scholarly journals A New Approach for Spherical Fuzzy TOPSIS and Spherical Fuzzy VIKOR Applied to the Evaluation of Hydrogen Storage Systems

Author(s):  
Iman Mohamad Sharaf

Abstract This study proposes a new perspective of the TOPSIS and VIKOR methods using the recently introduced spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) to handle the vagueness in subjective data and the uncertainties in objective data simultaneously. When implementing these techniques using SFSs, two main problems might arise that can lead to incorrect results. Firstly, the reference points might change with the utilized score function. Secondly, the distance between reference points might not be the largest, as known, among the available ratings. To overcome these deficiencies and increase the robustness of these two methods, they are implemented without utilizing any reference points to minimize the effect of defuzzification and without measuring the distance to eliminate the effect of distance formulas. In the proposed methods, when using an SFS to express the performance of an alternative for a criterion, this SFS per se can be viewed as a measure of proximity to the aspired level. On the other hand, the conjugate of the SFS can be viewed as a measure of proximity to the ineffectual level. Two practical applications are presented to demonstrate the proposed techniques. The first example handles a warehouse location selection problem. The second example evaluates hydrogen storage systems for automobiles with different types of data (crisp, linguistic variables, type 1 fuzzy sets). These data are transformed to SFSs to provide a more comprehensive analysis. A comparative study is conducted with earlier versions of TOPSIS and VIKOR to explicate the adequacy of the proposed methods and the consistency of the results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-29
Author(s):  
Laxminarayan Sahoo

The aim of this paper is to propose some score functions for the fruitful ranking of fermatean fuzzy sets (FFSs) and fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS method based on proposed score functions. fermatean fuzzy sets proposed by Senapati and Yager can handle uncertain information more easily in the process of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). In this paper, the authors have proposed three newly improved score functions for effective ranking of fermatean fuzzy sets. Here, they have applied the proposed score function to calculate the separation measure of each alternative from the positive and negative ideal solutions to determine the relative closeness coefficient. Based on different types of score functions, they have employed the TOPSIS method to solve the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem in which all preference information provided by the decision makers is expressed in terms of fermatean fuzzy decision matrices. Finally, a numerical example for selecting the bride form matrimonial site has been considered to illustrate the proposed method.


Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Ruirui Zhao ◽  
Minxia Luo ◽  
Shenggang Li

Picture fuzzy sets, which are the extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, can deal with inconsistent information better in practical applications. A distance measure is an important mathematical tool to calculate the difference degree between picture fuzzy sets. Although some distance measures of picture fuzzy sets have been constructed, there are some unreasonable and counterintuitive cases. The main reason is that the existing distance measures do not or seldom consider the refusal degree of picture fuzzy sets. In order to solve these unreasonable and counterintuitive cases, in this paper, we propose a dynamic distance measure of picture fuzzy sets based on a picture fuzzy point operator. Through a numerical comparison and multi-criteria decision-making problems, we show that the proposed distance measure is reasonable and effective.


Adsorption ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (S1) ◽  
pp. 871-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarang A. Gadre ◽  
Armin D. Ebner ◽  
James A. Ritter

2022 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 103761
Author(s):  
Jianjun Ye ◽  
Zhenhua Zhao ◽  
Junxu Cui ◽  
Zhengli Hua ◽  
Wenzhu Peng ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.V. Netskina ◽  
A.M. Ozerova ◽  
O.V. Komova ◽  
G.V. Odegova ◽  
V.I. Simagina

2014 ◽  
Vol 268 ◽  
pp. 950-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kriston P. Brooks ◽  
Troy A. Semelsberger ◽  
Kevin L. Simmons ◽  
Bart van Hassel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document