scholarly journals Lower Diagnostic Costs Associated with Early Deployment of Capsule Endoscopy in Non-Hematemesis Gastrointestinal Bleeding: a Cost-Utilization Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salmaan Jawaid ◽  
Louise Maranda ◽  
David Cave
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Specific Procedure ◽  
Decision Analytical Model ◽  
Diagnostic Management ◽  
Secondary Procedures ◽  
Cost Utilization ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs

Abstract Introduction: Often, the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with non-hematemesis gastrointestinal bleeding (NHGIB) is inconclusive. Consequently, the diagnostic evaluation may incur unnecessary health care costs and diagnostic times. The use of a cost decision-analytical model of the current diagnostic management strategy applied to patients presenting with NHGIB may reveal alternative strategies for the evaluation of NHGIB.Methods: Cost decision-analytical model that retrospectively follows the diagnostic course of 231 consecutive patients presenting with NHGIB to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary medical center. We measured the effect (cost and relative times) of selecting a specific procedure, plus the effect of pursuing secondary procedures after non-diagnostic primary procedures. Results: A primary VCE had a diagnostic rate of 68% vs. 45% and 48% for a primary EGD and COLO, respectively. Combining the diagnostic rates for each primary procedure with the cost of performing subsequent procedures (after non-diagnostic primary procedures), demonstrates the primary use of VCE (n=9) results in a total cost of $12,146 vs. $12,746 and $13,162 for a primary EGD (n=47) and COLO (n=33), respectively. Similarly, the use of VCE as a primary diagnostic procedure in NHGIB patients admitted to the floor would take 74 unit hours to reach a diagnosis compared to 104 and 131 for EGD and COLO, respectively. Conclusion: Our model suggests initial use of VCE for the diagnosis of acute NHGIB, may reduce time to diagnosis and management costs.

scholarly journals Lower Diagnostic Costs Associated With Early Deployment of Capsule Endoscopy in Non-hematemesis Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Cost-utilization Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salmaan Jawaid ◽  
Louise Maranda ◽  
David Cave
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Specific Procedure ◽  
Decision Analytical Model ◽  
Diagnostic Management ◽  
Secondary Procedures ◽  
Cost Utilization ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs

Abstract Introduction: Often, the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with non-hematemesis gastrointestinal bleeding (NHGIB) is inconclusive. Consequently, the diagnostic evaluation may incur unnecessary health care costs and diagnostic times. The use of a cost decision-analytical model of the current diagnostic management strategy applied to patients presenting with NHGIB may reveal alternative strategies for the evaluation of NHGIB.Methods: Cost decision-analytical model that retrospectively follows the diagnostic course of 231 consecutive patients presenting with NHGIB to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary medical center. We measured the effect (cost and relative times) of selecting a specific procedure, plus the effect of pursuing secondary procedures after non-diagnostic primary procedures.Results: A primary VCE had a diagnostic rate of 68% vs. 45% and 48% for a primary EGD and COLO, respectively. Combining the diagnostic rates for each primary procedure with the cost of performing subsequent procedures (after non-diagnostic primary procedures), demonstrates the primary use of VCE (n=9) results in a total cost of $12,146 vs. $12,746 and $13,162 for a primary EGD (n=47) and COLO (n=33), respectively. Similarly, the use of VCE as a primary diagnostic procedure in NHGIB patients admitted to the floor would take 74 unit hours to reach a diagnosis compared to 104 and 131 for EGD and COLO, respectively.Conclusion: Our model suggests initial use of VCE for the diagnosis of acute NHGIB, may reduce time to diagnosis and management costs.

scholarly journals A Decision Analytical Model Investigating Cost-Effectiveness of Erlotinib

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alam
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Markov Model ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
State Transition ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Qaly Gain ◽  
Health State ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Decision Analytical Model ◽  
The Cost

