scholarly journals Spectral Imaging With Dual-layer Spectral Detector Computed Tomography for Acute Coronary Syndrome

Author(s):  
Junji Mochizuki ◽  
Takeshi Nakaura ◽  
Naofumi Yoshida ◽  
Yasunori Nagayama ◽  
Masafumi Kidoh ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of spectral imaging with dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.Methods: We identified 33 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac CT using dual-layer spectral detector CT and were diagnosed with acute ischemic syndrome by an invasive coronary angiography. We reconstructed 120 kVp images and generated virtual monochromatic images (VMIs; 40–200 keV in 10 keV increments), iodine concentration maps, and effective atomic number (Z) maps. We calculated the contrast and contrast-to-noise noise ratio (CNR) between myocardial normal and hypo-perfusion and chose the VMIs with the best CNR for quantitative analysis. We compared the image noise, contrast, and CNR of 120 kVp images and the best VMIs, CT value, iodine concentration, and effective Z between myocardial normal and hypo-perfusion with the paired t-test.Results: As the X-ray energy decreased, venous attenuation, contrast, and CNR gradually increased. The 40 keV image yielded the best CNR. There was no significant difference in image noise between the 120 kVp and 40 keV images. The contrast and CNR between myocardial normal and hypo-perfusion were significantly higher in 40 keV images than those in 120 kVp images. The iodine concentration and the effective Z were significantly higher in normal myocardium than those in hypo-perfused myocardium.Conclusion: Spectral imaging with dual-layer spectral detector CT is a feasible technique to detect the hypo-perfused area of acute ischemic syndrome.

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Laura Jani ◽  
András Mester ◽  
Alexandra Stănescu ◽  
Sebastian Condrea ◽  
Monica Chiţu ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention is the first therapeutic choice in the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease and Multi-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (MSCT-CA) is a new non-invasive diagnostic tool in the follow-up of these patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR), to identify the predictive factors for ISR at 1 year after PCI and to assess the progression of non-culprit lesions, using a MSCT-CA follow-up. Material and methods: The study included 30 patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with one BMS implantation. The patients were divided into Group A (9 patients) presenting ISR and Group B (21 patients) without ISR at 1 year MSCT-CA follow-up. Results: ISR lesions were mostly localized on the LAD (45%). No significant difference between the study groups was identified for risk factors, as male gender (77.7% vs. 85.71%, p = 0.62), hypertension (88.8% vs. 95.23%, p = 0.51), smoking status (33.3% vs. 72.22%, p = 0.23), history of CVD (55.5% vs. 47.61%, p >0.99), diabetes (11.11% vs. 19.04%, p >0.99), hyperlipidemia (22.22% vs. 52.38%, p = 0.22), CKD (44.44% vs. 14.28%, p = 0.15), age, triglycerides and SYNTAX Score. A significant difference was recorded in baseline cholesterol level (141.7 ± 8.788 vs. 182.8 ± 12; p = 0.029). Ca Score at 1 year was significantly higher in patients with ISR (603.1 ± 529.3 vs. 259.4 ± 354.6; p = 0.005). 66.67% of patients from Group A presented significant non-culprit lesions at baseline vs. 23.81% in Group B (p = 0.041). Conclusions: MSCT-CA is a useful non-invasive diagnostic tool for ISR in the follow-up of patients who underwent primary PCI for an acute coronary syndrome. The presence of significant non-culprit lesions at the time of the primary PCI could be a predictive factor for ISR. A Ca Score >400 determined at 1-year follow-up is associated with a higher rate of ISR, and could be considered a significant cardiovascular risk factor for this group of patients. Further studies are required in order to elucidate the role of various imaging biomarkers in predicting the development of ISR.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K F Kofoed ◽  
T Engstroem ◽  
P Sigvardsen ◽  
C Torp-Pedersen ◽  
J Linde ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) coronary pathology may range from structurally normal vessels to severe coronary artery disease. Current guidelines recommend early invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for risk assessment and choice of treatment strategy. Purpose We tested the hypothesis that 1) a first-line coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) predicts long term clinical outcome in patients with NSTE-ACS and 2) adding ICA to CCTA does not improve prediction of cardiovascular events. Methods We included patients with NSTE-ACS confirmed by ischaemic ECG changes and/or elevated biomarkers of myocardial ischaemia, in whom both CCTA and ICA were feasible within 12 hours. According to the VERDICT study protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02061891) patients were randomised 1:1 to evaluation within 12 hours (Very Early) or 48–72 hours (Standard). CCTA was conducted prior to ICA and patients with an event between tests were excluded. Based on CCTA and ICA, patients were categorized according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines as having prognostic indication for coronary revascularization ESCprog (left main stenosis, proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis or multivessel disease) or no prognostic indication – ESCnon-prog. The primary endpoint was a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality, non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction, hospital admission for refractory myocardial ischemia or hospital admission for left sided heart failure. Discrimination of 1.5-year outcomes was assessed by time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results CCTA and ICA was conducted in 979 patients. During a median follow-up time of 4.2 (IQR 2.7–5.5) years the primary endpoint occurred in 209 (21.3%) patients. Patients with ESCprog as defined by CCTA had a hazard ratio of 1.53 (95% CI 1.16–2.03) for occurrence of the primary endpoint. AUC for the prediction of the primary endpoint by CCTA was 68.6 (95% CI: 62.7–74.5) as compared to 68.6 (95% CI: 62.8–74.5), when adding ICA to the model. Similar findings were noted in patients randomized to either Very Early or Standard treatment strategy. Conclusions Long-term risk assessment in patients with NSTE-ACS may be conducted using a first-line CCTA strategy and may thus potentially guide patient management. Adding invasive coronary angiography to CCTA does not improve risk assessment. Acknowledgement/Funding This study was funded by the Danish Agency for Science, Technology, and Innovation and the Danish Council for Strategic Research (grant no. 09–066994)


