scholarly journals Effects of High-Intensity Training on the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients and Survivors: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Author(s):  
Ana Lavín-Pérez ◽  
Daniel Collado-Mateo ◽  
Xián Mayo ◽  
Gary Liguori ◽  
Liam Humphreys ◽  
...  

Abstract Cancer and associated medical treatments affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by decreasing functional dimensions of physical, social, cognitive, and emotional well-being, while increasing short and late-term symptoms. Exercise, however, is demonstrated to be a useful therapy to improve cancer patients and survivors’ HRQoL, yet the effectiveness of high-intensity training (HIT) exercise is uncertain. This systematic-review and meta-analysis aimed to analyse the effects of HIT on HRQoL dimensions in cancer patients and survivors as well as evaluate the optimal prescription of HIT. The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and examined Web of Science and PubMed (Medline) databases. Data was analysed utilizing Review Manager Software. Twenty-two articles were included in the systematic review and seventeen in the meta-analysis. Results showed HIT improved global quality of life, physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, cognitive functioning, fatigue, pain, dyspnoea, and insomnia, compared to an inactive control group. Whereas no differences were found in contrast to low to moderate-intensity exercise compared to inactive controls. Particular improvements in HRQoL were observed during the cancer treatment and with the following prescription: a training duration of more than eight weeks, a frequency of 2 days/week, a volume of at least 120 minutes/week including 15 minutes or more of HIT. Our findings whilst encouraging, highlight the infancy of the extant evidence base for the role of HIT in the HRQoL of cancer patients and survivors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Myriam Lavín-Pérez ◽  
Daniel Collado-Mateo ◽  
Xián Mayo ◽  
Gary Liguori ◽  
Liam Humphreys ◽  
...  

AbstractCancer and associated medical treatments affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by decreasing functional dimensions of physical, social, cognitive, and emotional well-being, while increasing short and late-term symptoms. Exercise, however, is demonstrated to be a useful therapy to improve cancer patients' and survivors’ HRQoL, yet the effectiveness of high-intensity training (HIT) exercise is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyse the effects of HIT on HRQoL dimensions in cancer patients and survivors as well as evaluate the optimal prescription of HIT. The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and examined Web of Science and PubMed (Medline) databases. Data were analysed utilizing Review Manager Software. Twenty-two articles were included in the systematic review and 17 in the meta-analysis. Results showed HIT improved global quality of life, physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, cognitive functioning, fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and insomnia, compared to an inactive control group, yet no differences were found between HIT and low to moderate-intensity exercise interventions. Particular improvements in HRQoL were observed during cancer treatment and with a training duration of more than eight weeks, a frequency of 2 days/week, and a volume of at least 120 min/week, including 15 min or more of HIT. Our findings whilst encouraging, highlight the infancy of the extant evidence base for the role of HIT in the HRQoL of cancer patients and survivors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 138-139
Author(s):  
Sebastian Proschinger ◽  
Jens Bansi ◽  
Annette Rademacher ◽  
Niklas Joisten ◽  
Alexander Schenk ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Landaeta-Díaz ◽  
JM Fernández ◽  
M Da Silva-Grigoletto ◽  
D Rosado-Alvarez ◽  
A Gómez-Garduño ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renske Kruizinga ◽  
Iris D. Hartog ◽  
Marc Jacobs ◽  
Joost G. Daams ◽  
Michael Scherer-Rath ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062232096159
Author(s):  
Lanlan Pang ◽  
Zefu Liu ◽  
Sheng Lin ◽  
Zhidong Liu ◽  
Hengyu Liu ◽  
...  

Background and aims: Lung cancer patients suffer from deterioration in their physical and psychological function, which exerts a negative influence on their quality of life (QOL). Telemedicine has been proven to be an effective intervention for patients with several chronic diseases. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in improving QOL in lung cancer patients. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of telemedicine in lung cancer patients. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 15.1 were used to perform data analysis. Results: Our meta-analysis included eight clinical trials with a total of 635 lung cancer patients. The results showed that the telemedicine group had significantly higher QOL than the usual care group [standard mean difference (SMD) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29–1.63, I2 = 91%]. In addition, the telemedicine group had lower anxiety (SMD −0.44, 95% CI −0.66 to −0.23, I2 = 3%) and depression scores (SMD −0.48, 95% CI −0.91 to −0.05, I2 = 66%) than the usual care group. However, no significant differences were found in fatigue and pain outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion: Telemedicine may be an effective method of improving QOL in lung cancer patients and the further development and use of telemedicine care is recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document