scholarly journals CASSETTE - clindamycin adjunctive therapy for severe Staphylococcus aureus treatment evaluation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindra Dotel ◽  
Steven YC Tong ◽  
Asha Bowen ◽  
Jane N Nelson ◽  
Matthew VN O'Sullivan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Exotoxins are an important virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus. Clindamycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic, is thought to limit exotoxin production and improve outcomes in severe S. aureus infections. However, randomised prospective data to support this is lacking. Methods An open label, multicenter, randomised controlled trial (RCT) will compare outcome differences in severe S. aureus infection between a standard treatment (flucloxacillin/cefazolin in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; and vancomycin/daptomycin in methicillin-resistance S. aureus) and a standard treatment plus an additional clindamycin given for 7 days. We will include a minimum of 60 participants (both adult and children) in the pilot study. Participants will be enrolled within 72 hours of an index culture. Severe infections will include septic shock, necrotising pneumonia, or multifocal and non-contiguous skin and soft tissue/osteoarticular infections. Immunosuppressed, moribund, current severe diarrhea or C. difficile infection, pregnant, and those with anaphylaxis to beta-lactams or lincosamides will be excluded. Primary outcomes measure is number of days alive and free (1 or none) of SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) within the first 14 days post randomization. Secondary outcomes measure will include all-cause mortality at 14, 42 and 90 days, time to resolution of SIRS, proportion with microbiological treatment failure, and rate of change of C-reactive protein over time. Impacts of inducible clindamycin resistance, strains types, methicillin-susceptibility, and presence of various exotoxins will also be analysed. Discussion This study will assess the effect of adjunctive clindamycin on patient-centered outcomes in severe, toxin mediated S. aureus infections. The Pilot study will provide feasibility for a much larger RCT. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617001416381p. Registered 06 October 2017

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindra Dotel ◽  
Steven YC Tong ◽  
Asha Bowen ◽  
Jane N Nelson ◽  
Matthew VN O'Sullivan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Exotoxins are an important virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus. Clindamycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic, is thought to limit exotoxin production and improve outcomes in severe S. aureus infections. However, randomised prospective data to support this is lacking. Methods: An open label, multicenter, randomised controlled trial (RCT) will compare outcome differences in severe S. aureus infection between a standard treatment (flucloxacillin/cefazolin in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; and vancomycin/daptomycin in methicillin-resistance S. aureus) and a standard treatment plus an additional clindamycin given for 7 days. We will include a minimum of 60 participants (both adult and children) in the pilot study. Participants will be enrolled within 72 hours of an index culture. Severe infections will include septic shock, necrotising pneumonia, or multifocal and non-contiguous skin and soft tissue/osteoarticular infections. Immunosuppressed, moribund, current severe diarrhea or C. difficile infection, pregnant, and those with anaphylaxis to beta-lactams or lincosamides will be excluded. Primary outcomes measure is number of days alive and free (1 or none) of SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) within the first 14 days post randomization. Secondary outcomes measure will include all-cause mortality at 14, 42 and 90 days, time to resolution of SIRS, proportion with microbiological treatment failure, and rate of change of C-reactive protein over time. Impacts of inducible clindamycin resistance, strains types, methicillin-susceptibility, and presence of various exotoxins will also be analysed. Discussion: This study will assess the effect of adjunctive clindamycin on patient-centered outcomes in severe, toxin mediated S. aureus infections. The Pilot study will provide feasibility for a much larger RCT. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617001416381p. Registered 06 October 2017 Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, exotoxins, prospective studies, clindamycin, leukocidins


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P. F. Chow ◽  
Kate Maddaford ◽  
Jane S. Hocking ◽  
Catriona S. Bradshaw ◽  
Rebecca Wigan ◽  
...  

Abstract New treatments for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea are required to address rising antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to examine the efficacy of a 14-day course of mouthwash twice daily compared to standard treatment (antibiotic) for the treatment of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea. The OMEGA2 trial was a parallel-group and open-labelled randomised controlled trial among men with untreated oropharyngeal gonorrhoea that was conducted between September 2018 and February 2020 at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in Australia. Men were randomised to the intervention (rinsing, gargling and spraying mouthwash twice daily for 14 days) or control (standard treatment) arm and followed for 28 days. Participants in both arms were advised to abstain from sex and kissing with anyone for 14 days after enrolment. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected at baseline, Day 14 and Day 28 and tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) and culture. The primary outcome was the detection of oropharyngeal N. gonorrhoeae by NAAT at Day 14 after treatment. This trial was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001380280). This trial stopped early due to a high failure rate in the mouthwash arm. Twelve men were randomly assigned to either mouthwash (n = 6) or standard treatment (n = 6). Of the 11 men who returned at Day 14, the cure rate for oropharyngeal gonorrhoea in the mouthwash arm was 20% (95% CI 1–72%; 1/5) and in the standard treatment arm was 100% (95% CI 54–100%; 6/6). A 14-day course of mouthwash failed to cure a high proportion of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea cases.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne Harvey ◽  
Mary-Clare Waugh ◽  
James Rice ◽  
Giuliana Antolovich ◽  
Lisa Copeland ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Gabapentin is often used to manage pain in children with dystonic cerebral palsy, however the evidence for its effectiveness in this population is limited. The primary objective of this feasibility pilot study was to assess the factors which might impact on a future randomised controlled trial including the ability to recruit and retain participants, assess adherence/compliance to the prescribed intervention, and ability to complete all outcome assessments. The secondary objective was to gather preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of gabapentin at reducing pain, improving comfort and reducing dystonia in children with dystonic cerebral palsy. Methods This open label pilot study recruited children aged 5–18 years with dystonic cerebral palsy and accompanying pain affecting daily activities from four centres around Australia. Children were prescribed gabapentin for 12 weeks and were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility of the protocol. Secondary outcomes were pain behaviour, pain intensity, care and comfort, individualised goal setting and dystonia severity. Results Thirteen children (mean age 10.4 years (SD 2.4yrs), 9 females) were recruited from 71 screened over 15 months. Two children withdrew while eight children experienced side effects. There were issues with adherence to medication dosage regimens and data collection. Improvements were seen in pain behaviour, comfort and pain related goals at 12 weeks. Dystonia was not significantly changed. Conclusions Whilst gabapentin has potential to improve pain and comfort in children with dystonic CP, the feasibility of implementing a definitive randomised controlled trial is low. Alternative trials designs are required to further examine the effectiveness of gabapentin in this heterogeneous population. Trial registration The trial was registered with the Australian Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12616000366459) on 22/03/2016 and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (CT-2016-CTN-00500-1) on 22/06/2016.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document