Utilization of Coal Deposits of Thar Colliers with Underground Coal Gasification, Opportunities and Challenges in Syngas Generation

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilyas Khurshid ◽  
Mirza Abdul Samad Baig ◽  
Jonggeun Choe
Keyword(s):  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Coal Deposits

The Change of Structural and Thermal Properties of Rocks Exposed to High Temperatures in the Vicinity of Designed Geo-Reactor / Zmiany właściwości strukturalnych i cieplnych skał poddanych wysokim temperaturom w rejonie projektowanego georeaktora

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 465-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Małkowski ◽  
Zbigniew Niedbalski ◽  
Joanna Hydzik-Wiśniewska
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
High Temperatures ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Specific Density ◽  
Temperature Conductivity ◽  
Underground Gasification ◽  
Coal Deposits ◽  
Heat Diffusivity

Among the main directions of works on energy acquisition, there is the development and application of the technology of underground gasification of coal deposits (UCG). During the process of deposit burning and oxidation, there is also impact of temperatures exceeding 1000°C on rocks surrounding the deposit. As a result of subjecting carboniferous rocks to high temperatures for a prolonged period of time, their structure will change, which in turn will result in the change of their physical properties. Due to the project of underground coal gasification, as performed in Poland, laboratory tests are currently under way to a broad extent, including physical properties of carboniferous rocks subjected to high temperatures. The article presents results of laboratory tests of rocks surrounding the designed geo-reactor: changes to bulk density, specific density and porosity due to high temperature, and confronts the above results with the results of tests of thermal conductivity, specific heat and heat diffusivity (temperature conductivity) of the rocks. The mineralogical investigations were presented too.

scholarly journals Analysis of Risk Factors for Underground Coal Gasification

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-235
Author(s):  
Erika Škvareková ◽  
Marianna Tomašková ◽  
Gabriel Wittenberger ◽  
Štefan Zelenák
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Sulphide ◽  
Regular Education ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Slovak Republic ◽  
Primary Energy ◽  
Hazard Identification ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Underground Gasification ◽  
Coal Deposits ◽  
And Training

AbstractThe purpose of this article is to determine the environmental impacts of underground gasification on the population and to analyze the risk of underground coal gasification (UCG) activities using selected risk assessment methods. Coal gas is a regular part of coal deposits and its extraction also allows the use of coal deposits that cannot be extracted by traditional methods. These technologies bring both positive and negative aspects. The paper points out the risk analysis, hazard identification and assessment during the operation of UCG technology using a risk graph and a risk matrix. Identified risks to workers that cannot be reduced should be taken into consideration and appropriate safeguard should be used. For each risk, it is necessary to inform employees about regular education and training. From worldwide experience with this technology, it is possible to analyze risks in Slovakia. Actual gasification produces polluting gases such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen sulphide, nitrogen oxides, tar and ash, and creates a risk that may occur on and under the surface of the site depending on the geological and hydrogeological structure of the deposits. Possible measures to mitigate the adverse effects are proposed for the implementation of this technology. Coal is still one of the main domestic primary energy sources. Currently, only 5 out of 19 deposits in the Slovak Republic are used. Underground gasification could increase the use of Slovak coal and brown coal deposits.

HEAT EXCHANGE OF THE COAL BED WITH ENCLOSING ROCKS DURING UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
N.M. KACHURIN ◽  
◽  
E.I. ZAKHAROV ◽  
G.V. FRIDLENDER ◽  
M.P. GANIN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coal Seam ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Coal Deposits ◽  
Technological Level ◽  
Sufficient Degree ◽  
Host Rocks ◽  
Thermal Preparation

It is shown that heat leaving the chemical reaction zone due to heat conduction is spent on thermal preparation of the coal seam and heating of the host rocks. It has been suggested that, with a sufficient degree of accuracy, we can assume that the heat fluxes are perpendicular to the surfaces that transfer heat. This made it possible, combining the origin of coordinate axes with these surfaces, to develop a mathematical model of heat transfer of a gasified coal seam with host rocks. It is noted that the model of the integrated use of the coalcoal complex of coal deposits allows reaching a new technological level using underground coal gasification.

scholarly journals Underground coal gasification - the Velenje Coal Mine energy and economic calculations

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damjan Konovsek ◽  
Zdravko Praunseis ◽  
Jurij Avsec ◽  
Gorazd Bercic ◽  
Andrej Pohar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Economic Assessment ◽  
Operating Mode ◽  
Primary Energy ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Gasification Process ◽  
Coal Deposits ◽  
Demonstration Experiment ◽  
Past Experiences

Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a viable possibility for the exploitation of vast coal deposits that are unreachable by conventional mining and can meet the energy, economic and environmental demands of the 21st century. Due to the complexity of the process, and the site-specific coal and seam properties, it is important to acknowledge all the available data and past experiences, in order to conduct a successful UCG operation. Slovenia has huge unmined reserves of coal, and therefore offers the possibility of an alternative use of this domestic primary energy source. According to the available underground coal gasification technology, the energy and economic assessment for the exploitation of coal to generate electricity and heat was made. A new procedure for the estimation of the energy efficiency of the coal gasification process, which is also used to compare the energy analyses for different examples of coal exploitation, was proposed, as well as the technological schemes and plant operating mode in Velenje, and the use of produced synthetic coal gas (syngas). The proposed location for the pilot demonstration experiment in Velenje Coal Mine was reviewed and the viability of the underground coal gasification project in Velenje was determined.

