High-TDS Produced Water-Based, Low-Damaging Fracturing Fluids for Applications at 300°F or Higher

Author(s):  
Leiming Li ◽  
Rajesh Saini ◽  
Nam Mai
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (06) ◽  
pp. 60-61
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 201611, “A Pilot-Scale Evaluation of Natural-Gas-Based Foam at Elevated Pressure and Temperature Conditions,” by Griffin Beck, Swanand Bhagwat, and Carolyn Day, Southwest Research Institute, et al., prepared for the 2020 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, originally scheduled to be held in Denver, 5–7 October. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The complete paper presents recent results from a rigorous pilot-scale demonstration of natural-gas (NG) foam over a range of operating scenarios relevant to surface and bottomhole conditions with a variety of base-fluid mixtures. The NG foams explored in these investigations exhibited typical shear-thinning behavior observed in rheological studies of nitrogen- (N2) and carbon-dioxide- (CO2) based foams. The measured viscosity and observed stability indicate that NG foams are well-suited for fracturing applications. Test Facilities Two test facilities were used to explore properties of NG foams at a variety of relevant operating conditions to determine whether NG foam is a suitable alternative to typical water-based fracturing fluids. Pilot-Scale Foam-Test Facility. The pilot-scale foam-test facility (PFTF) is a single-pass pilot plant used to generate and characterize foams at conditions relevant to surface and reservoir conditions. The facility is capable of generating aqueous and oil-based foams using a variety of gases for the internal phase [e.g., methane (CH4), N2, and CO2]. Foams can be characterized at pressures up to 7,500 psi and temperatures up to 300°F. A key benefit of the PFTF is that it can be used to demonstrate new or challenging foaming processes before large-scale or field demonstrations. Further, these processes can be evaluated at conditions relevant to the final application. The test facility consists of three subsystems: a base-fluid system to pressurize and heat the liquid/viscosifier/surfactant mixture, a gas system to pressurize and heat the liquefied gas stream, and the foam test sections to measure various fluid properties of the NG foam. Laboratory Foam-Test Facility. Tests performed on the PFTF were limited to foams generated with pure CH4 and tap water. Additional laboratory tests were conducted to investigate the effects of multiconstituent natural gas mixtures and produced water on foam stability. For these tests, the aqueous base fluid for the foam half-life and foam rheology experiments was prepared from either de-ionized water, tap water, or a synthetic produced water based on a water sample from the Permian Basin. Foam fracturing fluids also typically contain a gelling agent and a foaming agent. The gel was prepared by slow addition of guar to a stirred water sample followed by 30 minutes of mixing to ensure complete hydration. The foaming agent was added and stirred in gently. Three foaming agents were used in this study: anionic Foamer A, nonionic Foamer B, and zwitterionic Foamer C.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus C. Weissenberger ◽  
Adrienne Lee ◽  
Tim Wasdal

Author(s):  
Klaudia Wilk

Hydraulic fracturing is the most effective method of stimulation for hydrocarbon reservoirs. However the use of water-based fracturing fluids, can be a problem in water-sensitive formations due to the permeability damage hazard caused by clay minerals swelling. For this reason, the foamed fracturing fluids with addition of natural, fast hydrating guar gum were examined. The rheology and filtration coefficients of foamed fracturing fluids were examined and compared to the properties of conventional water-based fracturing fluid. Laboratory results provided the input for numerical simulation of the fractures geometry for water-based fracturing fluids and 50% N2 foamed fluids. The results show, that the foamed fluids were able to create shorter and thinner fractures compared to the fractures induced by the non-foamed fluid. The simulation proved that the concentration of proppant in the fracture and its conductivity are similar or slightly higher when using the foamed fluid. Moreover such fluids are able to significantly reduce the amount of water necessary for fracturing treatments, limiting clay minerals swelling, and reducing the reservoir permeability damage. The foamed fluids, when injected to the reservoir, provide additional energy, that allow for more effective flowback, and maintain the proper fracture geometry and proppant placing. The results of laboratory work in combination with the 3D simulation showed, that the foamed fluids have suitable viscosity which allows opening the fracture, and transport the proppant into the fracture, providing successful fracturing operation.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 7645
Author(s):  
Shuang Zheng ◽  
Mukul M. Sharma

Stranded gas emission from the field production because of the limitations in the pipeline infrastructure has become one of the major contributors to the greenhouse effects. How to handle the stranded gas is a troublesome problem under the background of global “net-zero” emission efforts. On the other hand, the cost of water for hydraulic fracturing is high and water is not accessible in some areas. The idea of using stranded gas in replace of the water-based fracturing fluid can reduce the gas emission and the cost. This paper presents some novel numerical studies on the feasibility of using stranded natural gas as fracturing fluids. Differences in the fracture creating, proppant placement, and oil/gas/water flowback are compared between natural gas fracturing fluids and water-based fracturing fluids. A fully integrated equation of state compositional hydraulic fracturing and reservoir simulator is used in this paper. Public datasets for the Permian Basin rock and fluid properties and natural gas foam properties are collected to set up simulation cases. The reservoir hydrocarbon fluid and natural gas fracturing fluids phase behavior is modeled using the Peng-Robinson equation of state. The evolving of created fracture geometry, conductivity and flowback performance during the lifecycle of the well (injection, shut-in, and production) are analyzed for the gas and water fracturing fluids. Simulation results show that natural gas and foam fracturing fluids are better than water-based fracturing fluids in terms of lower breakdown pressure, lower water leakoff into the reservoir, and higher cluster efficiency. NG foams tend to create better propped fractures with shorter length and larger width, because of their high viscosity. NG foam is also found to create better stimulated rock volume (SRV) permeability, better fracturing fluid flowback with a large water usage reduction, and high natural gas consumption. The simulation results presented in this paper are helpful to the operators in reducing natural gas emission while reducing the cost of hydraulic fracturing operation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-245
Author(s):  
L. S. Ribeiro ◽  
T. N. C. Dantas ◽  
A. A. Dantas Neto ◽  
K. C. Melo ◽  
M. C. P. A. Moura ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leiming Li ◽  
Hong Sun ◽  
Qi Qu ◽  
Michael P. Mehle ◽  
Marshall G. Ault ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.K. Fontenelle ◽  
D. Chen ◽  
E. Schnoor ◽  
J. Haggstrom ◽  
D. Perkins

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document