scholarly journals Interpersonal Counselling for Adolescent Depression Delivered by Youth Mental Health Workers Without Core Professional Training: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trialstudy Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Abotsie ◽  
Viktoria Cestaro ◽  
Brioney Gee ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Thando Katangwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Young People ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Adolescent Depression ◽  
Specialist Services ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background: Depression is a common health problem during adolescence and is associated with adverse academic, social and health outcomes. To meet demand for treatment for adolescent depression, there is a need for evidence-based interventions suitable for delivery outside of specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Interpersonal Counselling for Adolescents (IPC-A), is a brief manualised intervention for adolescent depression suitable for delivery by staff who are not qualified health professionals following participation in a brief training course. While initial piloting within Local Authority services has generated promising results, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A has yet to be established. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A delivered by staff without core professional training in comparison to current provision.Method: Feasibility RCT with process evaluation using ethnographic methodology. Eligible young people (n=60) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IPC-A or treatment as usual (TAU). Participants will be assessed pre-randomisation (baseline) and followed up at 5, 10 and 23 weeks post-randomisation. A parallel process evaluation will generate understanding of intervention implementation across services and explore the acceptability of the intervention from the perspective of young people and other key stakeholders.Participants: Young people aged 12-18 years presenting to non-specialist services with symptoms of depression. Youth workers, young people and stakeholders will participate in the process evaluation.Discussion: The need for effective and accessible interventions for young people with mild/sub-threshold depression who in most cases, do not meet the threshold for mainstream mental health services is long overdue. The primary output of this feasibility trial will be the design of the subsequent full-scale trial. If the results of the current study indicate that this would be feasible, we intend to progress to a multi-site, assessor-blind, superiority RCT of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A in comparison to TAU for adolescents presenting to non-specialist services with depressive symptoms. If satisfactory solutions to any problems encountered cannot be identified, alternative research designs will be considered. If proven effective, an IPC-A training programme could be implemented.Trial registry: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN82180413. Registered 31 December 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN82180413

scholarly journals Interpersonal Counselling for Adolescent Depression delivered by Youth Mental Health Workers without Core Professional Training: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial study protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Abotsie ◽  
Viktoria Cestaro ◽  
Brioney Gee ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Thando Katangwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Young People ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Adolescent Depression ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Specialist Services ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background: Depression is a common health problem during adolescence and is associated with adverse academic, social and health outcomes. To meet demand for treatment for adolescent depression, there is a need for evidence-based interventions suitable for delivery outside of specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Interpersonal Counselling for Adolescents (IPC-A), is a brief manualised intervention for adolescent depression suitable for delivery by staff who are not qualified health professionals following participation in a brief training course. While initial piloting within Local Authority services has generated promising results, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A has yet to be established. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A delivered by staff without core professional training in comparison to current provision. Method: Feasibility RCT with process evaluation using ethnographic methodology. Eligible young people (n=60) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IPC-A or treatment as usual (TAU). Participants will be assessed pre-randomisation (baseline) and followed up at 5, 10 and 23 weeks post-randomisation. A parallel process evaluation will generate understanding of intervention implementation across services and explore the acceptability of the intervention from the perspective of young people and other key stakeholders.Participants: Young people aged 12-18 years presenting to non-specialist services with symptoms of depression. Youth workers, young people and stakeholders will participate in the process evaluation.Discussion: The need for effective and accessible interventions for young people with mild/sub-threshold depression who in most cases, do not meet the threshold for mainstream mental health services is long overdue. The primary output of this feasibility trial will be the design of the subsequent full-scale trial. If the results of the current study indicate that this would be feasible, we intend to progress to a multi-site, assessor-blind, superiority RCT of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A in comparison to TAU for adolescents presenting to non-specialist services with depressive symptoms. If satisfactory solutions to any problems encountered cannot be identified, alternative research designs will be considered. If proven effective, an IPC-A training programme could be implemented.Trial registry: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN82180413. Registered 31 December 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN82180413

scholarly journals Interpersonal counselling for adolescent depression delivered by youth mental health workers without core professional training: a feasibility randomised controlled trial study protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Abotsie ◽  
Viktoria Cestaro ◽  
Brioney Gee ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Thando Katangwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Young People ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Adolescent Depression ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Specialist Services ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background Depression is a common health problem during adolescence and is associated with adverse academic, social and health outcomes. To meet the demand for treatment for adolescent depression, there is a need for evidence-based interventions suitable for delivery outside of specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Interpersonal Counselling for Adolescents (IPC-A) is a brief manualised intervention for adolescent depression suitable for delivery by staff who are not qualified health professionals following participation in a brief training course. While initial piloting within Local Authority services has generated promising results, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A has yet to be established. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A delivered by staff without core professional training in comparison to current provision. Method Feasibility RCT with process evaluation using ethnographic methodology. Eligible young people (n = 60) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IPC-A or treatment as usual (TAU). Participants will be assessed pre-randomisation (baseline) and followed up at 5, 10 and 23 weeks post-randomisation. A parallel process evaluation will generate understanding of intervention implementation across services and explore the acceptability of the intervention from the perspective of young people and other key stakeholders. Participants Young people aged 12–18 years presenting to non-specialist services with symptoms of depression. Youth workers, young people and stakeholders will participate in the process evaluation. Discussion The need for effective and accessible interventions for young people with mild/sub-threshold depression who, in most cases, do not meet the threshold for mainstream mental health services is long overdue. The primary output of this feasibility trial will be the design of the subsequent full-scale trial. If the results of the current study indicate that this would be feasible, we intend to progress to a multi-site, assessor-blind, superiority RCT of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IPC-A in comparison to TAU for adolescents presenting to non-specialist services with depressive symptoms. If satisfactory solutions to any problems encountered cannot be identified, alternative research designs will be considered. If proven effective, an IPC-A training programme could be implemented. Trial registry ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN82180413, Registered 31 December 2019.

