scholarly journals Interventions to Prevent Anastomotic Leak After Esophageal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Jayne Myfanwy Grigor ◽  
Suha Kaaki ◽  
Dean A Fergusson ◽  
Donna E Maziak ◽  
Andrew J E Seely
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Early Removal ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Risk Ratios

Abstract Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication following esophagectomy. We aimed to provide an up-to-date review and critical appraisal of interventions designed to reduce AL risk.Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions to minimize esophagogastric AL. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for AL was performed using random effects. Results: Two reviewers screened 441 abstracts and identified 17 RCTs eligible for inclusion; 11 studies were meta-analyzed. Omentoplasty reduced the risk of AL significantly by 78% [RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.50] compared to no omentoplasty (3 studies, n=611 patients). Early removal of NG tube reduced AL risk significantly by 88% [RR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.65] compared to prolonged NG tube (2 studies, n=293 patients); Stapled (vs. hand-sewn) anastomosis did not significantly reduce AL risk [RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.87] compared to hand-sewn (6 studies, n=1454 patients). The quality of evidence was high for omentoplasty (vs. no omentoplasty), moderate for early removal of NG tube (vs. conventional removal), and very low for stapled anastomosis (vs. hand-sewn). Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to summarize the graded quality of evidence for all RCT interventions designed to reduce AL following esophagectomy. Our findings demonstrated that omentoplasty reduced the risk of AL with a high quality of evidence. Although early nasogastric tube removal reduced AL risk, there is a need for further research to strengthen the quality of evidence. Evidence profiles presented in our review may help inform the development of clinical practice recommendations.Systematic review registration: CRD42019127181

scholarly journals Interventions to prevent anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J.M. Grigor ◽  
Suha Kaaki ◽  
Dean A. Fergusson ◽  
Donna E. Maziak ◽  
Andrew J.E. Seely
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Early Removal ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Risk Ratios

Abstract Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication following esophagectomy. We aimed to provide an up-to-date review and critical appraisal of interventions designed to reduce AL risk. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions to minimize esophagogastric AL. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for AL was performed using random effects. Results: Two reviewers screened 441 abstracts and identified 17 RCTs eligible for inclusion; 11 studies were meta-analyzed. Omentoplasty reduced the risk of AL significantly by 78% [RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.50] compared to no omentoplasty (3 studies, n = 611 patients). Early removal of NG tube reduced AL risk significantly by 62% [RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.65] compared to prolonged NG tube (2 studies, n = 293 patients); Stapled (vs. hand-sewn) anastomosis did not significantly reduce AL risk [RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.87] compared to hand-sewn (6 studies, n = 1,454 patients). The quality of evidence was high for omentoplasty (vs. no omentoplasty), moderate for early removal of NG tube (vs. conventional removal), and very low for stapled anastomosis (vs. hand-sewn). Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to summarize the graded quality of evidence for all RCT interventions designed to reduce AL following esophagectomy. Our findings demonstrated that omentoplasty reduced the risk of AL with a high quality of evidence. Although early nasogastric tube removal reduced AL risk, there is a need for further research to strengthen the quality of evidence. Evidence profiles presented in our review may help inform the development of clinical practice recommendations. Systematic review registration: CRD42019127181

scholarly journals Interventions to prevent anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J.M. Grigor ◽  
Suha Kaaki ◽  
Dean A. Fergusson ◽  
Donna E. Maziak ◽  
Andrew J.E. Seely
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Early Removal ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Risk Ratios

Abstract Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication following esophagectomy. We aimed to provide an up-to-date review and critical appraisal of interventions designed to reduce AL risk. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions to minimize esophagogastric AL. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for AL was performed using random effects. Results: Two reviewers screened 441 abstracts and identified 17 RCTs eligible for inclusion; 11 studies were meta-analyzed. Omentoplasty reduced the risk of AL significantly by 78% [RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.50] compared to no omentoplasty (3 studies, n = 611 patients). Early removal of NG tube reduced AL risk significantly by 62% [RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.65] compared to prolonged NG tube (2 studies, n = 293 patients); Stapled (vs. hand-sewn) anastomosis did not significantly reduce AL risk [RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.87] compared to hand-sewn (6 studies, n = 1,454 patients). The quality of evidence was high for omentoplasty (vs. no omentoplasty), moderate for early removal of NG tube (vs. conventional removal), and very low for stapled anastomosis (vs. hand-sewn).Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to summarize the graded quality of evidence for all RCT interventions designed to reduce AL following esophagectomy. Our findings demonstrated that omentoplasty reduced the risk of AL with a high quality of evidence. Although early NG tube removal reduced AL risk, there is a need for further research to strengthen the quality of evidence. Evidence profiles presented in our review may help inform the development of clinical practice recommendations. Systematic review registration: CRD42019127181

scholarly journals Interventions to prevent anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. M. Grigor ◽  
Suha Kaaki ◽  
Dean A. Fergusson ◽  
Donna E. Maziak ◽  
Andrew J. E. Seely
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stapled Anastomosis ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Future Clinical Practice ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Risk Ratios

