scholarly journals Impact of Doxycycline on Covid-19 Patients With Risk Factors of Disease Degradation: Dynamic, A Randomised Controlled Double-blind Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
David Boutoille ◽  
Florence Vrignaud ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
Fabrice Bonnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Experimental Treatment ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Inflammatory Skin Diseases ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
History Of ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background: The DYNAMIC study is based on three properties of tetracyclines. (1) Tetracyclines are known to chelate zinc from metalloproteases (MMPs). It is possible that their chelating activity may help to inhibit COVID-19 infection by limiting its ability to replicate in the host. (2) As seen with dengue virus, tetracyclines may also be able to inhibit the replication of positive polarity single-stranded RNA viruses, such as COVID-19. (3) In addition, tetracyclines are modulators of innate immunity (anti-inflammatory activity), a property that has been used to treat inflammatory skin diseases for many years. They could therefore participate in limiting the cytokine storm induced by COVID-19. The lipophilic nature of tetracyclines and their strong pulmonary penetration could allow them to inhibit viral replication at this level. Among tetracyclines, the advantages of doxycycline are triple: its long history of safety (infrequent side effects with no notable risks), the short duration of treatment and its low cost.Methods: By estimating the rate of patients presenting pulmonary signs requiring hospitalisation in at-risk patients infected with COVID-19 at 25%, we hypothesise that on doxycycline, this rate would decrease to 12%. The main objective involves 2 embedded hypotheses tested successively in case of rejection of the previous one: (i) Decrease the rate of patients requiring hospitalisation, (ii) Decrease the use of mechanical ventilatory assistance.Discussion: This study could have an impact on the management of COVID-19 risk factor patientsupstream of hospitals by general practitioners. These patients,if kept at home under experimental treatment, would participate in reducing the risk of dissemination of SAR-CoV-2in the population.Thus, this treatment would contribute to supporting the deconfinement strategy through blocking the viral infection early and reducing the contagious period.Trial Registration: On ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT04371952, first published on 30 April 2020.

scholarly journals Impact of Doxycycline on COVID-19 Patients with Risk Factors: DYNAMIC, a Multi-Centre, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
David Boutoille ◽  
Florence Vrignaud ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
Fabrice Bonnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Experimental Treatment ◽  
Infectious Period ◽  
Inflammatory Skin Diseases ◽  
Short Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Registration Number

Abstract Background: The DYNAMIC study is based on three properties of tetracyclines. (1) Tetracyclines are known to chelate zinc from matrix metalloproteinases. It is possible their chelating activity may help inhibit COVID-19 infection by limiting its ability to replicate in the host. (2) As seen with dengue virus, tetracyclines may also be able to inhibit the replication of positive polarity single-stranded RNA viruses, such as COVID-19. (3) Tetracyclines are also modulators of innate immunity (anti-inflammatory activity), a property that has been used to treat inflammatory skin diseases for many years. They could therefore participate in limiting the cytokine storm induced by COVID-19. Moreover, the lipophilic nature of tetracyclines and their strong pulmonary penetration could allow them to inhibit viral replication at this level. Among the tetracyclines, doxycycline has three advantages: its long safety history (side effects are uncommon with no notable risks), its short treatment duration and its low cost.Methods: The trial will involve 330 patients who are positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and have one or more risk factors for worsening the disease. These patients will be included in six hospitals covering the whole of France. For 14 days they will be given either 200mg of doxycycline a day or a placebo. Our hypothesis is a considerable reduction in the number of patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 thanks to the treatment of doxycycline.Discussion: This study could have an impact on general practitioners’ management of COVID-19 patients with risk factors prior to hospital admission. If kept at home under experimental treatment, these patients would help reduce the risk of spreading SARS-CoV-2 among the population. This treatment would therefore contribute to supporting the deconfinement strategy by blocking the viral infection early and reducing the infectious period.Trial Registration: On ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT04371952, first published on 30 April 2020.

