scholarly journals Comparing Fertility Rates of Fresh Versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in Antagonist IVF Cycles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariba Seyedoshohadaei ◽  
Yasamin Honarbakhsh ◽  
Azra Allahveisi ◽  
Masoumeh Rezaei ◽  
Mohammad Jafar Rezaie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Fertility Rates ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Transfer Group

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare fertility rates of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in antagonist IVF cycles. Methods This cohort study was performed on 105 patients referred to the infertility clinic of Besat Hospital in Sanandaj. These patients were admitted to this infertility clinic from March 2014 to March 2020. Inclusion criteria were infertile couples treated with antagonistic IVF cycle. In this study, we compared the fertility rate in antagonist IVF cycles in two patient groups, the group that fresh embryo was transferred, vs the group that received frozen-thawed embryo. Data collected during this study from both groups were analyzed and compared using SPSS statistical software. Results In this study, out of 105 patients included in the project, 48 were in the fresh embryo transfer group, and 57 were in the frozen embryo transfer group. The rate of chemical pregnancy was 12 (25%) in the fresh group and 15 (26.3%) in the frozen group (P: 0.878); The clinical pregnancy rate was 11 (22.9%) in the fresh group and 11 (19.3%) in the frozen group (P: 0.650); The rate of abortion in the fresh group was 3 (6.3%), and in the frozen group was 8 (14%) (P: 0.194); and live birth rate was 9 (18.8%) in fresh group, compared with 7 (12.3%) in the frozen group (P: 0.358). Conclusion The difference in rate of chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, abortion, and live birth in antagonistic IVF cycles in the two groups of fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer is not statistically significant. Although not statistically significant, the percentage of chemical pregnancy was higher in the frozen embryo transfer group. The percentage of abortion was also higher in the frozen embryo transfer group, and the percentage of clinical pregnancy and live birth were higher in fresh embryo transfer group.

scholarly journals Live Birth Rate of Fresh Embryo Transfer with GnRH Agonist Long Protocol is Higher Than Frozen Embryo Transfer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Ding ◽  
Jingwei Yang ◽  
Lan Li ◽  
Na Yang ◽  
Ling Lan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Long Protocol

Abstract Background: Along with progress in embryo cryopreservation, especially in vitrification has made freeze all strategy more acceptable. Some studies found comparable or higher live birth rate with frozen embryo transfer (FET) than with fresh embryo transfer（ET）in gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. But there were no reports about live birth rate differences between fresh ET and FET with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol. The aim of this study is to analyze whether patients benefit from freeze all strategy in GnRH-a protocol from real-world data.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, in which women undergoing fresh ET or FET with GnRH-a long protocol at Chongqing Reproductive and Genetics Institute from January 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancy rate.Results: A total of 7,814 patients met inclusion criteria, implementing 5,216 fresh ET cycles and 2,598 FET cycles, respectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients were significantly different between two groups, except BMI. After controlling for a broad range of potential confounders (including age, infertility duration, BMI, AMH, no. of oocytes retrieved and no. of available embryos), multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in terms of clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate between two groups (all P>0.05). However, the implantation rate and live birth rate of fresh ET group were significantly higher than FET group (P<0.001 and P=0.012, respectively).Conclusion: Compared to FET, fresh ET following GnRH-a long protocol could lead to higher implantation rate and live birth rate in infertile patients underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). The freeze all strategy should be individualized and made with caution especially with GnRH-a long protocol.

scholarly journals Uterus Size May Affect Reproductive Outcome in Women with Adenomyosis After Gnrh- Agonist Pretreatment Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xiong ◽  
Ruiyi Tang ◽  
Peng Wu ◽  
Zhengyi Sun ◽  
jingran zhen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Gnrh Agonist ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background: GnRH-agonist is used to treat adenomyosis, but its efficacy in adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) is unclear. Methods：The retrospective cohort study comprised 112 adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement undergoing the first FET circle. A long-term GnRH-a pretreatment was administered to 112 patients with uterine enlargement. These patients were divided into two groups according to the therapeutic effect: patients with a normal-size uterus after GnRH-a treatment (GN group) and patients with an enlarged uterus after GnRH-a treatment (GL group). Results：Not all patients can shrink their uterus to a satisfactory level. After receiving GnRH-a pretreatment, the uterus returned to normal size in 77% of patients (GN group), and 23% of patients had a persistently enlarged uterus (GL group). The pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were significantly higher in the GN group than in the GL group. Controlling for the confounding factors, normal uterus size (odds ratio [OR] 4.50; P=0.03) and low body mass index (OR 3.13; P=0.03) affected the odds of achieving live birth. The cut-off value selected on the ROC curve of uterus volume after GnRH-a treatment for detecting live birth was 144.7Conclusions：GnRH-a pretreatment was associated with the regression of adenomyosis lesions and improved clinical pregnancy outcomes in the adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement whose lesion are GnRH-a susceptible on FET cycles. However, about a quarter of patients may not be less responsive to GnRH-a and have poorer pregnancy outcomes, especially in overweight women.

