scholarly journals Bracketless Invisible Orthosis in the Treatment of Children With Malocclusion : A Protocol of Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-chen Liu ◽  
Xiao-guang Li ◽  
Yu-li Xi ◽  
Wei Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Study Quality Assessment ◽  
Grade Approach

Abstract BackgroundMalocclusion is a common oral disorder. Childhood is a critical period for the development of malocclusion. This protocol will explore the clinical efficacy and safety of bracketless invisible orthosis (BIO) in the treatment of children with malocclusion.MethodsThis study will search MEDLINE, PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WANGFANG, VIP, CNKI, and CBM from inception to the present. We will not apply any limitations to the language and publication status. All potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of BIO for the treatment of children with malocclusion will be considered for inclusion. Two authors will independently carry out study identification, data extraction, and study quality assessment in each study. Any disagreement will be resolved through discussion with a third author. When a number of included studies are sufficient, we will conduct meta-analysis, as well as subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. The certainty of evidence will be appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Outcome of interest will be presented in summary of findings tables, and statistical analysis will be performed utilizing RevMan 5.4 software. DiscussionThis systematic study will summarize all available studies to investigate the clinical efficacy of BIO in treating children with malocclusion. Findings of this study will highlight efficacy and safety of BIO for the treatment of children with malocclusion for both clinical practice and future strategies. Study registrationOSF (https://osf.io/avpmx).

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine Tonifying-Shen (Kidney) Principle for Primary Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Junquan Liang ◽  
Fengyi Wang ◽  
Jiajia Huang ◽  
Yunxiang Xu ◽  
Guizhen Chen
Keyword(s):  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Primary Osteoporosis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Superior Effect

Objective. This study aimed to appraise the efficacy and safety of the tonifying-Shen (kidney) principle (TS (TK) principle) for primary osteoporosis (POP). Methods. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) using the TS (TK) principle for POP were searched from eight electronic databases to search for relevant literature that was published from the initiation to September 2019. Two reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, data synthesis, and quality assessment independently. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the risk of bias and conduct the data synthesis. We assessed the quality of evidence for outcomes by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results. Thirty-six studies with 3617 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed a consistently superior effect of the TS (TK) principle combined with conventional Western medicine (CWM) in terms of total effectiveness rates (RR = 1.28; 95% CI (1.23, 1.33); P < 0.00001 ), BMD of the lumbar spine (SMD = 0.71; 95% CI (0.47, 0.95); P < 0.00001 ) and proximal femur (SMD = 0.94; 95% CI (0.49, 1.38); P < 0.00001 ), TCM symptom integral (SMD = −1.23; 95% CI (−1.43, −1.02); P < 0.00001 ), and VAS scores (SMD = −3.88; 95% CI (−5.29, −2.46); P < 0.00001 ), when compared to using CWM alone and with significant differences. Besides, in respect of adverse effects, it showed no significant statistical difference between the experimental and control groups, RR = 0.99 and 95% CI (0.65, 1.51), P = 0.97 . Conclusion. Our meta-analysis provides promising evidence to suggest that using the TS (TK) principle combined with CWM for POP is more effective than using CWM alone. Also, both of them are safe and reliable for POP.

scholarly journals Efficacy of four hollow nail rhombic fixation for the treatment of patients with femoral neck fractures: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing-hui Ji ◽  
Yu Xue ◽  
Jie Miao ◽  
Zhi-xin Reng ◽  
Yu-fei Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background : This study aims to assess the efficacy of four hollow nail rhombic fixation (FHNRF) for the treatment of patients with femoral neck fractures (FNF). Methods : A literature search in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Thesis and Dissertation Catalog, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and China National Knowledge In­frastructure will be performed from inception through February 29, 2020. This study will not apply limitations to the language and publication date. All potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that identify the efficacy and safety of FHNRF for the treatment of patients with FNF. Two contributors will separately examine searched records, extract essential data, and assess study quality using Cochrane risk of bias tool. Any opposition between two authors will be settled by a third contributor. We will employ RevMan 5.3 software for statistical analysis. Discussion : This study will summarize high quality RCTs to assess the efficacy and safety of FHNRF for the treatment of patients with FNF. It will help to determine whether or not FHNRF is effective and safety for the treatment of patients with FNF. Systematic review registration CRD42020168378.