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.H Muhmad Hamidi ◽  
H Sani ◽  
M.A Ibrahim ◽  
K.S Ibrahim ◽  
A.B Md Radzi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objective Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains the principal cause of death in Malaysia. It is estimated about 20% of ACS occurs at nighttime during sleep between 12am to 6am. Factors associated with nocturnal ACS are unknown. Acute nocturnal pathophysiological response to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may increase risk of nocturnal ACS. We hypothesized that OSA risk is associated with timing of ACS onset. Methodology This study included 200 patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiogram for which the time of chest pain onset was clearly identified and divided into 2 groups; nocturnal ACS (12am-5.59am) and non-nocturnal ACS (6am–11.59pm). Two validated questionnaires, STOP-BANG and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were self-administered by subjects to determine OSA risk. All subjects timing of ACS onset, OSA risk, demography, anthropometric measurements, comorbidities and echocardiographic characteristics were analyzed. Results Acute coronary syndrome occurs nocturnally in 19% of ACS patients. The prevalence of high risk OSA individuals among ACS patients is 43%. There is significantly higher prevalence of high risk OSA individuals in nocturnal ACS group of 95% compared to 30% of high risk OSA individuals in non-nocturnal ACS group (p=0.001). Nocturnal ACS patients was significantly younger (50.1±8.7yrs, p=0.001), had higher BMI (33.9±4.3kg/m2, p=0.005), waist circumference (106.7±10.3cm, p=0.003) and larger neck circumference (44.6±3.3cm, p=0.001) compared to non-nocturnal ACS group. These groups had similar prevalence of other comorbidities for ACS and showed no significant difference between left and right ventricular systolic function. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the most significant predictors for nocturnal ACS are OSA risk, neck circumference and age. Conclusion There is a strong association between high risk OSA individuals and nocturnal ACS onset. Patient with nocturnal ACS onset should be screened for OSA and prioritized for polysomnography. OSA prevalence according to ACS onset Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L.C.W Fong ◽  
N Lee ◽  
A.T Yan ◽  
M.Y Ng