scholarly journals Impact of Doxycycline on COVID-19 Patients with Risk Factors: DYNAMIC, a Multi-Centre, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
David Boutoille ◽  
Florence Vrignaud ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
Fabrice Bonnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Infectious Period ◽  
Inflammatory Skin Diseases ◽  
Short Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Short Treatment Duration

Abstract Background: The DYNAMIC study is based on three properties of tetracyclines. (1) Tetracyclines are known to chelate zinc from matrix metalloproteinases. It is possible their chelating activity may help inhibit COVID-19 infection by limiting its ability to replicate in the host. (2) As seen with dengue virus, tetracyclines may also be able to inhibit the replication of positive polarity single-stranded RNA viruses, such as COVID-19. (3) Tetracyclines are also modulators of innate immunity (anti-inflammatory activity), a property that has been used to treat inflammatory skin diseases for many years. They could therefore participate in limiting the cytokine storm induced by COVID-19. Moreover, the lipophilic nature of tetracyclines and their strong pulmonary penetration could allow them to inhibit viral replication at this level. Among the tetracyclines, doxycycline has three advantages: its long safety history (side effects are uncommon with no notable risks), its short treatment duration and its low cost.Methods: The trial will involve 330 patients who are positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and have one or more risk factors for worsening the disease. These patients will be included as outpatients for early treatment of illness. For logistical reasons and in order to be able to standardise the study as much as possible, recruitment will take place in 6 hospital departments covering the whole of France. For 14 days they will be given either 200mg of doxycycline a day or placebo. Our hypothesis is a considerable reduction in the number of patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 thanks to the treatment of doxycycline.Discussion: This study could have an impact on the overcrowding of patients with COVID-19 at the hospital which is one of the major world-wide problems of this pandemic. This treatment would therefore contribute to supporting the deconfinement strategy by blocking the viral infection early and reducing the infectious period.Trial Registration: On ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT04371952, first published on 30 April 2020.

scholarly journals Impact of Doxycycline on COVID-19 Patients with Risk Factors: DYNAMIC, a Multi-Centre, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
David Boutoille ◽  
Florence Vrignaud ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
Fabrice Bonnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Positive Polarity ◽  
Inflammatory Skin Diseases ◽  
Short Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Chelating Activity ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Short Treatment Duration

Abstract Background: The DYNAMIC study is based on three properties of tetracyclines. (1) Tetracyclines are known to chelate zinc from matrix metalloproteinases. It is possible their chelating activity may help inhibit COVID-19 infection by limiting its ability to replicate in the host. (2) As seen with dengue virus, tetracyclines may also be able to inhibit the replication of positive polarity single-stranded RNA viruses, such as COVID-19. (3) Tetracyclines are also modulators of innate immunity (anti-inflammatory activity), a property that has been used to treat inflammatory skin diseases for many years. They could therefore participate in limiting the cytokine storm induced by COVID-19. Moreover, the lipophilic nature of tetracyclines and their strong pulmonary penetration could allow them to inhibit viral replication at this level. Among the tetracyclines, doxycycline has three advantages: its long safety history (side effects are uncommon with no notable risks), its short treatment duration and its low cost.Methods: The trial will involve 330 patients who are positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and have one or more risk factors for worsening the disease. These patients will be included as outpatients for early treatment of illness. For logistical reasons and in order to be able to standardise the study as much as possible, recruitment will take place in 6 hospital departments covering the whole of France. For 14 days they will be given either 200mg of doxycycline a day or placebo. Our hypothesis is a considerable reduction in the number of patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 thanks to the treatment of doxycycline.Discussion: This study could have an impact on the overcrowding of patients with COVID-19 at the hospital which is one of the major world-wide problems of this pandemic. This treatment would therefore contribute to supporting the deconfinement strategy by blocking the viral infection early and reducing the infectious period.Trial Registration: On ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT04371952, first published on 30 April 2020.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: results from the open-label period of a phase II randomised controlled trial (faSScinate)

