scholarly journals TAE Combined with Microwave Ablation in the Treatment of Rare Giant Hepatic Hemangioma:Case Report and Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-fu Feng ◽  
Xin-yi Chen ◽  
Jing-gang Mo ◽  
Hai-ling Wu ◽  
Jian-yu Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Microwave Ablation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Hepatic Hemangioma ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Common Benign Tumor ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ct ◽  
Risk Of Rupture ◽  
The Right ◽  
Giant Hepatic Hemangioma

Abstract Background: hepatic hemangioma is the most common benign tumor of the liver. However, patients with large hemangiomas that cause compression symptoms or that are at risk of rupture may need further intervention. It is necessary to explore additional minimally invasive and personalized treatment options.Case presentation: A 47-year-old female was diagnosed with right hepatic hemangioma for more than 10 years. Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT and CEUS revealed that there was a large hemangioma in the right liver, with a size of approximately 95x97x117 mm. Due to the patient's refusal of surgical treatment, hepatic artery embolization was performed in the first stage, then after 25 days of liver protection treatment, the liver function indexes decreased to normal levels. Then, B-ultrasound-guided microwave ablation of the giant hepatic hemangioma was performed. Ten days after the surgery, hepatobiliary ultrasonography showed that the hemangioma of the right liver was smaller than the previous size (the volume was reduced by approximately 30%). Then the patient was discharged from the hospital, and CT suggested that the hepatic hemangioma is significantly smaller two months after discharge. Because of COVID-19, the patient's CT examination was delayed.Conclusions: TAE combined with microwave ablation is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for hepatic hemangioma.

scholarly journals EAU, AUA and NICE Guidelines on Surgical and Minimally Invasive Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Critical Appraisal of the Guidelines Using the AGREE-II Tool

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Dmitry Enikeev ◽  
Vincent Misrai ◽  
Enrique Rijo ◽  
Roman Sukhanov ◽  
Denis Chinenov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Agree Ii ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Assessment Score ◽  
Nice Guideline ◽  
Agree Ii Tool

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To critically appraise the methodological rigour of the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) vis-à-vis BPH surgery as used by specialist research associations in the US, Europe and UK, and to compare whether the guidelines cover all or only some of the available treatments. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The current guidelines issued by the EUA, AUA and NICE associations have been analyzed by 4 appraisers using the AGREE-II instrument. We also compared the recommendations given in the guidelines for surgical and minimally invasive treatment to find out which of these CPGs include most of the available treatment options. <b><i>Results:</i></b> According to the AGREE II tool, the median scores of domains were: domain 1 scope and purpose 66.7%, domain 2 stakeholder involvement 50.0%, domain 3 rigor of development 65.1%, domain 4 clarity of presentation 80.6%, domain 5 applicability 33.3%, domain 6 editorial independence 72.9%. The overall assessment according to AGREE II is 83.3%. The NICE guideline scored highest on 5 out of 6 domains and the highest overall assessment score (91.6%). The EAU guideline scored lowest on 4 out of 6 domains and has the lowest overall assessment score (79.1%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The analyzed CPGs comprehensively highlight the minimally invasive and surgical treatment options for BPH. According to the AGREE II tool, the domains for clarity of presentation and editorial independence received the highest scores. The stakeholder involvement and applicability domains were ranked as the lowest. Improving the CPG in these domains may help to improve the clinical utility and applicability of CPGs.

Isolated giant true intercostal artery aneurysm with arteriovenous fistula: A case report

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110413
Author(s):  
Kenichi Honma ◽  
Terutoshi Yamaoka ◽  
Daisuke Matsuda
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Intercostal Artery ◽  
Spinal Cord Infarction ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Intercostal Artery Aneurysm ◽  
The Right

Objectives Intercostal artery aneurysm (IAA) is a very rare condition. Interestingly, only one study reported a case of intercostal aneurysm caused by an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Here, we report the case of a patient with non-ruptured isolated giant true IAA caused by an AVF (size, 28 × 41 mm). Methods Treatment options for IAA include open surgery and endovascular treatment (EVT). We chose EVT, as it is minimally invasive. The right 11th intercostal artery and aneurysm diverged from the aorta. Two outflow arteries, one inflow artery, and an AVF from the aneurysm were confirmed, and coil embolization was performed. The artery of Adamkiewicz did not communicate with the right 11th intercostal artery. We performed angiography and confirmed occlusion of IAA with endoleak. Results There were no clinical findings indicative of spinal cord infarction after treatment. The patient did not develop complications and was discharged the day after treatment. Endoleak was not observed on computed tomography angiography findings at 1 month after treatment. Conclusions In our patient, an AVF might have caused IAA. Endovascular treatment for non-ruptured isolated giant IAA is a safe and minimally-invasive treatment. We found that performing EVT is beneficial when the size of the IAA exceeds 30 mm.

