Prolonged COVID-19 infection in a child with lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma: which is the best management?

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, oncologists have managed patients at higher risk of having a severe course of this infection. This raises new questions about their correct management, as well as the difficulty of distinguishing tumor/treatments complications from those related to COVID-19. We report a case of an 11-year-old boy undergoing treatment for T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma who experienced a prolonged COVID-19 course. Oncologic therapy was continued without significant changes compared to the initially planned treatment. No relevant complications occurred. COVID-19 convalescent plasma was administered, resulting in a positive antibody titer after 24 days.

Analysis of Intent and Reason for Oncologic Therapy Administration in Cancer Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Purpose To investigate the intent of, and reason for, administration of oncologic therapies in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods Single center, retrospective, cohort study of patients with cancer who received oncologic therapies at a tertiary cancer center ICU between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2020. Oncologic therapies included traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, hormonal or biologic therapy directed at a malignancy and were characterized as initiation (initial administration) or continuation (part of an ongoing regimen). Results 84 unique patients (6.8% of total ICU admissions) received oncologic therapies in the ICU; 43 (51%) had hematologic malignancies and 41 (49%) had solid tumors. The intent of oncologic therapy was palliative in 63% and curative in 27%. Twenty-two (26%) patients received initiation and 62 (74%) received continuation oncologic therapies. The intent of oncologic therapy was significantly different by regimen type (initiation vs. continuation, p = <0.0001). Initiation therapy was more commonly prescribed with curative intent and continuation therapy was more commonly administered with palliative intent (p = <0.0001). Oncologic therapies were given in the ICU mainly for an oncologic emergency (56%) and because the patients happened to be in the ICU for a non-oncologic critical illness when their oncologic therapy was due (34.5%). Conclusion Our study provides intensivists with a better understanding of the context and intent of oncologic therapies and why these therapies are administered in the ICU.

Exosomes produced by melanoma cells significantly influence the biological properties of normal and cancer-associated fibroblasts

The incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma is increasing worldwide. While the treatment of initial stages of the disease is simple, the advanced disease frequently remains fatal despite novel therapeutic options . This requires identification of novel therapeutic targets in melanoma. Similarly to other types of tumours, the cancer microenvironment plays a prominent role and determines the biological properties of melanoma. Importantly, melanoma cell-produced exosomes represent an important tool of intercellular communication within this cancer ecosystem. We have focused on potential differences in the activity of exosomes produced by melanoma cells towards melanoma-associated fibroblasts and normal dermal fibroblasts. Cancer-associated fibroblasts were activated by the melanoma cell-produced exosomes significantly more than their normal counterparts, as assessed by increased transcription of genes for inflammation-supporting cytokines and chemokines, namely IL-6 or IL-8. We have observed that the response is dependent on the duration of the stimulus via exosomes and also on the quantity of exosomes. Our study demonstrates that melanoma-produced exosomes significantly stimulate the tumour-promoting proinflammatory activity of cancer-associated fibroblasts. This may represent a potential new target of oncologic therapy .

The liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of completion rates and effects on survival

Background: Patients presenting with synchronous colorectal liver metastases are increasingly being considered for a curative treatment, and the liver-first approach is gaining popularity in this context. However, little is known about the completion rates of the liver-first approach and its effects on survival. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of liver-first strategy for colorectal liver metastasis. The primary outcome was an assessment of the completion rates of the liver-first approach. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, causes of non-completion, and clinicopathologic data. Results: Seventeen articles were amenable for inclusion and the total study population was 1041. The median completion rate for the total population was 80% (range 20–100). The median overall survival for the completion and non-completion groups was 45 (range 12–69) months and 13 (range 10.5–25) months, respectively. Metadata showed a significant survival benefit for the completion group, with a univariate hazard ratio of 12.0 (95% confidence interval, range 5.7–24.4). The major cause of non-completion (76%) was liver disease progression before resection of the primary tumor. Pearson tests showed significant negative correlation between median number of lesions and median size of the largest metastasis and completion rate. Conclusions: The liver-first approach offers a complete resection to most patients enrolled, with an overall survival benefit when completion can be assured. One-fifth fails to return to intended oncologic therapy and the major cause is interim metastatic progression, most often in the liver. Risk of non-completion is related to a higher number of lesions and large metastases. The majority of studies stem from primary rectal cancers, which may influence on the return to intended oncologic therapy as well. PROSPERO id no: 170459

Neurologic complications in patients with lymphoid cancer

Neurologic complications of lymphoid cancer can be challenging to recognize and treat. The nervous system can be affected directly by hematogenous or local spread of lymphoma. Indirect neurologic effects of lymphoma include paraneoplastic syndromes and vascular complications. Lymphoma treatments can also cause neurologic complications. Early identification and treatment are crucial to stabilize or reverse neurologic deficits, prevent further nervous system injury, and to optimize overall oncologic therapy. This article provides an overview of different neurologic complications of lymphoma and its treatments, in addition to presentation of case studies that emphasize commonly encountered clinical scenarios.