scholarly journals Percutaneous Mastoid Electrical Stimulator Improves Poststroke Depression and Cognitive F unction in Patients with Ischaemic Stroke: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, and Sham-controlled Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taoli Lu ◽  
Lanying He ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Lili Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : Poststroke depression can lead to functional dependence, cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator (PMES) plus antidepressants on poststroke depression and cognitive function. Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study . A total of 258 clinically depressed ischaemic stroke patients within 14 days of index stroke were randomly assigned to the PMES plus antidepressant (PMES group, N=125) and sham plus antidepressant (sham group, N=133) groups. All patients underwent the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) test at 2 weeks (baseline), and 6 months(M6) after ischaemic stroke. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients showing a treatment response (≥50% reduction in HRSD score) and depression remission (HRSD score≤9) at 6 months. The secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with a MoCA score <26 . Results: The percentages of patients showing a treatment response and depression remission were significantly higher in the PMES group than in the sham group (57.60% vs 41.35%, P=0.009; 44.00% vs 29.32%, P=0.014 respectively). The mean value of the HRSD score change [M(month)6-baseline] was significantly higher in the PMES group than in the sham group at 6 months (-11.93 ±5.32 vs -10.48 ± 6.10, P = 0.036, respectively). The percentage of patients with MoCA scores <26 was lower in the PEMS group than in the sham group(12.0% vs 24.06%, P=0.012,respectively), and the mean value of the MoCA score change (M6-baseline) was higher in the PMES group than in the sham group (3.50±2.55 vs 2.72±2.52, P=0.005,respectively). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that PMES adjunctive to antidepressant therapy is effective in reducing depression, achieving remission in the short term, and improving cognition. Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered (registration number: ChiCTR1800016463) on 03 June 2018

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taoli Lu ◽  
lanying he ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Lili Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Backgrond : Poststroke depression could lead to functional dependence, cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator (PMES) plus antidepressant on poststroke depression and cognitive function. Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study . 258 clinically depressed ischemic stroke patients within 14 d of index stroke were randomly assigned to PMES plus antidepressant (PMES group, N=125) and sham plus antidepressant (sham group, N=133). All patients underwent Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) test at 2 weeks (baseline), and 6 months after the stroke. Primary outcomes were the percentage of treatment response (≥50% reduction in HRSD score) and depression remission (HRSD score≤9) at 6 months. Secondary outcome was the percentage of MoCA score <26. Results: The percentage of treatment response and depression remission in PMES group were significantly higher than that in the sham group (57.60% vs 41.35%, P=0.009), (44.00% vs 29.32%, P=0.014), respectively. The mean value of HRSD score change(M6-baseline) was significantly greater in the PMES group compared to sham group at 6 months (-11.93 ±5.32 vs -10.48 ± 6.10, P = 0.036). The percentage MoCA score <26 in PEMS group was lower than that in sham group(12.0% vs 24.06%, P=0.012), the mean value of MoCA score change (M6-baseline) was higher in PMES group compared to sham group (3.50±2.55 vs 2.72±2.52; P=0.005). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that PMES adjunctive to antidepressant therapy is effective in reducing depression, achieving remission in the short term, and improving cognition. Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered (registration number: ChiCTR1800016463) on 03 June 2018


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taoli Lu ◽  
Lanying He ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Lili Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Backgrond: Poststroke depression could lead to functional dependence, cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator (PMES) plus antidepressant on poststroke depression and cognitive function. Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study. 258 clinically depressed ischemic stroke patients within 14 d of index stroke were randomly assigned to PMES plus antidepressant (PMES group, N=125) and sham plus antidepressant (sham group, N=133). All patients underwent Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) test at 2 weeks (baseline), and 6 months after the stroke. Primary outcomes were the percentage of treatment response (≥50% reduction in HRSD score) and depression remission (HRSD score≤9) at 6 months. Secondary outcome was the percentage of MoCA score <26. Results: The percentage of treatment response and depression remission in PMES group were significantly higher than that in the sham group (57.60% vs 41.35%, P=0.009), (44.00% vs 29.32%, P=0.014), respectively. The mean value of HRSD score change(M6-baseline) was significantly greater in the PMES group compared to sham group at 6 months (-11.93 ±5.32 vs -10.48 ± 6.10, P = 0.036). The percentage MoCA score <26 in PEMS group was lower than that in sham group(12.0% vs 24.06%, P=0.012), the mean value of MoCA score change (M6-baseline) was higher in PMES group compared to sham group (3.50±2.55 vs 2.72±2.52; P=0.005). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that PMES adjunctive to antidepressant therapy is effective in reducing depression, achieving remission in the short term, and improving cognition. Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered (registration number: ChiCTR1800016463) on 03 June 2018


