scholarly journals Clathrin regulates the β-arrestin pathway regardless of ligand bias

Author(s):  
Atsuko Shiraki ◽  
Satoshi Shimizu

Abstract μ-opioid receptors (MOP) are thought to activate the G protein-mediated analgesic pathway and β-arrestin 2-mediated side effect pathway; however, ligands that recruit β-arrestin 2 only minimally to MOP may also cause opioid side effects. Such side effects are also induced in mutant mice lacking β-arrestin 2 or expressing phosphorylation-deficient MOP that do not recruit β-arrestin 2. These findings critically questioned whether β-arrestin 2 recruitment to MOP triggers side effects. Here, we show that β-arrestin 1 partially compensates for the lack of β-arrestin 2 in a neuronal cell line and thus might be involved in triggering such side effects in β-arrestin 2-null mice. Moreover, the magnitude of β-arrestin-mediated signals is not correlated with β-arrestin recruitment to MOP via phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal of MOP, which has long been used to evaluate β-arrestin bias of a ligand. Instead, β-arrestin activates downstream signals by binding with the clathrin heavy chain in the process of clathrin-coated pit formation. Our findings provide not only a novel insight into G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signalling to overcome opioid side effects but also an unexpected concept that the accumulation of molecules required for endocytosis is a key for activating the intracellular signalling.

2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamonchanok Sansuk ◽  
Xavier Deupi ◽  
Ivan R. Torrecillas ◽  
Aldo Jongejan ◽  
Saskia Nijmeijer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (52) ◽  
pp. 18494-18507
Author(s):  
Kelly Karl ◽  
Michael D. Paul ◽  
Elena B. Pasquale ◽  
Kalina Hristova

Ligand bias is the ability of ligands to differentially activate certain receptor signaling responses compared with others. It reflects differences in the responses of a receptor to specific ligands and has implications for the development of highly specific therapeutics. Whereas ligand bias has been studied primarily for G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), there are also reports of ligand bias for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). However, the understanding of RTK ligand bias is lagging behind the knowledge of GPCR ligand bias. In this review, we highlight how protocols that were developed to study GPCR signaling can be used to identify and quantify RTK ligand bias. We also introduce an operational model that can provide insights into the biophysical basis of RTK activation and ligand bias. Finally, we discuss possible mechanisms underpinning RTK ligand bias. Thus, this review serves as a primer for researchers interested in investigating ligand bias in RTK signaling.


Endocrinology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 1415-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Pawson ◽  
Elena Faccenda ◽  
Stuart Maudsley ◽  
Zhi-Liang Lu ◽  
Zvi Naor ◽  
...  

Regulatory elements present in the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails of G protein-coupled receptors contribute to agonist-dependent receptor desensitization, internalization, and association with accessory proteins such as β-arrestin. The mammalian type I GnRH receptors are unique among the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors because they lack a cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail. In addition, they do not recruit β-arrestin, nor do they undergo rapid desensitization. By measuring the internalization of labeled GnRH agonists, previous studies have reported that mammalian type I GnRH receptors undergo slow agonist-dependent internalization. In the present study, we have measured the internalization of epitope-tagged GnRH receptors, both in the absence and presence of GnRH stimulation. We demonstrate that mammalian type I GnRH receptors exhibit a low level of constitutive agonist-independent internalization. Stimulation with GnRH agonist did not significantly enhance the level of receptor internalization above the constitutive level. In contrast, the catfish GnRH and rat TRH receptors, which have cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails, displayed similar levels of constitutive agonist-independent internalization but underwent robust agonist-dependent internalization, as did chimeras of the mammalian type I GnRH receptor with the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails of the catfish GnRH receptor or the rat TRH receptor. When the carboxyl-terminal Tyr325 and Leu328 residues of the mammalian type I GnRH receptor were replaced with alanines, these two mutant receptors underwent significantly impaired internalization, suggesting a function for the Tyr-X-X-Leu sequence in mediating the constitutive agonist-independent internalization of mammalian type I GnRH receptors. These findings provide further support for the underlying notion that the absence of the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail of the mammalian type I GnRH receptors has been selected for during evolution to prevent rapid receptor desensitization and internalization to allow protracted GnRH signaling in mammals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (28) ◽  
pp. 16346-16355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amirhossein Mafi ◽  
Soo-Kyung Kim ◽  
William A. Goddard

Agonists to the μ-opioid G protein-coupled receptor (μOR) can alleviate pain through activation of G protein signaling, but they can also induce β-arrestin activation, leading to such side effects as respiratory depression. Biased ligands to μOR that induce G protein signaling without inducing β-arrestin signaling can alleviate pain while reducing side effects. However, the mechanism for stimulating β-arrestin signaling is not known, making it difficult to design optimum biased ligands. We use extensive molecular dynamics simulations to determine three-dimensional (3D) structures of activated β-arrestin2 stabilized by phosphorylated μOR bound to the morphine and D-Ala2,N-MePhe4, Gly-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) nonbiased agonists and to the TRV130 biased agonist. For nonbiased agonists, we find that the β-arrestin2 couples to the phosphorylated μOR by forming strong polar interactions with intracellular loop 2 (ICL2) and either the ICL3 or cytoplasmic region of transmembrane (TM6). Strikingly, Gi protein makes identical strong bonds with these same ICLs. Thus, the Gi protein and β-arrestin2 compete for the same binding site even though their recruitment leads to much different outcomes. On the other hand, we find that TRV130 has a greater tendency to bind the extracellular portion of TM2 and TM3, which repositions TM6 in the cytoplasmic region of μOR, hindering β-arrestin2 from making polar anchors to the ICL3 or to the cytosolic end of TM6. This dramatically reduces the affinity between μOR and β-arrestin2.


IUBMB Life ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-577
Author(s):  
Tadao Shibasaki ◽  
Kayoko Moroi ◽  
Mariko Nishiyama ◽  
Jing Zhou ◽  
Sadao Kimura ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Sabina Podlewska ◽  
Rafał Kurczab

Drug design process faces many challenges, and the most important ones are connected with side effects. Finding compounds that possess affinity towards target of interest is relatively simple; however, an approach one disease-one target is now making space for the search of polypharmacological ligands, where activity towards several proteins is considered at one time. Such proteins are not always the target ones, but very often such panels include also anti-targets, interaction with which is not desired, due to the side effects that may occur upon such contact. In the study, we examined ligands of four G protein-coupled receptors, forming antipsychotic profile: dopamine receptor D2, serotonin receptors 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C (anti-target), and 5-HT6. Number of ligands belonging to particular activity groups, as well as the selected compound structures are examined in detail. Also compound similarity between sets of different activity groups is analysed, giving a picture of difficulty of constructing molecular modeling methodologies that can help in the search of compounds with desired activity profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document