scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy (DAS28 remission) of Targeted Immune Modulators for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennie H. Best ◽  
Yuting Kuang ◽  
Yilin Jiang ◽  
Rajpal Singh ◽  
Andreas Karabis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Modulators ◽  
Das28 Remission

Abstract Background The objective of the study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of targeted immune modulators (TIMs) in TIM-naïve/mixed (≤ 20% TIM-experienced) and TIM-experienced (> 20% TIM-experienced) adults with moderately-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs). Methods A fixed effects Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using published study-level data form 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), identified from 2 recent systematic literature reviews conducted by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, and 2 additional phase III trials for filgotinib (FINCH-1, FINCH-2). RCTs that compared TIMs to each other, cDMARD or placebo were included. Treatments included Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi), and other non-TNFis. Efficacy was defined as achieving remission with a DAS28 score < 2.6 at 12 and 24 weeks. Results In the 12-week analysis for the TIM-naïve/mixed population, all TIMs combined with cDMARD were more likely to achieve remission compared to cDMARD alone (statistically significant), with intravenous tocilizumab showing a substantially greater magnitude of effect (odds ratio = 19.36, 95% credible interval: 11.01, 38.16). Similarly, in the 24-week analysis, intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab showed the highest odds ratio of achieving DAS28 remission compared to cDMARD. Similar trends were observed for the analyses on monotherapy or TIM-experienced population. Conclusion This NMA demonstrated that tocilizumab is associated with a greater likelihood of remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at 12 and 24 weeks compared to most other TIMs including new JAK inhibitors, when used in combination with a cDMARD or as monotherapy, among TIM-naïve/mixed or TIM-experienced populations.

scholarly journals Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Tofacitinib

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Ni ◽  
Soe Moe ◽  
Kay Thi Myint ◽  
Aung Htet
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Janus Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Immune Modulators ◽  
Serious Infections

Since the introduction of immune modulators in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there has been hope that orally effective biologic agents would be developed. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has become the first oral biologic to receive approval for use in active RA patients. This paper reviews the efficacy and safety profile of Tofacitinib at dosages of 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily. Remarkable improvement in terms of ACR 20 response and HAQ-DI score was noted at month 3 and month 6. DAS 28-4 ESR < 2.6 achievement was noticeably obvious at month 6 for both dosages. No significant serious adverse events, serious infections, neutropenia, or anaemia were observed compared to placebo. In fact, Tofacitinib 5 mg was even found to have significant protective effect of anaemia in the meta-analysis (P=0.004). Tofacitinib has a noticeable efficacy in controlling disease activity in RA with a manageable safety profile. However, longer studies are needed for its long-term safety profile.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3)

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 1320-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Sakae Tanaka ◽  
Atsushi Kawakami ◽  
Manabu Iwasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Conventional Dmards

ObjectivesTo investigate the efficacy and safety of peficitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn this double-blind phase III study, patients with RA and an inadequate response to prior disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were randomised to peficitinib 100 mg once daily, peficitinib 150 mg once daily, placebo or open-label etanercept for 52 weeks’ treatment; placebo-treated patients were switched at week 12 to peficitinib 100 or 150 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response at week 12/early termination (ET). Secondary endpoints (assessed throughout) included ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response, changes from baseline in disease activity scores (DAS)28 and ACR core parameters, adverse events (AEs) and changes in clinical or laboratory measurements.ResultsIn total, 507 patients received treatment. ACR20 response rates at week 12/ET were significantly higher in the peficitinib 100 mg (57.7%) and 150 mg (74.5%) groups versus placebo (30.7%) (p<0.001). ACR50/70 response rates were also higher for both peficitinib doses versus placebo. Improvements in ACR response were maintained until week 52. Changes from baseline in DAS28-C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the ACR core set were significantly greater for both peficitinib doses versus placebo at week 12/ET (p<0.001). AE incidence was similar across treatment arms. Incidence of serious infection and herpes zoster-related disease was higher with peficitinib versus placebo, but with no clear dose-dependent increase.ConclusionsIn patients with RA and inadequate response to DMARDs, peficitinib 100 mg once daily or 150 mg once daily was efficacious in reducing RA symptoms and was well tolerated compared with placebo.Trial registration numberNCT02308163.

scholarly journals Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-219214
Author(s):  
Bernard Combe ◽  
Alan Kivitz ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
J Abraham Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Double Blind

