Champion East: Low-Cost Redevelopment of Shallow, Stacked, and Faulted Heavy-Oil Reservoirs

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (04) ◽  
pp. 295-301
Author(s):  
Onno van Kessel

Summary The Champion East area offshore Brunei Darussalam consists of approximately 50 stacked, shallow, and intensely faulted heavy oil reservoirs. These reservoirs have been under development since 1975 and have to date produced just 9% of the oil initially in place. Over the period 1998-2003, Brunei Shell Petroleum (BSP) is embarking on a major redevelopment with the aim of converting a further 30 million m3 of oil-in-place volume into commercial reserves. An overview will be given of how new technology is adding value to the total redevelopment, supported by actual application results and learning points. The primary development of Champion East is now nearing completion. The use of existing facilities and ultra shallow, long reach horizontal wells - with innovative sand exclusion and downhole intelligence - has achieved a 60% unit cost reduction over previous drilling campaigns in the area. The only way to unlock another 5 to 15% of the oil-in-place volume is to start secondary recovery through water injection, in combination with the use of electric submersible pumps (ESPs). Introduction The Champion Asset comprises the Champion Field offshore Brunei Darussalam (Fig. 1) and all associated facilities and infrastructure, which also serve as an export hub for BSP's entire Offshore East production division. Oil production from the Champion Field averages approximately one-third of total BSP production. A large scope for recovery, mostly technology-driven, remains, even at low oil prices. Subsurface, the area comprises a hydrostatic, heterolithic sequence of interbedded thin sandstones and mudstones (with reservoir flow units no more than 15 m thick and permeabilities ranging from 0.01 to 0.2 µm2 in lower shoreface sands to 0.5 to 5 µm2 in tidal channels) deposited in environments spanning a systems tract that extends from the outer shelf into the lower coastal plain. Other key features are significant lateral thickness variations, compartmentalization caused by syndepositional tectonics, and the presence of multiple growth faults. The Champion field can be divided into two distinct parts (Fig. 2): Champion East, spanning a depth of approximately 200 to 1200 m, with hydrocarbons in some places seeping through the seabed and feeding a coral reef; and Champion Main, which encompasses a depth of approximately 1000 to 2000 m. Champion Main contains the mature core of the Champion field, where both primary and secondary (water-injection) recovery processes are well advanced and 28% of the oil initially in place has been produced. The main focus in Champion Main is on water-injection maintenance, production-system optimization, and scope for recompleting or sidetracking existing wells-all aimed at slowing the decline in oil production. Most efforts in the area are, however, focused on the growth potential offered by shallow reservoirs. The Champion East area is much less mature than Champion Main, with a cumulative oil production to date of just 9% of the oil initially in place. Historically, Champion East is underdeveloped because of its subsurface complexity and heterogeneity (leading to erratic well performance), less favorable reservoir and oil properties [density of 930 g/cm3 (20° API) and viscosity between 5 and 15 mPa's], and a perceived lack of spare conductor slots, which would necessitate large investments in new infrastructure. In 1995, it was estimated that an upfront investment in excess of U.S. $400 million would be required to advance the development of Champion East by accessing another 30 million m3 of undeveloped reserves. Out of this total, 40% would be required for new facilities, and the remaining 60% would be for drilling new wells. This hurdle essentially halted further developments (between 1992 and 1997, just one well was drilled in the area), and it was obvious that major changes were required to all the fundamentals (average reserves and rates per well, well costs, and facilities costs) to break this deadlock. The case for change, together with plans for possible solutions, is further described in Ref. 1. Reservoir Modeling Technology Traditionally, Champion East had been modeled with 2D methods of mapping gross interval properties for groups of reservoirs ranging in thickness from 20 to 40 m, using the previous 3D seismic survey shot in 1983 (relatively poor resolution) and well correlation methods based on lithostratigraphy. However, these methods often can prove unreliable in deltaic reservoirs that have undergone synsedimentary tectonics. The previous major Champion East infill drilling campaign (1990-92) was relatively unsuccessful because approximately 35% of all target reservoirs were found to be either nonexistent, water-bearing, or depleted. It then became clear that it was necessary to understand the structure, sequence stratigraphy, and fluid distribution of these reservoirs in greater detail. Two key data acquisition activities occurred in 1994: a high-resolution 3D seismic survey and the retrieval of some 350 m of continuous cores to review the sedimentology and high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, as described in Ref. 2. After screening studies to establish the correct priority and level of detail required, Shell's proprietary reservoir modeling software (GEOCAP-MoReS) was used to provide detailed 3D reservoir models for reservoir simulation. A total of 16 models were built and history matched (with approximately 50,000 grid cells each) between 1996 and 1999; together, they covered the entire area, with boundaries positioned (generally at sealing faults) to minimize crossflow effects. This allowed fast optimization of reservoir development plans by identifying connected oil in place and transmissibility for individual reservoir flow units, such as an upper shoreface sandbody or a tidal channel, which have remained undrained from previous development.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmine Shivani Medina ◽  
Iomi Dhanielle Medina ◽  
Gao Zhang

