scholarly journals Comparison of three surgical approaches for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis: a multicentre, retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Zeng ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Jiulin Tan ◽  
Zhilin Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Thoracolumbar Junction ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Posterior Debridement ◽  
Multicentre Retrospective Study

Abstract Background: The surgical approaches to thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis were controversial. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of three surgical approaches through a multicentre retrospective study. Methods: The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 177) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. 45 patients underwent anterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group A), 52 underwent anterior combined with posterior debridement and instrumented fusion in a single- or two-stage procedure (Group B) and 80 underwent posterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group C). Patients with neurological deficit were 10 in Group A, 23 in Group B, 36 in Group C. All patients had a standard preoperative and postoperative anti - tuberculous therapy regimen. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological results of the three groups were compared. Operations at each centre were performed by the same senior medical team in each centre. Results: All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion and pain relief. All patients with neurological deficits had different degrees of recovery after surgery. The operative time was 330.2±45.4min, 408.0±54.3min, 227.9±58.5min, and the blood loss was 744.0±193.8ml, 1134.6±328.2ml, 349.8±289.4ml in groups A, B and C respectively. The mean loss of correction was 5.5±3.7° in group A, 1.6±1.9° in group B, 1.7±2.2° in group C, and the difference between groups except B vs C were of statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only procedure is superior to the anterior-only procedure in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only procedure is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as the anterior-only or combined procedure but with shorter operation times, less trauma and less blood loss. Keywords: Spinal tuberculosis; Thoracolumbar junction lesion; Surgical treatment; Outcome.

scholarly journals Comparison of three surgical approaches for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis: a multicentre, retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Zeng ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Jiulin Tan ◽  
Zhilin Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Thoracolumbar Junction ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Multicentre Retrospective Study

Abstract Background The surgical approaches to thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis were controversial. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of three different procedures through a multicentre retrospective study. Methods The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 177) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. Forty-five patients underwent anterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group A), 52 underwent anterior combined with posterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group B) and 80 underwent posterior-only debridement and instrumented fusion (Group C). Patients with neurological deficit were 10 in Group A, 23 in Group B, 36 in Group C. All patients had a standard preoperative and postoperative anti - tuberculous therapy regimen. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological evaluation of the three groups were compared. Operations at each centre were performed by the respective senior medical teams of the six different hospitals. Results All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion and pain relief. Cases with neurological deficits had different degrees of improvement after surgery. The operative time was 330.2 ± 45.4 min, 408.0 ± 54.3 min, 227.9 ± 58.5 min, and the blood loss was 744.0 ± 193.8 ml, 1134.6 ± 328.2 ml, 349.8 ± 289.4 ml in groups A, B and C respectively. The average loss of correction was 5.5 ± 3.7° in group A, 1.6 ± 1.9° in group B, 1.7 ± 2.2° in group C, and the difference between groups except B vs C were of statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only procedure is the better than the anterior-only procedure in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only procedure is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as combined procedure with shorter operation time, less blood loss and trauma.

scholarly journals Comparison of three surgical approaches for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis: a multicentre, retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Zeng ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Jiulin Tan ◽  
Zhilin Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Thoracolumbar Junction ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Multicentre Retrospective Study

Abstract Background: The surgical approaches to thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis were controversial. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of three different procedures through a multicentre retrospective study. Methods: The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 177) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. 45 patients underwent anterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group A), 52 underwent anterior combined with posterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group B) and 80 underwent posterior-only debridement and instrumented fusion (Group C). Patients with neurological deficit were 10 in Group A, 23 in Group B, 36 in Group C. All patients had a standard preoperative and postoperative anti - tuberculous therapy regimen. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological evaluation of the three groups were compared. Operations at each centre were performed by the respective senior medical teams of the six different hospitals. Results: All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion and pain relief. Cases with neurological deficits had different degrees of improvement after surgery. The operative time was 330.2±45.4min, 408.0±54.3min, 227.9±58.5min, and the blood loss was 744.0±193.8ml, 1134.6±328.2ml, 349.8±289.4ml in groups A, B and C respectively. The average loss of correction was 5.5±3.7° in group A, 1.6±1.9° in group B, 1.7±2.2° in group C, and the difference between groups except B vs C were of statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only procedure is the better than the anterior-only procedure in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only procedure is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as combined procedure with shorter operation time, less blood loss and trauma.

