scholarly journals Prognostic value of Onodera’s Nutritional Index for intermediate and high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with or without Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Tingting Tao ◽  
Heng Yu ◽  
Yingying Xu ◽  
Zhi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Independent Prognostic Marker ◽  
Nutritional Index

Abstract Background Immunoinflammatory and nutritional markers such as peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) have gained considerable attention and revealed preliminaryly as prognostic markers in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Methods In this study, we firstly investigated the prognostic value of OPNI in GIST treated with or without TKIs based on the propensity score matching (PSM) method. All of the patients had received surgical resection for primary GIST, the data from 2010 to 2018 were initially and retrospectively identified from our gastrointestinal center. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results These patients who were treated with TKIs and those who did not were divided into two groups, and we used propensity score matching method to make them have more unified baseline data. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to identify associations with outcome variables. A total of 563 GISTs were initially chosen and 280 of them were included for analysis under an inclusion criteria. After PSM, there were 200 patients included. Multivariate analyses identified OPNI was an independent prognostic marker, and was associated with primary site, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor rupture, necrosis, and modified NIH risk classification. Low OPNI (< 42.6; HR 0.315; P༜0.001) were associated with worse RFS. Conclusions Preoperative OPNI is a novel and useful prognostic marker for GISTs both treated with or without TKIs.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of Onodera’s Nutritional Index for intermediate and high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with or without Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Tingting Tao ◽  
Heng Yu ◽  
Yingying Xu ◽  
Zhi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Independent Prognostic Marker ◽  
Nutritional Index

Abstract Background Immunoinflammatory and nutritional markers such as peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) have gained considerable attention and revealed preliminaryly as prognostic markers in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Methods In this study, we firstly investigated the prognostic value of OPNI in GIST treated with or without TKIs based on the propensity score matching (PSM) method. All of the patients had received surgical resection for primary GIST, the data from 2010 to 2018 were initially and retrospectively identified from our gastrointestinal center. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results These patients who were treated with TKIs and those who did not were divided into two groups, and we used propensity score matching method to make them have more unified baseline data. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to identify associations with outcome variables. A total of 563 GISTs were initially chosen and 280 of them were included for analysis under an inclusion criteria. After PSM, there were 200 patients included. Multivariate analyses identified OPNI was an independent prognostic marker, and was associated with primary site, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor rupture, necrosis, and modified NIH risk classification. Low OPNI (< 42.6; HR 0.315; P༜0.001) were associated with worse RFS. Conclusions Preoperative OPNI is a novel and useful prognostic marker for GISTs both treated with or without TKIs.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Onodera’s Nutritional Index for Intermediate and High Risk Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treated With or Without Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
feng wang ◽  
Tingting Tao ◽  
Heng Yu ◽  
Yingying Xu ◽  
Zhi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Independent Prognostic Marker ◽  
Nutritional Index

Abstract Background: Immunoinflammatory and nutritional markers such as peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) have gained considerable attention and revealed preliminaryly as prognostic markers in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).Methods: In this study, we firstly investigated the prognostic value of OPNI in GIST treated with or without TKIs based on the propensity score matching (PSM) method. All of the patients had received surgical resection for primary GIST, the data from 2010 to 2018 were initially and retrospectively identified from our gastrointestinal center. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.Results: These patients who were treated with TKIs and those who did not were divided into two groups, and we used propensity score matching method to make them have more unified baseline data. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to identify associations with outcome variables. A total of 563 GISTs were initially chosen and 280 of them were included for analysis under an inclusion criteria. After PSM, there were 200 patients included. Multivariate analyses identified OPNI was an independent prognostic marker, and was associated with primary site, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor rupture, necrosis, and modified NIH risk classification. Low OPNI (<42.6; HR 0.409; P＜0.001) were associated with worse RFS.Conclusions: Preoperative OPNI is a novel and useful prognostic marker for GISTs both treated with or without TKIs. Higher NLR and PLR have negative effects for RFS.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of Onodera’s Nutritional Index for intermediate and high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with or without TKIs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Tingting Tao ◽  
Heng Yu ◽  
Yingying Xu ◽  
Xuefeng Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Independent Prognostic Marker ◽  
Peripheral Blood Neutrophil ◽  
Nutritional Index