Abstract Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication following esophagectomy. We aimed to provide an up-to-date review and critical appraisal of the efficacy and safety of all previous interventions aiming to reduce AL risk. Methods We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions to minimize esophagogastric AL. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for AL were obtained using a random effects model. Results Two reviewers screened 441 abstracts and identified 17 RCTs eligible for inclusion; 11 studies were meta-analyzed. Omentoplasty significantly reduced the risk of AL by 78% [RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.50] compared to conventional anastomosis (3 studies, n = 611 patients). Early removal of NG tube significantly reduced the risk of AL by 62% [RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.65] compared to prolonged NG tube removal (2 studies, n = 293 patients); Stapled anastomosis did not significantly reduce the risk of AL [RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.87] compared to hand-sewn anastomosis (6 studies, n = 1454 patients). The quality of evidence was high for omentoplasty (vs. conventional anastomosis), moderate for early NG tube removal (vs. prolonged NG tube removal), and very low for stapled anastomosis (vs. hand-sewn anastomosis). Conclusions This is the first meta-analysis to summarize the graded quality of evidence for all RCT interventions designed to reduce the risk of AL following esophagectomy. Our findings demonstrated that omentoplasty significantly reduced the risk of AL with a high quality of evidence. Although early NG tube removal significantly reduced AL risk, there is a need for further research to strengthen the quality of evidence for this finding. Evidence profiles presented in our review may help inform the development of future clinical practice recommendations. Systematic review registration: CRD42019127181.

scholarly journals Changing gloves during cesarean section for prevention of postoperative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siwanon Rattanakanokchai ◽  
Nuntasiri Eamudomkarn ◽  
Nampet Jampathong ◽  
Bao-Yen Luong-Thanh ◽  
Chumnan Kietpeerakool
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Infections ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Incisional Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Grade Approach ◽  
Febrile Morbidity

AbstractThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess associations between changing gloves during cesarean section (CS) and postoperative infection. A literature search was conducted using the major electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and CENTRAL from their inception to September 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glove change during CS to no glove change were included. Outcomes of interest were endometritis, febrile morbidity, and incisional surgical site infection (SSI). GRADE approach was applied to assess the quality of evidence. Ten reports of six studies involving 1707 participants were included in the analyses. Glove change was associated with a reduction in the risk of incisional SSI following CS (pooled RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30, 0.78; moderate quality of evidence). Compared to no glove change, glove change during CS did not reduce the risks of endometritis (pooled RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.80, 1.24; low quality of evidence) or febrile morbidity (pooled RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.43, 1.71; very low quality of evidence). Changing gloves during CS was associated with a decreased risk of incisional SSI. The risks of postoperative endometritis and febrile morbidity were not altered by changing gloves.

scholarly journals A Comprehensive Evaluation Between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Intraoperative Sedation in the Elderly: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxia Huang ◽  
Zunjiang Li ◽  
Yingxin Long ◽  
Dongli Li ◽  
Manhua Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Sedative Effect ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: The sedative effect of intraoperative sedation in elderly surgery exerts critical influence on the prognosis. Comparison on the safety and efficacy between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in many clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were inconsistent and suspicious. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for intraoperative sedation in the elderly via meta-analysis and systematic reviews.Methods: RCTs regarding to the comparison of sedative effects and safety between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) will be comprehensively searched from 2000.10 to 2021.05 through 4 English databases and 4 Chinese databases. After extraction in duplicate, the systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed on the primary outcomes (hemodynamic changes, sedative effect, cognitive function) and secondary outcomes (analgesic effect, surgical characteristics, complications or adverse reactions) for assessing the two therapy methods using Review manage software (Version 5.3). Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity of the results, funnel plot and Egger’s test will be performed to analyze publication bias of the included studies, and test sequential analysis will be applied to assess the robustness and reliability of preliminary meta-analysis results. Finally, rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations on the meta results will be summarized by rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (GRADE) approach. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the safety and efficacy between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for intraoperative sedation in the elderly, it will give an insight on the application of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam, and will provide evidences-based reference for clinical decision makings.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021221897).