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taoli Lu ◽  
lanying he ◽  
Bei Zhang ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Lili Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Backgrond Poststroke depression could lead to functional dependence, cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator (PMES) plus antidepressant on poststroke depression and cognitive function.Methods 258 clinically depressed ischemic stroke patients within 14 d of index stroke were randomly assigned to PMES plus antidepressant (PMES group) and sham plus antidepressant (sham group). All patients underwent Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) test at 2 weeks (baseline), and 6 months after the stroke. The clinical outcome was defined as treatment response (≥50% reduction in HRSD) and depression remission (HRSD≤9) at 6 months.Results Compared with the sham group, PEMS group significantly improved MoCA and HRSD scoreat the end of the 6-month treatment period (P<0.001). The mean value of MoCA score change (3.50±2.55 vs 2.72±2.52; P=0.005), and HRSD score change (-11.93 ±5.32 vs -10.48 ± 6.10, P = 0.041) was significantly greater in the PMES group compared to sham group at 6 months. In fully adjusted models, PMES plus antidepressant was associated with increased treatment response rate [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-3.63; P=0.015], and depression remission rate [adjusted OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.05-3.18; P=0.032]. In fully adjust models, PMES plus antidepressant was associated with decreased risk of 6-month MoCA score <26 (adjusted OR, 0.25; 95%CI, 0.09–0.70; P=0.008).Conclusion These findings demonstrate that PMES adjunctive to antidepressant therapy is highly effective in reducing depression, achieving remission in the short term, and improving cognition.


Author(s):  
Victor Ifeanyichukwu Modekwe ◽  
Jideofor Okechukwu Ugwu ◽  
Okechukwu Hyginus Ekwunife ◽  
Andrew Nwankwo Osuigwe ◽  
Jideofor Chukwuma Orakwe ◽  
...  

Introduction: Procedural analgesia use in neonatal circumcision is not widespread in the developing world. An easy-to-administer, adequate and safe analgesia will encourage usage in neonatal circumcision. Orally administered ketamine may prove effective and safe, and may encourage procedural analgesia use in neonatal circumcision. Aim: To determine the analgesic efficacy of oral ketamine in Plastibell® neonatal circumcision. Materials and Methods: A hospital based randomised double blind controlled study was conducted at the paediatric surgery unit of the hospital, from March 2015 to December 2015. Total 121 neonates were sequentially recruited, and randomised into two groups. Group A received oral ketamine, and Group B received plain syrup (placebo) as procedural analgesia. Continuous pulse oximeter monitoring was done before, during and immediately after the procedure. The pre-procedural and intra-procedural peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and Pulse Rate (PR) were determined at the various stages. Also, the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) scores were assessed during the stages of the procedure. Differences in mean scores were analysed. Mann-Whitney U test and Independent t-test were used to compare means of continuous variable, while Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Sixty-one neonates received oral ketamine, while 60 received placebo. The intraoperative mean SpO2 were lower in the placebo group and significant at the tying stage with p=0.022. The mean intraoperative PR was higher in the placebo group and significant at dorsal-slit, tying and excision stages (p<0.05). The mean intraoperative NIPS scores were significantly higher in the placebo group. Conclusion: Oral ketamine provides effective and safe analgesia for neonatal Plastibell® circumcision in comparison to placebo.


1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 732-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milap C. Nahata ◽  
Carole A. Slencsak ◽  
Judith Kamp

This randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study involved 20 incontinent geriatric patients; all had indwelling Foley catheters. Each patient received chlorophyllin 100 mg/d for two weeks and placebo daily for two weeks, separated by a washout period of one week. For each subject, the intensity of urinary odor was measured ten times during both the treatment and placebo regimen and three times during the washout period, using a visual analog scale. A decrease in urinary odor was associated with chlorophyllin in 12 patients and with placebo in 6 patients at the end of two weeks on each regimen. Chlorophyllin treatment was associated with about a 21-percent decrease in mean urinary odor intensity, whereas placebo increased the odor by about 9 percent. The mean intensity of urinary odor was lowest during the second week of chlorophyllin treatment. Despite the decrease in urinary odor in many patients receiving chlorophyllin, its effect was not significantly greater than that of placebo. Our data suggest that chlorophyllin 100 mg/d for two weeks may not be effective in incontinent geriatric patients with mild to moderate urinary odor.


1995 ◽  
Vol 167 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Oehrberg ◽  
P. E. Christiansen ◽  
K. Behnke ◽  
A. L. Borup ◽  
B. Severin ◽  
...  