scholarly journals Efficacy of ondansetron for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 654-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengmao Zhou ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
Zeqing Bao ◽  
Xianxue Wang ◽  
Qili Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of ondansetron during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods We sought randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ondansetron during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from their inception to September 2016. Results Altogether, 21 RCTs were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed that the ondansetron group had a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting and bradycardia than the placebo group during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia [relative risk (RR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.36, 0.51) and RR = 0.45, 95% CI (0.26, 0.80), respectively]. There were no significant differences in the incidences of pruritus, hypotension, or shivering during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia [RR = 0.92, 95% CI (0.83, 1.02); RR = 0.72 (0.50, 1.06), 95% CI (0.50, 1.06); and RR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.71, 1.11), respectively]. Conclusion Ondansetron effectively reduces the incidences of nausea/vomiting and bradycardia under spinal anesthesia during cesarean section.

scholarly journals Acupuncture Treatment for Cough-Variant Asthma: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Jian Xiong ◽  
WenChuan Qi ◽  
Han Yang ◽  
SiTing Zou ◽  
Jing Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Acupuncture Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cough Variant Asthma ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background. In recent years, there have been many clinical reports on acupuncture treatment of cough-variant asthma, but no researcher has objectively analysed and evaluated the efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment of cough-variant asthma from the perspective of evidence-based medicine. Objective. To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating cough-variant asthma and to provide reference values for clinical decision-making. Methods. The comprehensive computer retrieval Chinese journal full-text database (CNKI), Chinese science and technology periodical database (VIP), ten thousand data knowledge service platform (WanFang Data), PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were used to collect literature for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) of acupuncture treatment of cough-variant asthma, as well as to retrieve papers and add reference retrieval after literature review, in accordance with the standard of literature filtering, data extraction, and quality evaluation. The data were meta-analysed using ReviewManager5.3 software recommended by Cochrane. Results. A total of 11 randomized controlled clinical studies were screened and included, comprising 929 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, acupuncture intervention on CVA could enhance the total clinical effectiveness rate, reduce the relapse rate of drug withdrawal, relieve symptoms of cough, phlegm, and diaphragmatic congestion, and improve lung function-related indicators and immune inflammation indicators. There were statistically significant differences in all efficacy evaluation criteria. Conclusion. The clinical curative effect of acupuncture treatment for cough-variant asthma is precise and has certain advantages in relieving symptoms and reducing the recurrence rate. However, the low quality of the evaluation in the RCT research literature is a problem, and more high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials are needed to further verify the comprehensive clinical efficacy and safety of this treatment. Registration number: PROSPERO (no. CRD42020155244) (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

scholarly journals Corticosteroids Had no Effect on 28-Days Mortality in Adult Patients with sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huoyan Liang ◽  
Heng Song ◽  
Gaofei Song ◽  
Hongyi Li ◽  
Xianfei Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Evaluation Methodology ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Abstract Objective: Corticosteroids are a common option used in the treatment of sepsis. However, the efficacy and potential risk of corticosteroids in septic patients have not been well assessed. We performed this review to assess the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in sepsis patients.Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases from inception to March 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effect of corticosteroids on septic patients were included. The quality of outcomes in the included articles was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. The data were pooled by using relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD). The random-effects model were used to to eveluate the pooled MD or RR and 95% CI.Results: Fifty-three RCTs that included 12,310 patients with sepsis were identified. Corticosteroids were not associated with the mortality in 28-day (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87–1.02; evidence rank, moderate), and long-term mortality (>60 d) (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.88–1.05) in septic patients (evidence rank, low). However, corticosteroids may exert a significant effect on the mortality in ICU (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80–0.98), in-hospital (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88–0.99; evidence rank, moderate) in patients with sepsis or septic shock (evidence rank, low). Furthermore, corticosteroids probably achieved a very small reductions in the length of hospital stay and ICU. Corticosteroids were associated with an higher risk of hypernatremia and hyperglycemia; further, they appear to have no significant effect on superinfection and gastroduodenal bleeding.Conclusions: Corticosteroids had no significant effect on the 28 and long-term mortality; however, they decreased the ICU and hospital mortality. Further, corticosteroids could increase the risk of the hypernatremia and hyperglycemia in sepsis patients.