Prediction of feasible synthesis gas compositions at three European coal deposits

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Otto ◽  
Thomas Kempka
Keyword(s):  
Synthesis Gas ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Gas Composition ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Computationally Efficient ◽  
Coal Conversion ◽  
Coal Deposits ◽  
In Situ Conditions

<p>In the present study, we apply our validated stoichiometric equilibrium model [1], based on direct minimisation of Gibbs free energy, to predict the synthesis gas compositions produced by in-situ coal conversion at three European coal deposits. The applied modelling approach is computationally efficient and allows to predict synthesis gas compositions and calorific values under various operating and geological boundary conditions, including varying oxidant and coal compositions. Three European coal deposits are assessed, comprising the South Wales Coalfield (United Kingdom), the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Poland) and the Ruhr District (Germany). The stoichiometric equilibrium models were first validated on the basis of laboratory experiments undertaken at two different operating pressures by [2] and available literature data [3]. Then, the models were adapted to site-specific hydrostatic pressure conditions to enable an extrapolation of the synthesis gas composition to in-situ pressure conditions. Our simulation results demonstrate that changes in the synthesis gas composition follow the expected trends for preferential production of specific gas components at increased pressures, known from the literature, emphasising that a reliable methodology for estimations of synthesis gas compositions for different in-situ conditions has been established. The presented predictive approach can be integrated with techno-economic models [4] to assess the technical and economic feasibility of in-situ coal conversion at selected study areas as well as of biomass and waste to synthesis gas conversion projects.</p><p><span>[</span><span>1] </span><span>Otto, C.; Kempka, T. Synthesis Gas Composition Prediction for Underground Coal Gasification Using a Thermochemical Equilibrium Modeling Approach. </span><em><span>Energies</span></em> <span><strong>2020</strong></span><span>, </span><em><span>13</span></em><span>, 1171.</span></p><p>[2] Kapusta et al., 2020</p><p>[3] Kempka et al., 2011</p><p>[4] Nakaten and Kempka, 2019</p>

scholarly journals Underground Coal Gasification: A Regulatory Framework for Alberta

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 525
Author(s):  
Astrid Kalkbrenner
Keyword(s):  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Approval Process ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Coal Seams ◽  
Clean Coal ◽  
Coal Deposits ◽  
The World ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Coal Technology

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) is a new emerging clean coal technology. It holds promise for reaching and making use of very deep coal seams that technically could not otherwise have been mined at these depths. UCG technology and knowledge developed significantly during the 20th century. Countries around the world with large coal deposits sustain and promote UCG research and launch projects with the intention to commercially deploy UCG. Alberta currently hosts two UCG projects, and a third project is under consideration. The development of these projects suggested the need for a UCG specific regulatory approval process. In 2011, Alberta enacted specific UCG legislation. This article deals with recent developments in UCG technology and its regulations. The aim of this article is to present Alberta’s current UCG regulatory framework as a model for other jurisdictions.

Cold Flow Simulation in Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Cavities

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipankar Chatterjee ◽  
◽  
Satish Gupta ◽  
Chebolu Aravind ◽  
Rakesh Roshan
Keyword(s):  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Cold Flow

scholarly journals Changes in properties of tar obtained during underground coal gasification process

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Wiatowski ◽  
Roksana Muzyka ◽  
Krzysztof Kapusta ◽  
Maciej Chrubasik
Keyword(s):  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Coal Tar ◽  
Liquid Product ◽  
Coke Oven ◽  
Underground Coal Gasification ◽  
Gasification Process ◽  
Dominant Component ◽  
Process Gas ◽  
High Volatility ◽  
Product Separator

AbstractIn this study, the composition of tars collected during a six-day underground coal gasification (UCG) test at the experimental mine ‘Barbara’ in Poland in 2013 was examined. During the test, tar samples were taken every day from the liquid product separator and analysed by the methods used for testing properties of typical coke oven (coal) tar. The obtained results were compared with each other and with the data for coal tar. As gasification progressed, a decreasing trend in the water content and an increasing trend in the ash content were observed. The tars tested were characterized by large changes in the residue after coking and content of parts insoluble in toluene and by smaller fluctuations in the content of parts insoluble in quinoline. All tested samples were characterized by very high distillation losses, while for samples starting from the third day of gasification, a clear decrease in losses was visible. A chromatographic analysis showed that there were no major differences in composition between the tested tars and that none of the tar had a dominant component such as naphthalene in coal tar. The content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in UCG tars is several times lower than that in coal tar. No light monoaromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes—BTEX) were found in the analysed tars, which results from the fact that these compounds, due to their high volatility, did not separate from the process gas in the liquid product separator.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document