scholarly journals Nature-Inspired Techniques For Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Author(s):  
Mehdi Bidar ◽  
Malek Mouhoub

Abstract Combinatorial applications such as configuration, transportation and resource allocation, often operate under highly dynamic and unpredictable environments. In this regard, one of the main challenges is to maintain a consistent solution anytime constraints are (dynamically) added. While many solvers have been developed to tackle these applications, they often work under idealized assumptions of environmental stability. In order to address limitation, we propose a methodology, relying on nature-inspired techniques, for solving constraint problems when constraints are added dynamically. The choice for nature-inspired techniques is motivated by the fact that these are iterative algorithms, capable of maintaining a set of promising solutions, at each iteration. Our methodology takes advantage of these two properties, as follows. We first solve the initial constraint problem and save the final state (and the related population) after obtaining a consistent solution. This saved context will then be used as a resume point for finding, in an incremental manner, new solutions to subsequent variants of the problem, anytime new constraints are added. More precisely, once a solution is found, we resume from the current state to search for a new one (if the old solution is no longer feasible), when new constraints are added. This can be seen as an optimization problem where we look for a new feasible solution satisfying old and new constraints, while minimizing the differences with the solution of the previous problem, in sequence. This latter objective ensures to find the least disruptive solution, as this is very important in many applications including scheduling, planning and timetabling. Following on our proposed methodology, we have developed the dynamic variant of several nature-inspired techniques to tackle dynamic constraint problems. Constraint problems are represented using the well-known Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) paradigm. Dealing with constraint additions in a dynamic environment can then be expressed as a series of static CSPs, each resulting from a change in the previous one by adding new constraints. This sequence of CSPs is called the Dynamic CSP (DCSP). To assess the performance of our proposed methodology, we conducted several experiments on randomly generated DCSP instances, following the RB model. The results of the experiments are reported and discussed.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhanda Stella Mbaka Muzalal

Constraint satisfaction problems present a general framework for studying a large class of algorithmic problems such as satisfaction of Boolean formulas, solving systems of equations over finite fields, graph colourings, as well as various applied problems in artificial intelligence (scheduling, allocation of cell phone frequencies, among others.) CSP (Constraint Satisfaction Problems) bring together graph theory, complexity theory and universal algebra. It is a well known result, due to Feder and Vardi, that any constraint satisfaction problem over a finite relational structure can be reduced to the homomorphism problem for a finite oriented graph. Until recently, it was not known whether this reduction preserves the type of the algorithm which solves the original constraint satisfaction problem, so that the same algorithm solves the corresponding digraph homomorphism problem. We look at how a recent construction due to Bulin, Deli´c, Jackson, and Niven can be used to show that the polynomial solvability of a constraint satisfaction problem using Datalog, a programming language which is a weaker version of Prolog, translates from arbitrary relational structures to digraphs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-241
Author(s):  
Laura Climent ◽  
Miguel A. Salido ◽  
Richard J. Wallace ◽  
Federico Barber

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 1950010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libor Barto ◽  
Michael Kompatscher ◽  
Miroslav Olšák ◽  
Van Pham Trung ◽  
Michael Pinsker

There exist two conjectures for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) of reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures: the first one states that tractability of the CSP of such a structure is, when the structure is a model-complete core, equivalent to its polymorphism clone satisfying a certain nontrivial linear identity modulo outer embeddings. The second conjecture, challenging the approach via model-complete cores by reflections, states that tractability is equivalent to the linear identities (without outer embeddings) satisfied by its polymorphisms clone, together with the natural uniformity on it, being nontrivial. We prove that the identities satisfied in the polymorphism clone of a structure allow for conclusions about the orbit growth of its automorphism group, and apply this to show that the two conjectures are equivalent. We contrast this with a counterexample showing that [Formula: see text]-categoricity alone is insufficient to imply the equivalence of the two conditions above in a model-complete core. Taking another approach, we then show how the Ramsey property of a homogeneous structure can be utilized for obtaining a similar equivalence under different conditions. We then prove that any polymorphism of sufficiently large arity which is totally symmetric modulo outer embeddings of a finitely bounded structure can be turned into a nontrivial system of linear identities, and obtain nontrivial linear identities for all tractable cases of reducts of the rational order, the random graph, and the random poset. Finally, we provide a new and short proof, in the language of monoids, of the theorem stating that every [Formula: see text]-categorical structure is homomorphically equivalent to a model-complete core.


