scholarly journals Impact of Superselective Intra-Arterial and Systemic Chemoradiotherapy for Gingival Carcinoma; Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicity between radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACRT) and RT with concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT), for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: Median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT group: 60 Gy; SCRT group:69 Gy). At 3 years, the two groups significantly differed in overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.75%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.00–87.62; SCRT: 50.37%, 95% CI: 27.58–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.64%, 95% CI: 62.69–85.17; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.028) and local control (LC; IACRT: 77.17%, 95% CI: 64.23–86.41; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with poor OS (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had significantly worse PFS.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. IACRT is an effective and organ-preserving treatment for GC.Trial registration: retrospectively registered

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4%, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6%, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2%, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC). Methods We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n = 66; SCRT group: n = 18). Results The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups. Conclusions This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4%, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6%, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2%, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

Ten-Year Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic GI Stromal Tumors: Long-Term Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Intergroup Phase III Randomized Trial on Imatinib at Two Dose Levels

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15) ◽  
pp. 1713-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo G. Casali ◽  
John Zalcberg ◽  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Kit Mutation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors

Purpose To report on the long-term results of a randomized trial comparing a standard dose (400 mg/d) versus a higher dose (800 mg/d) of imatinib in patients with metastatic or locally advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs). Patients and Methods Eligible patients with advanced CD117-positive GIST from 56 institutions in 13 countries were randomly assigned to receive either imatinib 400 mg or 800 mg daily. Patients on the 400-mg arm were allowed to cross over to 800 mg upon progression. Results Between February 2001 and February 2002, 946 patients were accrued. Median age was 60 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Median follow-up time was 10.9 years. Median progression-free survival times were 1.7 and 2.0 years in the 400- and 800-mg arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.91; P = .18), and median overall survival time was 3.9 years in both treatment arms. The estimated 10-year progression-free survival rates were 9.5% and 9.2% for the 400- and 800-mg arms, respectively, and the estimated 10-year overall survival rates were 19.4% and 21.5%, respectively. At multivariable analysis, age (< 60 years), performance status (0 v ≥ 1), size of the largest lesion (smaller), and KIT mutation (exon 11) were significant prognostic factors for the probability of surviving beyond 10 years. Conclusion This trial was carried out on a worldwide intergroup basis, at the beginning of the learning curve of the use of imatinib, in a large population of patients with advanced GIST. With a long follow-up, 6% of patients are long-term progression free and 13% are survivors. Among clinical prognostic factors, only performance status, KIT mutation, and size of largest lesion predicted long-term outcome, likely pointing to a lower burden of disease. Genomic and/or immune profiling could help understand long-term survivorship. Addressing secondary resistance remains a therapeutic challenge.

AN INDIAN PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DOCETAXEL THERAPY IN CRPC: CAN PRETREATMENT FACTORS PREDICT THE RESPONSE

2021 ◽  
pp. 78-81
Author(s):  
Devashish Kaushal ◽  
Rajeev Sood
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Carcinoma Prostate

Introduction: Studies on the effects of chemotherapy in Indian Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) patients are very limited and world data is inconsistent. The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects of Docetaxel therapy in CRPC in Indian patients in terms of survival benet, both progression-free survival, and overall survival. This study also analyzes the effects of various factors on the survival of CRPC patients. Methodology: This is a single institutional prospective observational study. CRPC patients were treated with Docetaxel and followed till death as the primary endpoint or till the end of the study. Survivals were calculated with the Kaplan Meier method. Factors affecting survival were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis by log-rank t-test and Cox proportion hazard regression analysis. Result: Out of enrolled 101 patients, 78 were treated with Docetaxel. A decline in PSA (>50% reduction) was observed in 61.54%. Radiological response of regression noted in 40 % Nuclear Bone Scan and 19.23% CT/MRI by RECIST criteria. Progression-free survival and overall survival with Docetaxel (n=78) were 11.8 and 21 months respectively. Hemoglobin less than 11 gm%, Alkaline phosphatase more than 115 IU/dl, PSAmore than 14 ng/ml, Gleason score more than 7 and duration from diagnosis of carcinoma prostate to CRPC less than 24 months, the number of chemotherapy cycles less than 6 were all found to be signicantly associated with poor overall survival in univariate analysis while only Hemoglobin (P=0.0159) showed an independent association with overall survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Overall and progression-free survival of CRPC patients with Docetaxel is 21 & 11.8 months respectively. Hemoglobin, Alkaline phosphatase, PSA, Gleason score, Docetaxel cycle, and duration from diagnosis of carcinoma prostate to CRPC were found to be signicantly associated with poor overall survival.