Skeletal and dental effects of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Bortolotti ◽  
Livia Solidoro ◽  
Maria Lavinia Bartolucci ◽  
Serena Incerti Parenti ◽  
Corrado Paganelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Transverse Dimension ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Summary Background Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) is a surgical technique developed to correct transverse discrepancies in skeletally mature patients. However, there is limited evidence concerning the immediate skeletal and dental changes obtained only due to SARME. Objective The aim of the present systematic review is to investigate the immediate skeletal and dental effects of SARME in adult patients with transverse maxillary hypoplasia. Search Methods An electronic search of the literature in MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Lilacs and Scopus databases was performed. Selection Criteria Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies investigating the skeletal and dental effects of SARME procedures in adult patients were included. Data Collection and Analysis The included studies received a methodological quality scoring according to the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The quality of evidence was assessed by means of the Grading Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. For each included study and for each analysed parameter, the difference in means and 95 per cent confidence interval was calculated between baseline and immediate post-expansion. A meta-analysis of original outcome data, if possible, was conducted. Results Nine articles were selected. The methodological quality ratings indicated that one study was at low risk of bias, seven presented some concerns and only one was at high risk of bias. In all the included studies, the SARME procedure resulted in a significant expansion of the maxillary transverse dimension. The meta-analysis compared skeletal and dental inter-molar width before and after treatment: the mean difference was of 3.3 mm (2.8–3.9) and 7.0 mm (6.1–7.8), respectively (P-value less than 0.001). The quality of evidence was low-moderate. Conclusions SARME is effective in obtaining a significant expansion of the maxillary transverse dimension. However, the immediate SARME effect is mainly a molar expansion rather than a pure bone transverse widening of the maxilla. Registration The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO database with the registration number CRD42018117967.

scholarly journals Optimal Application of Forced Air Warming to Prevent Peri-Operative Hypothermia during Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2517
Author(s):  
Yoonyoung Lee ◽  
Kisook Kim
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Forced Air Warming ◽  
Forced Air ◽  
Full Body

Patients who undergo abdominal surgery under general anesthesia develop hypothermia in 80–90% of the cases within an hour after induction of anesthesia. Side effects include shivering, bleeding, and infection at the surgical site. However, the surgical team applies forced air warming to prevent peri-operative hypothermia, but these methods are insufficient. This study aimed to confirm the optimal application method of forced air warming (FAW) intervention for the prevention of peri-operative hypothermia during abdominal surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to provide a synthesized and critical appraisal of the studies included. We used PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library CENTRAL to systematically search for randomized controlled trials published through March 2020. Twelve studies were systematically reviewed for FAW intervention. FAW intervention effectively prevented peri-operative hypothermia among patients undergoing both open abdominal and laparoscopic surgery. Statistically significant effect size could not be confirmed in cases of only pre- or peri-operative application. The upper body was the primary application area, rather than the lower or full body. These findings could contribute detailed standards and criteria that can be effectively applied in the clinical field performing abdominal surgery.

Ondansetron reduces the incidence of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in non-caesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 175045892096415
Author(s):  
Tito D Tubog ◽  
Richard S Bramble
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systolic Arterial Pressure ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Induced Hypotension ◽  
Quality Of Evidence

The incidence rates of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension vary depending on the surgical procedures. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in reducing the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in non-caesarean delivery. Thirteen trials consisting of 1166 patients were included for analysis. Compared to placebo, there is a low quality of evidence that ondansetron was effective in reducing the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.87; p = 0.005) and bradycardia (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.90; p = 0.02). We also found a moderate quality of evidence that ondansetron lowered the number of rescue ephedrine (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.87; p = 0.007). Patients treated with ondansetron have higher mean arterial pressure 15 to 20 minutes after spinal anaesthesia induction and higher systolic arterial pressure 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes after spinal anaesthesia. The evidence suggests that prophylactic administration of ondansetron results in the reduction of the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension, bradycardia and rescue ephedrine in patients undergoing non-caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.

scholarly journals Lumbar Roll Usage While Sitting Reduces the Forward Head Posture in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 5171
Author(s):  
Yusuke Handa ◽  
Kenya Okada ◽  
Hiroshi Takasaki
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grade System ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Forward Head Posture ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Head Posture ◽  
Head Extension ◽  
The Cochrane Library

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the use of a lumbar roll reduced forward head posture (FHP) while sitting among individuals with or without musculoskeletal disorders. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception to August 2020. The quality of evidence for variables used in the meta-analysis was determined using the GRADE system. Five studies satisfied the criteria for data analysis. All studies included individuals without any spinal symptoms. Data from five studies on neck angle showed a statistically significant (p = 0.02) overall effect (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.77), indicating a lesser neck flexion angle while sitting with a lumbar roll than without it. Data from two studies on head angle showed a statistically significant (p = 0.04) overall effect (SMD = 0.47), indicating a lesser head extension angle while sitting with a lumbar roll than without it. In each meta-analysis, the quality of evidence was very low in the GRADE system. The use of a lumbar roll while sitting reduced FHP among individuals without spinal symptoms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document