Abstract Background Immunoinflammatory and nutritional markers such as peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) have gained considerable attention and revealed preliminaryly as prognostic markers in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Methods In this study, we firstly investigated the prognostic value of OPNI in GIST treated with or without TKIs based on the propensity score matching (PSM) method. All of the patients had received surgical resection for primary GIST, The data from 2010 to 2018 were initially and retrospectively identified from our gastrointestinal center. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results These patients who were treated with TKIs and those who did not were divided into two groups, and we used propensity score matching method to make them have more unified baseline data. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to identify associations with outcome variables.A total of 563 GISTs were initially chosen and 280 of them were included for analysis under an inclusion criteria. After PSM, there were 200 patients included. Multivariate analyses identified OPNI was an independent prognostic marker, and was associated with primary site, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor rupture, necrosis, and modified NIH risk classification. Low OPNI (< 44.05; HR 0.433; 95% CI 0.236–0.794; P = 0.007) were associated with worse RFS. Conclusions Preoperative OPNI is a novel and useful prognostic marker for GISTs both treated with or without TKIs.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of Onodera’s nutritional index for intermediate- and high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wang ◽  
Tingting Tao ◽  
Heng Yu ◽  
Yingying Xu ◽  
Zhi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Nutritional Index

Abstract Background Immunoinflammatory and nutritional markers, such as the peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI), have gained considerable attention and have been preliminarily revealed as prognostic markers of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Methods In this study, we first investigated the prognostic value of OPNI in GISTs treated with or without TKIs based on the propensity score matching (PSM) method. All of the patients had received surgical resection for primary GIST, and data from 2010 to 2018 were initially and retrospectively identified from our gastrointestinal center. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results The patients were divided into groups treated and not treated with TKIs, and we used the propensity score matching method to homogenize their baseline data. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to identify associations with outcome variables. A total of 563 GISTs were initially chosen, and 280 of them were included for analysis under the inclusion criteria. After PSM, there were 200 patients included. Multivariate analyses identified OPNI as an independent prognostic marker that was associated with primary site, tumor size, mitotic index, tumor rupture, necrosis, and modified NIH risk classification. Low OPNI (< 42.6; HR 0.409; P < 0.001) was associated with worse RFS. Conclusions Preoperative OPNI is a novel and useful prognostic marker for GISTs both treated and not treated with TKIs. Higher NLR and PLR have negative effects on RFS.

Controlling Nutritional Status score is superior to Prognostic Nutritional Index score in predicting survival and complications in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a Chinese propensity score matching study

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1190-1197
Author(s):  
Yi-Shen Mao ◽  
Si-Jie Hao ◽  
Cai-Feng Zou ◽  
Zhi-Bo Xie ◽  
De-Liang Fu
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Nutritional Index ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

AbstractPreoperative nutritional status plays an important role in predicting postoperative outcomes. Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) are good tools to assess patients’ nutritional status. They have been used in predicting outcomes in various malignancies, but few studies have focused on pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Totally, 306 PDAC patients were enrolled. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was introduced to eliminate the baseline inequivalence. Patients with different PNI (or CONUT) scores showed inequivalence baseline characteristics, and patients with compromised nutritional status were related with a more advanced tumour stage. After PSM, the baseline characteristics were well balanced. Both low PNI (≤45) and high CONUT (≥3) were independent risk factors for poor overall survival (P < 0·05), and the result remained the same after PSM. Survival analysis demonstrated both patients with low PNI and high CONUT score were associated with poorer survival, and the result remained the same after PSM. The results of AUC indicated that CONUT might have a higher sensitivity and specificity in predicting complications and survival. Preoperative low PNI (≤45) and high CONUT (≥3) scores might be reliable predictors of prognosis and surgical complications in PDAC patients. Compared with PNI, CONUT might be more effective.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document