues and identifies factors facilitating or inhibiting such collaborations.SettingWe conducted case studies of four rural communities in the US state of Iowa that have demonstrated progress in creating healthier communities.ParticipantsKey informants from local public health departments, hospitals and other health-promoting organisations and groups participated in this study. Twenty-two key-informant interviews were conducted. Participants were selected based on their organisation’s involvement in community health initiatives.ResultsRural communities used different forms of collaborations, including cross-sector partnership, cross-sector interaction and cross-sector exploration, to address community health issues. Stakeholders from public health, healthcare, social services, education and business sectors were involved. Factors facilitating cross-sector collaborations include health-promoting local contexts, seed initiatives that mobilise communities, hospital visions that embrace broad views of health and shared collaboration leadership and governance. Challenges to developing and sustaining cross-sector collaborations include different institutional logics, financial and human resources constraints and geographic dispersion.ConclusionsRural communities use cross-sector collaborations to address community health issues in the forms of interaction and exploration, but real and lasting partnerships are rare. The development, operation and sustainment of cross-sector collaborations are influenced by a set of contextual and practical factors. Practical strategies and policy interventions may be used to enhance cross-sector collaborations in rural communities.


2006 ◽  
Vol 163 (suppl_11) ◽  
pp. S142-S142
Author(s):  
C.J Benally ◽  
M Everett ◽  
J Moses ◽  
E Yazzie

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Ingram ◽  
F. Douglas Scutchfield ◽  
Richard Charnigo ◽  
Martha C. Riddell

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
Anil D Gotmare ◽  
P.G. Khot ◽  
Shraddha R. Gotmare

Gadchiroli district is a part of Vidarbha, Traibal district away from 200 KM from sub capital of Maharashtra, Nagpur, Gadchiroli is well known tribal district of vidarbha. Total forest cover of the district is around 78% of total geographic area. District has 12 blocks with 6 revenue division. It is a notified tribal district having 8.61%–81.50% tribal population in different blocks and block-wise urbanization varies from 0.00% to 37.10%. Objective: Objective of present research paper is to device tool to rank the blocks of the district according to community health status exist in blocks and accordingly assess community health status at block level in Gadchiroli district.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marinda Asiah Nuril Haya ◽  
Shuhei Ichikawa ◽  
Yukino Shibagaki ◽  
Akame Machijuu Genki Project Community Advisory Board ◽  
Hideki Wakabayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although Japan has a decentralized public health system, local governments have considered expert opinions over those of the community in decisions about public health programs. Differences in communities’ interests may create gaps between health program objectives and implementation. We hypothesized that community-based participatory research (CBPR), which involves the community at every step, promotes effective program implementation and community empowerment. This study addressed the first step of CBPR, assessing community needs and developing tailored health program for a rural community in Japan. Methods: In this sequential exploratory mixed-method study (qualitative followed by quantitative), we first formed a community advisory board (CAB) representing community organizations, city officials, and university researchers. The CAB conducted group discussions with community residents to identify the community’s health issues and strengths. These group discussions were analyzed using thematic analysis, and the results were used to develop a questionnaire, which was subsequently sent to all households in the community to obtain priority scores for health issues and proposed action and to assess willingness to participate in community health program. The CAB then designed a program using the overall study results. Results: Ten group discussions with 68 participants identified the following health issues: 1) diseases; 2) unhealthy behaviors; and 3) unsupportive environment. Nature, vacant lots, and local farms were considered local strengths. Of a total of 1470 households in the community, questionnaires were collected from 773 households. Cancer, lifestyle-related diseases, and cerebrovascular diseases were ranked as the most important health problems. Improving services and access to medical checkups, use of public space for exercise, local farming, and collaboration with the community health office were considered necessary to address these health problems. Considering feasibility and the availability of resources in the community, the CAB decided to focus on lifestyle-related diseases and designed activities centered on health awareness, nutrition, and exercise. These activities drew on community’s strengths and were adapted to Japanese culture.Conclusions: The community’s priority health problem was closely related to the epidemiology of diseases. The CBPR approach was useful for identifying community’s needs and for designing a unique community health program that made use of local strengths.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document