A Framework for Identifying Human Factors Research Needs in Command and Control

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth Bonder ◽  
W. P. Cherry ◽  
Robert L. Farrell
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Collins McLaughlin ◽  
Laura M. Fletcher ◽  
John F. Sprufera

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey S. Smallman ◽  
mark St. John ◽  
Michael B. Cowen

1992 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 631-632
Author(s):  
Raymond S. Nickerson

The National Research Council's Committee on Human Factors attempts to identify human-factors research needs of special interest to its sponsors and of importance to the country as a whole. This paper gives a brief overview of what the committee is and how it functions, by way of introduction to the succeeding presentations, which describe three of its current activities


1978 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
Louis E. Boydstun ◽  
Terrence J. Stobbe ◽  
Don B. Chaffin

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is turning to human factors research to provide support in the development and evaluation of performance and design standards. A review of current standards for the design of fall warning systems reveals several areas where human factors research can substantially contribute to the development of safety standards. The review provides a conceptual framework for future research efforts and describes research needs in the development and validation of visual, auditory and tactile warning systems.


1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Mitchell

NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center provides both the control and ground support for all of NASA's unmanned near-earth satellites and the communications for manned missions (e.g., the space shuttle). Recently, Goddard has become very concerned with the human factors aspects of their current and proposed command and control environments, particularly those which are being considered for increased application of automation. This paper describes current activities as well as proposed research.


Author(s):  
Paula Sind-Prunier

The purpose of this session(s) is to attempt a novel forum for bridging the researcher/practitioner dichotomy that divides the human factors professional community. The objective of this session(s) is to convene a group of attendees to formulate a detailed list of critical human factors research needs. Attendees will suggest and discuss critical needs they have for human factors data, research, and analyses. The purpose of discussion will be to embellish and clarify initial suggestions, rather than to limit or discourage specific suggestions. This is not a forum for researchers to discuss their work, but rather a forum for practitioners to discuss their current work and the informational needs that serve as barriers to their effectiveness. Individual Technical Groups co-sponsored component discussions as a means for targeting their application areas of interest. The Strategic Planning Focus Groups held at the 1995 Annual Meeting served as the model for interaction among attendees. A publication will be produced following the Annual Meeting which identifies critical human factors research needs, based on direct input from industry practitioners– the direct consumers of such research. As such, it differs from similar publications extant (e.g., those of the National Research Council) which are driven by researchers' perceptions of research needs. By using the interactive “focus group” format that was so successful at the 1995 Annual Meeting, it is anticipated that this session will be able to make great strides toward bridging the research/practice gap that currently exists in the human factors profession.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document