scholarly journals Phytophthora Root Rot Resistance and Its Correlation with Fruit Rot Resistance in Capsicum annuum

HortScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1931-1937
Author(s):  
Rachel P. Naegele ◽  
Mary K. Hausbeck
Keyword(s):  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
Partial Resistance ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
Fruit Rot ◽  
Multiple Sources ◽  
Sources Of Resistance ◽  
Phytophthora Root Rot ◽  
Foliar Blight ◽  
Moderate Resistance

Phytophthora capsici causes root and fruit rot and foliar blight of pepper. Multiple sources of resistance to Phytophthora root rot have previously been identified, but most display only partial resistance. One source, CM334, has broad spectrum root rot resistance to multiple pathogen isolates but has only low to moderate fruit rot resistance. This study evaluated previously identified pepper lines for resistance to two P. capsici isolates, OP97 and 12889, and compared root rot resistance to fruit rot resistance and genetic structure. CM334 was confirmed as a broad spectrum resistance genotype, whereas all other sources of resistance evaluated were susceptible to infection by one or both isolates evaluated. Although not completely resistant, PI 566811 displayed moderate resistance to fruit and root rot to both P. capsici isolates. Fruit rot resistance had a significant but small to moderate positive correlation (r = 0.26–0.63) with root rot resistance depending on the isolate and length of exposure. Pepper accessions with resistance to Phytophthora root and fruit rot belonging to different genetic subpopulations were identified and could serve as candidates for partial-resistance loci to incorporate into pepper breeding programs.

scholarly journals An Inexpensive Disease Screening Technique for Foliar Blight of Chile Pepper Seedlings

HortScience ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1182-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tito P. Alcantara ◽  
Paul W. Bosland
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Fungal Pathogen ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
Symptom Development ◽  
Sources Of Resistance ◽  
Screening Technique ◽  
Land Race ◽  
Foliar Blight ◽  
Leaf Surfaces ◽  
Test Plants

An inexpensive, rapid, and reliable seedling screening technique was developed to identify sources of resistance to foliar blight of Capsicum annuum L. caused by the fungal pathogen Phytophthora capsici Leon. Leaf surfaces of test plants were inoculated with 500 to 1000 zoospores prepared in distilled water. Seedlings were incubated for 5 days in an easy-to-construct dew chamber and observed for symptom development. `Criollo de Morelos 334' chile seedlings, a Mexican land race resistant to root rot caused by the same fungal pathogen, were highly resistant to foliar blight. All commercial cultivars tested in this study, however, were highly susceptible. No root rot symptoms were observed in any of the foliar-inoculated plants.

scholarly journals Inheritance of Phytophthora Root Rot and Foliar Blight Resistance in Pepper

1999 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Walker ◽  
Paul W. Bosland
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
Dominant Gene ◽  
Segregation Ratio ◽  
Stem Cutting ◽  
Blight Resistance ◽  
Phytophthora Root Rot ◽  
Resistant Parent ◽  
Foliar Blight ◽  
Foliar Resistance

The inheritance of resistance to Phytophthora capsici Leonian root rot and foliar blight was compared in two different Capsicum annuum L. var. annuum pod types. The seedling was screened for phytophthora root rot, while a genetically identical stem cutting was screened for phytophthora foliar blight to determine if the same gene(s) confer resistance to both disease syndromes. The susceptible parents were `Keystone Resistant Giant #3' (`Keystone'), a bell pepper type, and `Early Jalapeño', while `Criollo de Morelos-334' was the resistant parent. Resistance was observed in both F1 populations screened for phytophthora root and foliar infection indicating dominance for resistance. Reciprocal effects were not detected. To determine if the same gene(s) conferred root rot and foliar resistance, root rot screening results were matched to the corresponding foliar blight stem cutting reaction. The segregation of resistance in the F2 generations was dependent on the susceptible parent. In the F2 generation derived from `Early Jalapeño', root rot resistance and foliar blight resistance segregated in a 9:3:3:1 (root resistant/foliar resistant: root resistant/foliar susceptible: root susceptible/foliar resistant: root susceptible/foliar susceptible) ratio. One independent, dominant gene was necessary for root rot resistance, and a different independent, dominant gene was needed for foliar blight resistance. In the F2 generation derived from `Keystone', root rot and foliar blight resistance segregated in a 7:2:2:5 (root resistant/foliar resistant: root resistant/foliar susceptible: root susceptible/foliar resistant: root susceptible/foliar susceptible) ratio. This segregation ratio is expected when one dominant gene is required for root resistance, and a different dominant gene is required for foliar resistance. In addition to these two genes, at least one dominant allele of a third gene must be present for expression of root rot and foliar blight resistance.