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase-1-preferential inhibitor filgotinib versus placebo or tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite ongoing treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsThis 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled phase III trial evaluated once-daily oral filgotinib in patients with RA randomised 3:3:2:3 to filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) or filgotinib 100 mg (FIL100), subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg biweekly, or placebo (through week 24), all with stable weekly background MTX. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12. Additional efficacy outcomes were assessed sequentially. Safety was assessed from adverse events and laboratory abnormalities.ResultsThe proportion of patients (n=1755 randomised and treated) achieving ACR20 at week 12 was significantly higher for FIL200 (76.6%) and FIL100 (69.8%) versus placebo (49.9%; treatment difference (95% CI), 26.7% (20.6% to 32.8%) and 19.9% (13.6% to 26.2%), respectively; both p<0.001). Filgotinib was superior to placebo in key secondary endpoints assessing RA signs and symptoms, physical function and structural damage. FIL200 was non-inferior to adalimumab in terms of Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C reactive protein ≤3.2 at week 12 (p<0.001); FIL100 did not achieve non-inferiority. Adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were comparable among active treatment arms.ConclusionsFilgotinib improved RA signs and symptoms, improved physical function, inhibited radiographic progression and was well tolerated in patients with RA with inadequate response to MTX. FIL200 was non-inferior to adalimumab.Trial registration numberNCT02889796.

scholarly journals Baricitinib in patients with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARDs: results from the RA-BUILD study

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Dougados ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
Ying-Chou Chen ◽  
Maria Greenwald ◽  
Edit Drescher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Joint Damage ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Acr20 Response ◽  
Synthetic Dmards

BackgroundBaricitinib is an oral, reversible, selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor.MethodsIn this phase III, double-blind 24-week study, 684 biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 conventional synthetic DMARDs were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to placebo or baricitinib (2 or 4 mg) once daily, stratified by region and the presence of joint erosions. Endpoint measures included American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20, primary endpoint), Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score ≤3.3.ResultsMore patients achieved ACR20 response at week 12 with baricitinib 4 mg than with placebo (62% vs 39%, p≤0.001). Compared with placebo, statistically significant improvements in DAS28, SDAI remission, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, morning joint stiffness, worst joint pain and worst tiredness were observed. In a supportive analysis, radiographic progression of structural joint damage at week 24 was reduced with baricitinib versus placebo. Rates of adverse events during the treatment period and serious adverse events (SAEs), including serious infections, were similar among groups (SAEs: 5% for baricitinib 4 mg and placebo). One patient had an adverse event of tuberculosis (baricitinib 4 mg); one patient had an adverse event of non-melanoma skin cancer (baricitinib 4 mg). Two deaths and three major adverse cardiovascular events occurred (placebo). Baricitinib was associated with a decrease in neutrophils and increases in low-density and high-density lipoprotein.ConclusionsIn patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARDs, baricitinib was associated with clinical improvement and inhibition of progression of radiographic joint damage.Trial registration numberNCT01721057; Results.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RAJ4) in Japan

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 1305-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Sakae Tanaka ◽  
Atsushi Kawakami ◽  
Manabu Iwasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response ◽  
Once Daily

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor peficitinib versus placebo in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase III study, patients with RA and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo, peficitinib 100 mg once daily or peficitinib 150 mg once daily with MTX for 52 weeks. Based on baseline randomisation, at week 12, non-responders receiving placebo were switched to peficitinib until the end of treatment; the remaining patients were switched to peficitinib at week 28. Primary efficacy variables were American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response rate at week 12/early termination (ET) and change from baseline in van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (mTSS) at week 28/ET.Results519 patients were randomised and treated. Significantly more (p<0.001) peficitinib (58.6%, 100 mg; 64.4%, 150 mg) than placebo (21.8%) recipients achieved ACR20 response at week 12/ET. Significantly lower (p<0.001) mean changes from baseline in mTSS at week 28/ET occurred in peficitinib (1.62, 100 mg; 1.03, 150 mg) than placebo (3.37) recipients. Peficitinib was associated with haematological and biochemical parameter changes, and increased incidence of serious infections and herpes zoster-related disease. One death from suicide occurred in a patient in the placebo group after switching to peficitinib 100 mg.ConclusionsIn Japanese patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX, peficitinib demonstrated significant superiority versus placebo in reducing RA symptoms and suppressing joint destruction. Peficitinib had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, with no new safety signals compared with other JAK inhibitors.Trial registration numberNCT02305849.