Author(s):  
Alexsander Andrade de Melo ◽  
Mateus De Oliveira Oliveira

A fundamental drawback that arises when one is faced with the task of deterministically certifying solutions to computational problems in PSPACE is the fact that witnesses may have superpolynomial size, assuming that NP is not equal to PSPACE. Therefore, the complexity of such a deterministic verifier may already be super-polynomially lower-bounded by the size of a witness. In this work, we introduce a new symbolic framework to address this drawback. More precisely, we introduce a PSPACE-hard notion of symbolic constraint satisfaction problem where both instances and solutions for these instances are implicitly represented by ordered decision diagrams (i.e. read-once, oblivious, branching programs). Our main result states that given an ordered decision diagram D of length k and width w specifying a CSP instance, one can determine in time f(w,w')*k whether there is an ODD of width at most w' encoding a solution for this instance. Intuitively, while the parameter w quantifies the complexity of the instance, the parameter w' quantifies the complexity of a prospective solution. We show that CSPs of constant width can be used to formalize natural PSPACE hard problems, such as reachability of configurations for Turing machines working in nondeterministic linear space. For such problems, our main result immediately yields an algorithm that determines the existence of solutions of width w in time g(w)*n, where g:N->N is a suitable computable function, and n is the size of the input.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 321-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
KOSTAS STERGIOU

The Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem (QCSP) is an extension of the CSP that can be used to model combinatorial problems containing contingency or uncertainty. It allows for universally quantified variables that can model uncertain actions and events, such as the unknown weather for a future party, or an opponent's next move in a game. Although interest in QCSPs is increasing in recent years, the development of techniques for handling QCSPs is still at an early stage. For example, although it is well known that local consistencies are of primary importance in CSPs, only arc consistency has been extended to quantified problems. In this paper we contribute towards the development of solution methods for QCSPs in two ways. First, by extending directional arc and path consistency, two popular local consistencies in constraint satisfaction, to the quantified case and proposing an algorithm that achieves these consistencies. Second, by showing how value ordering heuristics can be utilized to speed up computation in QCSPs. We study the impact of preprocessing QCSPs with value reordering and directional quantified arc and path consistency by running experiments on randomly generated problems. Results show that our preprocessing methods can significantly speed up the QCSP solving process, especially on hard instances from the phase transition region.


Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boxin Guan ◽  
Yuhai Zhao ◽  
Yuan Li

Solving the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is to find an assignment of values to variables that satisfies a set of constraints. Ant colony optimization (ACO) is an efficient algorithm for solving CSPs. However, the existing ACO-based algorithms suffer from the constructed assignment with high cost. To improve the solution quality of ACO for solving CSPs, an ant colony optimization based on information entropy (ACOE) is proposed in this paper. The proposed algorithm can automatically call a crossover-based local search according to real-time information entropy. We first describe ACOE for solving CSPs and show how it constructs assignments. Then, we use a ranking-based strategy to update the pheromone, which weights the pheromone according to the rank of these ants. Furthermore, we introduce the crossover-based local search that uses a crossover operation to optimize the current best assignment. Finally, we compare ACOE with seven algorithms on binary CSPs. The experimental results revealed that our method outperformed the other compared algorithms in terms of the cost comparison, data distribution, convergence performance, and hypothesis test.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 429-439
Author(s):  
Jeremy Frank

AbstractAs planning problems become more complex, it is increasingly useful to integrate complex constraints on time and resources into planning models, and use constraint reasoning approaches to help solve the resulting problems. Dynamic constraint satisfaction is a key enabler of automated planning in the presence of such constraints. In this paper, we identify some limitations with the previously developed theories of dynamic constraint satisfaction. We identify a minimum set of elementary transformations from which all other transformations can be constructed. We propose a new classification of dynamic constraint satisfaction transformations based on a formal criteria, namely the change in the fraction of solutions. This criteria can be used to evaluate elementary transformations of a constraint satisfaction problem as well as sequences of transformations. We extend the notion of transformations to include constrained optimization problems. We discuss how this new framework can inform the evolution of planning models, automated planning algorithms, and mixed-initiative planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document