scholarly journals Screening of Cucurbita moschata Duchesne Germplasm for Crown Rot Resistance to Floridian Isolates of Phytophthora capsici Leonian

HortScience ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario J. Chavez ◽  
Eileen A. Kabelka ◽  
José X. Chaparro
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
Crown Rot ◽  
Fruit Rot ◽  
Cucurbita Moschata ◽  
Breeding Lines ◽  
Foliar Blight ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Crown And Root Rot ◽  
Highly Virulent

Phytophthora capsici causes seedling death, crown and root rot, fruit rot, and foliar blight on squash and pumpkins (Cucurbita spp. L.). A total of 119 C. moschata accessions, from 39 geographic locations throughout the world, and a highly susceptible butternut squash cultivar, Butterbush, were inoculated with a suspension of three highly virulent P. capsici isolates from Florida to identify resistance to crown rot. Mean disease rating (DR) of the C. moschata collection ranged from 1.4 to 5 (0 to 5 scale with 0 resistant and 5 susceptible). Potential resistant and tolerant individuals were identified in the C. moschata collection. A set of 18 PIs from the original screen were rescreened for crown rot resistance. This rescreen produced similar results as the original screen (r = 0.55, P = 0.01). The accessions PI 176531, PI 458740, PI 442266, PI 442262, and PI 634693 were identified with lowest rates of crown infection with a mean DR less than 1.0 and/or individuals with DR = 0. Further selections from these accessions could be made to develop Cucurbita breeding lines and cultivars with resistance to crown rot caused by P. capsici.

scholarly journals Inheritance of Phytophthora Stem Blight Resistance as Compared to Phytophthora Root Rot and Phytophthora Foliar Blight Resistance in Capsicum annuum L.

2005 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ousmane Sy ◽  
Paul W. Bosland ◽  
Robert Steiner
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
Blight Resistance ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Stem Cuttings ◽  
Phytophthora Root Rot ◽  
Stem Blight ◽  
Foliar Blight ◽  
Genetic Mechanisms

The pathogen Phytophthora capsici Leon. is known to be a limiting factor of chile pepper (Capsicum L.) production around the world. The genetics of the resistance is becoming better understood due to the specific nature of the host-pathogen interaction, i.e., all plant organs are subject to infection. It has been shown that phytophthora root rot resistance and phytophthora foliar blight resistance are under different genetic mechanisms. This study aimed at understanding the inheritance of resistance of phytophthora stem blight and to determine whether phytophthora stem blight was the same disease syndrome as phytophthora root rot and phytophthora foliar blight. Stem cuttings of a segregating F2 population and testcross progeny facilitated the ability to screen for two disease syndromes concurrently. When the three disease syndromes were compared separately, the F2 populations fit a 3 resistant (R): 1 susceptible (S) ratio and the testcross progenies fit a 1R:1S ratio. When comparative studies were performed (stem vs. foliar and stem vs. root), the F2 populations fit a 9R/R:3R/S:3S/R:1S/S ratio and the testcross fit a 1R/R:1R/S:1S/R:1S/S ratio. These ratios are consistent of a single gene controlling the resistance of each system. Therefore, phytophthora stem blight, root rot, and foliar blight are three separate disease syndromes.

scholarly journals Differentiation of Race Specific Resistance to Phytophthora Root Rot and Foliar Blight in Capsicum annuum

2003 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Oelke ◽  
Paul W. Bosland ◽  
Robert Steiner
Keyword(s):  
New Mexico ◽  
Capsicum Annuum ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
Specific Resistance ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
Significant Implication ◽  
Phytophthora Root Rot ◽  
Physiological Races ◽  
Foliar Blight ◽  
Extensive Breeding