scholarly journals The role of upadacitinib in the treatment of moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2110476
Author(s):  
Ali Berkant Avci ◽  
Eugen Feist ◽  
Gerd Rüdiger Burmester
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Jak Inhibitors ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies

Despite recent promising developments in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a substantial proportion of patients still cannot achieve the treatment targets: low disease activity and remission. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have the potential to fill this important gap with their high efficiency, rapid onset of action, and acceptable safety profile. The fact that the previously approved two JAK inhibitors, tofacitinib and baricitinib, inhibit more than one JAK molecule raised the question whether a safer profile can be possible by inhibiting fewer JAK molecules. Upadacitinib, a JAK 1 selective molecule developed in this context has been evaluated in the SELECT phase-III study program and demonstrated a high and rapid efficacy in monotherapy as well as in combination with csDMARDs both in csDMARD-naive RA patients and in patients refractory to csDMARD and bDMARD treatments. Upadacitinib 15 mg once daily displayed a similar safety profile except for increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels and herpes zoster (HZ) risk compared to its active comparators methotrexate (MTX) and adalimumab. Most of the CPK elevations were asymptomatic, and most of the HZ cases were not serious. Along with the randomized-controlled studies and meta-analysis results, upadacitinib 15 mg once daily has a favorable efficacy/safety profile. Long-term extensions of current studies and real-world data will be important to fully appreciate its potential in the treatment of RA.

scholarly journals Tofacitinib versus Biologic Treatments in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Nonbiologic DMARDs: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelien Bergrath ◽  
Robert A. Gerber ◽  
David Gruben ◽  
Tatjana Lukic ◽  
Charles Makin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as monotherapy and combined with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) versus biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and other novel DMARDs for second-line moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients by means of a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods. MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and March 2015. Efficacy data based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, improvements in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at 6 months, and discontinuation rates due to adverse events were analyzed by means of Bayesian NMAs. Results. 45 RCTs were identified, the majority of which demonstrated a low risk of bias. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) and 10 mg BID monotherapy exhibited comparable efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events versus other monotherapies. Tofacitinib 5 mg BID and 10 mg BID + DMARDs or methotrexate (MTX) were mostly comparable to other combination therapies in terms of efficacy and discontinuation due to adverse events. Conclusion. In most cases, tofacitinib had similar efficacy and discontinuation rates due to adverse events compared to biologic DMARDs.

scholarly journals A Network Meta-Analysis to Compare Effectiveness of Baricitinib and Other Treatments in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-23
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background/Objectives: This article compares the effectiveness of baricitinib (BARI) 4 mg (oral, Janus kinase [JAK] 1/2 inhibitor) versus other targeted synthetic/biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response (IR) to MTX. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the interventions of interest. Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA) were used to compare American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses at 24 weeks. A series of prespecified sensitivity analyses addressed the potential impact of, among others, baseline risk, treatment effect modifiers, and trial design on treatment response. Results: Nineteen RCTs were included in the NMA (primary analysis). For ACR20, BARI 4 mg + MTX was found to be more effective than adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg + MTX (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.33), abatacept (ABA) 10 mg + MTX (IV/4 weeks) (OR 1.45), infliximab (IFX) 3 mg + MTX (IV/8 wks) (OR 1.63), and rituximab (RTX) 1000 mg + MTX (OR 1.63). No differences were found on ACR50. For ACR70, BARI 4 mg + MTX was more effective than ADA 40 mg + MTX (OR 1.37), ABA 10 mg + MTX (OR 1.86), and RTX 1000 mg + MTX (OR 2.26). Sensitivity analysis including 10 additional RCTs with up to 20% of patients with prior biologic use showed BARI 4 mg + MTX to be more effective than tocilizumab (TCZ) 8 mg + MTX on ACR20 (OR 1.44). Results for all sensitivity analyses were consistent with the direction and magnitude of the primary results. Key limitations include the time span in which trials were conducted (1999–2017), during which patient characteristics and treatment approaches might have changed. Conclusion: This NMA suggests that BARI 4 mg + MTX is an efficacious treatment option in the MTX-IR population as evidenced by the robustness of results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document