scholarly journals Combining therapy with recombinant human endostatin and cytotoxic agents for recurrent disseminated glioblastoma: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-jing Ge ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Shao-pei Qi ◽  
Feng-jun Xue ◽  
Zhi-meng Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Medical University

Abstract Background: The optimal chemotherapeutics of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma has yet to be determined. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (rh-ES) combined with temozolomide and irinotecan in patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 adult patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma treated with this combination chemotherapy at Department of Neuro-Oncology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University of China from November 2009 to August 2018. Temozolomide was given orally at 200mg/m2 daily for 5 days and rh-ES was administrated 15 mg/d daily for 14 days of each 28-day treatment cycle. Irinotecan was given intravenously every 2 weeks on a 28-day cycle at 340 mg/m2 or 125 mg/m2 depending on antiepileptic drugs. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (6m-PFS). Results: The 6m-PFS was 23.3%. The median PFS was 3.2 months. The overall survival rate (OS) at 12 months was 28.6%. The median OS was 6.9 months. Six out of 30 (20%) patients demonstrated partial radiographic response and 11 (36.7%) remained stable. The PFS of the 6 patients who got partial response was 5.8, 6.3, 6.9, 13.6, 15.8 and 16.6 months, respectively, and the median time interval of first response was 4 (range, 2.0-6.6) months. The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicities and gastrointestinal effects. The Grade ≥3 adverse event was hematologic toxicities. The adverse events were manageable. Conclusions: Rh-ES, in combination with cytotoxic drugs, was an alternative effective regimen with manageable toxicities in treatment of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma.

scholarly journals Combining therapy with recombinant human endostatin and cytotoxic agents for recurrent disseminated glioblastoma: a retrospective study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-jing Ge ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Shao-pei Qi ◽  
Feng-jun Xue ◽  
Zhi-meng Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Medical University

Abstract Background The optimal chemotherapeutics of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma has yet to be determined. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (rh-ES) combined with temozolomide and irinotecan in patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 30 adult patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma treated with this combination chemotherapy at Department of Neuro-Oncology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University of China from November 2009 to August 2018. Temozolomide was given orally at 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 days and rh-ES was administrated 15 mg/d daily for 14 days of each 28-day treatment cycle. Irinotecan was given intravenously every 2 weeks on a 28-day cycle at 340 mg/m2 or 125 mg/m2 depending on antiepileptic drugs. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (6 m-PFS). Results The 6 m-PFS was 23.3%. The median PFS was 3.2 months. The overall survival rate (OS) at 12 months was 28.6%. The median OS was 6.9 months. Six out of 30 (20%) patients demonstrated partial radiographic response and 11 (36.7%) remained stable. The PFS of the 6 patients who got partial response was 5.8, 6.3, 6.9, 13.6, 15.8 and 16.6 months, respectively, and the median time interval of first response was 4 (range, 2.0–6.6) months. The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicities and gastrointestinal effects. The Grade ≥ 3 adverse event was hematologic toxicities. The adverse events were manageable. Conclusions Rh-ES, in combination with cytotoxic drugs, was an alternative effective regimen with manageable toxicities in treatment of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma.

scholarly journals Combining therapy with recombinant human endostatin and cytotoxic agents for recurrent disseminated glioblastoma: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-jing Ge ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Shao-pei Qi ◽  
Feng-jun Xue ◽  
Zhi-meng Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Medical University

Abstract Background: The optimal chemotherapeutics of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma has yet to be determined. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (rh-ES) combined with temozolomide and irinotecan in patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 adult patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma treated with this combination chemotherapy at Department of Neuro-Oncology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University of China from November 2009 to August 2018. Temozolomide was given orally at 200mg/m 2 daily for 5 days and rh-ES was administrated 15 mg/d daily for 14 days of each 28-day treatment cycle. Irinotecan was given intravenously every 2 weeks on a 28-day cycle at 340 mg/m 2 or 125 mg/m 2 depending on antiepileptic drugs. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (6m-PFS). Results: The 6m-PFS was 23.3%. The median PFS was 3.2 months. The overall survival rate (OS) at 12 months was 28.6%. The median OS was 6.9 months. Six out of 30 (20%) patients demonstrated partial radiographic response and 11 (36.7%) remained stable. The PFS of the 6 patients who got partial response was 5.8, 6.3, 6.9, 13.6, 15.8 and 16.6 months, respectively, and the median time interval of first response was 4 (range, 2.0-6.6) months. The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicities and gastrointestinal effects. The Grade ≥ 3 adverse event was hematologic toxicities. The adverse events were manageable. Conclusions: Rh-ES, in combination with cytotoxic drugs, was an alternative effective regimen with manageable toxicities in treatment of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma.