scholarly journals 172ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER (ESET) IN HUMANS DOES NOT AFFECT THE CHANCES OF A SUCCESSFUL PREGNANCY

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
J. Catt ◽  
T. Wood ◽  
M. Henman ◽  
R. Jansen
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Single Embryo Transfer ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Transfer Group

Improvements in human IVF have led to increased pregnancy rates but at the expense of increasing twinning rates. Twins are a bad outcome for the offspring, parents and the healthcare system. An obvious solution to this is to transfer only one embryo and freeze the rest for potential further treatment. This study looked at the effect of doing this on the cumulative live birth rate (when the cryopreserved embryos were thawed and transferred). Patients less than 38 years of age presenting for IVF treatment and with more than two embryos suitable for transfer were offered the chance of transferring only one embryo (elective single embryo transfer, eSET) and freezing the rest. Those patients declining a single embryo transfer had two transferred and served as the controls. Patients not achieving a pregnancy returned for a frozen embryo transfer but were not restricted on the number transferred (to a maximum of two). Cumulative live birth rates were recorded over the ensuing two years. Statistical comparisons were made using paired chi-square tests. The live birth rates from the initial fresh transfer was 41% for eSET (41/111) and significantly higher (53%, P&lt;0.05) for the two-embryo transfer group. These differences were eliminated when the frozen embryos were factored in, both groups rising to 61% of patients treated (68 and 172 live births, respectively). The twinning rate was significantly reduced (P&lt;0.01) from 33% in the two-embryo transfer group to 6% (arising from 4 sets of twins in the frozen embryo transfers) in the eSET group. eSET in the fresh embryo transfer cycle does not affect the chances of a live birth and reduces the twinning rate at least fivefold. Currently, 70% of patients under the age of 38 are electing to have eSET.

FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER IMPROVES LIVE BIRTH RATE OVER FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER IN FRESHLY RETRIEVED DONOR EGG CYCLES

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e272-e273
Author(s):  
Iris Insogna ◽  
Andrea Lanes ◽  
Malinda S. Lee ◽  
Elizabeth S. Ginsburg ◽  
Janis H. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Donor Egg

scholarly journals Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin injection before frozen embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in endometriosis infertility

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanbo Du ◽  
Lei Yan ◽  
Mei Sun ◽  
Yan Sheng ◽  
Xiufang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Abortion Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Control Group

Abstract Purpose To investigate the effect of hCG in hormone replacement regime for frozen thawed embryo transfer in women with endometriosis. Methods We performed a retrospective, database-searched cohort study. The data of endometriosis patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer between 1/1/2009-31/8/2018 were collected. According to the protocols for frozen embryo transfer cycle, these patients were divided into two groups: Control group(n=305), and hCG group(n=362). And clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, early abortion rate, late abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Results There was a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate in hCG group (56.6% vs. 48.2%, p=0.035) compared to the control group. And the live birth rate in hCG group (43.5% vs. 37.4%, p=0.113) also elevated, but the difference is statistically insignificant. Conclusion hCG administration in hormone replacement regime for FET increase the pregnancy rate in women with endometriosis.

P–590 Women with hypothalamic hypogonadism have lower live birth rates following frozen embryo transfer

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Heidenberg ◽  
A Lanes ◽  
E Ginsburg ◽  
C Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Polycystic Ovary ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Ovary Syndrome ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Tubal Factor Infertility ◽  
Tubal Factor