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh Khanna ◽  
Christopher P Denton ◽  
Celia J F Lin ◽  
Jacob M van Laar ◽  
Tracy M Frech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Score ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesAssess the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in a phase II study.MethodsPatients with SSc were treated for 48 weeks in an open-label extension phase of the faSScinate study with weekly 162 mg subcutaneous tocilizumab. Exploratory end points included modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) and per cent predicted forced vital capacity (%pFVC) through week 96.ResultsOverall, 24/44 (55%) placebo-tocilizumab and 27/43 (63%) continuous-tocilizumab patients completed week 96. Observed mean (SD (95% CI)) change from baseline in mRSS was –3.1 (6.3 (–5.4 to –0.9)) for placebo and –5.6 (9.1 (–8.9 to–2.4)) for tocilizumab at week 48 and –9.4 (5.6 (–8.9 to –2.4)) for placebo-tocilizumab and –9.1 (8.7 (–12.5 to –5.6)) for continuous-tocilizumab at week 96. Of patients who completed week 96, any decline in %pFVC was observed for 10/24 (42% (95% CI 22% to 63%)) placebo-tocilizumab and 12/26 (46% (95% CI 27% to 67%)) continuous-tocilizumab patients in the open-label period; no patients had >10% absolute decline in %pFVC. Serious infection rates/100 patient-years (95% CI) were 10.9 (3.0 to 27.9) with placebo and 34.8 (18.0 to 60.8) with tocilizumab during the double-blind period by week 48 and 19.6 (7.2 to 42.7) with placebo-tocilizumab and 0.0 (0.0 to 12.2) with continuous-tocilizumab during the open-label period.ConclusionsSkin score improvement and FVC stabilisation in the double-blind period were observed in placebo-treated patients who transitioned to tocilizumab and were maintained in the open-label period. Safety data indicated increased serious infections in patients with SSc but no new safety signals with tocilizumab.Trial registration numberNCT01532869; Results.

scholarly journals Can topical epinephrine application to the papilla prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Results from a double blind, multicentre, placebo controlled, randomised clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000562
Author(s):  
Adriana Fabiola Romano-Munive ◽  
J Jesus García-Correa ◽  
Luis F García-Contreras ◽  
José Ramírez-García ◽  
Luis Uscanga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Sterile Water ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Rectal Indomethacin

Background and study aimsPost-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is a complication associated with important morbidity, occasional mortality and high costs. Preventive strategies are suboptimal as PEP continues to affect 4% to 9% of patients. Spraying epinephrine on the papilla may decrease oedema and prevent PEP. This study aimed to compare rectal indomethacin plus epinephrine (EI) versus rectal indomethacin plus sterile water (WI) for the prevention of PEP.Patients and methodsThis multicentre randomised controlled trial included patients aged >18 years with an indication for ERCP and naive major papilla. All patients received 100 mg of rectal indomethacin and 10 mL of sterile water or a 1:10 000 epinephrine dilution. Patients were asked about PEP symptoms via telephone 24 hours and 7 days after the procedure. The trial was stopped half way through after a new publication reported an increased incidence of PEP among patients receiving epinephrine.ResultsOf the 3602 patients deemed eligible, 3054 were excluded after screening. The remaining 548 patients were randomised to EI group (n=275) or WI group (n=273). The EI and WI groups had similar baseline characteristics. Patients in the EI group had a similar incidence of PEP to those in the WI group (3.6% (10/275) vs 5.12% (14/273), p=0.41). Pancreatic duct guidewire insertion was identified as a risk factor for PEP (OR 4.38, 95% CI (1.44 to 13.29), p=0.009).ConclusionSpraying epinephrine on the papilla was no more effective than rectal indomethacin alone for the prevention of PEP.Trial registration numberThis study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02959112).