scholarly journals P14.82 Combining therapy with recombinant human endostatin and cytotoxic agents for recurrent disseminated glioblastoma: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii87-iii87
Author(s):  
J Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND The optimal chemotherapeutics of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma has yet to be determined. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) and irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with recombinant human endostatin (rh-ES) in patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 30 adult patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma treated with this combination chemotherapy from November 2009 to August 2018. TMZ was given orally 200mg/m2 for 5 days in each 28-day cycle (5/28d). CPT-11 was administrated 125 mg/m2 for patients not receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) or 340 mg/m2 for patients receiving EIAEDs on day 1 and day 15; rh-ES was administrated 15 mg/d, daily for 14 days of each 28-day treatment cycle. RESULTS Primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (6m-PFS). The 6m-PFS was 23.3%. The median PFS was 3.2 months. The overall survival rate (OS) at 12 months was 28.6%. The median OS was 6.9 months. Six out of 30 (20%) patients demonstrated partial radiographic response and 11/30 (36.7%) remained stable. The PFS of the 6 patients who got partial response was 5.8, 6.3, 6.9, 13.6, 15.8, 16.6 months, respectively, and the median time interval of first response was 4 (range, 2.0–6.6) months. The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicity and gastrointestinal reactions. The Grade ≥3 adverse event was mainly hematologic toxicity. The adverse events were manageable. CONCLUSION Rh-ES, in combination with cytotoxic drugs, was an alternative effective regimen with manageable toxicity in treatment of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma.

scholarly journals Combining therapy with recombinant human endostatin and cytotoxic agents for recurrent disseminated glioblastoma: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-jing Ge ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Shao-pei Qi ◽  
Feng-jun Xue ◽  
Zhi-meng Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Recombinant Human Endostatin ◽  
First Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Medical University

Abstract Background: The optimal chemotherapeutics of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma has yet to be determined. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of temozolomide and irinotecan combined with recombinant human endostatin (rh-ES) in patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 adult patients with recurrent disseminated glioblastoma treated with this combination chemotherapy at Department of Neuro-Oncology, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University of China from November 2009 to August 2018. Temozolomide was given orally 200mg/m2 for 5 days in each 28-day cycle (5/28d). Irinotecan was administrated 125 mg/m2 for patients not receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) or 340 mg/m2 for patients receiving EIAEDs on day 1 and day 15; rh-ES was administrated 15 mg/d, daily for 14 days of each 28-day treatment cycle. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (6m-PFS). Results: The 6m-PFS was 23.3%. The median PFS was 3.2 months. The overall survival rate (OS) at 12 months was 28.6%. The median OS was 6.9 months. Six out of 30 (20%) patients demonstrated partial radiographic response and 11/30 (36.7%) remained stable. The PFS of the 6 patients who got partial response was 5.8, 6.3, 6.9, 13.6, 15.8, 16.6 months, respectively, and the median time interval of first response was 4 (range, 2.0-6.6) months. The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicity and gastrointestinal reactions. The Grade ≥3 adverse event was hematologic toxicity. The adverse events were manageable. Conclusions: Rh-ES, in combination with cytotoxic drugs, was an alternative effective regimen with manageable toxicity in treatment of recurrent disseminated glioblastoma.

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis

Chemotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kotone Hayuka ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽  
Akitsu Murakami ◽  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Takamasa Nishiuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib in Advanced Osteosarcoma With Metastases After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanqing Li ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Lei Song ◽  
Qiuchi Ai ◽  
shuai zhang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Multimodal Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Common Drug ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Abstract To study and observe the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma with metastases. We retrospectively studied patients with advanced osteosarcoma and metastases who received anlotinib treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to April 2020. All patients had received standard multimodal therapies, before taking anlotinib. Therapeutic doses of anlotinib were 12 mg for adults and 10 mg for children and adolescents once a day for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by a week of withdrawal. This 3-week cycle of treatment was continued until the tumor progressed rapidly or the patients failed to tolerate the side effects. Adverse drug reactions were recorded, and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated based on progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The median PFS was 9.81 ± 0.9 months, and the 6-month and 10-month PFS rates were 73.3% and 33.3%, respectively. The median OS was 11.43 ± 0.58 months. No patients achieved complete response. After 6 months of treatment, the DCR and ORR were 80% and 13.3%, respectively. No drug-related deaths or Grade 4 adverse events occurred in the patients. Five patients (33.3%) had Grade 3 adverse events. The most common drug-related adverse events were hand-food syndrome, fatigue, high blood pressure, anorexia, and pneumothorax. Anlotinib had a certain curative effect on patients with advanced osteosarcoma and metastases after failure of standard treatment. The adverse events were mostly tolerable or relieved after treatment.

Biweekly Raltitrexed in Combination with Irinotecan (RIR) as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Non-Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Trial.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Cheng ◽  
Yu-Wen Zhou ◽  
Ye Chen ◽  
Zhi-Ping Li ◽  
Meng Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Irinotecan-based doublet chemotherapy strategy was standard second-line backbone treatment for patients with oxaliplatin‑refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of raltitrexed combined with irinotecan biweekly administered as the second-line therapy for mCRC patients.Methods The study was a single-center, non-randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients with mCRC after failure with first-line treatment of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine or its derivatives were enrolled. Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) and raltitrexed (2.5 mg/m2) were given intravenously on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival and treatment related adverse events. Results Between December 2012 and October 2016, 35 patients were enrolled. 33 and 35 patients were assessed for response and safety, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 8.6 %, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.8–5.2). The median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 8.5–15.5). Four patients received conversion therapy to no evidence of disease (NED), and 2 patients were still alive with beyond 24 months survival. The most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were leukopenia (8.6%), neutropenia (5.7%). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse events were anorexia (14.3%), vomiting (14.3%), nausea (11.4%) and fatigue (8.6%). Two patients discontinued the protocol treatment because of treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events. No one died from treatment-related events. The incidence and severity of toxicity was irrelevant to UGT1A1 status.Conclusions The combination of irinotecan with raltitrexed is an active, convenient and acceptable toxic regimen for second-line treatment for mCRC patients, which needs further study as a chemotherapy backbone to be combined with targeted agents in mCRC.Trial registration No. ChiCTR-ONC-12002767. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 29 Octorber 2012, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