scholarly journals Forensic mental health services for children and adolescents: Rationale and development

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Hindley ◽  
César Lengua ◽  
Oliver White
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Young People ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Forensic Mental Health ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Service Accessibility ◽  
Specialist Services ◽  
Form Part

SummaryThis article outlines the rationale for dedicated specialist services for high-risk young people about whom there may be family or professional concerns in relation to mental disorder. It provides an overview of the development and remit of such services and emphasises the need for them to form part of overall service provision for children and young people.Learning Objectives• Greater understanding of the scope and emphasis of forensic child and adolescent mental health services (FCAMHS)• Greater understanding of the different statutory jurisdictions that frequently apply in the cases of high-risk young people• Greater understanding of the importance of initial service accessibility for concerned professionals and for authoritative understanding by FCAMHS of the wide variety of circumstances in which high-risk young people may find themselves

scholarly journals An evidence synthesis of risk identification, assessment and management for young people using tier 4 inpatient child and adolescent mental health services

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (22) ◽  
pp. 1-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Hannigan ◽  
Deborah Edwards ◽  
Nicola Evans ◽  
Elizabeth Gillen ◽  
Mirella Longo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Young People ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Adolescent Mental Health ◽  
Child And Adolescent ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Phase 2

BackgroundInpatient child and adolescent mental health services are one part of a complex system, and exist to meet the needs of young people with the greatest mental health difficulties.ObjectivesThe research question was ‘What is known about the identification, assessment and management of risk (where “risk” is broadly conceived) in young people (aged 11–18 years) with complex mental health needs entering, using and exiting inpatient child and adolescent mental health services in the UK?’Data sourcesThe two-phase Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre approach was used. In phase 1, scoping searches were made using two databases with an end date of March 2013. Phase 2 centred on the search for citations relating to the risks to young people of ‘dislocation’ and ‘contagion’. Searches were made using 17 databases, with time limits from 1995 to September 2013. Websites were searched, a call for evidence circulated and references of included citations reviewed.Review methodsPriority risk areas for phase 2 were decided in collaboration with stakeholders including through consultations with young people and the mother of a child who had been in hospital. All types of evidence relating to outcomes, views and experiences, costs and cost-effectiveness, policies, and service and practice responses in the areas of ‘dislocation’ and ‘contagion’ for young people (11–18 years) using inpatient mental health services were considered. A staged approach to screening was used. Data were extracted into tables following guidance from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination or tables developed for the review. Quality was assessed using appraisal checklists from the Effective Public Health Practice Project or the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme or devised by previous reviewers. No papers were excluded on the grounds of quality, and all materials identified were narratively synthesised.ResultsIn phase 1, 4539 citations were found and 124 included. Most were concerned with clinical risks. In phase 2, 15,662 citations were found and 40 addressing the less obvious risks of ‘dislocation’ and ‘contagion’ were included, supplemented by 20 policy and guidance documents. These were synthesised using these categories: Dislocation: Normal Life; Dislocation: Identity; Dislocation: Friends; Dislocation: Stigma; Dislocation: Education; Dislocation: Families; and Contagion. No studies included an economic analysis or economic evaluation. The importance to stakeholders of these less obvious risks contrasted with the limited quantity and quality of research capable of informing policy, services and practice in these areas.LimitationsIncluded studies were of variable quality. Data derived could not be used to inform an economic modelling of NHS costs or to analyse cost-effectiveness. Other limitations were the search for only English-language materials and the use of umbrella concepts (‘dislocation’ and ‘contagion’).ConclusionsThe less obvious risks are important, but little evidence exists to support their identification, assessment and management. This has implications for services, and a programme of research is recommended to generate new knowledge.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

scholarly journals The divide between child and adult mental health services: points for debate

2013 ◽  
Vol 202 (s54) ◽  
pp. s41-s44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Lamb ◽  
Margaret Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Young People ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Discussion Paper ◽  
Adult Mental Health ◽  
The Uk

SummaryThis discussion paper outlines our personal views for debate on some of the complexities inherent in the crucial task of improving mental health services for young people in the UK.

scholarly journals Pathways to mental health services for young people: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 1005-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen MacDonald ◽  
Nina Fainman-Adelman ◽  
Kelly K. Anderson ◽  
Srividya N. Iyer
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Young People ◽  
Health Services

scholarly journals Unexpected deaths of children and young people in the UK

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Stallard ◽  
Michelle Maguire ◽  
Justin Daddow ◽  
Rosie Shepperd ◽  
Mike Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Young People ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Child Death ◽  
National Data ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
National Health Service Trust ◽  
Incident Reports ◽  
The Uk

Aims and methodTo review the deaths of children and young people who took their own life. We conducted a retrospective analysis of serious incident reports from a National Health Service trust and reviews by the child death overview panels of the local safeguarding children boards.ResultsWe identified 23 deaths, with annual rates varying considerably between local authorities and over time. Over half of the children (n = 13, 56%) were not known to specialist child and adolescent mental health services, with 11 having no contact with any agency at the time of their death. Hanging was the most common method (n = 20, 87%) and of these, half (n =11, 55%) were low-level hangings.Clinical implicationsTraining is required to improve awareness, recognition and the assessment of children at risk of taking their own life. Specialist child mental health services should directly assess plans or attempts at hanging and offer advice about the seriousness of attempting this. National data (by age) on children and young people who take their own life should be routinely published to inform clinical and preventive services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document