scholarly journals Effectiveness assessment of riluzole in the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: RILUZOX-01: protocol of a randomised, parallel, controlled, double-blind and multicentre study by the UNICANCER-AFSOS Supportive Care intergroup

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e027770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Kerckhove ◽  
Jérome Busserolles ◽  
Trevor Stanbury ◽  
Bruno Pereira ◽  
Valérie Plence ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Repeated Administration ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionMost patients (>70%) experience acute neuropathic symptoms shortly after oxaliplatin infusions. These symptoms are not always resolved between infusions. Overall, 30%–50% of patients suffer from chronic oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). This cumulative and dose-dependent sensory neuropathy limits compliance or results in oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies to be substituted with less neurotoxic agents. These treatment changes impair clinical outcomes, and may be associated with comorbidities, such as distress, depression and anxiety. Currently, no drug used to prevent or treat OIPN is sufficiently effective to be used routinely in clinical practice. There is, thus, an unmet therapeutic need to reduce the intensity of and/or prevent OIPN. We hypothesised that riluzole would be an excellent candidate to address this public health issue. Riluzole is approved for treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In animals, there is a beneficial effect on sensorimotor and pain disorders, as well as related comorbidities, after repeated administration of oxaliplatin. In humans, riluzole has shown neuroprotective, anxiolytic and antidepressive effects.Methods and analysisRILUZOX-01 trial was designed as a randomised, controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of riluzole to prevent OIPN. Patients with colorectal cancer and initiating adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy are eligible. Patients (n=210) will be randomly assigned to either riluzole or placebo, concomitantly with chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the change in OIPN intensity, assessed by the sensory scale of the QLQ-CIPN20, after six 2-week cycles of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include incidence and severity of neuropathy, grade of sensory neuropathy, intensity and features of neuropathic pain, health-related quality of life, disease-free survival, overall survival and safety.Ethics and dessiminationThe study was approved by a French ethics committee (ref:39/18_1, ‘Comité de Protection des Personnes’ Ouest-IV, France) and plans to start enroling patients in September 2019. The trial is registered in EudraCT and clinicaltrials.gov.Trial registration numberN°2017-002320-25;NCT03722680

scholarly journals Weekly iron–folic acid supplements containing 2.8 mg folic acid are associated with a lower risk of neural tube defects than the current practice of 0.4 mg: a randomised controlled trial in Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. e003897
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn L I Samson ◽  
Su Peng Loh ◽  
Siew Siew Lee ◽  
Dian C Sulistyoningrum ◽  
Geok Lin Khor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Folic Acid ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Folic Acid Supplements ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Menstruating Women ◽  
Iron Folic Acid ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionWeekly iron–folic acid (IFA) supplements are recommended for all menstruating women in countries where anaemia prevalence is >20%. Anaemia caused by folate deficiency is low worldwide, and the need to include folic acid is in question. Including folic acid might reduce the risk of a neural tube defect (NTD) should a woman become pregnant. Most weekly supplements contain 0.4 mg folic acid; however, WHO recommends 2.8 mg because it is seven times the daily dose effective in reducing NTDs. There is a reluctance to switch to supplements containing 2.8 mg of folic acid because of a lack of evidence that this dose would prevent NTDs. Our aim was to investigate the effect of two doses of folic acid, compared with placebo, on red blood cell (RBC) folate, a biomarker of NTD risk.MethodsWe conducted a three-arm double-blind efficacy trial in Malaysia. Non-pregnant women (n=331) were randomised to receive 60 mg iron and either 0, 0.4, or 2.8 mg folic acid once weekly for 16 weeks.ResultsAt 16 weeks, women receiving 0.4 mg and 2.8 mg folic acid per week had a higher mean RBC folate than those receiving 0 mg (mean difference (95% CI) 84 (54 to 113) and 355 (316 to 394) nmol/L, respectively). Women receiving 2.8 mg folic acid had a 271 (234 to 309) nmol/L greater mean RBC folate than those receiving 0.4 mg. Moreover, women in the 2.8 mg group were seven times (RR 7.3, 95% CI 3.9 to 13.7; p<0.0001) more likely to achieve an RBC folate >748 nmol/L, a concentration associated with a low risk of NTD, compared with the 0.4 mg group.ConclusionWeekly IFA supplements containing 2.8 mg folic acid increases RBC folate more than those containing 0.4 mg. Increased availability and access to the 2.8 mg formulation is needed.Trail registration numberThis trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12619000818134).