scholarly journals Comparison between 5-day decitabine and 7-day azacitidine for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with poor prognostic features: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung-Hyun Lee ◽  
Ka-Won Kang ◽  
Min Ji Jeon ◽  
Eun Sang Yu ◽  
Dae Sik Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Multicentre Cohort Study ◽  
Treatment Responses ◽  
Grade 3

AbstractNumerous studies have analysed the clinical efficacies of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, reports that compare the two HMAs, decitabine and azacitidine, in patients with lower-risk (low and intermediate-1) MDS are limited. We compared 5-day decitabine and 7-day azacitidine regimens in terms of treatment responses, survival outcomes, and adverse events in patients with lower-risk MDS with poor prognostic features. The overall response rates (ORRs) were 67.2% and 44.0% in the patients treated with decitabine and azacitidine, respectively (P = 0.014). While the median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in the patients treated with decitabine than in those treated with azacitidine (P = 0.019), no significant differences in event-free and overall survival rates were observed between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with azacitidine treatment, decitabine treatment is significantly associated with a higher ORR (P = 0.026) and longer PFS (P = 0.037). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade 3 or higher haematologic adverse events in response to the two HMAs. In conclusion, in lower-risk MDS, especially with poor prognostic features, ORR and PFS were significantly better with 5-day decitabine treatment than with 7-day azacitidine treatment, with comparable safety.

scholarly journals EPID-07. HEMATOLOGICAL ADVERSE EVENTS IN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi75-vi76
Author(s):  
Catherine Garcia ◽  
Zin Myint ◽  
Rani Jayswal ◽  
Allison Butts ◽  
Heidi Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Severe Grade

Abstract BACKGROUND Temozolomide (TMZ) is the cornerstone for glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. A significant proportion of patients develops hematologic toxicities with limited investigations on outcomes and risk factors for their development. METHODS Our study combines data from the two largest group trials, RTOG 0525 and RTOG 0825, to analyze serious hematologic adverse events (HAE) associated with TMZ therapy for GBM. We analyzed frequency and outcomes of HAE during chemoradiation. RESULTS 1154 patients were evaluated with a median age of 57 years. Over 79% of patients developed HAE during the entire course of GBM treatment. During chemoradiation the most common HAE during chemoradiation was lymphopenia (41.5%), followed by thrombocytopenia (39.0%), and anemia (35.3%). Of these, 34.1% were severe (Grade 3 or 4) and 65.9% were mild (grade 1 or 2). During maintenance the most common HAE was leukopenia (50.7%), followed by neutropenia (50.4%), and lymphopenia (45.3%). MGMT methylation was not associated with HAEs. A history of HAEs during chemoradiation was a protective factor for developing HAEs during maintenance. MGMT methylated and age younger than 50 were protective factors for mortality. Patients that presented HAEs anytime during treatment had a longer overall survival and progression free survival. There was no significant difference in survival between mild or severe HAEs. CONCLUSION HAE are common during chemoradiation with TMZ for GBM, but are more commonly grade 1 or 2 per CTCAE. HAE during GBM treatment is associated with decreased progression free survival and overall survival.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Administration of Bortezomib in Combination with Thalidomide and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenghao Wu ◽  
Cuiping Zheng ◽  
Songyan Chen ◽  
Xiaoping Cai ◽  
Yuejian Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Subcutaneous Administration ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The Other ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients with the therapy of subcutaneous (subQ) administration of bortezomib and dexamethasone plus thalidomide (VTD) regimen.Methods. A total of 60 newly diagnosed MM patients were analyzed. 30 patients received improved VTD regimen (improved VTD group) with the subQ injection of bortezomib and the other 30 patients received conventional VTD regimen (VTD group).The efficacy and safety of two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results. The overall remission (OR) after eight cycles of treatment was 73.3% in the VTD group and 76.7% in the improved VTD group (P>0.05). No significant differences in time to 1-year estimate of overall survival (72% versus 75%,P=0.848) and progression-free survival (median 22 months versus 25 months;P=0.725) between two groups. The main toxicities related to therapy were leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, and renal and urinary disorders. Grade 3 and higher adverse events were significantly less common in the improved VTD group (50%) than VTD group (80%,P=0.015).Conclusions. The improved VTD regimen by changing bortezomib from intravenous administration to subcutaneous injection has noninferior efficacy to standard VTD regimen, with an improved safety profile and reduced adverse events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document