scholarly journals Clinical Effect of a New Type of Transpedicular Reducer for Fracture Reduction via Pedicle and Bone Grafting Combined With Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
menghan cai ◽  
Zhijun Xin ◽  
Weijun Kong ◽  
Qian Du ◽  
Wenjun Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Clinical Effect ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Fracture Reduction ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
New Type ◽  
Vertebral Bodies

Abstract BackgroundShort-segment transpedicular screw fixation is a common method for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures (TBFs). When it is used, the anterior middle columns of the fractured vertebral body lack good support, resulting in fractured vertebral bodies decreased height and difficult to reduct.Therefore,the purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of a new type of transpedicular reducer that we designed for fractured vertebral body reduction and bone grafting in the treatment of TBFs.MethodsA total of 9 patients with TBFs who agreed to be treated with the new transpedicular reducer for fracture reduction via pedicle and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation were retrospectively analysed. We measured the anterior and middlel heights of the injured vertebrae, the ratios of the anterior and middlel heights of the injured vertebral body to the respective heights of the adjacent uninjured vertebral bodies (AVBHr and MVBHr, respectively), and the Cobb angle of patients at different stages before and after surgery, and evaluated the distribution of bone grafts and bone healing 3 days and 12 months after the operation.ResultsThe anterior height of the injured vertebrae before the operation; after application of the transpedicular reducer; and 3 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation were 17.56±3.74 mm; 27.70±2.53 mm; and 29.08±2.52 mm, 28.36±1.93 mm, 28.12±1.42 mm, and 27.96±0.72 mm, respectively. The mid-heights of the injured vertebrae were 21.36±4.20 mm; 26.74±1.00 mm; and 27.70±2.01 mm, 27.05±2.45 mm, 26.94±1.84 mm, and 26.83 ±2.45 mm, respectively. The Cobb angles of the injured vertebrae were 3.80±1.44°; 1.26±1.00°; and 0.72±0.70°, 1.03±0.65°, 1.12±0.63°, and 1.34±0.56°, respectively. The allogeneic bones were distributed in the anterior and middle columns 3 days after the operation, and the bone had healed well 12 months after the operation.ConclusionThe new transpedicular reducer has a good reduction, allogeneic bone support, and clinical treatment effect for TBFs through pedicle fracture reduction and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation.

scholarly journals Clinical effect of a new type of transpedicular reducer for fracture reduction via pedicle and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menghan Cai ◽  
Zhijun Xin ◽  
Weijun Kong ◽  
Qian Du ◽  
Wenjun Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Fracture Reduction ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Transpedicular Screw ◽  
New Type ◽  
Transpedicular Screw Fixation

Abstract Background: Short-segment transpedicular screw fixation is a common method for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures (TBFs),but this technique has many problems.Therefore,the purpose of this article is to observe and evaluate the clinical efficacy of a new type of transpedicular reducer that we designed for fractured vertebral body reduction and bone grafting in the treatment of TBFs.Methods:From July 2018 to November 2020, 70 cases of TBFs were included. 35 cases were treated with the new transpedicular reducer for fracture reduction via pedicle and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation (observation group), 35 cases were treated with short-segment transpedicular screw fixation (control group).Before operation, after application of the transpedicular reducer(not needed in the control group),3 days after operation, 3 months after operation, 6 months after operation, and 12 months after operation, the two groups were recorded and compared respectively: the anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebrae, the ratios of the anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebral body to the respective heights of the adjacent uninjured vertebral bodies (AVBHr and MVBHr, respectively), and the Cobb angle of patients.And we compared the pain VAS score and quality of life GQOL-74 score at the last follow-up.At last,we evaluated the distribution of bone grafts and bone healing 12 months after the operation.Results:All 70 cases were followed up for at least 12 months.The observation group's anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebral, AVBHr and MVBHr were higher than those of the control group at 3 days,3 months,6 months and 12 months after operation, the cobb angle was smaller than that in control group, the pain VAS score and the quality of life GQOL-74 score at the last follow-up were better than those of the control group, and these difference were statistically significant (P <0.05). The observation group showed no obvious defects on CT at 12 months after operation, and the bone healing was good. Conclusion: The new type of transpedicular reducer for fracture reduction via pedicle and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation for TBFs has a good clinical efficacy.

scholarly journals Clinical effect of a novel transpedicular reducer for reduction and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Menghan Cai ◽  
Zhijun Xin ◽  
Weijun Kong ◽  
Qian Du ◽  
Wenjun Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Transpedicular Screw ◽  
Transpedicular Screw Fixation

Abstract Background Short-segment transpedicular screw fixation is a common method for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures (TBFs),but this technique has many problems. Therefore,the purpose of this article is to observe and evaluate the clinical efficacy of a novel transpedicular reducer that we designed for fractured vertebral body reduction and bone grafting in the treatment of TBFs. Methods From July 2018 to November 2020, 70 cases of TBFs were included. Thirty-five patients were treated with the novel transpedicular reducer for reduction and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation (observation group), and 35 patients were treated with short-segment transpedicular screw fixation (control group). Before the operation, after reduction, and 3 days, 3 months,and 12 months after the operation, the two groups were assessed, and compared with respect to the anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebrae, the ratios of the anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebral body to the respective heights of the adjacent uninjured vertebral bodies (AVBHr and MVBHr, respectively), and the Cobb angle of the patients. We compared the pain VAS score and quality of life GQOL-74 score at the last follow-up. Finally,we evaluated the distribution of bone grafts and bone healing 12 months after the operation. Results The anterior height, middle height, AVBHr, MVBHr, and Cobb angle of the injured vertebral body in the observation after reduction, and 3 days, 3 months and 12 months post-operatively were compared with those of the injured vertebral body before operation. All of these parameters were improved, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). These parameters in the observation group at the above time points were significantly better than thoes in the control group at the corresponding time points (p < 0.05). The VAS scores at the last follow-up were significantly better than those of the control group (p < 0.05), but the GQOL-74 score differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The observation group showed no obvious defects on CT at 12 months after the operation, and the bone healing was good. Conclusion The novel transpedicular reducer for reduction and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation for TBFs has good clinical efficacy.