Abstract Background Prasugrel and ticagrelor are both effective anti-platelet drugs for patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, there has been limited data on the direct comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor until the recent ISAR-REACT 5 trial. Purpose To compare the efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome with respect to the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cardiac cardiovascular death, and secondary endpoints including MI, stroke, cardiovascular death, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or above), and stent thrombosis within 1 year. Methods Meta-analysis was performed on randomised controlled trials (RCT) up to December 2019 that randomised patients with acute coronary syndrome to either prasugrel or ticagrelor. RCTs were identified from Medline, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov using Cochrane library CENTRAL by 2 independent reviewers with “prasugrel” and “ticagrelor” as search terms. Effect estimates with confidence intervals were generated using the random effects model by extracting outcome data from the RCTs to compare the primary and secondary clinical outcomes. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (Ver 2.0) was used for assessment of all eligible RCTs. Results 411 reports were screened, and we identified 11 eligible RCTs with 6098 patients randomised to prasugrel (n=3050) or ticagrelor (n=3048). The included trials had a follow up period ranging from 1 day to 1 year. 330 events on the prasugrel arm and 408 events on the ticagrelor arm were recorded. There were some concerns over the integrity of allocation concealment over 7 trials otherwise risk of other bias was minimal. Patients had a mean age of 61±4 (76% male; 50% with ST elevation MI; 35% with non-ST elevation MI; 15% with unstable angina; 25% with diabetes mellitus; 64% with hypertension; 51% with hyperlipidaemia; 42% smokers). There was no significant difference in risk between the prasugrel group and the ticagrelor group on the primary composite endpoint (Figure 1) (Risk Ratio (RR)=1.17; 95% CI=0.97–1.41; p=0.10, I2=0%). There was no significant difference between the use of prasugrel and ticagrelor with respect to MI (RR=1.24; 95% CI=0.81–1.90; p=0.31); stroke (RR=1.05; 95% CI=0.66–1.67; p=0.84); cardiovascular death (RR=1.01; 95% CI=0.75–1.36; p=0.95); BARC type 2 or above bleeding (RR=1.17; 95% CI =0.90–1.54; p=0.24); stent thrombosis (RR=1.58; 95% CI =0.90–2.76; p=0.11). Conclusion Compared with ticagrelor, prasugrel did not reduce the primary composite endpoint of MI, stroke and cardiovascular death within 1 year. There was also no significant difference in the risk of MI, stroke, cardiovascular death, major bleeding and stent thrombosis respectively. Figure 1. Primary Objective Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Redfern ◽  
K Hyun ◽  
D Brieger ◽  
D Chew ◽  
J French ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of disease burden globally. With advancements in medical and surgical care more people are surviving initial acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and are in need of secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Increasing availability of high quality individual-level data linkage provides robust estimates of outcomes long-term. Purpose To compare 3 year outcomes amongst ACS survivors who did and did not participate in Australian CR programs. Methods SNAPSHOT ACS follow-up study included 1806 patients admitted to 232 hospitals who were followed-up by data linkage (cross-jurisdictional morbidity, national death index, Pharmaceutical Benefit Schedule) at 6 and 36 months to compare those who did/not attend CR. Results In total, the cohort had a mean age of 65.8 (13.4) years, 60% were male, only 25% (461/1806) attended CR. During index admission, attendees were more likely to have had PCI (39% v 14%, p<0.001), CABG (11% v 2%, p<0.001) and a diagnosis of STEMI (21% v 5%, p<0.001) than those who did not attend. However, there was no significant difference between CR attendees/non-attendees for risk factors (LDL-cholesterol, smoking, obesity). Only 19% of eligible women attended CR compared to 30% of men (p<0.001). At 36 months, there were fewer deaths amongst CR attendees (19/461, 4.1%) than non-attendees (116/1345, 8.6%) (p=0.001). CR attendees were more likely to have repeat ACS, PCI, CABG at both 6 and 36 months (Table). At 36 months, CR attendees were more likely to have been prescribed antiplatelets (78% v 53%, p<0.001), statins (91% 73%, p<0.001), beta-blockers (11% v 13%, p=0.002) and ACEI/ARBs (72% v 61%, p<0.001) than non-attendees. Conclusions Amongst Australian ACS survivors, participation in CR was associated with less likelihood of death and increased prescription of pharmacotherapy. However, attendance at CR was associated with higher rates of repeat ACS and revascularisation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): New South Wales Cardiovascular Research Network, National Heart Foundation


Angiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Sakakura ◽  
Takanori Yasu ◽  
Yasuyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Takuji Katayama ◽  
Yoshitaka Sugawara ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document