Background: A decision analytical model investigating cost-effectiveness of Erlotinib was submitted to the UK NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), which was not based on actual health-state transition probabilities, leading to structural uncertainty in the model. The study adopted a Markov state-transition model for investigating the cost-effectiveness of Erlotinib versus Best Supportive Care (BSC) as a maintenance therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Unlike manufacturer submission (MS), the Markov model was governed by transition probabilities, and allowed a negative post-progression survival (PPS) estimate to appear in later cycle. Using published summary survival data, the study employs three fixed- and time-varying approaches to estimate state transition probabilities that are used in a restructured model. Results: Post-progression probabilities and probabilities of death for Erlotinib were different than fixed-transition approaches. The best fitting curves are achieved for both PPS and probability of death across the time for which data were available, but the curves start diverging towards the end of this period. The Markov model which extrapolates the curves forward in time suggests that this difference between a time-varying and fixed-transition becomes even greater. Our models produce an ICER of £54k -£66k per QALY gain, which is comparable to an ICER presented in the MS (£55k/QALY gain). Conclusions: Results from restructured Markov models show robust cost-effectiveness results for Erlotinib vs BSC. Although these are comparable to manufacturer submissions, in terms of magnitude, they vary, and which are crucial for interventions falling near a threshold value. The study will further explore the cost-effectiveness of therapies for NSCLC in Qatar.

scholarly journals Economic Evaluation of Voriconazole for the Treatment of Candidemia in Canadian Adults

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coleman Rotstein ◽  
Lael Cragin ◽  
Michel Laverdière ◽  
Gary Garber ◽  
Eric J Bow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Decision Analytical Model ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Neutropenic Patients ◽  
Canadian Setting ◽  
The Cost

BACKGROUND: Candidemia is a common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infection. When selecting therapeutic treatments for candidemia, cost-effectiveness is an important consideration. The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of voriconazole for the treatment of candidemia.METHODS: A decision-analytical model was used for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of voriconazole compared with a regimen of conventional amphotericin B (CAB) followed by fluconazole (FLU) in the treatment of non-neutropenic patients diagnosed with candidemia in the Canadian setting, based on the Global Candidemia Study. The time frame of the model was 98 days (14 weeks). Model parameters were based primarily on clinical outcome, and resource use data collected from the clinical trial were used. Supplemental data were obtained from an independent panel of 12 Canadian experts for parameters not available from the clinical trial. Unit costs were collected from Canadian sources. The outcome variables selected in the study were the number of patients cured within 98 days, the number of patients surviving at 98 days and the number of patients avoiding toxicity. Incremental costs per outcome were calculated to compare the cost-effectiveness analyses (both probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed).RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated a difference of $1,121 in the total average cost of treatment with voriconazole ($70,489) versus CAB/FLU ($69,368). While the costs of voriconazole exceeded the costs of CAB/FLU, these costs were almost completely offset by lower hospitalization costs. While patients in both treatment arms experienced cure rates of 41%, both the percentage of patients surviving at day 98 (64.5% versus 58.2%) and the percentage of patients avoiding toxicity (64.5% versus 52.5%) were higher in the voriconazole arm. Accounting for differences in total costs and clinical outcomes, this analysis estimated an incremental cost per patient surviving at day 98 of $17,739, and an incremental cost per patient avoiding toxicity of $9,298. In the case of cost per patient cured, voriconazole had a higher cost ($1,121) than CAB/FLU. The results of the deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the model was robust.CONCLUSIONS: Results of the decision-analytical model provided evidence to support the cost-effectiveness of voriconazole relative to a regimen of CAB/FLU in the treatment of non-neutropenic patients diagnosed with candidemia in the Canadian setting.

GSS 2011 Linked with TIFF: Exploring the Cost of Child Care in Canada and the Use of the Child Care Tax Benefit

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-103
Author(s):  
Leanne Findlay ◽  
Dafna Kohen
Keyword(s):  
Child Care ◽  
General Social Survey ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Indigenous Identity ◽  
Social Survey ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs ◽  
Compare And Contrast ◽  
Employment Characteristics ◽  
Different Sources