scholarly journals Analysis of outcome of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoraco-lumbar spine fractures: a prospective comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 343
Author(s):  
Raj Kumar ◽  
Bhaskar Sarkar ◽  
Syed Ifthekar ◽  
Samarth Mittal ◽  
Pankaj Kandwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures with spinal injury.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective comparative study including thirty patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture were equally divided into an open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) group and a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) group. Demographic characteristics, clinical and radiological outcomes, and adverse events were assessed and compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Demographic and clinical features including age, gender, fracture level, mechanism of injury and neurological status in both groups were not significantly different (all p&gt;0.05). The PPSF group exhibits significantly lower operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay compared with the OPSF group (all p&lt;0.05). There was no significant difference in the sagittal Cobb′s angle (CA), fracture vertebral body angle (VBA), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH) on pre-operative, immediate post-operative and final follow up between the two surgical techniques (all p&gt;0.05). Visual analogue scale (VAS) remarkably decreased in both groups after surgery but difference was not statically significant (p=0.808). Common postoperative complications in both groups were superficial infections, pressure ulcer and urinary tract infection (UTI) worsening. Hardware failure was seen only in one case of PPSF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures can be effectively managed with PPSF/OPSF. There were no significant differences in radiological and clinical outcomes and post-op complications between 2 groups but blood loss, operative time and hospitalization stay were less in percutaneous group, which may represent a potential benefit.</p><p><strong> </strong></p>

scholarly journals Short Segment versus Long Segment Pedicle Screws Fixation in Management of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Ahmed Aly
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference

<p>Posterior pedicle screw fixation has become a popular method for treating thoracolumbar burst fractures. However, it remains unclear whether additional fixation of more segments could improve clinical and radiological outcomes. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of fixation levels with pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Springer, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant randomized and quasirandomized controlled trials that compared the clinical and radiological efficacy of short versus long segment for thoracolumbar burst fractures managed by posterior pedicle screw fixation. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Based on predefined inclusion criteria, Nine eligible trials with a total of 365 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Results were expressed as risk difference for dichotomous outcomes and standard mean difference for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence interval. Baseline characteristics were similar between the short and long segment fixation groups. No significant difference was identified between the two groups regarding radiological outcome, functional outcome, neurologic improvement, and implant failure rate. The results of this meta-analysis suggested that extension of fixation was not necessary when thoracolumbar burst fracture was treated by posterior pedicle screw fixation. More randomized controlled trials with high quality are still needed in the future.</p>

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Case Series

2016 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. e131-e138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Agarwal ◽  
Phillip Choi ◽  
Raymond Sekula
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation

Introduction Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common pathology without a clear consensus on best treatment approach. Minimally invasive approaches are being investigated due to potential benefits in recovery time and morbidity. We examine long-term resolution of symptoms of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation. Methods Retrospective clinical review of seven patients with spinal trauma who presented with thoracolumbar burst fracture from July 2012 to April 2013 and were treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Electronic patient charts and radiographic imaging were reviewed for initial presentation, fracture characteristics, operative treatment, and postoperative course. Results The patients had a median age of 29 years (range 18 to 57), and 57% were men. The median Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale score was 4 (range 2 to 9). All patients had proper screw placement and uneventful postoperative courses given the severity of their individual traumas. Five of seven patients were reached for long-term follow-up of greater than 28 months. Six of seven patients had excellent pain control and stability at their last follow-up. One patient required revision surgery for noncatastrophic hardware failure. Conclusion Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture may provide patients with durable benefits and warrants further investigation.

Finite Element Study to Evaluate the Biomechanical Performance of the Spine After Augmenting Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation With Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Burst Fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shady S. Elmasry ◽  
Shihab S. Asfour ◽  
Francesco Travascio
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Fatigue Testing ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Hardware Failure ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) is a well-known minimally invasive surgery (MIS) employed in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures (TBF). However, hardware failure and loss of angular correction are common limitations caused by the poor support of the anterior column of the spine. Balloon kyphoplasty (KP) is another MIS that was successfully used in the treatment of compression fractures by augmenting the injured vertebral body with cement. To overcome the limitations of stand-alone PPSF, it was suggested to augment PPSF with KP as a surgical treatment of TBF. Yet, little is known about the biomechanical alteration occurred to the spine after performing such procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the immediate post-operative biomechanical performance of stand-alone PPSF, stand-alone-KP, and KP-augmented PPSF procedures. Novel three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of the thoracolumbar junction that describes the fractured spine and the three investigated procedures were developed and tested under mechanical loading conditions. The spinal stiffness, stresses at the implanted hardware, and the intradiscal pressure at the upper and lower segments were measured and compared. The results showed no major differences in the measured parameters between stand-alone PPSF and KP-augmented PPSF procedures, and demonstrated that the stand-alone KP may restore the stiffness of the intact spine. Accordingly, there was no immediate post-operative biomechanical advantage in augmenting PPSF with KP when compared to stand-alone PPSF, and fatigue testing may be required to evaluate the long-term biomechanical performance of such procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document