scholarly journals Comparison of three surgical approaches for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis: a multicentre, retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Zeng ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Jiulin Tan ◽  
Zhilin Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Thoracolumbar Junction ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Instrumented Fusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Multicentre Retrospective Study

Abstract Background: The surgical approaches to thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis were controversial. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of three different procedures through a multicentre retrospective study. Methods: The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 177) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. 45 patients underwent anterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group A), 52 underwent anterior combined with posterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group B) and 80 underwent posterior-only debridement and instrumented fusion (Group C). Patients with neurological deficit were 10 in Group A, 23 in Group B, 36 in Group C. All patients had a standard preoperative and postoperative anti - tuberculous therapy regimen. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological evaluation of the three groups were compared. Operations at each centre were performed by the respective senior medical teams of the six different hospitals. Results: All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion and pain relief. Cases with neurological deficits had different degrees of improvement after surgery. The operative time was 330.2±45.4min, 408.0±54.3min, 227.9±58.5min, and the blood loss was 744.0±193.8ml, 1134.6±328.2ml, 349.8±289.4ml in groups A, B and C respectively. The average loss of correction was 5.5±3.7° in group A, 1.6±1.9° in group B, 1.7±2.2° in group C, and the difference between groups except B vs C were of statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only procedure is the better than the anterior-only procedure in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only procedure is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as combined procedure with shorter operation time, less blood loss and trauma.

scholarly journals Surgery for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis a multicentre, retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Zeng ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Jiulin Tan ◽  
Zhilin Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Thoracolumbar Junction ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Purpose A multicentre, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different surgical techniques for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis. Methods The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 257) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. A total of 45 patients were operated on by an anterior approach (Group A), 52 by a combined anterior and posterior approach (Group B) and 160 by a posterior approach (Group C). Anti-tuberculosis therapy was performed both before and after surgery. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological results of the three groups were compared. Results All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion, pain relief and neurological recovery. The mean loss of correction in group A at last follow-up was higher than in groups B and C (P < 0.05), and the difference between groups B and C was not significant (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss in group B were greater than in groups A and C. Conclusions For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only approach is superior to the anterior-only approach in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only approach is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as the anterior-only or combined approach but with shorter operation times, less trauma and less blood loss. Keywords Spinal tuberculosis; Thoracolumbar junction; Three approaches.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC STATUS AND COMPLICATIONS BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT DOSES OF INTRAMYOMETRIAL VASOPRESSIN DURING LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY, THE LESSER THE BETTER

2021 ◽  
pp. 111-113
Author(s):  
NUPUR MODA ◽  
SUSHREE DAS ◽  
MADHUSMITA PATRO ◽  
PRERNA BISWAL
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Laparoscopic Myomectomy ◽  
Hemodynamic Status ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Different Doses

Objective: Our aim is comparison of hemodynamic status and complications between two different doses of intramyometrial vasopressin during laparoscopic myomectomy. Methods: We did a retrospective analysis of hemodynamic status and its anesthetic concerns in patients who received two different doses of intramyometrial vasopressin. Eighty patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy under general anesthesia were divided into two groups of 40 patients in each group. In Group A (n=40), 10 units of intramyometrial vasopressin in 200 ml of normal saline were given and, in Group B, 20 units of intramyometrial vasopressin in 200 ml of NS were given intraoperatively by surgeon. Results: 20 units intramyometrial vasopressin used dogmatically by surgeons drops blood loss but it is connected with cardiovascular impediments. Hence, 10 units of intramyometrial vasopressin as compared to 20 units which are used by some surgeons are associated with similar blood loss and lesser side effects such as bradycardia, pulmonary edema, hypotension, blood loss, and increased airway pressure. Conclusion: Hence, anesthesiologists and gynecologists must take the precautions to escape and minimize the frequency of impediments with intramyometrial vasopressin by selecting the appropriate dosage of vasopressin.