Affordability of child care is fundamental to parents’, in particular, women’s decision to work. However, information on the cost of care in Canada is limited. The purpose of the current study was to examine the feasibility of using linked survey and administrative data to compare and contrast parent-reported child care costs based on two different sources of data. The linked file brings together data from the 2011 General Social Survey (GSS) and the annual tax files (TIFF) for the corresponding year (2010). Descriptive analyses were conducted to examine the socio-demographic and employment characteristics of respondents who reported using child care, and child care costs were compared. In 2011, parents who reported currently paying for child care (GSS) spent almost $6700 per year ($7,500 for children age 5 and under). According to the tax files, individuals claimed just over $3900 per year ($4,700). Approximately one in four individuals who reported child care costs on the GSS did not report any amount on their tax file; about four in ten who claimed child care on the tax file did not report any cost on the survey. Multivariate analyses suggested that individuals with a lower education, lower income, with Indigenous identity, and who were self-employed were less likely to make a tax claim despite reporting child care expenses on the GSS. Further examination of child care costs by province and by type of care are necessary, as is research to determine the most accurate way to measure and report child care costs.

The cost implication of primary prevention in the HOPE 3 trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-271
Author(s):  
Andre Lamy ◽  
Eva Lonn ◽  
Wesley Tong ◽  
Balakumar Swaminathan ◽  
Hyejung Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Cost Saving ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Pressure Lowering ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs ◽  
Country Specific

Abstract Aims The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation-3 (HOPE-3) found that rosuvastatin alone or with candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) (in a subgroup with hypertension) significantly lowered cardiovascular events compared with placebo in 12 705 individuals from 21 countries at intermediate risk and without cardiovascular disease. We assessed the costs implications of implementation in primary prevention in countries at different economic levels. Methods and results Hospitalizations, procedures, study and non-study medications were documented. We applied country-specific costs to the healthcare resources consumed for each patient. We calculated the average cost per patient in US dollars for the duration of the study (5.6 years). Sensitivity analyses were also performed with cheapest equivalent substitutes. The combination of rosuvastatin with candesartan/HCT reduced total costs and was a cost-saving strategy in United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. In contrast, the treatments were more expensive in developing countries even when cheapest equivalent substitutes were used. After adjustment for gross domestic product (GDP), the costs of cheapest equivalent substitutes in proportion to the health care costs were higher in developing countries in comparison to developed countries. Conclusion Rosuvastatin and candesartan/HCT in primary prevention is a cost-saving approach in developed countries, but not in developing countries as both drugs and their cheapest equivalent substitutes are relatively more expensive despite adjustment by GDP. Reductions in costs of these drugs in developing countries are essential to make statins and blood pressure lowering drugs affordable and ensure their use. Clinical trial registration HOPE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00468923.

scholarly journals THU0548 THE ECONOMIC BURDEN OF ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS IN SPAIN. RESULTS OF THE SPANISH ATLAS 2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 514.2-514
Author(s):  
M. Merino ◽  
O. Braçe ◽  
A. González ◽  
Á. Hidalgo-Vega ◽  
M. Garrido-Cumbrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Health Care Cost ◽  
Labour Productivity ◽  
General Health Questionnaire ◽  
Indirect Costs ◽  
Productivity Losses ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Care Costs