BackgroundThis study compared the efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine with placebo in the treatment of panic disorder.MethodAfter three weeks of placebo, patients received 12 weeks of treatment with paroxetine (20, 40, or 60 mg) or placebo, and finally two weeks of placebo. Dosages were adjusted according to efficacy and tolerability. Standardised cognitive therapy was given to all patients. The primary measure of outcome was reduction in the number of panic attacks.ResultsAnalysis of the results showed statistically significant differences in favour of paroxetine between the two treatment groups in two out of the three primary measures of outcome, i.e. 50% reduction in total number of panic attacks and number of panic attacks reduced to one or zero over the study period. For the third measure of outcome, the mean change in the total number of attacks from baseline, there was a positive trend in favour of paroxetine. The results of the primary measures of outcome were strongly supported by the results of the secondary efficacy measures of outcome. In addition, paroxetine, at all doses, was very well tolerated.ConclusionParoxetine plus cognitive therapy was significantly more effective than placebo plus cognitive therapy in the treatment of panic disorder.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Lundsgaard Kraglund ◽  
Janne Kaergaard Mortensen ◽  
Søren Paaske Johnsen ◽  
Grethe Andersen ◽  
Erik Lerkevang Grove

AbstractWe evaluated the effect of SSRI treatment on platelet aggregation in patients with ischaemic stroke and included patients from the randomized double-blind controlled study of citalopram in acute ischaemic stroke (TALOS). Patients on clopidogrel were included 6 months after acute ischaemic stroke. Platelet parameters, including P2Y12 platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow System, were measured at the last day of study treatment and repeated after a 14-day wash-out period. A total of 60 patients were included (n = 32 randomized to citalopram). Platelet aggregation levels did not differ between the citalopram group (mean 116, 95% CI 89 to 143) and the placebo group (mean 136, 95% CI 109 to 163) (On-treatment, p = 0.14). Similarly, there was no significant change in platelet aggregation in the citalopram group from on-treatment to post-treatment (mean difference 2.0; 95% CI −18 to 14). Platelet count, size and turnover were not affected by SSRI treatment. In conclusion, SSRI therapy did not lead to statistically significant inhibition of platelet aggregation in ischaemic stroke patients treated with clopidogrel.


2019 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. e192-e196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sepideh Vahabi ◽  
Siavash Beiranvand ◽  
Arash Karimi ◽  
Mahmoudreza Moradkhani

Abstract Context Hemorrhoid is one of the most common diseases in both, men and women, affecting half of the world's population over the age of 50. Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of local ointment of glyceryl trinitrate ointment (GTN) after hemorrhoidectomy. Methods and Materials In this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the patients were grouped as the treatment, that is GTN, and placebo (P) group. After surgery, 0.2% gelatin GTN ointment (250 mg), and P ointment (n = 20 for each group) were applied topically on 1 cm on the anus using a standard ruler, three times a week in respective groups. visual analog scale was used to assess the intensity of the pain and complications of the drugs were observed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. Statistical Analysis Used Data and questionnaires were analyzed statistically using SPSS17 software and results were recorded in the tabular form. Results Six hours after the application of the ointment, no significant difference was found among the groups, however, after 12, 18, and 24 hours significant reduction in pain was seen in GTN group, which was least after 18 hours. The mean values of the total pain score in the first 24 hours after surgery in the GTN group were 3.15 and 5.45 in the P group which were statistically significant. Nonetheless, headache was significantly increased in the GTN group. Conclusion Simple and safe topical GTN ointment can reduce the pain after hemorrhoidectomy, leading to the reduced need of other analgesics.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9007-9007 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Lee ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
Y. Chun ◽  
M. Kim ◽  
H. Chang ◽  
...  

9007 Introduction: Although pyridoxine has been used empirically for the prevention of HFS associated with capecitabine, its efficacy has not been proven yet. We performed a prospective randomized double-blind study to determine whether pyridoxine can prevent the development of HFS when given concurrently with capecitabine. Method: Chemotherapy-naive patients (pts) with gastrointestinal tract cancers who were going to have capecitabine-containing chemotherapy were randomized to receive either oral pyridoxine (200 mg/day) or placebo daily during chemotherapy after stratified by chemotherapy regimen: 1) capecitabine alone, 2) capecitabine and cisplatin, or 3) docetaxel, capecitabine, and cisplatin. The patients were observed until grade 2 or 3 HFS (by NCI CTC version 2.0) developed or capecitabine containing chemotherapy ended. When grade 2 or 3 HFS developed in pts in placebo group, the pts were randomized again to receive either pyridoxine or placebo for next cycle of chemotherapy in order to determine whether pyridoxine could improve the HFS. Result: From Jun 2004 to Oct 2005, total 389 pts were entered onto the study. But, 29 pts (15 in placebo group and 14 in pyridoxine group) were excluded from the study because of ineligibility or pts’ refusal. Pts’ characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. Grade 2 or 3 HFS developed in 55 of 180 (30.6%) pts in placebo group and in 57 of 180 (31.7%) pts in pyridoxine group. (p=0.788) The median cycles of chemotherapy to grade 2 or 3 HFS was 3 in both groups. The mean cumulative dose of capecitabine until occurrence of grade 2 or 3 HFS was not different statistically between the two groups. (221,157.5 mg/m2 vs. 259,808.5 mg/m2, p=0.788). Total 44 of 55 pts in placebo group who had grade 2 or 3 HFS were randomized to receive either placebo or pyridoxine at next cycle. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the proportion of pts with improvement of HFS (43% vs 48%, p=0.94). Conclusion: These results indicated that pyridoxine is not effective for the prevention of HFS associated with capecitabine therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document