The Evolution of a High Near-Wellbore Pressure Loss Treatment Strategy for the Australian Cooper Basin

Author(s):  
Geoffrey A. Roberts ◽  
Simon T. Chipperfield ◽  
William K. Miller
2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 569
Author(s):  
Nicholas Eades ◽  
Mohit Patter ◽  
Aldi Smokaj

Fracture stimulation in the Cooper Basin has long been challenged by high near-wellbore pressure loss (NWBPL) present in hydraulic fracture treatments. Though many strategies have been applied to either mitigate or prevent this, the industry is still in need of a broadly applicable, economic and practical solution. An approach that has significant potential, and targets NWBPL from its foundation, is perforation design. Perforation design has been shown in the past to have a significant effect on the initiation of a fracture and the success of its continued propagation. A commercial 3D hydraulic fracture simulator has been applied to data from Cooper Basin wells. These vertical wells contain tight sand intervals and are characterised by high differential stress. A sensitivity analysis has been performed using industry-standard GOHFER software, focusing on parameters including perforation diameter, shot density, interval length, number of intervals, and shot spacing. Though many previous authors have suggested that perforation design has limited impact on pressure loss, the analysis performed in this study indicates that there are methods inherent in perforation design that can impact on high NWBPL. In particular, this study has noted a potential for many cost-saving strategies that could be applied to future completions. This is an innovative study that examines the underlying links between perforation design and the resulting near-wellbore pressure loss. It focuses on problematic areas of the Cooper Basin in the hope that by examining these links useful recommendations can be made to the industry.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
Raymond Johnson Jr ◽  
Ruizhi Zhong ◽  
Lan Nguyen

Tight gas stimulations in the Cooper Basin have been challenged by strike–slip to reverse stress regimes, adversely affecting the hydraulic fracturing treatment. These stress conditions increase borehole breakout and affect log and cement quality, create more tortuous pathways and near-wellbore pressure loss, and reduce fracture containment. These factors result in stimulation of lower permeability, low modulus intervals (e.g. carbonaceous shales and interbedded coals) versus targeted tight gas sands. In the Windorah Trough of the Cooper Basin, several steps have been employed in an ongoing experiment to improve hydraulic fracturing results. First, the wellbore was deviated in the maximum horizontal stress direction and perforations shot 0 to 180° phased to better align the resulting hydraulic fractures. Next, existing drilling and logging-while-drilling data were used to train a machine learning model to improve reservoir characterisation in sections with missing or poor log data. Finally, diagnostic fracture injection tests in non-pay and pay sections were targeted to specifically inform the machine learning model and better constrain permeability and stress profiles. It is envisaged that the improved well and perforation alignment and better targeting of intervals for the fracturing treatment will result in lowered tortuosity, better fracture containment, and higher concentrations of localised proppant, thereby improving conductivity and targeting of desired intervals. The authors report the process and results of their experimentation, and the results relative to the offsetting vertical well where a typical five-stage treatment was employed.


Author(s):  
Feifei Zhang ◽  
Stefan Miska ◽  
Mengjiao Yu ◽  
Evren Ozbayoglu ◽  
Nicholas Takach

In drilling operations, accurate estimation of pressure profile in the wellbore is essential to achieve better bottom hole pressure control. Adjusting the drilling fluid properties and optimizing flow rate require precise knowledge of the pressure profile in the circulation system. Annular pressure profile calculations must consider solids present in the drilling fluid because the solids drilled from formations may have a significant effect on pressure in the wellbore. In cases of high solids fraction or solid pack off, the pressure loss caused by solids is much higher than the friction pressure loss. This paper looks into the effect of solids on the wellbore pressure profile under different conditions. An extensive number of experiments were conducted on a 90-ft-long, 4.5″x8″ full-scale flow loop to simulate field conditions. The effects of solids on pressure profile in the annulus are investigated. In the experimental results, a significant difference is found between the pressure profile with solids and without solids in the wellbore. A practical approach to calculate the pressure profile by considering the effects of solids in the wellbore is developed. This approach is based on the results of solids behavior in the wellbore. Both solids fraction in the well and solids pack off are considered in the proposed approach. The prediction results are in good agreement with the experimental data. The results of this study show how the pressure profile in the wellbore varies when solids present in the annulus. The pressure gradient with solids can be several times larger than the pure friction loss without solids. A decrease in flow rate may lead to a higher pressure profile and the risk of solids pack off in the wellbore because it increases the solids fraction. Results of this paper may have important applications in drilling operations.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.T. Chipperfield ◽  
G.A. Roberts ◽  
W.K. Miller ◽  
R.S. Vandersypen

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 300-301
Author(s):  
Michaella E. Maloney ◽  
Pei Zhong ◽  
Charles G. Marguet ◽  
Yufeng F. Zhou ◽  
Jeffrey C. Sung ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 294-294
Author(s):  
Yufeng Zhou ◽  
Charles G. Marguet ◽  
Michaella E. Maloney ◽  
Franklin H. Cocks ◽  
Glenn M. Preminger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document