Abstract The phenomenon of higher than expected production rates and recovery factors in heavy oil reservoirs captured the term "foamy oil," by researchers. This is mainly due to the bubble filled chocolate mousse appearance found at wellheads where this phenomenon occurs. Foamy oil flow is barely understood up to this day. Understanding why this unusual occurrence exists can aid in the transfer of principles to low recovery heavy oil reservoirs globally. This study focused mainly on how varying the viscosity and temperature via pressure depletion lab tests affected the performance of foamy oil production. Six different lab-scaled experiments were conducted, four with varying temperatures and two with varying viscosities. All experiments were conducted using lab-scaled sand pack pressure depletion tests with the same initial gas oil ratio (GOR). The first series of experiments with varying temperatures showed that the oil recovery was inversely proportional to elevated temperatures, however there was a directly proportional relationship between gas recovery and elevation in temperature. A unique observation was also made, during late-stage production, foamy oil recovery reappeared with temperatures in the 45-55°C range. With respect to the viscosities, a non-linear relationship existed, however there was an optimal region in which the live-oil viscosity and foamy oil production seem to be harmonious.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 60-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sixu Zheng ◽  
Daoyong Yang

Summary Techniques have been developed to experimentally and numerically evaluate performance of water-alternating-CO2 processes in thin heavy-oil reservoirs for pressure maintenance and improving oil recovery. Experimentally, a 3D physical model consisting of three horizontal wells and five vertical wells is used to evaluate the performance of water-alternating-CO2 processes. Two well configurations have been designed to examine their effects on heavy-oil recovery. The corresponding initial oil saturation, oil-production rate, water cut, oil recovery, and residual-oil-saturation (ROS) distribution are examined under various operating conditions. Subsequently, numerical simulation is performed to match the experimental measurements and optimize the operating parameters (e.g., slug size and water/CO2 ratio). The incremental oil recoveries of 12.4 and 8.9% through three water-alternating-CO2 cycles are experimentally achieved for the aforementioned two well configurations, respectively. The excellent agreement between the measured and simulated cumulative oil production indicates that the displacement mechanisms governing water-alternating-CO2 processes have been numerically simulated and matched. It has been shown that water-alternating-CO2 processes implemented with horizontal wells can be optimized to significantly improve performance of pressure maintenance and oil recovery in thin heavy-oil reservoirs. Although well configuration imposes a dominant impact on oil recovery, the water-alternating-gas (WAG) ratios of 0.75 and 1.00 are found to be the optimum values for Scenarios 1 and 2, respectively.


Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Yang Yu ◽  
Shangqi Liu ◽  
Yu Bao ◽  
Lixia Zhang ◽  
Jia Xie ◽  
...  