Despite extensive breeding efforts, no pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. annuum) cultivars with universal resistance to phytophthora root rot and foliar blight (Phytophthora capsici Leon) have been commercially released. A reason for this limitation may be that physiological races exist within P. capsici, the causal agent of phytophthora root rot and phytophthora foliar blight. Physiological races are classified by the pathogen's reactions to a set of cultivars (host differential). In this study, 18 varieties of peppers were inoculated with 10 isolates of P. capsici for phytophthora root rot, and four isolates of P. capsici for phytophthora foliar blight. The isolates originated from pepper plants growing in New Mexico, New Jersey, Italy, Korea, and Turkey. For phytophthora root rot, nine of the 10 isolates were identified as different physiological races. The four isolates used in the phytophthora foliar blight study were all determined to be different races. The identification of physiological races within P. capsici has significant implication in breeding for phytophthora root rot and phytophthora foliar blight resistance.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Diverse, Worldwide Collection of Wild, Cultivated, and Landrace Pepper (Capsicum annuum) for Resistance to Phytophthora Fruit Rot, Genetic Diversity, and Population Structure

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Naegele ◽  
A. J. Tomlinson ◽  
M. K. Hausbeck
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Population Structure ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
The United States ◽  
Fruit Rot ◽  
Sources Of Resistance ◽  
Plant Introductions ◽  
Genetic Clusters ◽  
Commercial Breeding ◽  
Moderately Resistant

Pepper is the third most important solanaceous crop in the United States and fourth most important worldwide. To identify sources of resistance for commercial breeding, 170 pepper genotypes from five continents and 45 countries were evaluated for Phytophthora fruit rot resistance using two isolates of Phytophthora capsici. Genetic diversity and population structure were assessed on a subset of 157 genotypes using 23 polymorphic simple sequence repeats. Partial resistance and isolate-specific interactions were identified in the population at both 3 and 5 days postinoculation (dpi). Plant introductions (PIs) 640833 and 566811 were the most resistant lines evaluated at 5 dpi to isolates 12889 and OP97, with mean lesion areas less than Criollo de Morelos. Genetic diversity was moderate (0.44) in the population. The program STRUCTURE inferred four genetic clusters with moderate to very great differentiation among clusters. Most lines evaluated were susceptible or moderately susceptible at 5 dpi, and no lines evaluated were completely resistant to Phytophthora fruit rot. Significant population structure was detected when pepper varieties were grouped by predefined categories of disease resistance, continent, and country of origin. Moderately resistant or resistant PIs to both isolates of P. capsici at 5 dpi were in genetic clusters one and two.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Efficacy of the Systems Approach at Mitigating Five Common Pests in Oregon Nurseries

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy K. Osterbauer ◽  
Melissa Lujan ◽  
Gary McAninch ◽  
S. Lane ◽  
Aaron Trippe
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Systems Approach ◽  
Phytophthora Root Rot ◽  
Potted Plants ◽  
Foliar Blight ◽  
Total Percentage ◽  
Phytophthora Spp ◽  
Root Weevils ◽  
Pest Incidence ◽  
Point Inspection

In Oregon, the U.S. Nursery Certification (USNCP), Grower Assisted Inspection (GAIP), and Shipping Point Inspection (SPI) programs are used to certify nursery plants as pest free. To compare the programs' effectiveness for mitigating pest risk, potted plants grown within two USNCP, two GAIP, and two SPI nurseries were surveyed for Phytophthora root rot (Phytophthora spp.), Phytophthora foliar blight (Phytophthora spp.), bittercress (Cardamine spp.), snails and slugs (Class Gastropoda), and root weevils (Otiorhynchus spp.). A total of 1,635 plots were surveyed in the nurseries, with one or more pests detected in 1,003 plots. Based on the total percentage of plots found infested with a pest, significantly fewer were detected in the GAIP nurseries (55%) than in the USNCP nurseries (68%). However, bittercress incidence was significantly higher in GAIP nurseries (21%), while snails and slugs incidence was significantly higher in USNCP nurseries (49%), and Phytophthora root rot incidence was significantly higher in SPI nurseries (31%). Also, the plant families grown by the nurseries had a significant impact on pest incidence for two of the target pests, Phytophthora root rot and root weevils. While the GAIP seemed the best at mitigating pest incidence overall, none of the certification programs was consistently the most effective against all five target pests.

