Who are the beneficiaries and what are the reasons for non-utilization of respite care? A cross-sectional study on family caregivers

Author(s):  
Jianan Huang ◽  
Nadja Münzel ◽  
Anke Scheel-Sailer ◽  
Armin Gemperli

Abstract BackgroundFamily caregivers assume substantial caregiving responsibilities for persons with chronic conditions, which leads to negative impact on their lives. Respite care is provided as a temporary relief for them. The design of appropriate respite care programs requires the identification of beneficiary subgroups for different types of services. The objectives of the study were to quantify the uptake of respite care services by family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury, and to identify the main beneficiaries of the respective offers and the reasons for non-use.MethodsA cross-sectional survey of family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury was conducted nationwide in Switzerland. The use of 11 different respite care services during the last 12 months was investigated, along with caregivers’ reasons for not using any respite service. Classification trees were used to characterize the beneficiaries and reasons for not using respite services.ResultsOne-third of family caregivers used at least one type of respite care service during the last 12 months. Utilization of respite care was found to be greater among those who employed professional home care (57% vs 24% among those without professional home care). There were marked cantonal differences in the utilization of respite care. The primary reason for not using respite services was “no demand” (80% among non-users of respite services), mainly among caregivers who were less emotionally affected by their caregiving tasks. Conclusions Utilization of respite care services primarily depends on living arrangements and place of residency and less on the functional status of the care recipient. Programs should thus be tailored to the cultural context of their potential users. This is best achieved through coordination with local health care professionals who can identify the needs, provide information, initiate referrals, and integrate the care into a larger support plan.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianan Huang ◽  
Nadja Münzel ◽  
Anke Scheel-Sailer ◽  
Armin Gemperli

Abstract Background Family caregivers assume substantial caregiving responsibilities for persons with chronic conditions, such as individuals with spinal cord injury, which leads to negative impacts on their lives. Respite care and other services are provided as a temporary relief and support for them. Design of appropriate respite care programs depends on identification of beneficiary subgroups for the different types of service. This study aimed to quantify the uptake of different respite and support services for family caregivers, the reasons for non-use, and to explore the respective predictors. Methods A cross-sectional survey of family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury was conducted nationwide in Switzerland. The use of 11 different respite and support services during the previous 12 months was investigated, along with caregivers’ reasons for not using any respite. Classification trees were used to characterize the beneficiaries and reasons for not using respite. Results About a third of family caregivers used at least one type of respite or support service during the previous 12 months. Utilization of respite care was greater among those who employed professional home care (57% vs 24% of those without professional home care). Marked cantonal differences were also observed in utilization of respite care. The primary reason for not using respite services was “no demand” (80% of non-users of respite services), mainly among caregivers who were less emotionally affected by their caregiving tasks. Conclusions Utilization of respite and support services depends more on place of residence and use of home care services than on functional status of the care recipient. Accordingly, programs should be tailored to the cultural context of their potential users. This is best achieved through coordination with local health care professionals who can identify needs, provide information, initiate referrals, and integrate the care into a larger support plan.


Spinal Cord ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 924-932
Author(s):  
Jianan Huang ◽  
Diana Pacheco Barzallo ◽  
Sara Rubinelli ◽  
Nadja Münzel ◽  
Mirjam Brach ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1394-1402
Author(s):  
De Gong ◽  
Yingmin Wang ◽  
Lirong Zhong ◽  
Mengmeng Jia ◽  
Ting Liu ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Hinrichs ◽  
Veronika Lay ◽  
Ursina Arnet ◽  
Inge Eriks-Hoogland ◽  
Hans Georg Koch ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1190-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja de Groot ◽  
Jacinthe J. Adriaansen ◽  
Marga Tepper ◽  
Govert J. Snoek ◽  
Lucas H.V. van der Woude ◽  
...  

This study investigated (i) the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in people with a long-standing spinal cord injury (SCI); (ii) whether personal or lesion characteristics are determinants of the MetS; and (iii) the association with physical activity or peak aerobic capacity on the MetS. In a cross-sectional study, persons with SCI (N = 223; time since injury of ≥10 years) were tested. The individual components of the MetS were assessed together with the physical activity measured by the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD), while peak aerobic capacity was tested during a graded wheelchair exercise test on a treadmill. Thirty-nine percent of the participants had MetS. In a multivariate logistic regression analyses and after performing a backward regression analysis, only age and education were significant determinants of the MetS. A 10-year increase in age leads to a 1.5 times more chance to have the MetS. Furthermore, people with a low education will multiply the relative risk of MetS compared with people with high education by almost 2. With and without correcting for confounders, no significant relationship was found between PASIPD or peak aerobic capacity and the MetS. It can be concluded that the prevalence of the MetS is high (39%) in people with a long-standing SCI but is comparable to the general Dutch population. Older people and those with a lower education level are most at risk for the MetS. Physical activity and peak aerobic fitness were not related to the MetS in this group with a long-standing SCI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Hatefi ◽  
AmirHosein Meisami ◽  
Alalleh Dalvand ◽  
Milad Borji

Background: Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are a variety of chronic diseases that various causes such as trauma may contribute to its onset. One of the problems in these patients is the problem of physical activity and, consequently, daily activities. Objectives: This study aimed to assess daily living of patients with SCI. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study in 2019, 120 patients with SCI in Kermanshah were included in the study using purposive sampling. The instruments used in this study fell into two parts. One part included the demographic characteristics of the SCI patients, and the other part was a questionnaire of the rate of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire (IPA-P). Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16 using descriptive tests such as mean and standard deviation. Results: The result showed there was a significant relationship between demographic characteristics such as education (P < 0.007), time of spinal cord injury (P < 0.01), and income (P = 0.000). Also, the results showed there was a relationship between Autonomy and Participation, and the age of patients and their autonomy and participation decreased with age (P = 0.000, R = 0.72). Most of the patients had severe problems with daily activities. Also, most patients had very poor scores in relation to daily living activities. Conclusions: Considering the low rate of participation and autonomy in patients with SCI, it is suggested to conduct studies aimed at improving their self-care and social participation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document