scholarly journals Patient perceptions of physical rehabilitation education and treatment after breast cancer surgery: A mixed methods study

Author(s):  
Deirdre E McGhee ◽  
Anne T McMahon ◽  
Julie R Steele

Abstract Purpose To investigate the content and delivery of physical rehabilitation education and treatment received by women following breast cancer surgery and to establish patient perceptions of this physical rehabilitation.Methods 509 Australian women (55 years SD 6.5) who previously had breast cancer surgery retrospectively completed an online survey about the content, delivery, satisfaction with and perceptions of the physical rehabilitation they received for six physical side-effects. The percentage of respondents who received each delivery format for the six physical side-effects and their satisfaction levels were tabulated. A thematic analysis was conducted on patients’ perceptions of the physical rehabilitation they received.Results Pamphlets were the most common delivery format of physical rehabilitation following breast cancer surgery. Common physical side-effects, however, were not included in the content and at less than 50% of women were satisfied with their physical rehabilitation. Three major themes emerged: Women perceived (i) they were unaware of and unprepared for the physical side-effects of their surgery/treatment, (ii) information delivery was unsuitable in terms of the timing, delivery format and cognisance of patient needs, and (iii) follow-up was insufficient at critical time points of recovery.Conclusion The physical rehabilitation received by women after all types of breast cancer surgery is perceived to be poor in terms of its content, delivery format and follow-up and women perceive that their needs at various stages of recovery are not being met. Physical rehabilitation needs to improve after all types of breast cancer surgery.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre E McGhee ◽  
Julie R Steele

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the access to and content of physical rehabilitation received by women after different types of breast cancer surgery. Methods: On-line survey of 632 Australia women (59.8 years SD 9.6) grouped according to their last reported breast cancer surgery: (i) breast conserving surgery (BCS; n=228), (ii) mastectomy (n=208; MAST), and (iii) breast reconstruction (BRS; n=196). Respondents retrospectively reported the physical rehabilitation education and treatment they received for six physical side-effects. Chi square of analysis of the percentage of respondents who received any form of physical rehabilitation for each physical side-effect amongst the three groups. Tabulation of the percentage of the entire cohort (n=632) that had lymph nodes removed, post-operative complications, or pre-existing musculoskeletal issues who received any form of physical rehabilitation as part of standard post-operative care.Results: No significant difference was found in the percentage of respondents who received any form of physical rehabilitation across the three groups, except for the physical side-effects of lymphoedema and breast support issues. Substantial variation was found in the percentage that received physical rehabilitation across the different physical side-effects. Physical rehabilitation for shoulder issues and lymphoedema was received by 75% and 70% of respondents respectively as part of standard care, compared to scar and torso issues and physical discomfort disturbing sleep, where less than 50% received any form of physical rehabilitation. Conclusion: Access to physical rehabilitation is poor following all types of breast cancer surgery, with gaps in the physical rehabilitation provided for specific physical side-effects.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 715-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena-Marie Petersson ◽  
Marjan Vaez ◽  
Marie I. Nilsson ◽  
Fredrik Saboonchi ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1126-1127
Author(s):  
C CANNING ◽  
C CAREW ◽  
D BUGGY ◽  
F FLANAGAN ◽  
M STOKES

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz ◽  
Rolf Gemperli ◽  
José Roberto Filassi

2014 ◽  
Vol 5;17 (5;9) ◽  
pp. E589-E598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar A. Mohamed

Background: There is little systematic research on the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of adjunctive analgesic agents in paravertebral analgesia. The addition of adjunctive analgesics, such as fentanyl and clonidine, to local anesthetics has been shown to enhance the quality and duration of sensory neural blockades, and decrease the dose of local anesthetic and supplemental analgesia. Objectives: Investigation of the safety and the analgesic efficacy of adding 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine 0.25% in thoracic paravertebral blocks (PVB) in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Study Design: A randomized, double-blind trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Methods: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status –I – III patients were randomly assigned to receive thoracicPVB with either 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% (Group B, n = 30), or 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% + 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (Group BD, n= 30). Assessment parameters included hemodynamics, sedation score, pain severity, time of first analgesics request, total analgesic consumption, and side effects in the first 48 hours. Results: There was a significant reduction in pulse rate and diastolic blood pressure starting at 30 minutes in both groups, but more evidenced in group BD (P < 0.001). Intraoperative Systolic blood pressure showed a significant reduction at 30 minutes in both groups (P < 0.001) then returned to baseline level at 120 minutes in both groups. There was a significant increase in pulse rate starting 2 hours postoperative until 48 hours postoperatively in group B but only after 12 hours until 48 hours in group BD (P < 0.001). The time of the first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly prolonged in the group BD (8.16 ± 42 hours) in comparison to group B (6.48 ± 5.24 hours) (P = 0.04). The mean total consumption of intravenous tramadol rescue analgesia in the postanesthesia care unit in the firtst 48 hours postoperatively was significantly decreased in group BD (150.19 ± 76.98 mg) compared to group B (194.44 ± 63.91 mg) (P = 0.03). No significant serious adverse effects were recorded during the study. Limitations: This study is limited by its sample size. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg to bupivacaine 0.25% in thoracic PVB in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy improves the quality and the duration of analgesia and also provides an analgesic sparing effect with no serious side effects. Key words: Dexmedetomidine, paravertebral block, postoperative analgesia, breast cancer surgery


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyu Luo, ◽  
Guang Cao ◽  
Wenbin Guo ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Qiuru Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Longer follow-up was necessary to testify the exact value of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND).Methods:From January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2005, 1027 patients with breast cancer were randomly assigned to two groups: MALND and CALND (conventional axillary lymph node dissection). 996 eligible patients were enrolled.Results:The final cohort of 996 patients was followed for an average of 198 months. The events other than death differed significantly between the two cohorts(p=0.0311) (46.3% in MALND and 53.2% in CALND, respectively). The sum of the events other than death and deaths from other causes was much more in CALND (59.6%)than in MALND (53.4%)(p=0.0494). The 17-year DFS rates were 36.7 percent for MALND group and 33.6 percent for CALND group,respectively. There was a significant difference between the groups (p=.0306). The OS rates were 53.2 percent after MALND and 46.0 percent after CALND ( p= .0119). The MALND patients had much less axillary pain (p =. 0000), numbness or paresthesia (p = .0000) ,arm mobility (p =. 0000), and arm swelling on operated side (p = .0000). The aesthetic appearance of axilla in MALND group was much better than that in CALND group (p =. 0000) at an average follow-up of 17-year.Conclusions:The use of MALND in breast cancer surgery not only decreases the relapse and arm complications but also improves long-term survival of patients. Therefore, MALND should be one of the preferred approaches for breast cancer surgery when ALND is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document