With further progress of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) technology, a growing number of oil sands or heavy oil reservoirs were put into production in an efficient way. However, owing to the existence of muddy laminae within reservoirs, there are challenges associated with the expansion of the steam chamber and oil drainage during the SAGD process. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the adverse impact of muddy laminae on conventional SAGD performance and introduce an improvement strategy with multilateral well patterns to reduce the adverse impact and improve the performance. In the research reported here, the reservoir numerical simulation approach is applied to conduct the research. The analysis conducted on a prototypical reservoir reveals that the steam chamber may expand slowly in some sections due to the poor capacity of heat and mass transfer, and the expansion of the steam chamber is relatively uneven along the wellbore, when the muddy laminae are existing in the formation. The influence level of the muddy laminae on conventional SAGD performance under different distribution modes is different, but the adverse effect is mainly reflected in the delay of peak oil production, the decrease in peak oil production, the decrease in steam chamber volume, and the increase in the cumulative steam oil ratio (mainly in early and middle stages of the SAGD process). On the basis of aforementioned researches, the improvement strategy with two different multilateral well patterns, planar multilateral well and upward multilateral well, is introduced to improve the SAGD performance. The results indicate that the combination of a planar multilateral injector and planar multilateral producer has the best performance. By adopting such kind of combination, the recovery factor can be increased from 31.36% to 47.08%, and the cumulative steam oil ratio can be decreased from 5.29 m3/m3 to 4.64 m3/m3 under the combined distribution mode of muddy laminae. It can be known that the branches of the planar multilateral well are very helpful for the expansion of the steam chamber and oil drainage, once the heat connection between branches of the injector and producer is well established. Overall results show that the multilateral well pattern is promising for SAGD applications at oil sands or heavy oil reservoirs which are rich in muddy laminae.


2001 ◽  
Vol 4 (05) ◽  
pp. 366-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yarlong Wang ◽  
Carl C. Chen

Summary A coupled reservoir-geomechanics model is developed to simulate the enhanced production phenomena in both heavy-oil reservoirs (northwestern Canada) and conventional oil reservoirs (i.e., North Sea). The model is developed and implemented numerically by fully coupling an extended geomechanics model to a two-phase reservoir flow model. Both the enhanced production and the ranges of the enhanced zone are calculated, and the effects of solid production on oil recovery are analyzed. Field data for solid production and enhanced oil production, collected from about 40 wells in the Frog Lake area (Lloydminster, Canada), are used to validate the model for the cumulative sand and oil production. Our studies indicate that the enhanced oil production is mainly contributed (1) by the reservoir porosity and permeability improvement after a large amount of sand is produced, (2) by higher mobility of the fluid caused by the movement of the sand particles, and (3) by foamy oil flow. A relative permeability reduction after a certain period of production may result in a pressure-gradient increase, which can promote further sand flow. This process can further improve the absolute permeability and the overall sand/fluid slurry production. Our numerical results simulate the fact that sand production can reach up to 40% of total fluid production at the early production period and decline to a minimum level after the peak, generating a high-mobility zone with a negative skin near the wellbore. Such an improvement reduces the near-well pressure gradient so that the sanding potential is weakened, and it permits an easier path for the viscous oil to flow into the well. Our studies also suggest that the residual formation cement is a key factor for controlling the cumulative sand production, a crucial factor that determines the success of a cold production operation and improved well completion. Introduction Field results from many heavy-oil reservoirs in northwestern Canada, such as Lindbergh and Frog Lake in the Lloydminster fields, suggest that primary recovery is governed mainly by the processes of sand production and foamy-oil flow.1–3 To manage production in such reservoirs, the challenge we face is optimizing production so that sand production is under control. For decades, industries have developed various highly effective tools for sand control. In practice, however, sand control often results in reduced oil flow or no production at all, particularly in heavy-oil reservoirs. For example, it has been observed that an average oil production of only 0.0 to 1.5 m3/d can be achieved in a well in which no sand production is allowed, while 7 to 15 m3/d oil may be produced with sand production.4 A significant improvement in production also has been reported by allowing a certain amount of sand produced before gravel packing in the high-rate production well in conventional reservoirs.5 It seems that sanding corresponds to a high oil production in these reservoirs, as sand production either increases the reservoir mobility or allows the development of highly permeable zones such as channels (wormholes).1 Encouraging sand production to enhance oil production, on the other hand, increases oil production costs owing to environmental problems. Consequently, neither trying to eliminate the sand production completely nor letting sand be produced freely, we attempt to develop a quantified model linking sand rate and reservoir enhancement so that we can forecast the economic outcome of such an operation. The investigation of sand production has been extensive, but it has been limited primarily to the areas of incipience of sand production and control. Sand arching and production initiation from a cavity simulating a perforating tunnel were studied, and a critical flow rate before sanding was found for single-phase steady-state flow.6 Such a study was extended to gas reservoirs, in which the gas density is a function of pressure,7 and to those formations subject to nonhydrostatic loading.8,9 Studying the enhanced production and the cumulative sand production, a series of simplified models for massive sand production have been developed.10,11 Similar models based on a coupled classic geomechanics model were also proposed thereafter.12,13 Because these aforementioned sand-production models are somewhat restricted by the fact that they are simplified by analytical methods, and in reality reservoir formations are much more complex (i.e. nonlinear behaviors), a numerical model coupling a multiphase transient fluid flow to elastoplastic geomechanical deformation is thus developed in this article; its purpose is to simulate these major nonlinear effects. According to the proposed model, a corresponding plastic yielding zone (or a disturbed zone) propagates into reservoir formation because of the transient fluid pressure diffusion, and the corresponding effective stresses change near a wellbore. A possible absolute permeability change inside the yielding zone is also considered, as dilatant deformation developed may enhance the permeability in the plastic zone. As a primary unknown, saturation is assumed to change with the induced pore-pressure change. The relative permeability is updated by the saturation, which in turn changes the response of the pore pressure and the skeleton deformation. A continuum mechanics approach is used in our calculation. Rather than characterizing each random wormhole proposed,1,4,5 we impose a homogeneous medium with an average permeability to make the numerical solutions manageable. The wormholes or geomechanical dilatation zone can be represented by a higher-permeability region in the plastic yielding zone owing to porosity enhancement,1 and solid flow is considered as a continuous moving phase along the transient fluid flow. Alternatively, a sand erosion model was introduced, and the geomechanics coupling to a single-phase flow was presented previously.14,15