scholarly journals Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of 1,695 laparoscopic operations

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 3049
Author(s):  
Dasharadha Jatothu ◽  
Rajkumar Sade ◽  
Kirthana Sade ◽  
. Taruni ◽  
Nagababu Pyadala
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gallstone Disease ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Gold Standard Method ◽  
Operative Complication

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCs) is the gold standard method to treat gallstone disease. But there are some complications which occur frequently as compared to open cholecystectomy.Methods: The prospective study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Telengana during the period of 2 years; March 2015 to February 2017. A total of 1,695 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases were included in this study. Several treatment options such as, conservative treatment, minimally invasive treatment and open surgery was performed based on the severity of the disease.Results: Majority of patients were female (83.9%) and most common age group affected was above 40 years. Intra-operative and post-operative complication occurred in 4.5% and 1.9% patients respectively. Majority complications were treated by conservative treatment and minimally invasive treatment. So, in conclusion, we can use conservative and minimally invasive treatment to manage the complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Conclusions: Conservative treatment options and minimally invasive treatment was more efficient to overcome the post-operative complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals Feasibility of Using a Novel 2.45 GHz Double Short Distance Slot Coaxial Antenna for Minimally Invasive Cancer Breast Microwave Ablation Therapy: Computational Model, Phantom, and In Vivo Swine Experimentation

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ortega-Palacios ◽  
C. J. Trujillo-Romero ◽  
M. F. J. Cepeda Rubio ◽  
A. Vera ◽  
L. Leija ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Computational Model ◽  
Short Distance ◽  
Microwave Ablation ◽  
Slot Antenna ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Ablation Therapy

Microwave ablation (MWA) by using coaxial antennas is a promising alternative for breast cancer treatment. A double short distance slot coaxial antenna as a newly optimized applicator for minimally invasive treatment of breast cancer is proposed. To validate and to analyze the feasibility of using this method in clinical treatment, a computational model, phantom, and breast swine in vivo experimentation were carried out, by using four microwave powers (50 W, 30 W, 20 W, and 10 W). The finite element method (FEM) was used to develop the computational model. Phantom experimentation was carried out in breast phantom. The in vivo experimentation was carried out in a 90 kg swine sow. Tissue damage was estimated by comparing control and treated micrographs of the porcine mammary gland samples. The coaxial slot antenna was inserted in swine breast glands by using image-guided ultrasound. In all cases, modeling, in vivo and phantom experimentation, and ablation temperatures (above 60°C) were reached. The in vivo experiments suggest that this new MWA applicator could be successfully used to eliminate precise and small areas of tissue (around 20–30 mm2). By modulating the power and time applied, it may be possible to increase/decrease the ablation area.

Current Concepts of Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Plantar Fasciitis: a Comprehensive Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan Hasegawa ◽  
Ivan Urits ◽  
Vwaire Orhurhu ◽  
Mariam Salisu Orhurhu ◽  
Joseph Brinkman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Comprehensive Review

Ten-Step Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lumbar Giant Disc Herniation via Unilateral Tubular Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sertac Kirnaz ◽  
Gary Kocharian ◽  
Fabian Sommer ◽  
Lynn B McGrath ◽  
Jacob L Goldberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Interlaminar Approach ◽  
Patient Consent ◽  
Over The Top

Abstract Giant disc herniation (GDH) is generally defined as a lumbar disc herniation that obstructs 50% or more of the space in the spinal canal.1-3 Common treatment options for GDH include unilateral interlaminar approach, bilateral approach, or open full laminectomy.4,5 Surgical treatment of GDH may be challenging because severe bilateral compression of neural elements in the spinal canal increases the risk of iatrogenic injury to nerve roots and dura. The surgical approach can be further complicated by calcification, hardening, and dehydration of the GDH tissue. The prevailing opinion in the literature is that giant disc herniations cannot safely be treated via tubular minimally invasive approaches.5-7 In this video, we present a case of a 52-yr-old male patient with a history of progressive low back pain that radiates bilaterally from the buttocks toward the posterior legs and knees for 2 yr because of a GDH at the L4-5 level. The patient was treated via a tubular “over-the-top” minimally invasive decompression in order to first provide generous bilateral decompression of neural elements and dura.8,9 After sufficient decompression at the surgical level, the discectomy was performed via an ipsilateral piecemeal resection of the GDH. The “over-the-top” contralateral mobilization of disc herniation was also achieved with this approach, which facilitated the removal of the entire disc fragment. Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure. Therefore, GDH should not be considered as a contraindication for tubular decompression when this modified technique is performed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document