Prognostic factors for overall survival in non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Nonlinear effect of continuous covariates.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19538-e19538
Author(s):  
Claudio J. Flores ◽  
Luis Augusto Casanova
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Nonlinear Effect ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
P Value ◽  
Continuous Covariates ◽  
Ann Arbor

e19538 Background: To evaluate prognostic factors in patients with primary non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed prognostic factors (PFs) for overall survival (OS) in 2160 patients (pts) with NHL treated at INEN between 1990-2002. PFs were determinate according to Cox model with P-splines. Results: The median age was 54 years (range 14 - 96) and 51% were male. The majority of the pts had good performance status (73%, WHO 0-1). The Ann Arbor stage was I-II in 51%, III-IV in 49% and B symptoms were present in 38% of the pts. The hemoglobin (Hb) was low in 48%. Leukocytes (WBC), lymphocytes and LDH were elevated in 17.7%, 7.7% and 60% of pts, respectively. Of all patients, 709 (32.8 %) pts had died. The median follow-up was 12.6 months, with a median survival of 61.8 months and the survival rate at 5 and 10 years of 51.2 % and 41.7 % respectively. PFs identified were: age, sex, zubrod, clinical stage, Hb, leukocytes, lymphocytes and LDH. The following table shows the p-value and hazard ratio (HR). The effect of continuous covariates in the log(HR) is non-linear. The cutoff points of highest (HR >1) match the clinically defined ones, which are: age >60yrs, Hb<12g/dl and LDH >240UI/L. Both leukocytes and lymphocytes have two higher risk breakpoints: leukocytes >3x103 and >10x103, lymphocytes <20% and >60%. Conclusions: PFs for OS in our group of pts were similar to other reports in NHL. Age, Hb, leukocytes, and lymphocytes are relevant to OS, which showed a nonlinear effect in the log (HR). [Table: see text]

Prognostic Factors Influencing Progression-Free Survival Determined From a Series of Sporadic Desmoid Tumors: A Wait-and-See Policy According to Tumor Presentation

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (26) ◽  
pp. 3553-3558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Salas ◽  
Armelle Dufresne ◽  
Binh Bui ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Philippe Terrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
Desmoid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Wait And See

Purpose Desmoid tumors are mesenchymal fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferations with locoregional aggressiveness and high ability to recur after initial treatment. We present the results of the largest series of sporadic desmoid tumors ever published to determine the prognostic factors of these rare tumors. Patients and Methods Four hundred twenty-six patients with a desmoid tumor at diagnosis were included, and the following parameters were studied: age, sex, delay between first symptoms and diagnosis, tumor size, tumor site, previous history of surgery or trauma in the area of the primary tumor, surgical margins, and context of abdominal wall desmoids in women of child-bearing age during or shortly after pregnancy. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis for progression-free survival (PFS). Results In univariate analysis, age, tumor size, tumor site, and surgical margins (R2 v R0/R1) had a significant impact on PFS. PFS curves were not significantly different for microscopic assessment of surgical resection quality (R0 v R1). In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, and tumor site had independent values. Three prognostic groups for PFS were defined on the basis of the number of independent unfavorable prognostic factors (0 or 1, 2, and 3). Conclusion This study clearly demonstrates that there are different prognostic subgroups of desmoid tumors that could benefit from different therapeutic strategies, including a wait-and-see policy.

Trecc: Re-challenge therapy with anti-EGFR in metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (mCRC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 683-683
Author(s):  
Amanda Karani ◽  
Tiago Felismino ◽  
Lara Azevedo Diniz ◽  
Mariana Petaccia Macedo ◽  
Larissa Machado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Colorectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Free Interval