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3961
Author(s):  
Haiyang Yu ◽  
Songchao Qi ◽  
Zhewei Chen ◽  
Shiqing Cheng ◽  
Qichao Xie ◽  
...  

The global greenhouse effect makes carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction an important task for the world, however, CO2 can be used as injected fluid to develop shale oil reservoirs. Conventional water injection and gas injection methods cannot achieve desired development results for shale oil reservoirs. Poor injection capacity exists in water injection development, while the time of gas breakthrough is early and gas channeling is serious for gas injection development. These problems will lead to insufficient formation energy supplement, rapid energy depletion, and low ultimate recovery. Gas injection huff and puff (huff-n-puff), as another improved method, is applied to develop shale oil reservoirs. However, the shortcomings of huff-n-puff are the low sweep efficiency and poor performance for the late development of oilfields. Therefore, this paper adopts firstly the method of Allied In-Situ Injection and Production (AIIP) combined with CO2 huff-n-puff to develop shale oil reservoirs. Based on the data of Shengli Oilfield, a dual-porosity and dual-permeability model in reservoir-scale is established. Compared with traditional CO2 huff-n-puff and depletion method, the cumulative oil production of AIIP combined with CO2 huff-n-puff increases by 13,077 and 17,450 m3 respectively, indicating that this method has a good application prospect. Sensitivity analyses are further conducted, including injection volume, injection rate, soaking time, fracture half-length, and fracture spacing. The results indicate that injection volume, not injection rate, is the important factor affecting the performance. With the increment of fracture half-length and the decrement of fracture spacing, the cumulative oil production of the single well increases, but the incremental rate slows down gradually. With the increment of soaking time, cumulative oil production increases first and then decreases. These parameters have a relatively suitable value, which makes the performance better. This new method can not only enhance shale oil recovery, but also can be used for CO2 emission control.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cenk Temizel ◽  
Raul Moreno ◽  
Bao Jia ◽  
Ahmad Alkouh ◽  
Basel Al-Otaibi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document