Abstract Study question How do live birth rates differ in anovulatory women with polycystic ovary syndrome and hypothalamic hypogonadism compared to normo-ovulatory women undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfer? Summary answer Live birth rates are similar among all groups undergoing fresh embryo transfer but are significantly lower in women with hypothalamic hypogonadism undergoing frozen embryo transfer. What is known already Conflicting data exist regarding pregnancy outcomes in patients with tubal factor infertility versus polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Some studies demonstrate higher pregnancy and live birth rates for women with PCOS undergoing fresh embryo transfer, but other studies demonstrate no difference. Women with PCOS have higher live birth rates than those with tubal factor infertility when undergoing frozen embryo transfer. Fewer data are available regarding IVF outcomes in women with hypothalamic hypogonadism (HH) and tubal factor infertility. Several studies report comparable live birth rates with fresh embryo transfer, but there are no data on frozen embryo transfer outcomes. Study design, size, duration Retrospective cohort study of all fresh and frozen autologous embryo transfers performed for patients with oligo-anovulation (PCOS, n = 380 and HH, n = 39) and normo-ovulation (tubal factor infertility, n = 315) from 1/1/2012 to 6/30/2019. A total of 734 transfers from 653 patients were analyzed. Participants/materials, setting, methods Transfer outcomes, including implantation, miscarriage, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, were assessed in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated adjusting for age, BMI, stimulation protocol, number of embryos transferred, embryo quality, endometrial stripe thickness and day of transfer. Poisson regression was used for counts and with an offset for ratios. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for patients contributing multiple cycles. Main results and the role of chance For fresh embryo transfer cycles, live birth rates are similar among patients with tubal factor infertility, PCOS and HH (29.5% vs. 37.9% vs. 35.9%, respectively, aRR 1.15 95% CI: 0.91–1.44 and aRR 1.23 95% CI: 0.81–2.00, respectively). When evaluating frozen embryo transfer cycles, patients with HH have lower live birth rates than patients with tubal factor infertility (26.5% vs. 42.6%, aRR 0.54 95% CI: 0.33–0.88) and patients with PCOS (26.5% vs. 46.7%, aRR 0.55 95% CI: 0.34–0.88). Additionally, patients with HH have higher chemical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates than patients with tubal factor infertility (26.5% vs. 13.0% and 17.7% vs. 6.5%, respectively, RR 2.71 95% CI: 1.27–5.77 and RR 2.03 95% CI: 1.05–3.80, respectively). Point biserial correlation showed no significant correlation between live birth and endometrial stripe thickness in HH patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer (r = 0.028, p-value 0.876). Limitations, reasons for caution This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the small sample size of women with hypothalamic hypogonadism. Additionally, these data represent outcomes from a single academic center, so generalizability of our findings may be limited. Wider implications of the findings: Lower live birth rates for HH patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer cycles are not correlated with endometrial stripe thickness. This may be due to absent gonadotropin signaling on endometrial receptors. A prospective randomized trial of HH patients to modified natural versus programmed frozen embryo transfer would best support this hypothesis. Trial registration number Not applicable

P–159 Slow-growing embryos should be frozen on day 5

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Zamora ◽  
I Katsouni ◽  
D Garcia ◽  
R Vassena ◽  
A Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Patient Counselling ◽  
Slow Growing

Abstract Study question What is the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer (FET) of slow-growing embryos frozen on day 5 (D5) or on day 6 (D6)? Summary answer The live birth rate after single FET is significantly higher for slow-growing embryos frozen on D5 compared to those frozen on D6. What is known already Most data on the outcomes of blastocyst transfer stem from studies that evaluate fresh transfer from normal growing D5 blastocyst ET. However not all embryos will begin blastulation nor reach the fully expanded stage by D5; those are the slow-growing embryos. Studies that compare D5 to D6 embryos in FET cycles show contradictory results. Some have reported higher clinical pregnancy rates after D5 FET, while others have reported similar outcomes for D5 and D6 cryopreserved blastocyst transfers. There is a lack of evidence regarding the best approach for vitrifying embryos that exhibit a slow developmental kinetic. Study design, size, duration This retrospective cohort study included 821 single FET of slow-growing embryos frozen on D5 or D6, belonging to patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with donor oocytes between January 2011 and October 2019, in a single fertility center. The origin of blastocysts was either supernumerary embryos after fresh embryo transfer or blastocysts from freeze-all cycles. All embryos were transferred 2- 4h after thawing. Participants/materials, setting, methods We compared reproductive outcomes of slow-growing embryos frozen on D5 versus (n = 442) slow-growing embryos frozen on D6 (n = 379). D5 group consisted in embryos graded 0, 1, 2 of Gardner scale and frozen on D5. Similarly, D6 group consisted in embryos graded 3, 4, 5 of Gardner scale (blastocyst stage) and frozen on D6. Differences in pregnancy rates between study groups were compared using a Chi2 test. A p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Main results and the role of chance Baseline characteristics were comparable between study groups. Overall, mean age of the woman was 42.3±5.4 years old; donor sperm was used in 25% of cycles, and it was frozen in 73.2% of cycles. Pregnancy rates were significantly higher when transferring slow D5 embryos compared to D6 for all the pregnancy outcomes analyzed: biochemical pregnancy rate was 27.7% vs 20.2%, p &lt; 0.016; clinical pregnancy rate was 17.5% vs 10.2%, p &lt; 0.004); ongoing pregnancy rate was: 15.7% vs 7.8% (p &lt; 0.001); live birth rate was: 15.4% vs 7.5%, (p &lt; 0.001). These results suggest that when embryos exhibit a slow development behavior (not reaching full blastocysts at D5), waiting until D6 for blastulation and expansion does not improve clinical outcomes. Vitrification at D5 will should the preferred option in cases where the oocyte is assumed of high quality Limitations, reasons for caution The retrospective design of the study is its main limitation. Also, morphology as sole selection criterion for transfer. However, blastocyst morphology is a very good predictor of implantation and pregnancy, and a good indicator of the embryo’s chromosomal status (higher euploidy rate in higher morphological quality blastocysts). Wider implications of the findings: These results can help to the standardization of laboratory protocols. As the decision of vitrifying slow developing embryos on D5 or D6 is made by the laboratory team or by the gynaecologist in agreement with the patient, having an evidence based strategy simplifies patient counselling and decision making. Trial registration number Not applicable

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document