Outcomes of Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture in Patients With Osteoporosis Without Neurologic Symptoms: Analysis of Three Different Surgical Approaches

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1052-1057
Author(s):  
Tao Li ◽  
Yonghong Zheng ◽  
Zhengwei Xu ◽  
Dingjun Hao ◽  
Lixiong Qian
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture ◽  
Neurologic Symptoms ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients with osteoporosis without neurologic symptoms according to the surgical approach. The patients in group A underwent percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty, those in group B underwent minimally invasive percutaneous reduction and internal fixation, and those in group C underwent open reduction with bone graft fusion and internal fixation. Fracture reduction was assessed by X-ray. The operative time in group A was shorter than that in groups B and C, with less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stay. The intraoperative blood loss was less in group B than in group C, with shorter hospital stay. The postoperative visual analog scale scores were lower than the preoperative scores in each group. Cobb's angle of the injured vertebra in the last follow-up was larger in group A than in groups B and C. Regarding complications, in group A, nine patients developed postoperative bone cement leakage that required no specific treatment. In group B, one patient developed subcutaneous hematoma that healed well after treatment. The screw channel was loosened in two patients without symptoms; the screws were removed 1 year later. In group C, delayed incision healing was found in five patients. All three surgical approaches safely and effectively relieved the lower back pain in patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture with osteoporosis but without neurologic symptoms.

scholarly journals Comparison of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis in adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwei Li ◽  
Zheng Liu ◽  
Xiao Xiao ◽  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Xiyang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Kyphosis Angle ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Thoracic Spinal ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis

Abstract Background The surgical procedures for mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis mainly include anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion. Until now, the surgical choice is still controversial. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic (T5–9) spinal tuberculosis in adult patients. Methods Eighty-seven cases with mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis were treated with anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion (Group A, n = 39) and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion (Group B, n = 48) from January 2007 to June 2014. Parameters including the operation time, blood loss, time of ESR and CRP decreasing to the normal level, time of abscess disappearance, time of bone graft fusion, rate of surgical complications, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale were compared between two groups to evaluate their therapeutic effects. Results All patients were followed up for 5–10 years with the mean of 6.2 ± 1.1 years. No significant differences were observed regarding the gender composition ratio, age, course of disease, number of lesion segments, and preoperative indexes of ESR, CRP, VAS score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale between the two groups. Besides, no significant differences were observed regarding VAS score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale between the two groups in the 5th postoperative year (P > 0.05). However, the operation time (158.2 ± 10.7 min vs. 183.7 ± 14.1 min), blood loss (517.9 ± 76.5 ml vs.714.6 ± 57.4 ml), time of ESR (2.3 ± 1.1 months vs.3.1 ± 1.4 months) and CRP (1.1 ± 0.3 months vs.1.2 ± 0.6 months) decreasing to the normal level, time of abscess disappearance (2.7 ± 1.6 months vs.4.9 ± 1.9 months), and time of bone graft fusion (6.6 ± 0.8 months vs.8.0 ± 9.6 months) in Group A were less than those in Group B (P < 0.05). Conclusions Both anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion have a low risk of surgical complications and provide good quality of life for the patients with mid-thoracic (T5–9) spinal tuberculosis followed up in the mid-term. Moreover, the anterior procedure leads to early resolution of the disease and faster fusion.

scholarly journals Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation with single anterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation in treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongchun Zhou ◽  
Weiwei Li ◽  
Liqun Gong ◽  
Jiao Zhou ◽  
Jing Luo
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Anterior Debridement ◽  
Thoracic Spinal ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Posterior Debridement ◽  
Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical effect of single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation and single anterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis of adult patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made by involving 38 adult patients with thoracic spinal tuberculosis from between June 2013 and December 2015. Of the 38 patients, 21 patients were categorized in single anterior approach group and underwent single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation (Group A). The remaining 17 patients were classified in single posterior approaches group (Group B), which received single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation. Clinical manifestations, laboratory and imaging results of the two groups were analyzed subsequently. Results: All patients were followed up for 23.9 ± 3.8 m (range, 19–36 m). Bony fusion was achieved in all bone grafts. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in group B were significantly less than those in group A (P<0.05). The VAS scores, ESR, and CRP levels 6 weeks after operation and at the final follow-up were significantly lower than the preoperative levels (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, ASIA improvement no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). Furthermore, the postoperative and final-follow-up kyphosis angles in group B were both significantly smaller than those in group A (P<0.05). Group A had a postoperative angle correction rate smaller than group B, and its postoperative angle loss was greater than group B’s (P<0.05). Conclusion: Single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation can achieve similar curative effect as single anterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis, but also accompanied by additional advantages of shorter operation time and less bleeding .

