scholarly journals A pre-pandemic COVID-19 assessment of the costs of prevention and control interventions for healthcare associated infections in medical and surgical units in Québec

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Tchouaket ◽  
Stephanie Robins ◽  
Sandra Boivin ◽  
Drissa Sia ◽  
Kelley Kilpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Median Cost ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
The Cost ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) present a major public health problem that significantly affects patients, health care providers and the entire healthcare system. Infection prevention and control programs limit HCAIs and are an indispensable component of patient and healthcare worker safety. The clinical best practices (CBPs) of handwashing, screening, hygiene and sanitation of surfaces and equipment, and basic and additional precautions are keystones of infection prevention and control (IPC). Systematic reviews of IPC economic evaluations report the lack of rigorous empirical evidence demonstrating the cost-benefit of IPC program in general, and point to the lack of assessment of the value of investing in CBPs more specifically. Objective This study aims to assess overall costs associated with each of the four CBPs. Methods Across two Quebec hospitals, 48 healthcare workers were observed for two hours each shift, for two consecutive weeks. A modified time-driven activity-based costing framework method was used to capture all human resources (time) and materials required (e.g. masks, cloths, disinfectants) for each clinical best practice. Using a hospital perspective with a time horizon of one year, median costs per CBP per hour, as well as the cost per action, were calculated and reported in 2018 Canadian dollars. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results A total of 1831 actions were recorded. The median cost of hand hygiene (N = 867) was 19.6 cents per action. For cleaning and disinfection of surfaces (N = 102), the cost was 21.4 cents per action, while cleaning of small equipment (N = 85) was 25.3 cents per action. Additional precautions median cost was $4.13 per action. The donning or removing or personal protective equipment (N = 720) cost was 75.9 cents per action. Finally, the total median costs for the five categories of clinical best practiced assessed were 27.2 cents per action. Conclusion The costs of clinical best practices were low, from 20 cents to $4.13 per action. This study provides evidence based arguments with which to support the allocation of resources to infection prevention and control practices that directly affect the safety of patients, healthcare workers and the public. Further research of costing clinical best care practices is warranted.

scholarly journals A pre-pandemic COVID-19 assessment of the costs of prevention and control interventions for healthcare associated infections in medical and surgical wards in Québec

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Tchouaket Nguemeleu ◽  
Stephanie Robins ◽  
Sandra Boivin ◽  
Drissa Sia ◽  
Kelley Kilpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
The Cost ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) present a major public health problem that significantly affects patients, health care providers and the entire healthcare system. Infection prevention and control programs limit HCAIs and are an indispensable component of patient and healthcare worker safety. The clinical best practices (CBPs) of handwashing, screening, hygiene and sanitation of surfaces and equipment, and basic and additional precautions (e.g., isolation, and donning and removing personal protective equipment) are keystones of infection prevention and control (IPC). There is a lack of rigorous IPC economic evaluations demonstrating the cost–benefit of IPC programs in general, and a lack of assessment of the value of investing in CBPs more specifically. Objective This study aims to assess overall costs associated with each of the four CBPs. Methods Across two Quebec hospitals, 48 healthcare workers were observed for two hours each shift, for two consecutive weeks. A modified time-driven activity-based costing framework method was used to capture all human resources (time) and materials (e.g. masks, cloths, disinfectants) required for each clinical best practice. Using a hospital perspective with a time horizon of one year, median costs per CBP per hour, as well as the cost per action, were calculated and reported in 2018 Canadian dollars ($). Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results A total of 1831 actions were recorded. The median cost of hand hygiene (N = 867) was 20 cents per action. For cleaning and disinfection of surfaces (N = 102), the cost was 21 cents per action, while cleaning of small equipment (N = 85) was 25 cents per action. Additional precautions median cost was $4.1 per action. The donning or removing or personal protective equipment (N = 720) cost was 76 cents per action. Finally, the total median costs for the five categories of clinical best practiced assessed were 27 cents per action. Conclusions The costs of clinical best practices were low, from 20 cents to $4.1 per action. This study provides evidence based arguments with which to support the allocation of resources to infection prevention and control practices that directly affect the safety of patients, healthcare workers and the public. Further research of costing clinical best care practices is warranted.

scholarly journals Strengthening infection prevention and control and systematic surveillance of healthcare associated infections in India

BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j3768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya Swaminathan ◽  
Jagdish Prasad ◽  
Akshay C Dhariwal ◽  
Randeep Guleria ◽  
Mahesh C Misra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
And Control

scholarly journals Attitudes, knowledge and practices of healthcare workers regarding occupational exposure of pulmonary tuberculosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley T. Bhebhe ◽  
Cornel Van Rooyen ◽  
Wilhelm J. Steinberg
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Attitudes And Practices ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
And Control

