scholarly journals Impact of Testosterone Therapy on hypogonadal patients unresponsive to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors alone: A systematic review and a meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Xiaowei Yu ◽  
Yanhong Liu ◽  
Xiaoyuan Zhang ◽  
Qun Wang

Abstract Background Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors as the first-line treatment for erectile dysfunction, when patients with hypogonadism fail to respond to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, the beneficial of addition testosterone therapy is a major concern for clinicians. The objective of this study was to collect and summarize the evidence that evaluated the benefit of addition testosterone therapy in hypogonadism fail to respond to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Methods Electronic literature searches of Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were conducted up to October 2020 and included randomized controlled trials. Specifically, we were looking for papers where Erectile Function Domain Score differences between pre and post-treatment were used as the primary outcome after treatment of testosterone therapy alone, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors therapy alone, or a dual treatment of both testosterone therapy and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Secondary outcomes included the number of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors non-responders who subsequently reported a satisfactory treatment of dual treatment with testosterone therapy and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Results A total of 4 studies that met our criteria, consisting of 326 patients. The Erectile Function Domain Score was significantly higher after treatment of testosterone combine with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors(4.88[4.18–5.57]), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors with placebo(3.15[1.82–4.47]), and testosterone monotherapy (2.04[0.38–3.71]) compared with baseline. Dual treatment with testosterone and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors significantly improved Erectile Function Domain Score when compared with testosterone monotherapy (3.16, 95% CI: 1.79–4.53), Of 41.7% patients in the dual treatment group reported an improvement, compared to only 33.0% in phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors treatment group. Conclusions Combination therapy of testosterone and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors seems most effective in men with both erectile dysfunction and hypogonadism who initial unrespond to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Hisanori Taniguchi ◽  
Seiji Shimada ◽  
Hidefumi Kinoshita

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of testosterone therapy (TTh) for late-onset hypogonadism are systematically reviewed and a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of TTh in improving erectile function is performed. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify RCTs published from 2007. RCTs that assessed erectile function using the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EFD) were included in the meta-analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The systematic review included 18 RCTs and the meta-analysis included 6 studies that enrolled a total of 1,458 patients. The overall meta-analysis revealed that the IIEF-EFD score was significantly improved in the TTh group compared with the placebo group (mean difference 1.86; 95% confidence interval 1.01–2.72; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Compared with patients receiving placebo, there was a significant improvement in the IIEF-EFD of patients who received TTh using testosterone gel, those who received TTh for over 30 weeks, and those without diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> TTh achieved a significant improvement in the IIEF-EFD score of hypogonadal men compared with placebo, especially in those who received testosterone gel, were treated for over 30 weeks, and had no comorbidities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 155798831988076
Author(s):  
Jinze Li ◽  
Lei Peng ◽  
Dehong Cao ◽  
Lujia He ◽  
Yunxiang Li ◽  
...  

Previous studies have reported the clinical efficacy of avanafil for erectile dysfunction (ED), but these findings are controversial. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of avanafil for ED. EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched extensively to obtain eligible studies. Clinical outcomes including successful vaginal penetration (SVP), successful intercourse (SI), International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) score and treatment adverse events (TAEs) were compared using RevMan v.5.3. Eight RCTs involving 3,709 patients were included. The analysis demonstrated that compared with placebo, the SVP (RR = 3.20, 95% CI [2.60, 3.95], p < .001), SI (RR = 2.53, 95% CI [2.19, 2.92], p < .001), change in IIEF-EF score (MD = 4.57, 95% CI [3.68, 5.46], p < .001) and TAEs (RR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.38, 2.31], p < .0001) were significantly higher in the avanafil. In addition, avanafil 200 mg were higher than avanafil 100 mg in SI (RR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.75, 0.99], p = .03) and change in IIEF-EF score (MD = −1.34, 95% CI [−1.67, −1.01], p < .001), but there were no obvious differences in SVP (RR = 0.89; 95% CI [0.74, 1.08], p = .23) and TAEs (RR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.83, 1.14], p = .74) between the two doses. The present evidence suggests that avanafil (especially 200 mg) has the potential to be the drug of choice for ED, but more strict and larger sample size RCTs are need to validate the findings.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Sandner ◽  
Niels Svenstrup ◽  
Hanna Tinel ◽  
Helmut Haning ◽  
Erwin Bischoff

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 2228-2241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank E. Uschner ◽  
Kathleen Glückert ◽  
Rafael Paternostro ◽  
Thorsten Gnad ◽  
Robert Schierwagen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 674-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Chen ◽  
Sergej E.L. Staubli ◽  
Marc P. Schneider ◽  
Alfons G. Kessels ◽  
Sandra Ivic ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document