683 Background: Anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy (CT) promotes high response rates (RR) and median overall survival (OS) surpasses 30 months in RASwt/BRAFwt mCRC. After disease progression (PD), resistance mechanisms have been described. The aim of our study was to evaluate efficacy of anti-EGFR re-challenge (TRECC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients (pts) with mCRC. All pts had received anti-EGFR plus CT and were discontinued for different reasons. During the treatment, there was re-challenge with an anti-EGFR + CT. We aimed to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after re-challenge and prognostic factors associated with PFS. Results: Sixty eight pts met the study criteria. Median follow-up after re-challenge was 39.3m. Discontinuation after first exposure was 25% due to PD; 75% for other reasons. Median anti-EGFR free interval was 10.5m. At re-challenge, main CT regime was: FOLFIRI 58.8%, Cetuximab and Panitumumab were used in 59 and 9 pts respectively. mPFS after re-challenge was 6.6m; mOS was 24.4m. Objective response rate (CR + PR) at re-challenge was 42.6%. In an univariate analysis, adverse prognostic factors related to PFS were: absence of objective response at 1st EGFR exposure (HR 2.12, CI:1.20-3.74 p = 0.009); PD as reason for 1st discontinuation (HR 3.44, CI:1.88-6.29 p < 0.0001); re-challenge at fourth or later lines (HR 2,51, CI:1.49-4.23 p = 0.001); panitumumab use (HR 2.26 CI:1.18-5.54 p = 0.017). In a multivariate model, only PD as reason for 1st discontinuation remained statistically significant (HR = 2.63, CI:1.14-6.03 p = 0.022). mPFS was 3.3m and 8.4m and mOS was 7,5m and 33,4m in patients with PD as reason for 1st discontinuation and other reasons respectively. Conclusions: Re-challenge therapy is commonly used due to paucity of effective lines of treament for mCRC. In our analysis, pts that stopped 1st anti-EGFR therapy due to PD have shorter survival, suggesting these pts do not benefit from TRECC. However, interruption due to treatment holiday after PR/CR resulted in longer PFS. In conclusion, for a selected group of pts, TRECC could be considered a strategy of treatment. Due to the limited number of pts, our data should be evaluated in a prospective cohort of patients.

Prognostic Factors for Myelodysplastic Syndrome in the Veteran Population: Single Institution Experience.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4622-4622
Author(s):  
Michael Axelson ◽  
Shirisha Reddy ◽  
Crystal Lumby ◽  
Sue Sivess-Franks ◽  
Jonathan Dowell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background: Myelodyplastic syndrome (MDS) is the disease of the elderly and increasingly common in the veteran population. Here we report a single institution experience with MDS at the Dallas VA Medical Center. Patients and Method: From a period of 1998–2007, eighty three pts were identified out of which 54 pts had bone marrow (BM) biopsy proven diagnosis of MDS. Overall survival (OS) analysis with dependent variables (Age at diagnosis, IPSS Score, WHO morphologic diagnosis, number of blood and platelet transfusions required, Hb level, ANC, cytogenetics, blast percentage, BM cellularity at diagnosis) were conducted by selection method “foreward” and only these significant variables were used in the Cox regression for multivariate analysis. Methods of Kaplan and Meier were used to generate OS curves. Results: The median age of diagnosis was 74 yrs with a median follow up time of 12.5 months. The WHO morphologic subtype was RA/RARS (n=13), Del5q (n=1), RCMD/RCMDRS (n=34), RAEB1 (n=3), RAEB2 (n=1), missing (n=2). The distribution of IPSS score was 0 (n=25); 0.5 (n=15); 1.0 (n=8), 1.5 (n=4), missing (n=2). Five pts had treatment related MDS and 3 pts transformed to AML. One patient had concurrent MGUS and one patient developed multiple myeloma. At diagnosis, 23 pts had a hemoglobin (Hb) value of less than 10g/dl. Only 4 pts had ANC less than 500; sixteen pts had ANC 500–1800 and 34 pts had normal counts. A majority of pts had normal cytogenetics (n=37), 5 pts had good risk, 5 pts had intermediate risk and 7 pts had poor risk cytogenetics. Six pts had hypocellular (<30%) BM at diagnosis whereas 16 pts had a hypercellular marrow (> 50%). Only 4 pts had more than 5% blast in the BM. Twenty nine pts eventually became blood transfusion dependent and 12 pts needed platelet transfusion at some point. Thirty six pts were treated with erythropoietin (with or without neupogen) and 13 pts received some type of disease modifying therapy (5-azacytidine/lenalidomide/ATG/clinical trial). The mean survival time was 106 months. Median survival was not reached at the time of analysis. In the univariate analysis, IPSS score (p=0.003), No. of blood transfusions (p=0.028), cytogenetics (p=0.0001) and blast percentage (p=0.0015), were statistically significant. BM cellularity (p=0.06) and Hb level (p=0.09) showed a trend towards significance. On multivariate analysis, Hb greater than 10 (HR 0.08; p=0.011), abnormal cytogenetics (HR 4.2; p=0.001), BM Blast > 5% (p=0.026) and BM cellularity < 30% (HR 4.6; p=0.033) emerged as the significant predictors of overall survival. IPSS score or Blood transfusion requirement did not pan out to be significant. Conclusion: MDS in the veteran population may be different from general population and may have unique predictors of survival. A larger number of patients and longer duration of follow up is required to further evaluate these prognostic factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document