Background: Healthcare-associated tuberculosis (TB) has become a major occupational hazard for healthcare workers (HCWs). HCWs are inevitably exposed to TB, due to frequent interaction with patients with undiagnosed and potentially contagious TB. Whenever there is a possibility of exposure, implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices is critical.Objective: Following a high incidence of TB among HCWs at Maluti Adventist Hospital in Lesotho, a study was carried out to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of HCWs regarding healthcare-associated TB infection and infection controls.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study performed in June 2011; it involved HCWs at Maluti Adventist Hospital who were involved with patients and/or sputum. Stratified sampling of 140 HCWs was performed, of whom, 129 (92.0%) took part. A self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire was used.Results: Most respondents (89.2%) had appropriate knowledge of transmission, diagnosis and prevention of TB; however, only 22.0% of the respondents knew the appropriate method of sputum collection. All of the respondents (100.0%) were motivated and willing to implement IPC measures. A significant proportion of participants (36.4%) reported poor infection control practices, with the majority of inappropriate practices being the administrative infection controls (> 80.0%). Only 38.8% of the participants reported to be using the appropriate N-95 respirator.Conclusion: Poor infection control practices regarding occupational TB exposure were demonstrated, the worst being the first-line administrative infection controls. Critical knowledge gaps were identified; however, there was encouraging willingness by HCWs to adapt to recommended infection control measures. Healthcare workers are inevitably exposed to TB, due to frequent interaction with patients with undiagnosed and potentially contagious TB. Implementation of infection prevention and control practices is critical whenever there is a possibility of exposure.

Healthcare governance and the modernisation of the NHS: infection prevention and control

2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Pratt ◽  
S Morgan ◽  
J Hughes ◽  
A Mulhall ◽  
C Fry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Clinical Governance ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
And Control

Q uality is central to the government's programme for modernising the NHS and clinical quality is at the heart of this agenda. The recent introduction of corporate governance with controls assurance and clinical governance in the NHS has established a framework for providing such excellence in clinical care. Governance applies to all healthcare activities and provides an ideal opportunity for infection prevention and control practitioners to improve the quality of their service and reduce the risk of patients acquiring preventable healthcare-associated infections (HAI). This paper will discuss the introduction of governance in the NHS, describe the key principles of clinical governance and relate these to infection prevention and control.

scholarly journals Healthcare-associated infections in Intensive Care Units: epidemiology and infection control in low-to-middle income countries

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1040-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emine Alp ◽  
Nizam Damani
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
And Control

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are major patient safety problems in hospitals, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). Patients in ICUs are prone to HAIs due to reduced host defense mechanisms, low compliance with infection prevention and control (IPC) measures due to lack of education and training, and heavy workload and low staffing levels, leading to cross-transmission of microorganisms from patient to patient. Patients with HAIs have prolonged hospital stays, and have high morbidity and mortality, thus adding economic burden on the healthcare system. For various reasons, in low-to-middle income countries (LMICs), the scale of the problem is huge; each year, many people die from HAIs. In this review, epidemiology of HAIs and infection prevention and control measures in ICUs is discussed, with especial emphasis on LMICs. High rates of HAIs caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are serious problems in ICUs in LMICs. In view of increasing prevalence of MDROs, LMICs should establish effective IPC infrastructure, appoint IPC teams, and provide adequate training and resources. These resources to establish and appoint IPC teams can be released by avoiding ritualistic, wasteful, and unsafe IPC practices, and by diverting resources to implement basic IPC measures, including early detection of infection, isolation of patients, application of appropriate IPC precautions, adherence to hand hygiene, and implementation of HAIs care bundles and basic evidence-based practices.

scholarly journals HUBUNGAN PENGAWASAN INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL LINK NURSE (IPCLN) TERHADAP KEPATUHAN PERAWAT MELAKUKAN CUCI TANGAN DI RUANG RAWAT INAP MURNI TEGUH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MEDAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Seriga Banjarnahor
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Hand Washing ◽  
Memorial Hospital ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
And Control ◽  
Quality Of Nursing

Healthcare Associated Infections (HAIs)/ Nosocomial infections is a mayority problem in Hospital caused by hand contact. Hand washing is a one of the effective simple strategy to prevent Healthcare Associated Infections (HAIs)/Nosocomial Infection. Hospital and the other care facilities are required to have a IPCN (Infection Prevention and Control Link Nurese). In IPCN work assisted by several IPCLN (Infection Prevention and Control Link Nurse). Strategy to improve a quality of nursing services is very important to do optimize the compliance of nurse by hand washing supervision or suvervisi wich focuses to improving a quality of nursing care. This study aims to determine the relationship of control Infection Prevention and Control Link Nurse 9IPCLN) to compliance of handwasing nurse to patinet room in Murni Teguh Memorial Hospital Medan. The results showed that IPCLN survalliance at Murni Teguh Memorial Hospital Medan was generally poor is 24 respondents (70,59%)less good an dgood is 7 respondent (20,59%). The conclution of this study is the controlof Infrction Prevention and Control Link Nurse (IPCLN) has significant relationship to the compliance of nurse perform handwashing in the inpatient room at Murni Teguh Memorial Hospital Medan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document