Background:Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a disease associated with a high number of comorbidities, chronic pain, functional disability, and resource consumption.Objectives:This study aimed to estimate the burden of disease for patients diagnosed with AS in Spain.Methods:Data from 578 unselected patients with AS were collected in 2016 for the Spanish Atlas of Axial Spondyloarthritis via an online survey. The estimated costs were: Direct Health Care Costs (borne by the National Health System, NHS) and Direct Non-Health Care Costs (borne by patients) were estimated with the bottom-up method, multiplying the resource consumption by the unit price of each resource. Indirect Costs (labour productivity losses) were estimated using the human capital method. Costs were compared between levels of disease activity using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score (<4 or low inflammation versus ≥4 or high inflammation) and risk of mental distress using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) score (<3 or low risk versus ≥3 or high risk).Results:The average annual cost per patient with AS in 2015 amounted to €11,462.3 (± 13,745.5) per patient. Direct Health Care Cost meant an annual average of €6,999.8 (± 9,216.8) per patient, to which an annual average of €611.3 (± 1,276.5) per patient associated with Direct Non-Health Care Cost borne by patients must be added. Pharmacological treatment accounted for the largest percentage of the costs borne by the NHS (64.6%), while for patients most of the cost was attributed to rehabilitative therapies and/or physical activity (91%). The average annual Indirect Costs derived from labour productivity losses were €3,851.2 (± 8,484.0) per patient, mainly associated to absenteeism. All categories showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between BASDAI groups (<4 vs ≥4) except for the Direct Non-Healthcare Cost, showing a progressive rise in cost from low to high inflammation. Regarding the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), all categories showed statistically significant differences between GHQ-12 (<3 vs ≥3), with higher costs associated with higher risk of poor mental health (Table 1).Table 1.Average annual costs per patient according to BASDAI and GHQ-12 groups (in Euros, 2015)NDirect Health CostsDirect Non-Health CostsIndirect CostsTotal CostBASDAI<4917,592.0*557.32,426.5*10,575.8*≥43769,706.9*768.05,104.8*15,579.7*Psychological distress (GHQ-12)<31468,146.8*493.6*3,927.2*12,567.6*≥32609,772.9*807.2*4,512.3*15,092.5*Total5786,999.8611.33,851.211,462.3* p <0.05Conclusion:Direct Health Care Costs, and those attributed to pharmacological treatment in particular, accounted for the largest component of the cost associated with AS. However, a significant proportion of the overall costs can be further attributed to labour productivity losses.Acknowledgments:Funded by Novartis Farmacéutica S.A.Disclosure of Interests:María Merino: None declared, Olta Braçe: None declared, Almudena González: None declared, Álvaro Hidalgo-Vega: None declared, Marco Garrido-Cumbrera: None declared, Jordi Gratacos-Masmitja Grant/research support from: a grant from Pfizzer to study implementation of multidisciplinary units to manage PSA in SPAIN, Consultant of: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly, Speakers bureau: Pfizzer, MSD, ABBVIE, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Lilly

The cost of decontaminating an ED after finding a bed bug: results from a single academic medical center

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicken Totten ◽  
Holli Charbonneau ◽  
Wyatt Hoch ◽  
Samir Shah ◽  
Johnathan Michael Sheele
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Bed Bug ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
The Cost

Prevalence of Abacavir Hypersensitivity Reaction and Cost-Effectiveness of HLA-B*5701 Screening: A Ten-Year Experience in The HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 1698-1705
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reaction ◽  
Human Leukocyte Antigen ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Human Leukocyte ◽  
Leukocyte Antigen ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Use Pattern ◽  
The Cost

Background: Recently, the authors had reported a case with abacavir hypersensitivity reaction (ABC-HSR), the first diagnosed patient at the HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center (MSMC). There was no data regarding the incidence or prevalence of ABC-HSR previously reported in Thailand. Objective: To study the prevalence of ABC-HSR, the abacavir use pattern and the cost effectiveness for the routine human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*5701 screening before abacavir use by analyses of the MSMC data. Materials and Methods: All patients at the MSMC who were prescribed abacavir from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for ABC-HSR and the abacavir use pattern at the time when abacavir was started. The cost-effectiveness analysis was applied by analyzing the cost between the routine HLA-B*5701 screening before abacavir use and the HLA-B*5701 confirmation for ABC-HSR. The cost for the prevention of a case of ABC-HSR was defined. Results: There were total of 54 patients who were prescribed abacavir and only one ABC-HSR case diagnosed. The prevalence of ABC-HSR was 1.85%. The main reason for the abacavir prescription was a substitution for tenofovir (TDF) because of the TDF adverse effects (81.13%). The HLA-B*5701 screening before abacavir use was done in 26.42% at the MSMC. If all eligible patients were routinely screened for the HLA-B*5701 allele before abacavir use, the cost would be 54,000 Baht. The cost for the diagnosis and the management of the ABC- HSR case was 7,230 Baht. The cost for the prevention of a case of ABC-HSR was 46,770 Baht. Conclusion: The prevalence of ABC-HSR was low. The main reason for abacavir use was a substitution for TDF. The cost for the prevention for a case of ABC-HSR was 46,770 Baht which would be less if the cost for the HLA-B*5701 test was reduced. Keywords: Abacavir; Hypersensitivity reaction; Prevalence; HLA-B*5701

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document