scholarly journals Naoxuekang, Xinnaoshutong and Xuesaitong capsules for treating stroke: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. e015983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiling Chen ◽  
Hongbo Cao ◽  
Xu Guo ◽  
Meidan Zhao ◽  
Qing Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Facial Paralysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Initial Treatment Period ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Index Value ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionAfter stroke, hemiplegia, dysphasia and facial paralysis can manifest during the convalescent period. Currently, no Chinese patent medicine (CPM) is previously reported to cure each of these symptoms primarily, and thus, there are no relevant instructions for the use of CPM. This study presents a new approach based on comparative effectiveness research to distinguish the curative effects of three CPMs that are often used in stroke convalescence to determine the ideal medicine for the treatment of each symptom.Methods and analysisIn this multicentre and double-blind clinical trial, stratified randomisation is used to group the patients according to their primary symptoms (hemiplegia, dysphasia and facial paralysis). Three strata will be enrolled, with 80 eligible participants included in each stratum. Each stratum will be randomly and equally divided into four groups, and each group will receive one of the following treatments: Naoxuekang, Xinnaoshutong (XNST), Xuesaitong (XST) or placebo. This study will include two stages: the initial treatment period (30 days) and a follow-up period (180 days). Three replicates for each data point will be completed during this trial. The first visit will occur on day 0 after enrolment, the second visit on day 30±2 and the third visit on day 210±5. The Delphi technique is adopted to achieve index weighting, which ensures that the evaluation outcome is patient oriented. The weighted index value will be computed as the final measurement index of the outcome.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (registration number TJUTCM-EC20160007). The results will be offered for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberThis trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-17010397). The date of registration was 11 January 2017.

Is there a case for MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in the UK?

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Sessa
Keyword(s):  
Medical Profession ◽  
Popular Literature ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Psychedelic Drugs ◽  
History Of ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Uk ◽  
New Research ◽  
Effective Use ◽  
Recreational Use

Much has been written in scientific and popular literature in recent years about the dangers surrounding the recreational use of the drug MDMA/ecstasy. What is little known and understood however is the history of the apparently safe and effective use of MDMA as a therapeutic tool for psychotherapy. In this paper the author explores this history and describes the recent re-emergence of scientific interest in MDMA and other psychedelic drugs. There are currently several new double-blind randomised controlled trials underway re-visiting the subject. By acknowledging the limitations of this new research and emphasising the importance of exercising appropriate but realistic caution, the author asks that the medical profession consider a dispassionate and open-minded debate to examine whether MDMA might have a legitimate place as an adjunct to psychotherapy in modern psychiatric practice.

scholarly journals Effect of tranexamic acid on the prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing craniotomy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e049839
Author(s):  
Bei Wu ◽  
Yu Lu ◽  
Yun Yu ◽  
Hongli Yue ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Medical University

IntroductionAbnormal coagulation function aggravates the prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). It was reported that the antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid (TXA) could reduce intracranial haemorrhage and mortality in non-operative patients with TBI. However, there is a lack of evaluation of TXA in patients with TBI undergoing craniotomy.Methods and analysisThis is a single-centre randomised controlled, double-blind, parallel study aiming to investigate the effectiveness and safety of TXA in patients with TBI during the perioperative period. Blood loss and transfusion, neurological function, adverse events, mortality and serum immune-inflammatory cytokines will be collected and analysed.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University (reference number KY 2020-136-03). The results of this study will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberChiCTR2100041911.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document