Resistance to Phytophthora medicaginis Hansen and Maxwell in wild Cicer species and its use in breeding root rot resistant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 383 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. Knights ◽  
R. J. Southwell ◽  
M. W. Schwinghamer ◽  
S. Harden
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiment ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
Partial Resistance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Phytophthora Root Rot ◽  
Cicer Arietinum L ◽  
Cicer Species ◽  
Wild Cicer Species ◽  
Moderately Resistant ◽  
Chickpea Cultivars

Phytophthora root rot caused by Phytophthora medicaginis is a major disease of chickpea in Australia. Only partial resistance, derived from chickpea, is available in Australian cultivars. Five wild Cicer species were compared with chickpea cv. Jimbour (moderately resistant) in a field experiment. The proportions of accessions with significantly lower (P < 0.05) disease scores, where lower scores equate to higher resistance, were 9/9 for C. echinospermum, 9/21 for C. bijugum, 1/4 for C. judaicum, 1/29 for C. reticulatum, and 0/3 for C. pinnatifidum. The resistance of C. echinospermum (7/7 accessions) but not the other Cicer species was reproduced in a greenhouse test. Nine out of 30 chickpea × C. echinospermum-derived lines were as resistant as the C. echinospermum parents in a separate greenhouse experiment. C. echinospermum appears to be the best of the sources we examined for breeding chickpea cultivars resistant to P. medicaginis.

The proportion of individual lucerne plants resistant to Phytophthora medicaginis and Colletotrichum trifolii in Australian cultivars

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Mackie ◽  
J. A. G. Irwin
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Crown Rot ◽  
Sources Of Resistance ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Phytophthora Root Rot ◽  
Colletotrichum Trifolii ◽  
Eastern Australia

Summary. Phytophthora root rot (Phytophthora medicaginis) and colletotrichum crown rot (Colletotrichum trifolii) are the 2 most serious pathogens of lucerne in eastern Australia. Work reported in this paper shows that in glasshouse tests of the 11 most commonly grown Australian lucerne cultivars, the proportion of individual plants with resistance to both pathogens ranges from 0 (Hunter River and Aurora) through to a maximum of 19.8% (Sequel HR). Within 9 of the cultivars, the proportion of individual plants resistant to the 2 pathogens was <7%. Since these 2 diseases are known to cause serious losses in eastern Australia, the results indicate further improvement in lucerne production can be obtained by increasing the proportion of individual plants in a cultivar resistant to both pathogens. This would be best achieved by identifying dominant sources of resistance and incorporating this into on-going lucerne breeding programs.

scholarly journals Resistance of Pepper to Phytophthora Crown, Root, and Fruit Rot Is Affected by Isolate Virulence

Plant Disease ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Foster ◽  
M. K. Hausbeck
Keyword(s):  
Root Rot ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
Phytophthora Capsici ◽  
Fruit Rot ◽  
Hot Pepper ◽  
Cultivar Resistance ◽  
Breeding Lines ◽  
Pepper Fruit ◽  
Millet Seed ◽  
Crown And Root Rot

Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the virulence of four Phytophthora capsici isolates from Michigan to 31 bell and hot pepper cultivars and breeding lines. Resistance to crown and root rot was assessed following the inoculation of soilless media with P. capsici–infested millet seed. In a detached fruit assay, fruit rot resistance was evaluated following inoculation with zoospore suspensions of 1.75 × 106 zoospores/ml. The four isolates differed in virulence to pepper lines screened for crown and root rot resistance and were considered to be four different physiological races. The pepper lines CM334, NY07-8001, NY07-8006, and NY07-8007 were resistant to the isolates tested. None of the commercial cultivars were resistant to P. capsici isolate 12889, but several cultivars were resistant to the other isolates screened. The isolates varied in their ability to cause infection on the fruits of the different cultivars. Overall, pepper fruit were more susceptible to P. capsici than the roots and crowns. Management of Phytophthora crown and root rot of pepper can be improved through the use of resistant cultivars. However, since isolate virulence affects resistance, cultivar resistance will need to be utilized on a local scale accordingly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document