scholarly journals Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between dexmedetomidine and propofol among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 030006052110327
Author(s):  
Weihua Liu ◽  
Wenli Yu ◽  
Hongli Yu ◽  
Mingwei Sheng
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Weighted Mean Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Weighted Mean

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods Relevant studies comparing dexmedetomidine and propofol among patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Results Seven relevant studies (dexmedetomidine group, n = 238; propofol group, n = 239) met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in the induction time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 3.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.95–7.88, I2 = 99%) and recovery time (WMD = 2.74, 95% CI = −2.72–8.19, I2 = 98%). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in the risks of hypotension (risk ratio [RR] = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.25–1.22) and nausea and vomiting (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.46–2.22) between the drugs, whereas dexmedetomidine carried a lower risk of hypoxia (RR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.11–0.63) and higher risk of bradycardia (RR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.38–6.54). Conclusions Dexmedetomidine had similar efficacy and safety profiles as propofol in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of Antifungal Agents Used in the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis among HIV-Infected Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 637
Author(s):  
Shamala Gopal Rajadurai ◽  
Mari Kannan Maharajan ◽  
Sajesh K. Veettil ◽  
Divya Gopinath
Keyword(s):  
Antifungal Agents ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oropharyngeal Candidiasis ◽  
Mycological Cure ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Assessment Development ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Favorable Safety ◽  
Grade Approach

The objective of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of different antifungal agents used for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) in adult patients with HIV. A systematic search was performed on the four major databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and Scopus) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of antifungal agents in HIV patients with OPC. A network meta-analysis was performed from the data extracted from the selected studies. The agents were ranked according using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the quality of evidence. A total of 15 trials were included in the quantitative analysis involving the data from a total of 2883 participants. Fluconazole was ranked as the most effective antifungal agent to achieve clinical cure (SUCRA = 0.87) in OPC followed by posaconazole and itraconazole. Posaconazole was ranked the most efficacious agent in achieving mycological cure (SUCRA = 0.81), followed by fluconazole. While nystatin was ranked the safest, the effect estimates of none of the other systemic antifungal agents were significantly higher than fluconazole. Based on the available evidence, fluconazole can be considered as the most effective drug in the treatment of OPC among HIV-infected adults and has a favorable safety profile, followed by posaconazole.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 030006052110066
Author(s):  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Bo Wang ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Zhongju Du
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Review ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Methods A literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Review, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of all retrieved studies. The research was reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure the reliability and verity of the results. The statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 13.0. Results Nine randomized controlled trials were collected for the data extraction and meta-analysis. Significant differences in the pain score at 4, 12, and 24 weeks were found between patients treated with radiofrequency ablation and those treated with placebo. Furthermore, the use of radiofrequency ablation was associated with an improved outcome of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. No serious adverse events were observed in any patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation. Conclusion Radiofrequency ablation is efficacious and safe for reducing pain and improving knee function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, without increasing the risk of adverse effects.

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety between Indacaterol and Tiotropium in COPD: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0119948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Soo Kim ◽  
Jinkyeong Park ◽  
Seong Yong Lim ◽  
Yeon-Mok Oh ◽  
Kwang Ha Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors versus cabapenems for febrile neutropenia empiric therapy: A systematic review and meta analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyang Meng ◽  
Jingyi ZHANG ◽  
Ailing ZHANG ◽  
Jie YANG ◽  
Jingli LU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Adults And Children

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) versus carbapenems for febrile neutropenia empiric therapy are controversial. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library databases, Web of Science and Google scholar were searched up to 1 April 2020. Studies were included if they compared BL/BLIs versus carbapenem for febrile neutropenia patients undergoing chemotherapy for either solid tumours or haematological malignancies among adults and children. We pooled the treatment success rate, mortality and adverse events. Results Nine RCTs were included. There was no differences between carbapenems and BL/BLIs were observed in terms of treatment success without modification (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.93–1.15), no differences were observed in the subgroups of BL/BLIs, adults and children. No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.64–2.06). Our study shows that gastrointestinal events are the most common adverse effects, nausea/vomiting were significantly more common with carbapenems (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.35–5.92, P = 0.006), however, diarrhea were more common with BL/BLIs (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27–0.80, P = 0.006). Conclusions The efficacy and safety of BL/BLIs with carbapenems were comparable in empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document