scholarly journals Spinous Process Combined with a Titanium Mesh Cage as a Bone Graft in the Stability Reconstruction of Lumbar or Lumbosacral Spinal Tuberculosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongqi Zhang ◽  
Lige Xiao ◽  
mingxing Tang ◽  
Guanteng Yang
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Spinous Process ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Titanium Mesh ◽  
Bony Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background. To investigate the clinical efficacy of one-stage posterior debridement using the spinous process (SP) combined with titanium mesh cages (TMCs) as interbody grafts for the treatment of single-segment lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis.Methods. From 2010 to 2018, 69 patients who underwent one-stage posterior debridement using grafts and internal fixation within a single lumbar or lumbosacral segment were included in this study. 12 cases using the SP combined with a TMC (SP+TMC, group A), 30 cases using a TMC only (group B), and 27 cases using allografts (group C) were included. Measurements including operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) grade, final follow-up (FFU) duration and postoperative complications were recorded. Radiological measurements, including the number of segments fixated, the number of pedicle screws used, the Cobb angle, pelvic parameters, and the bony fusion time, were reviewed. All outcomes were analysed using SPSS 25.Results. We found that group A had fewer fixation segments (1.67±0.64 vs 2.81±0.94, pAC<0.01), fewer pedicle screws implanted (5.05±1.29 vs 6.85±1.37, pAC<0.01), a shorter operative time (166.43±44.11 min vs 205.93±51.73 min, pAC<0.01), reduced blood loss (543.81±230.81 ml vs 803.70±446.78 ml, pAC<0.01), and a strikingly lower hospital cost (14710.42±2354.55$ vs 19260.34±3310.75$, pAC<0.01) than group C.Compared to group B, group A had a lower economic cost (16680.23±3614.73$ vs 14710.42±2354.55$, pAB=0.03). There was no significant difference in bony fusion time among the three groups (8.90 ±2.11 months vs 8.60±2.39 months vs 9.59 ±2.04 months, p>0.01). No significant difference was observed with respect to pre- or postoperative ESR and CRP (p>0.01). There was no significant difference among the 3 groups with respect to the ODI, VAS score or ASIA grade during any period. No differences regarding the hospital stay, rate of complications, loss of PI-LL, correction or loss of Cobb angle were observed among the three groups (p>0.01).Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that compared to a TMC or allograft, the use of the SP combined with a TMC as a bone graft is an effective and reliable approach for the surgical management of one-level lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis, leading to good restoration of spinal stability. Furthermore, this approach is an economical structural bone grafting method, especially for patients in developing countries or areas.

scholarly journals Thoracoscopy Assisted Minimally Surgery (NUSS procedure) for Pectus Excavatum vs. Novel Modified NUSS procedure - A Single-Center Retrospective Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. E404-E408
Author(s):  
Lifei Meng ◽  
Mingsong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Pectus Excavatum ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Nuss Procedure ◽  
School Of Medicine ◽  
Hospitalization Time ◽  
Group A ◽  
Reducing Costs ◽  
Group B

Objective: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the efficacy of thoracoscopy assisted minimally surgery (NUSS procedure) for pectus excavatum and novel modified NUSS procedure by comparing the data of patients of pectus excavatum who had undergone novel modified NUSS Procedure or NUSS procedure. Methods: A retrospective study was performed, involving 132 cases of patients with pectus excavatum collected from Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Xinhua Hospital cardio-thoracic surgery between Jan. 2009 and Jan. 2012. The 132 patients were strictly divided into two groups: Group A included 76 cases that underwent a novel modified NUSS procedure; Group B included 56 cases that underwent NUSS procedure. Compared data included gender, age, operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital staying and clinical variables and demographic were compared with univariable analysis. Results: No statistically significant correlations were observed in the two groups, such as age (12.67±4.793 years vs. 12.20± 6.423 years), sex, and other clinical data (P > 0.05). In Group A, postoperative hospitalization time (3.95±0.487 days vs. 6.07±1.412 days), operation time (46.28±12.218 minutes vs. 72.23±24.270 minutes), and blood loss (7.37±4.863 ml vs. 16.93±14.002 ml) were significantly better than those in Group B (P < 0.05), shortening hospitalization time, reducing costs, meaning statistically significant differences. There was no recurrence in Group A and Group B after operation. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that novel modified NUSS procedure is less invasive, having rapid recovery, shortening the time of hospital stay, and reducing hospital cost. Thus, it is safe, worth promoting, and is widely being used.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document